Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia - View original article

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation
A four-lead TENS unit.
Jump to: navigation, search
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation
A four-lead TENS unit.

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is the use of electric current produced by a device to stimulate the nerves for therapeutic purposes. TENS, by definition, covers the complete range of transcutaneously applied currents used for nerve excitation although the term is often used with a more restrictive intent, namely to describe the kind of pulses produced by portable stimulators used to treat pain.[1] The unit is usually connected to the skin using two or more electrodes. A typical battery-operated TENS unit is able to modulate pulse width, frequency and intensity. Generally TENS is applied at high frequency (>50 Hz) with an intensity below motor contraction (sensory intensity) or low frequency (<10 Hz) with an intensity that produces motor contraction.[2] The benefit of TENS for pain management is controversial.[3]

Medical uses[edit]


TENS devices available to the domestic market are used as a non-invasive nerve stimulation intended to reduce both acute and chronic pain. One review from 2007 felt that the evidence supports a benefit in chronic musculoskeletal pain[4] while another review (from the Cochrane Collaboration in 2008) deemed the evidence of poor quality and thus no conclusions were possible regarding chronic pain.[5] Results from a task force on neck pain in 2008 found no clinically significant benefit to TENS for the treatment of neck pain when compared to a placebo treatment.[6] A 2010 review did not find evidence to support the use of TENS for chronic low back pain.[7][8] There is tentative evidence that it may be useful for painful diabetic neuropathy.[7]

In principle, an adequate intensity of stimulation is necessary to achieve pain relief with TENS.[9][10] An analysis of treatment fidelity (meaning that the delivery of TENS in a trial was in accordance with current clinical advice, such as using "a strong but comfortable sensation" and suitable, frequent treatment durations) showed that higher fidelity trials tended to have a positive outcome.[11]

A few studies have shown objective evidence that TENS may modulate or suppress pain signals in the brain. One used evoked cortical potentials to show that electric stimulation of peripheral A-beta sensory fibers reliably suppressed A-delta fiber nociceptive processing.[12] Two other studies used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI): one showed that high-frequency TENS produced a decrease in pain-related cortical activations in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome,[13] while the other showed that low-frequency TENS decreased shoulder impingement pain and modulated pain-induced activation in the brain.[14]

A head-mounted TENS device called Cefaly was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration, on March 11, 2014, for the prevention of migraines. This was the first TENS device which the FDA approved for pain prevention, as opposed to pain suppression.[15]

Labor pain[edit]

A significant number of TENS machine brands have been targeted for use for labor pain, although a 1997 report of a study done by the University of Oxford said that TENS "has been shown not to be effective in postoperative and labour pain."[16] Use is documented in the attached references: in obstetric care, particularly in labor;[17]


Electrical stimulation for pain control was used in ancient Rome, 63 A.D. It was reported by Scribonius Largus that pain was relieved by standing on an electrical fish at the seashore.[18] In the 16th through the 18th century various electrostatic devices were used for headache and other pains. Benjamin Franklin was a proponent of this method for pain relief[citation needed]. In the 19th century a device called the electreat, along with numerous other devices were used for pain control and cancer cures. Only the electreat survived into the 20th century, but was not portable, and had limited control of the stimulus.[citation needed]. Development of modern TENS unit is generally credited to C. Norman Shealy.


The first modern, patient-wearable TENS was patented in the United States in 1974.[19] It was initially used for testing the tolerance of chronic pain patients to electrical stimulation before implantation of electrodes in the spinal cord dorsal column.[20] The electrodes were attached to an implanted receiver, which received its power from an antenna worn on the surface of the skin. Although intended only for testing tolerance to electrical stimulation, many of the patients said they received so much relief from the TENS itself that they never returned for the implant.

A number of companies began manufacturing TENS units after the commercial success of the Medtronic device became known. The neurological division of Medtronic, founded by Don Maurer, Ed Schuck and Dr. Charles Ray, developed a number of applications for implanted electrical stimulation devices for treatment of epilepsy, Parkinson's disease, and other disorders of the nervous system.

Today many people confuse TENS with electrical muscle stimulation (EMS). EMS and TENS devices look similar, with both using long electric lead wires and electrodes. TENS is for blocking pain, where EMS is for stimulating muscles.


There are several anatomical locations where TENS electrodes are contraindicated:

TENS used across an artificial cardiac pacemaker (or other indwelling stimulator, including across its leads) may cause interference and failure of the implanted device. Serious accidents have been recorded in cases when this principle was not observed.[23] A 2009 review in this area suggests that electrotherapy, including TENS, "are best avoided" in patients with pacemakers or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). They add that "there is no consensus and it may be possible to safely deliver these modalities in a proper setting with device and patient monitoring", and recommend further research. The review found several reports of ICDs administering inappropriate treatment due to interference with TENS devices, but notes that the reports on pacemakers are mixed: some non-programmable pacemakers were inhibited by TENS, but others were unaffected or auto-reprogrammed.[24]

The use of TENS is likely to be less effective on areas of numb skin/decreased sensation due to nerve damage. It may also cause skin irritation due to the inability to feel currents until they are too high.[21] There's an unknown level of risk when placing electrodes over an infection (possible spreading due to muscle contractions), but cross contamination with the electrodes themselves is of greater concern.[25] TENS should also be used with caution in people with epilepsy or pregnant women; do not use over area of the uterus as the effects of electrical stimulation over the developing fetus are not known.[23][26]

See also[edit]


  1. ^ Robertson
  2. ^ Robinson, Andrew J; Lynn Snyder-Mackler (2007-09-01). Clinical Electrophysiology: Electrotherapy and Electrophysiologic Testing (Third ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN 0781744849. 
  3. ^ Josimari M. DeSantana, PT, PhD, Deirdre M. Walsh, PT, PhD, Carol Vance, PT, MSc, Barbara A. Rakel, RN, PhD, and Kathleen A. Sluka, PT, PhD (December 2008). "Effectiveness of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Treatment of Hyperalgesia and Pain". Curr Rheumatol Rep 10 (6): 492–499. doi:10.1007/s11926-008-0080-z. PMC 2746624. PMID 19007541. 
  4. ^ Johnson, M.; Martinson, M. (2007). "Efficacy of electrical nerve stimulation for chronic musculoskeletal pain: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials". Pain 130 (1–2): 157–165. doi:10.1016/j.pain.2007.02.007. PMID 17383095.  edit
  5. ^ Nnoaham, K. E.; Kumbang, J. (2008). Nnoaham, Kelechi E, ed. "Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for chronic pain". The Cochrane Library (3): CD003222. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003222.pub2. PMID 18646088.  edit
  6. ^ Haldeman, S.; Carroll, L.; Cassidy, J. D.; Schubert, J.; Nygren, Å.; Bone Joint Decade 2000-2010 Task Force on Neck Pain Its Associated Disorders (2008). "The Bone and Joint Decade 2000–2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders". Spine 33 (4 Suppl): S5–S7. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181643f40. PMID 18204400.  edit
  7. ^ a b Dubinsky, R. M.; Miyasaki, J. (2009). "Assessment: Efficacy of transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation in the treatment of pain in neurologic disorders (an evidence-based review): Report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology". Neurology 74 (2): 173–176. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181c918fc. PMID 20042705.  edit
  8. ^ Khadilkar, A.; Odebiyi, D. O.; Brosseau, L.; Wells, G. A. (2008). Brosseau, Lucie, ed. "Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) versus placebo for chronic low-back pain". The Cochrane Library (4): CD003008. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003008.pub3. PMID 18843638.  edit
  9. ^ Bjordal, J. M.; Johnson, M. I.; Ljunggreen, A. E. (2003). "Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) can reduce postoperative analgesic consumption. A meta-analysis with assessment of optimal treatment parameters for postoperative pain". European Journal of Pain 7 (2): 181–188. doi:10.1016/S1090-3801(02)00098-8. PMID 12600800.  edit
  10. ^ Rakel, B.; Frantz, R. (2003). "Effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on postoperative pain with movement". The journal of pain : official journal of the American Pain Society 4 (8): 455–464. doi:10.1067/S1526-5900(03)00780-6. PMID 14622666.  edit
  11. ^ Bennett, M. I.; Hughes, N.; Johnson, M. I. (2011). "Methodological quality in randomised controlled trials of transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation for pain: Low fidelity may explain negative findings". PAIN 152 (6): 1226–1232. doi:10.1016/j.pain.2010.12.009. PMID 21435786.  edit
  12. ^ Ellrich, J.; Lamp, S. (2005). "Peripheral Nerve Stimulation Inhibits Nociceptive Processing: An Electrophysiological Study in Healthy Volunteers". Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface 8 (4): 225–232. doi:10.1111/j.1525-1403.2005.00029.x. PMID 22151549.  edit
  13. ^ Kara M, Ozçakar L, Gökçay D, Ozçelik E, Yörübulut M, Güneri S, Kaymak B, Akinci A, Cetin A (2010). "Quantification of the Effects of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Double-Blind Randomized Placebo-Controlled Study". Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 91 (8): 1160–1165. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2010.04.023. PMID 20684895.  edit
  14. ^ Kocyigit, F.; Akalin, E.; Gezer, N. S.; Orbay, O.; Kocyigit, A.; Ada, E. (2012). "Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Effects of Low-frequency Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation on Central Pain Modulation". The Clinical Journal oF Pain 28 (7): 581–588. doi:10.1097/AJP.0b013e31823c2bd7. PMID 22699130.  edit
  15. ^
  16. ^ McQuay HJ, Moore RA, Eccleston C, Morley S, de C Williams AC (July 1997). "Systematic review of outpatient services for chronic pain control". Health Technology Assessment 1 (6): i–iv, 1–135. PMID 9483161. 
  17. ^ Van Der Spank, J. T.; Cambier, D. C.; De Paepe, H. M.; Danneels, L. A.; Witvrouw, E. E.; Beerens, L. (2000). "Pain relief in labour by transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)". Archives of gynecology and obstetrics 264 (3): 131–136. doi:10.1007/s004040000099. PMID 11129512.  edit
  18. ^ Jensen, J. E.; Conn, R. R.; Hazelrigg, G.; Hewett, J. E. (1985). "The use of transcutaneous neural stimulation and isokinetic testing in arthroscopic knee surgery". The American journal of sports medicine 13 (1): 27–33. doi:10.1177/036354658501300105. PMID 3872082.  edit
  19. ^ Maurer, D "Transcutaneous stimulator and stimulation method" U.S. Patent 3,817,254, Publication date June 18, 1974
  20. ^ Burton, C. (1974). "Instrumentation for dorsal column stimulator implantation". Surgical neurology 2 (1): 39–40. PMID 4810453.  edit
  21. ^ a b c d e f g Watson, p. 266
  22. ^ Bracciano, AG (2008). Physical Agent Modalities: Theory and Application for the Occupational Therapist (2 ed.). SLACK Incorporated. p. 232. ISBN 1556426496. 
  23. ^ a b c d e Robertson, p. 159
  24. ^ Digby, G. C.; Daubney, M. E.; Baggs, J.; Campbell, D.; Simpson, C. S.; Redfearn, D. P.; Brennan, F. J.; Abdollah, H.; Baranchuk, A. (2009). "Physiotherapy and cardiac rhythm devices: a review of the current scope of practice". Europace 11 (7): 850–859. doi:10.1093/europace/eup102. PMID 19411677.  edit
  25. ^ Robertson, p. 160
  26. ^ Watson, p. 265

Books cited[edit]

Further reading[edit]

External links[edit]