This Means War (film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia - View original article

This Means War
This Means War Poster.jpg
Theatrical release poster
Directed byMcG
Produced bySimon Kinberg
James Lassiter
Robert Simonds
Will Smith
Screenplay byTimothy Dowling
Simon Kinberg
Story byTimothy Dowling
Marcus Gautesen
StarringReese Witherspoon
Chris Pine
Tom Hardy
Til Schweiger
Chelsea Handler
Music byChristophe Beck
CinematographyRussell Carpenter
Edited byNicolas De Toth
Production
company
Distributed by20th Century Fox
Release dates
  • February 17, 2012 (2012-02-17)
Running time97 minutes
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish
Budget$65 million
Box office$156,491,279[1]
 
Jump to: navigation, search
This Means War
This Means War Poster.jpg
Theatrical release poster
Directed byMcG
Produced bySimon Kinberg
James Lassiter
Robert Simonds
Will Smith
Screenplay byTimothy Dowling
Simon Kinberg
Story byTimothy Dowling
Marcus Gautesen
StarringReese Witherspoon
Chris Pine
Tom Hardy
Til Schweiger
Chelsea Handler
Music byChristophe Beck
CinematographyRussell Carpenter
Edited byNicolas De Toth
Production
company
Distributed by20th Century Fox
Release dates
  • February 17, 2012 (2012-02-17)
Running time97 minutes
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish
Budget$65 million
Box office$156,491,279[1]

This Means War is a 2012 American romantic comedy spy film directed by McG. The film stars Reese Witherspoon, Chris Pine, and Tom Hardy as victims of a love triangle in which two CIA agents who are best friends discover that they are dating the same woman.

Plot[edit]

CIA agents and best friends Franklin "FDR" Foster (Chris Pine) and Tuck Hansen (Tom Hardy) are deployed to Hong Kong to prevent international criminal Karl Heinrich (Til Schweiger) from acquiring a weapon of mass destruction but the mission goes awry, resulting in the death of Heinrich's brother, Jonas and Heinrich swearing vengeance against them. Upon returning to America, their boss, Collins (Angela Bassett) assigns them to desk duty for their protection.

FDR is a womanizer, whose cover is a cruise ship captain, while Tuck, who presents himself as a travel agent, has an ex-wife, Katie (Abigail Spencer) and a young son, Joe (John Paul Ruttan). After seeing a commercial for online dating, Tuck decides to sign himself up and is paired with Lauren Scott (Reese Witherspoon), a product-testing executive who is dealing with the recent engagement of her ex-boyfriend. Her best friend, Trish (Chelsea Handler) enrolled her in the same online dating website. FDR insists on being Tuck's backup for the date and hides nearby, but Tuck and Lauren hit it off right away.

Shortly thereafter, FDR runs into Lauren at a video store and tries to flirt with her, not knowing she's Tuck's date. She surmises that he's a ladies' man and ignores him. Intrigued, FDR crashes into one of Lauren's test groups and persuades her to go on a date with him. The date does not go well at the start, with Lauren storming out of the club FDR takes her to. After arguing in the street, FDR walks away from Lauren but seconds later, Lauren sees her ex-boyfriend and his fiancée approaching. Desperate, Lauren grabs FDR and kisses him and lies to her ex that she and FDR are together, as FDR plays along with the ruse. Her ex and his fiancée both seem jealous at the passion displayed, and later move along. FDR demands that Lauren explain what just happened and suggests they grab some dinner at a nearby pizza parlor, where they talk seriously and hit it off. Later, Lauren feels guilty about dating two men at the same time, but is persuaded by Trish to make the best of the situation.

FDR and Tuck soon discover that they are seeing the same woman and decide not to tell her that they know each other, not to interfere with each other's dates and not to have sex with her, letting her instead come to a decision between them. They soon break their rules and use CIA technology and assets to spy on her, discover her preferences and sabotage each other's chances with her. FDR and Lauren eventually have sex. Tuck and Lauren nearly have sex but she decides against it, feeling bad about sleeping with both the men. However, since Tuck sabotages FDR's surveillance devices in her apartment, FDR is convinced that Tuck and Lauren did have sex.

Lauren and Trisha discuss the pros & cons of dating more than one guy and Trish advises Lauren on how to pick 'the right one'.

Eventually, Lauren invites Tuck to lunch, while FDR discovers that Heinrich has arrived in town to exact his revenge. He interrupts Lauren's date to warn Tuck but Tuck doesn't believe him. They engage in an extended fight, after which Lauren discovers that they are in fact best friends and, feeling made a fool of, leaves with Trish. At that moment, the women are kidnapped by Heinrich and his men, who are pursued by FDR and Tuck.

FDR and Tuck rescue Lauren and Trish after a car chase, in which they reveal that they are not who they say they are. On Lauren's advice, they shoot out the headlights on Heinrich's SUV, deploying the airbags and sending the car rolling out of control towards them all. With Lauren standing directly in the path of the approaching SUV, FDR and Tuck, on different sides of the road, urge her to come to their side and she is saved as she ultimately chooses FDR's side, while Heinrich dies when his car rolls off the elevated freeway and crashes below. Lauren has decided to be with FDR and Tuck makes amends with him, as they declare their brotherly love for one another, and FDR says they're "family, and forever." Lauren and FDR kiss. Tuck soon reconciles with Katie and remarries her.

Shortly thereafter, FDR and Tuck go on a mission. They are about to parachute out of a Chinook helicopter when FDR reveals that he will marry Lauren, and asks Tuck to be his best man. He reveals that he had sex with Katie before she met Tuck, but no longer feels guilty about it because Tuck had sex with Lauren. Tuck, however, reveals that they did not go all the way and angrily tackles FDR out of the helicopter.

The DVD release has two very different alternate endings: either Lauren choosing neither; or Lauren choosing Tuck.

Cast[edit]

Production[edit]

According to Entertainment Weekly, "the initial script dates back [...] at least about a decade," with Bradley Cooper, Seth Rogen, and Sam Worthington reportedly turning down the lead role. Going back even further, Martin Lawrence and Chris Rock also declined the part.[2] Screenwriter Larry Doyle claimed to have read the script in 1998, and that in the draft the protagonists were video game designers with access to guided missiles.[3]

Principal photography took place in Vancouver from September 13 to December 1, 2010.[4]

Release[edit]

This Means War was previously scheduled for wide release on February 14, but 20th Century Fox postponed its opening to February 17, 2012, in order "to avoid a head-on confrontation with" Screen Gems' The Vow, which had been "expected to dominate" the box office on Valentine's Day.[5] Instead, it was sneak previewed that "Tuesday evening at between 2,000 and 2,500 locations nationwide."[6] During its first weekend ending February 19, it opened at #5 behind Safe House, The Vow, Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance, and Journey 2: The Mysterious Island with $17.4 million from 3,189 locations.[7] The following weekend, it dropped to #7 behind newcomers Act of Valor and Tyler Perry's Good Deeds with $8.4 million.[8] After a 17-week theatrical run, it earned $54,760,791 domestically and $101,730,488 overseas for a worldwide total of $156,491,279.[1][9]

The film was released to DVD and Blu-ray Disc on May 22, 2012 with a rating of PG-13.[10]

Critical response[edit]

The film opened to mostly negative reviews. Based upon 165 reviews, it received a 26% "rotten" score on Rotten Tomatoes, with an average score of 4.3/10 with the consensus saying, "A career lowlight for all three of its likable stars, This Means War is loud, clumsily edited, and neither romantic nor funny."[11] On Metacritic, the film holds a rating of 31 out of 100, based on 36 reviews, indicating "generally unfavorable reviews".

Peter Travers of Rolling Stone found this "action-spiked romcom [...] death-sentenced by a lack of humor, heart and a coherent reason for being. I could say more, but do I really need to?"[12] Roger Ebert of the Chicago Sun-Times considered the film "an incompetent stupid action comedy" that was "so bad it's nothing else but bad" and observed that Witherspoon lacked the "irresistible raw sex appeal" to be "convincing as the woman [Hardy and Pine] go to war over."[13] Richard Roeper of ReelzChannel called the film "one of the worst movies of this or any other year" and mocked Handler, who looked old, "lost," and "haggard" while delivering "her lines in a kind of flat monotone."[14]

Lou Lumenick of the New York Post ridiculed the film for being "spectacularly awful" and "riddled with continuity errors," suggesting that it "has a script whose sensible parts would fit on a napkin with enough room left over for the Gettysburg Address."[15] Todd McCarthy of The Hollywood Reporter recommended "the whole picture" be "sent back for a reshoot" as it "manages to embarrass its three eminently attractive leading players in every scene" and disapproved of Handler's performance, noting that she "has no sense of creating a character."[16] James Berardinelli of ReelViews dismissed the film as "a 98-minute music video without the music -- all splash and little heart," joking that "we keep hoping the sleazy bad guy will show up and shoot" the main characters.[17]

Claudia Puig of USA Today opined that "silly action sequences grow tedious and rarely blend with the wannabe madcap comedy" and concluded that McG "can't seem to decide whether he's making a spy action flick with romance interspersed or a rom-com peppered with action."[18] Mary Pols of Time criticized the film's "terrible sense of chemistry all the way around" and declared that "even the pairing of Witherspoon and Handler [...] turns out to be a dud."[19] Peter Debruge of Variety thought Hardy and Pine "are too busy trying to out-appeal one another to make the buddy dynamic click" and wondered if "it's the pic's cartoonish tone that keeps them from doing much more than look pretty, trading on the stars' blue eyes and impossibly big lips in lieu of their proven acting ability."[20]

Lisa Schwarzbaum of Entertainment Weekly "enjoyed everything that's all over the place about the finished product" and stated that while it "may have been hammered together by brute Hollywood force, [...] there's this going for it: It's game to throw in anything that'll keep the motor running."[2] Tom Long of The Detroit News characterized the film as "unpretentious goofiness" with "some nice light yuks" and believed "the whole sublimely stupid mess works."[21] Betsy Sharkey of the Los Angeles Times warned that "if you can get past the gross invasion of privacy," there "is some bittersweet fun peppered by bursts of sharp patter," especially from Hardy and Pine, who electrified "the screen almost any time they're sharing it."[22]

Accolades[edit]

YearAwardCategoryRecipientResultRef.
2013Young Artist AwardBest Performance in a Feature Film - Supporting Young Actor Ten and UnderJohn Paul RuttanNominated[23]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b "This Means War (2012)". Box Office Mojo. IMDb. Retrieved December 30, 2012. 
  2. ^ a b Schwarzbaum, Lisa (February 17, 2012). "This Means War". Entertainment Weekly. Retrieved February 19, 2012. 
  3. ^ Why You Keep Seeing the Same Movie Over and Over Again, TIME
  4. ^ "BCFC Film List: September 28, 2010". British Columbia Film Commission. September 31, 2010. Retrieved December 27, 2012. 
  5. ^ Kilday, Gregg (February 7, 2012). "Fox Delays 'This Means War' Opening to Avoid Box Office Face-Off With 'The Vow'". The Hollywood Reporter. Retrieved February 19, 2012. 
  6. ^ Fritz, Ben; Kaufman, Amy (February 7, 2012). "'This Means War' Official Release Date Delayed". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved February 19, 2012. 
  7. ^ "Weekend Box Office: February 17–19, 2012". Box Office Mojo. IMDb. Retrieved February 21, 2012. 
  8. ^ "Weekend Box Office: February 24-26, 2012". Box Office Mojo. IMDb. Retrieved December 27, 2012. 
  9. ^ "Weekly Box Office: This Means War". Box Office Mojo. IMDb. Retrieved December 27, 2012. 
  10. ^ "This Means War". On DVD Releases. Retrieved December 30, 2012. 
  11. ^ "This Means War". Rotten Tomatoes. Flixster. Retrieved December 8, 2012. 
  12. ^ Travers, Peter (February 16, 2012). "This Means War". Rolling Stone. Retrieved February 19, 2012.  1.5/4 stars
  13. ^ Ebert, Roger (February 15, 2012). "This Means War". Chicago Sun-Times. Retrieved February 19, 2012.  1.5/4 stars
  14. ^ Roeper, Richard (February 17, 2012). "This Means War". RichardRoeper.com. Retrieved February 19, 2012.  .5/5 stars
  15. ^ Lumenick, Lou (February 13, 2012). "Straight to DVD: Romance-free rom-com doesn't give Reese a chance!". New York Post. Retrieved February 19, 2012.  0/4 stars
  16. ^ McCarthy, Todd (February 9, 2012). "'This Means War': Film Review". The Hollywood Reporter. Retrieved February 19, 2012. 
  17. ^ Berardinelli, James (February 15, 2012). "This Means War". ReelViews. Retrieved February 19, 2012.  2.5/4 stars
  18. ^ Puig, Claudia (February 16, 2012). "'This Means War' is a losing battle". USA Today. Retrieved February 19, 2012.  2/4 stars
  19. ^ Pols, Mary (February 16, 2012). "Who is the Victor in 'This Means War'? Not the Viewer". Time. Retrieved February 19, 2012. 
  20. ^ Debruge, Peter (February 9, 2012). "'This Means War'". Variety. Retrieved February 19, 2012. 
  21. ^ Long, Tom (February 17, 2012). "Review: Spies employ tricks of the trade in absurdly fun romcom 'This Means War'". The Detroit News. Retrieved February 19, 2012. 
  22. ^ Sharkey, Betsy (February 14, 2012). "'This Means War' review: Bromance conquers all". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved February 19, 2012.  3/5 stars
  23. ^ "34th Annual Young Artist Awards". YoungArtistAwards.org. Retrieved 2013-03-31. 

External links[edit]