VSEPR theory

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia - View original article

 
Jump to: navigation, search

Valence shell electron pair repulsion (VSEPR) theory is a model used, in chemistry, to predict the geometry of individual molecules from the number of electron pairs surrounding their central atoms.[1] It is also named GillespieNyholm theory after its two main developers. The acronym "VSEPR" is occasionally pronounced "vesper" or "vuh-seh-per".

The premise of VSEPR is that the valence electron pairs surrounding an atom tend to repel each other, and will therefore adopt an arrangement that minimizes this repulsion, thus determining the molecule's geometry. The sum of the number of atoms bonded to a central atom and the number of lone pairs formed by its nonbonding valence electrons is known as the central atom's steric number.

VSEPR theory is usually compared with valence bond theory, which addresses molecular shape through orbitals that are energetically accessible for bonding. Valence bond theory concerns itself with the formation of sigma and pi bonds. Molecular orbital theory is another model for understanding how atoms and electrons are assembled into molecules and polyatomic ions.

VSEPR theory has long been criticized for not being quantitative, and therefore limited to the generation of "crude" (though structurally accurate) molecular geometries of covalently-bonded molecules. However, molecular mechanics force fields based on VSEPR have also been developed.[2]

History[edit]

The idea of a correlation between molecular geometry and number of valence electrons (both shared and unshared) was originally proposed in 1939 by Ryutaro Tsuchida in Japan,[citation needed] and was independently presented in a Bakerian Lecture in 1940 by Nevil Sidgwick and Herbert Powell of the University of Oxford.[3] In 1957, Ronald Gillespie and Ronald Sydney Nyholm of University College London refined this concept into a more detailed theory, capable of choosing between various alternative geometries.[4][5]

Description[edit]

VSEPR theory, occasionally pronounced "vesper" or "vuh-seh-per",[6] is used to predict the arrangement of electron pairs around non-hydrogen atoms in molecules, especially simple and symmetric molecules, where these key, central atoms participate in bonding to 2 or more other atoms; the geometry of these key atoms and their non-bonding electron pairs in turn determine the geometry of the larger whole.

The number of electron pairs in the valence shell of a central atom is determined after drawing the Lewis structure of the molecule, and expanding it to show all electron-pair bonds and lone pairs *of* electrons.[7] For the purposes of VSEPR theory, the multiple electron pairs in a double bond or triple bond are treated as though they were a bond with single pair of electrons.[7] In cases where a molecule can be depicted by two or more resonance structures, these structures generally differ only by the interchange of double and single bonds, so that they have the same steric number and therefore the same VSEPR model.

The electron pairs are assumed to lie on the surface of a sphere centered on the central atom and tend to occupy positions that minimizes their mutual repulsions by maximizing the distance between them.[7][8] Gillespie has emphasized that the electron-electron repulsion due to the Pauli exclusion principle is more important in determining molecular geometry than the electrostatic repulsion.[9] The number of electron pairs, therefore, determine the overall geometry that they will adopt. For example, when there are two electron pairs surrounding the central atom, their mutual repulsion is minimal when they lie at opposite poles of the sphere. Therefore, the central atom is predicted to adopt a linear geometry. If there are 3 electron pairs surrounding the central atom, their repulsion is minimized by placing them at the vertices of an equilateral triangle centered on the atom. Therefore, the predicted geometry is trigonal. Likewise, for 4 electron pairs, the optimal arrangement is tetrahedral.[7]

This overall geometry is further refined by distinguishing between bonding and nonbonding electron pairs. The bonding electron pair shared in a sigma bond with an adjacent atom lies further from the central atom than a nonbonding (lone) pair of that atom, which is held close to its positively-charged nucleus. VSEPR theory therefore views repulsion by the lone pair to be greater than the repulsion by a bonding pair. As such, when a molecule has 2 interactions with different degrees of repulsion, VSEPR theory offers the structure where lone pairs occupy positions that allow them to experience less repulsion. Lone pair-lone pair (lp-lp) repulsions are considered stronger than lone pair-bonding pair (lp-bp) repulsions, which in turn are considered stronger than bonding pair-bonding pair (bp-bp) repulsions, distinctions that then guide decisions about overall geometry when 2 or more non-equivalent positions are possible.[7] For instance, when 5 ligands or lone pairs surround a central atom, a trigonal bipyramidal molecular geometry is specified. In this geometry, the 2 collinear "axial" positions lie 180° apart from one another, and 90° from each of 3 adjacent "equatorial" positions; these 3 equatorial positions lie 120° apart from each other. The axial positions therefore experience more repulsion than the equatorial positions; hence, when there are lone pairs, they tend to occupy equatorial positions.[8]

The difference between lone pairs and bonding pairs may also be used to rationalize deviations from idealized geometries. For example, the H2O molecule has four electron pairs in its valence shell: two lone pairs and two bond pairs. The four electron pairs are spread so as to point roughly towards the apices of a tetrahedron. However, the bond angle between the two O-H bonds is only 104.5°, rather than the 109.5° of a regular tetrahedron, because the two lone pairs (whose density or probability envelopes lie closer to the oxygen nucleus) exert a greater mutual repulsion than the two bond pairs.[7][8]

AXE method[edit]

The "AXE method" of electron counting is commonly used when applying the VSEPR theory. The A represents the central atom and always has an implied subscript one. The X represents the number of ligands (atoms bonded to A). The E represents the number of lone electron pairs surrounding the central atom.[7] The sum of X and E is known as the steric number.

Based on the steric number and distribution of X's and E's, VSEPR theory makes the predictions in the following tables. Note that the geometries are named according to the atomic positions only and not the electron arrangement. For example the description of AX2E1 as a bent molecule means that the three atoms AX2 are not in one straight line, although the lone pair helps to determine the geometry.

Steric
No.
Molecular geometry[10]
0 lone pair
Molecular geometry[10]
1 lone pair
Molecular geometry[10]
2 lone pairs
Molecular geometry[10]
3 lone pairs
2AX2E0-2D.png
Linear (CO2)
   
3AX3E0-side-2D.png
Trigonal planar (BCl3)
AX2E1-2D.png
Bent (SO2)
  
4AX4E0-2D.png
Tetrahedral (CH4)
AX3E1-2D.png
Trigonal pyramidal (NH3)
AX2E2-2D.png
Bent (H2O)
 
5AX5E0-2D.png
Trigonal bipyramidal (PCl5)
AX4E1-2D.png
Seesaw (SF4)
AX3E2-2D.png
T-shaped (ClF3)
AX2E3-2D.png
Linear (I
3
)
6AX6E0-2D.png
Octahedral (SF6)
AX5E1-2D.png
Square pyramidal (BrF5)
AX4E2-2D.png
Square planar (XeF4)
 
7AX7E0-2D.png
Pentagonal bipyramidal (IF7)[8]
AX6E1-2D.png
Pentagonal pyramidal (XeOF
5
)[11]
AX5E2-2D.png
Pentagonal planar (XeF
5
)[12]
 
8
Square antiprismatic
(TaF3−
8
)[8]

 
  
9Tricapped trigonal prismatic (ReH2−
9
)[13]
OR
Capped square antiprismatic[citation needed]
   


Molecule TypeShape[10]Electron arrangement[10]Geometry[10]Examples
AX2E0LinearAX2E0-3D-balls.pngLinear-3D-balls.pngBeCl2,[1] HgCl2,[1] CO2[8]
AX2E1BentAX2E1-3D-balls.pngBent-3D-balls.pngNO
2
,[1] SO2,[10] O3,[1] CCl2
AX2E2BentAX2E2-3D-balls.pngBent-3D-balls.pngH2O,[10] OF2[14]
AX2E3LinearAX2E3-3D-balls.pngLinear-3D-balls.pngXeF2,[10] I
3
,[15] XeCl2
AX3E0Trigonal planarAX3E0-3D-balls.pngTrigonal-3D-balls.pngBF3,[10] CO2−
3
,[16] NO
3
,[1] SO3[8]
AX3E1Trigonal pyramidalAX3E1-3D-balls.pngPyramidal-3D-balls.pngNH3,[10] PCl3[17]
AX3E2T-shapedAX3E2-3D-balls.pngT-shaped-3D-balls.pngClF3,[10] BrF3[18]
AX4E0TetrahedralAX4E0-3D-balls.pngTetrahedral-3D-balls.pngCH4,[10] PO3−
4
, SO2−
4
,[8] ClO
4
,[1] TiCl4,[19] XeO4[20]
AX4E1SeesawAX4E1-3D-balls.pngSeesaw-3D-balls.pngSF4[10]
AX4E2Square planarAX4E2-3D-balls.pngSquare-planar-3D-balls.pngXeF4[10]
AX5E0Trigonal bipyramidalTrigonal-bipyramidal-3D-balls.pngTrigonal-bipyramidal-3D-balls.pngPCl5[10]
AX5E1Square pyramidalAX5E1-3D-balls.pngSquare-pyramidal-3D-balls.pngClF5,[18] BrF5,[10] XeOF4[8]
AX5E2Pentagonal planarAX5E2-3D-balls.pngPentagonal-planar-3D-balls.pngXeF
5
[12]
AX6E0OctahedralAX6E0-3D-balls.pngOctahedral-3D-balls.pngSF6,[10] WCl6[21]
AX6E1Pentagonal pyramidalAX6E1-3D-balls.pngPentagonal-pyramidal-3D-balls.pngXeOF
5
,[11] IOF2−
5
[11]
AX7E0Pentagonal bipyramidal[8]AX7E0-3D-balls.pngPentagonal-bipyramidal-3D-balls.pngIF7[8]
AX8E0Square antiprismatic[8]AX8E0-3D-balls.pngSquare-antiprismatic-3D-balls.pngIF
8
, ZrF4−
8
, ReF
8
AX9E0Tricapped trigonal prismatic (as drawn)
OR capped square antiprismatic
AX9E0-3D-balls.pngAX9E0-3D-balls.pngReH2−
9
[13]
† Electron arrangement including lone pairs, shown in pale yellow
‡ Observed geometry (excluding lone pairs)

When the substituent (X) atoms are not all the same, the geometry is still approximately valid, but the bond angles may be slightly different from the ones where all the outside atoms are the same. For example, the double-bond carbons in alkenes like C2H4 are AX3E0, but the bond angles are not all exactly 120°. Likewise, SOCl2 is AX3E1, but because the X substituents are not identical, the XAX angles are not all equal.

As a tool in predicting the geometry adopted with a given number of electron pairs, an often used physical demonstration of the principle of minimal electron pair repulsion utilizes inflated balloons. Through handling, balloons acquire a slight surface electrostatic charge that results in the adoption of roughly the same geometries when they are tied together at their stems as the corresponding number of electron pairs. For example, five balloons tied together adopt the trigonal bipyramidal geometry, just as do the five bonding pairs of a PCl5 molecule (AX5) or the two bonding and three non-bonding pairs of a XeF2 molecule (AX2E3). The molecular geometry of the former is also trigonal bipyramidal, whereas that of the latter is linear.

Examples[edit]

The methane molecule (CH4) is tetrahedral because there are four pairs of electrons. The four hydrogen atoms are positioned at the vertices of a tetrahedron, and the bond angle is cos−1(−13) ≈ 109°28'.[22][23] This is referred to as an AX4 type of molecule. As mentioned above, A represents the central atom and X represents an outer atom.[7]

The ammonia molecule (NH3) has three pairs of electrons involved in bonding, but there is a lone pair of electrons on the nitrogen atom.[24] It is not bonded with another atom; however, it influences the overall shape through repulsions. As in methane above, there are four regions of electron density. Therefore, the overall orientation of the regions of electron density is tetrahedral. On the other hand, there are only three outer atoms. This is referred to as an AX3E type molecule because the lone pair is represented by an E.[7] By definition, the molecular shape or geometry describes the geometric arrangement of the atomic nuclei only, which is trigonal-pyramidal for NH3.[7]

Steric numbers of 7 or greater are possible, but are less common. The steric number of 7 occurs in iodine heptafluoride (IF7); the base geometry for a steric number of 7 is pentagonal bipyramidal.[8] The most common geometry for a steric number of 8 is a square antiprismatic geometry.[25] Examples of this include the octacyanomolybdate (Mo(CN)4−
8
) and octafluorozirconate (ZrF4−
8
) anions.[25]

The nonahydridorhenate ion (ReH2−
9
) in potassium nonahydridorhenate is a rare example of a compound with a steric number of 9, which has a tricapped trigonal prismatic geometry.[13][26] Another example is the octafluoroxenate ion (XeF2−
8
) in nitrosonium octafluoroxenate(VI),[12][27][28] although in this case one of the electron pairs is a lone pair, and therefore the molecule actually has a distorted square antiprismatic geometry.

Possible geometries for steric numbers of 10, 11, 12, or 14 are bicapped square antiprismatic (or bicapped dodecadeltahedral), octadecahedral, icosahedral, and bicapped hexagonal antiprismatic, respectively. No compounds with steric numbers this high involving monodentate ligands exist, and those involving multidentate ligands can often be analysed more simply as complexes with lower steric numbers when some multidentate ligands are treated as a unit.[29][30]

Exceptions[edit]

There are groups of compounds where VSEPR fails to predict the correct geometry.

Transition metal compounds[edit]

Hexamethyltungsten, a transition metal compound whose geometry is different from that predicted by VSEPR.

Many transition metal compounds do not have the geometries predicted by VSEPR, which can be ascribed to there being no lone pairs in the valence shell and the interaction of core d electrons with the ligands.[31] The structure of some of these compounds, including metal hydrides and alkyl complexes such as hexamethyltungsten, can be predicted correctly using the VALBOND theory, which is based on sd hybrid orbitals and the three-center four-electron bonding model.[32][33] Crystal field theory is another theory that can often predict the geometry of coordination complexes.

Some AX2E0 molecules[edit]

The gas phase structures of the triatomic halides of the heavier members of group 2, (i.e., calcium, strontium and barium halides, MX2), are not linear as predicted but are bent, (approximate X-M-X angles: CaF2, 145°; SrF2, 120°; BaF2, 108°; SrCl2, 130°; BaCl2, 115°; BaBr2, 115°; BaI2, 105°).[34] It has been proposed by Gillespie that this is caused by interaction of the ligands with the electron core of the metal atom, polarising it so that the inner shell is not spherically symmetric, thus influencing the molecular geometry.[31][35] Disilynes are also bent, despite having no lone pairs.[36]

Some AX2E2 molecules[edit]

One example of the AX2E2 geometry is molecular lithium oxide, Li2O, a linear rather than bent structure, which is ascribed to its bonds being essentially ionic and the strong lithium-lithium repulsion that results.[37] Another example is O(SiH3)2 with an Si-O-Si angle of 144.1°, which compares to the angles in Cl2O (110.9°), (CH3)2O (111.7°), and N(CH3)3 (110.9°).[31] Gillespie and Robinson rationalize the Si-O-Si bond angle based on the observed ability of a ligand's lone pair to most greatly repel other electron pairs when the ligand electronegativity is greater than or equal to that of the central atom.[31] In O(SiH3)2, the central atom is more electronegative, and the lone pairs are less localized and more weakly repulsive. The larger Si-O-Si bond angle results from this and strong ligand-ligand repulsion by the relatively large -SiH3 ligand.[31]

Some AX6E1 and AX8E1 molecules[edit]

Xenon hexafluoride, which has a regular octahedral geometry despite containing a lone pair.

Some AX6E1 molecules, e.g. xenon hexafluoride (XeF6) and the Te(IV) and Bi(III) anions, TeCl2−
6
, TeBr2−
6
, BiCl3−
6
, BiBr3−
6
and BiI3−
6
, are regular octahedra and the lone pair does not affect the geometry.[38] One rationalization is that steric crowding of the ligands allows no room for the non-bonding lone pair;[31] another rationalization is the inert pair effect.[39] Similarly, the octafluoroxenate anion (XeF2−
8
) is a square antiprism and not a distorted square antiprism (as predicted by VSEPR theory for an AX8E1 molecule), despite having a lone pair.

Odd-electron molecules[edit]

The VSEPR theory can be extended to molecules with an odd number of electrons by treating the unpaired electron as a "half electron pair"—in effect, the odd electron has an influence on the geometry which is similar to a full electron pair, but less pronounced so that the geometry may be intermediate between the molecule with a full electron pair and the molecule with one less electron pair on the central atom.[citation needed] For example, nitrogen dioxide (NO2) is an AX2E0.5 molecule, with an unpaired electron on the central nitrogen; VSEPR predicts a geometry similar to the NO
2
ion (AX2E1, bent, bond angle approx. 120°), but intermediate between NO
2
and NO+
2
(AX2E0, linear, 180°).[citation needed] In fact NO2 is bent with an angle of 134°, which is closer to 120° than to 180°, in qualitative agreement with the theory.[citation needed] Similarly chlorine dioxide (ClO2, AX2E1.5) has a geometry similar to ClO
2
but intermediate between ClO
2
and ClO+
2
.[citation needed]

Finally the methyl radical (CH3) is predicted to be trigonal pyramidal like the methyl anion (CH
3
), but with a larger bond angle as in the trigonal planar methyl cation (CH+
3
). However in this case the VSEPR prediction is not quite true, as CH3 is actually planar, although its distortion to a pyramidal geometry requires very little energy.[40]

VSEPR and localized orbitals[edit]

The VSEPR theory places each pair of valence electrons in a bond or a lone pair found in a local region of the molecule. Molecular orbital (MO) theory yields a set of orbitals that have the symmetry of the molecule; some of these MO's may be delocalized over several atoms. However these orbitals can be transformed into an equivalent set of localized molecular orbitals.[41] In the water molecule for example, MO calculations yield two lone pairs—an s-p hybrid MO in the plane of the molecule and a pure p-type orbital perpendicular to the plane—that can be combined into two equivalent sp3 nonbonding orbitals comparable to the water oxygen lone pairs of VSEPR theory.[41] Likewise, there are two calculated bonding orbitals each extending over all three atoms, which can be combined into two localized orbitals, one for each bond. The delocalized and localized orbitals are generally described as providing completely equivalent descriptions of the ground state.[41]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b c d e f g Jolly, W. L.,Modern Inorganic Chemistry, McGraw-Hill, 1984, p.77-90. ISBN 0-07-032760-2
  2. ^ Box, Vernon G. S. (1997-03-17). "The Molecular Mechanics of Quantized Valence Bonds". Journal of Molecular Modeling 3 (3): 124–141. doi:10.1007/s008940050026. Retrieved 28 September 2011. 
  3. ^ http://rspa.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/176/965/153.abstract N.V.Sidgwick and H.M.Powell, Proc.Roy.Soc.A 176, 153–180 (1940) Bakerian Lecture. Stereochemical Types and Valency Groups
  4. ^ R.J.Gillespie and R.S.Nyholm, Quart.Rev. 11, 339 (1957)
  5. ^ R.J.Gillespie, J.Chem.Educ. 47, 18(1970)
  6. ^ H. Stephen Stoker (2009). General, Organic, and Biological Chemistry. Cengage Learning. p. 119. ISBN 978-0-547-15281-3. 
  7. ^ a b c d e f g h i j R.H. Petrucci, W.S. Harwood and F.G. Herring, General Chemistry (8th ed., Prentice-Hall 2002) pp.410-417. ISBN 0-13-014329-4
  8. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m G.L. Miessler and D.A. Tarr, Inorganic Chemistry (2nd ed., Prentice-Hall 1999) pp.54-62. ISBN 0-13-841891-8
  9. ^ R.J. Gillespie (2008), Coordination Chemistry Reviews vol.252, pp.1315-1327, Fifty years of the VSEPR model
  10. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s Steric numbers 2-6 from R.H. Petrucci, W.S. Harwood and F.G. Herring, General Chemistry (8th ed., Prentice-Hall 2002) Table 11.1, pp.413-414. ISBN 0-13-014329-4
  11. ^ a b c Baran, E. (2000). "Mean amplitudes of vibration of the pentagonal pyramidal XeOF5 and IOF52− anions". Journal of Fluorine Chemistry 101: 61–63. doi:10.1016/S0022-1139(99)00194-3.  edit
  12. ^ a b c Housecroft, C.E. and Sharpe A.G. "Inorganic Chemistry" (2nd edn, Pearson 2005. ISBN 0130-39913-2), p.498
  13. ^ a b c Housecroft, C.E. and Sharpe A.G. "Inorganic Chemistry" (2nd edn, Pearson 2005. ISBN 0130-39913-2), p.254
  14. ^ Housecroft, C.E. and Sharpe A.G. "Inorganic Chemistry" (2nd edn, Pearson 2005. ISBN 0130-39913-2), p.448
  15. ^ Housecroft, C.E. and Sharpe A.G. "Inorganic Chemistry" (2nd edn, Pearson 2005. ISBN 0130-39913-2), p.483
  16. ^ Housecroft, C.E. and Sharpe A.G. "Inorganic Chemistry" (2nd edn, Pearson 2005. ISBN 0130-39913-2), p.368
  17. ^ Housecroft, C.E. and Sharpe A.G. "Inorganic Chemistry" (2nd edn, Pearson 2005. ISBN 0130-39913-2), p.407
  18. ^ a b Housecroft, C.E. and Sharpe A.G. "Inorganic Chemistry" (2nd edn, Pearson 2005. ISBN 0130-39913-2), p.481
  19. ^ Housecroft, C.E. and Sharpe A.G. "Inorganic Chemistry" (2nd edn, Pearson 2005. ISBN 0130-39913-2), p.598-9
  20. ^ Housecroft, C.E. and Sharpe A.G. "Inorganic Chemistry" (2nd edn, Pearson 2005. ISBN 0130-39913-2), p.499
  21. ^ Housecroft, C.E. and Sharpe A.G. "Inorganic Chemistry" (2nd edn, Pearson 2005. ISBN 0130-39913-2), p.659
  22. ^ Valence Angle of the Tetrahedral Carbon Atom W.E. Brittin, J. Chem. Educ., 1945, 22 (3), p 145
  23. ^ "Angle Between 2 Legs of a Tetrahedron" – Maze5.net
  24. ^ R.H. Petrucci, W.S. Harwood and F.G. Herring, General Chemistry (8th ed., Prentice-Hall 2002) pp.392-393. ISBN 0-13-014329-4
  25. ^ a b Wiberg, Egon (2001). Inorganic Chemistry. Arnold Frederick Holleman. Academic Press. p. 1165. ISBN 0-12-352651-5. 
  26. ^ Holleman, A. F.; Wiberg, E. "Inorganic Chemistry" Academic Press: San Diego, 2001. ISBN 0-12-352651-5.
  27. ^ Peterson, W.; Holloway, H.; Coyle, A.; Williams, M. (Sep 1971). "Antiprismatic Coordination about Xenon: the Structure of Nitrosonium Octafluoroxenate(VI)". Science 173 (4003): 1238–1239. Bibcode:1971Sci...173.1238P. doi:10.1126/science.173.4003.1238. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 17775218.  edit
  28. ^ Hanson, Robert M. (1995). Molecular origami: precision scale models from paper. University Science Books. ISBN 0-935702-30-X. 
  29. ^ Holleman, A. F.; Wiberg, E. (2001), Inorganic Chemistry, San Diego: Academic Press, p. 1165, ISBN 0-12-352651-5 
  30. ^ Holleman, A. F.; Wiberg, E. (2001), Inorganic Chemistry, San Diego: Academic Press, p. 1721, ISBN 0-12-352651-5 
  31. ^ a b c d e f Models of molecular geometry, Gillespie R. J., Robinson E.A. Chem. Soc. Rev., 2005, 34, 396–407, doi: 10.1039/b405359c
  32. ^ Landis, C. R.; Cleveland, T.; Firman, T. K. Making sense of the shapes of simple metal hydrides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 1859–1860.
  33. ^ Landis, C. R.; Cleveland, T.; Firman, T. K. Structure of W(CH3)6. Science 1996, 272, 182–183.
  34. ^ Greenwood, Norman N.; Earnshaw, Alan (1997). Chemistry of the Elements (2nd ed.). Butterworth-Heinemann. ISBN 0080379419. 
  35. ^ Core Distortions and Geometries of the Difluorides and Dihydrides of Ca, Sr, and Ba Bytheway I, Gillespie R.J, Tang T.H., Bader R.F. Inorganic Chemistry, 34,9, 2407–2414, 1995 doi:10.1021/ic00113a023
  36. ^ Akira Sekiguchi, Rei Kinjo, Masaaki Ichinohe (September 2004). "A Stable Compound Containing a Silicon-Silicon Triple Bond". Science 305 (5691): 1755–1757. Bibcode:2004Sci...305.1755S. doi:10.1126/science.1102209. PMID 15375262. [1]
  37. ^ A spectroscopic determination of the bond length of the LiOLi molecule: Strong ionic bonding, D. Bellert, W. H. Breckenridge, J. Chem. Phys. 114, 2871 (2001); doi:10.1063/1.1349424
  38. ^ Wells A.F. (1984) Structural Inorganic Chemistry 5th edition Oxford Science Publications ISBN 0-19-855370-6
  39. ^ Housecroft, C. E.; Sharpe, A. G. (2004). Inorganic Chemistry (2nd ed.). Prentice Hall. p. 214. ISBN 978-0130399137. 
  40. ^ Anslyn E.V. and Dougherty D.A., Modern Physical Organic Chemistry (University Science Books, 2006), p.57
  41. ^ a b c IN Levine, 1991, "Quantum Chemistry," 4th Ed., New York:Prentice-Hall, sec.15.8. The two descriptions are equivalent because the total wavefunction for all electrons is a Slater determinant, which is unchanged by the transformation of the orbitals.

Further reading[edit]

External links[edit]