Spratly Islands

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia - View original article

Spratly Islands
Disputed islands
Spratly Islands-CIA WFB Map.png
Spratly Islands
LocationSouth China Sea
Coordinates10°N 114°E / 10°N 114°E / 10; 114Coordinates: 10°N 114°E / 10°N 114°E / 10; 114
Total islandsover 750
Major islandsTaiping Island
Namyit Island
Northeast Cay
Sin Cowe Island
Southwest Cay
Spratly Island
Swallow Reef
Thitu Island
West York Island
Arealess than 5 square kilometres (1.9 sq mi)
Coastline926 kilometres (575 mi)
Highest pointon Southwest Cay
4 metres (13 ft)
Claimed by
EEZBrunei zone
 People's Republic of China
Prefecture-level citySansha, Hainan[1]
 Republic of China (Taiwan)
DistrictTruong Sa
Populationno indigenous population
Ethnic groupsvarious
Jump to: navigation, search
Not to be confused with Paracel Islands.
Spratly Islands
Disputed islands
Spratly Islands-CIA WFB Map.png
Spratly Islands
LocationSouth China Sea
Coordinates10°N 114°E / 10°N 114°E / 10; 114Coordinates: 10°N 114°E / 10°N 114°E / 10; 114
Total islandsover 750
Major islandsTaiping Island
Namyit Island
Northeast Cay
Sin Cowe Island
Southwest Cay
Spratly Island
Swallow Reef
Thitu Island
West York Island
Arealess than 5 square kilometres (1.9 sq mi)
Coastline926 kilometres (575 mi)
Highest pointon Southwest Cay
4 metres (13 ft)
Claimed by
EEZBrunei zone
 People's Republic of China
Prefecture-level citySansha, Hainan[1]
 Republic of China (Taiwan)
DistrictTruong Sa
Populationno indigenous population
Ethnic groupsvarious
Spratly Islands
Chinese name
Simplified Chinese南沙群岛
Traditional Chinese南沙群島
Vietnamese name
VietnameseQuần Đảo Trường Sa
Malay name
MalayKepulauan Spratly
Gugusan Semarang Peninjau[2][3][4]
Filipino name
TagalogKapuluan ng Kalayaan
The location of the Spratly and Paracel Islands in the South China Sea.

The Spratly Islands (Chinese name: Nansha islands,[5] Vietnamese Name: Quần đảo Trường Sa, Filipino Name: Kapuluan ng Kalayaan) are a disputed group of more than 750 reefs, islets, atolls, cays, and islands in the South China Sea.[6] The archipelago lies off the coasts of the Philippines, Malaysia (Sabah), and southern Vietnam. Named after the British explorer, Richard Spratly (c.e. 1806-1866) who sighted them in 1843,[7] they contain less than 4 square kilometers (1.5 square miles) of land area spread over more than 425,000 square kilometers (164,000 square miles) of sea. The Spratlys are one of 3 archipelagos of the South China Sea which comprise more than 30,000 islands and reefs and which complicate governance and economics in that region of Southeast Asia. Such small and remote islands have little economic value in themselves but are important in establishing international boundaries. No native islanders inhabit the islands which offer rich fishing grounds and may contain significant oil and natural gas reserves.[8][9]

The seas around the Spratlys are known to mariners as the Dangerous Ground and are characterized by many low islands, sunken reefs, and atolls awash, with reefs often rising abruptly from ocean depths, all of which makes the area dangerous for navigation.

About 45 islands are occupied by relatively small numbers of military forces from the People's Republic of China, Republic of China (Taiwan), Vietnam, the Philippines, and Malaysia. Brunei has also claimed an exclusive economic zone in the southeastern part of the Spratlys encompassing just one area of small islands on Louisa Reef. This has led to escalating tensions between numerous countries over the disputed status of the islands.

Geographic and economic overview[edit]

(sea surface): 410,000 km2 (160,000 sq mi) of the central South China Sea

The Spratly Islands contain almost no significant arable land and have no indigenous inhabitants, although twenty of the islands, including Taiping Island, the largest, are considered to be able to sustain human life. Natural resources include fish, guano, undetermined oil and natural gas potential. Economic activity includes commercial fishing, shipping, and tourism. Although, the region is undrilled and untested, extensive geophysical and geological studies and proximity to nearby oil- and gas-producing sedimentary basins suggests the potential for the presence of commercial oil and gas reserves within the Spratly Islands region[10] Commercial exploitation of hydrocarbons has yet to be started and it is even possible that there may not be enough oil and gas reserves within the Spratly Islands region for commercial development.[8] The Spratly Islands have at least three fishing ports, several docks and harbors, at least three heliports, at least four fortified platforms and six to eight airstrips.[citation needed] These islands are strategically located near several primary shipping lanes.


The Spratly Islands consist of reefs, banks, and shoals that consist of biogenic carbonate. These accumulations of biogenic carbonate lie upon the higher crests of major submarine ridges that are uplifted fault blocks, known by geologists as horsts. These horsts are part of a series of parallel and en echelon, half-grabens and rotated fault-blocks. The long axes of the horsts, rotated fault blocks, and half-grabens form well-defined linear trends that lie parallel to magnetic anomalies exhibited by the oceanic crust of the adjacent South China Sea. The horsts, rotated fault blocks, and the rock forming the bottoms of associated grabens consist of stretched and subsided continental crust that is composed of Triassic, Jurassic, and Cretaceous strata that include calc-alkalic extrusive igneous rocks, intermediate to acid intrusive igneous rocks, sandstones, siltstones, dark-green claystones, and metamorphic rocks that include biotite-muscovite-feldspar-quartz migmatites and garnet-mica schists.[11][12][13]

The dismemberment and subsidence of continental crust into horsts, rotated fault blocks, and half-grabens that underlie the Spratly Islands and surrounding sea bottom occurred in two distinct periods. They occurred as the result of the tectonic stretching of continental crust along underlying deeply-rooted detachment faults. During the Late Cretaceous and Early Oligocene, the earliest period of tectonic stretching of continental crust and formation of horsts, half-grabens, and rotated fault-blocks occurred in association the rifting and later sea-floor spreading that created the South China Sea. During the Late Oligocene-Early Miocene additional stretching and block faulting of continental crust occurred within the Spratly Islands and adjacent Dangerous Ground. During and after this period of tectonic activity, corals and other marine life colonized the crests of the horsts and other ridges that lay in shallow water. The remains of these organisms accumulated over time as biogenic carbonates that comprise the current day reefs, shoals and cays of the Spratly Islands. Starting with their formation in Late Cretaceous, fine-grained organic-rich marine sediments accumulated within the numerous submarine half-grabens that underlie sea bottom within the Dangerous Ground region.[11][12][13]

The geological surveys show localized areas within the Spratly Islands region are favorable for the accumulation of economic oil and gas reserves. They include thick sequences of Cenozoic sediments east of the Spratly Islands. Southeast and west of them, there also exist thick accumulations of sediments that possibly might contain economic oil an gas reserves lie closer to the Spratly Islands.[8][10]


Coral reefs[edit]

Coral reefs are the predominant structure of these islands; the Spratly group contains over 600 coral reefs in total.[6]


Little vegetation grows on these islands, which are subject to intense monsoons. Larger islands are capable of supporting tropical forest, scrub forest, coastal scrub and grasses. It is difficult to determine which species have been introduced or cultivated by humans. Taiping Island was reportedly covered with shrubs, coconut, and mangroves in 1938; pineapple was also cultivated here when it was profitable. Other accounts mention papaya, banana, palm, and even white peach trees growing on one island. A few islands which have been developed as small tourist resorts had soil and trees brought in and planted where there were none.[6]


The islands that do have vegetation provide important habitats for many seabirds and sea turtles.[6]

Both the Green Turtle (Chelonia mydas, endangered) and the Hawksbill Turtle (Eretmochelys imbricata, critically endangered) formerly occurred in numbers sufficient to support commercial exploitation. These species reportedly continue to nest even on islands inhabited by military personnel (such as Pratas) to some extent, though it is believed that their numbers have declined.[6]

Seabirds use the islands for resting, breeding, and wintering sites. Species found here include Streaked Shearwater (Calonectris leucomelas), Brown Booby (Sula leucogaster), Red-Footed Booby (S. sula), Great Crested Tern (Sterna bergii), and White Tern (Gygis alba). Little information is available regarding current status of the islands’ seabird populations, though it is likely that birds may divert nesting site to smaller, less disturbed islands. Bird eggs cover the majority of Song Tu, a small island in the eastern Danger Zone.[6]

Unfortunately, this ecoregion is still largely a mystery. Scientists have focused their research on the marine environment, while the ecology of the terrestrial environment remains relatively unknown.[6]

Ecological hazards[edit]

Political instability, tourism and the increasing industrialization of neighboring countries has led to serious disruption of native flora and fauna, over-exploitation of natural resources, and environmental pollution. Disruption of nesting areas by human activity or by introduced animals, such as dogs, has reduced the number of turtles nesting on the islands. Sea turtles are also slaughtered for food on a significant scale. The sea turtle is a symbol of longevity in Chinese culture and at times the military personnel are given orders to protect the turtles.[6]

Heavy commercial fishing in the region incurs other problems. Though it has been outlawed, fishing methods continue to include the use of bottom trawls fitted with chain rollers. In addition, during a recent[timeframe?] routine patrol, more than 200 kg of Potassium cyanide solution was confiscated from fishermen who had been using it for fish poisoning. These activities have a devastating impact on local marine organisms and coral reefs.[6]

Some interest has been taken in regard to conservation of these island ecosystems. J.W. McManus has explored the possibilities of designating portions of the Spratly Islands as a marine park. One region of the Spratly Archipelago named Truong Sa was proposed by Vietnam’s Ministry of Science, Technology, and the Environment (MOSTE) as a future protected area. The 160 km2 site is currently managed by the Khanh Hoa Provincial People’s Committee of Vietnam.[6]

Military groups in the Spratlys have engaged in environmentally damaging activities such as shooting turtles and seabirds, raiding nests, and fishing with explosives. The collection of rare medicinal plants, collecting of wood and hunting for the wildlife trade are common threats to the biodiversity of the entire region, including these islands. Coral habitats are threatened by pollution, over-exploitation of fish and invertebrates, and the use of explosives and poisons as fishing techniques.[6]


Chinese texts of the 12th century record these islands being a part of Chinese Ming dynasty territory and that they had earlier (206 BC) been used as fishing grounds by Chinese fishermen during the Han Dynasty.[14][15] Further records show the islands as inhabited at various times in history by Chinese and Vietnamese fishermen, and during the second world war by troops from French Indochina and Japan.[16][17][18]However, there were no large settlements on these islands until 1956, when Filipino lawyer, businessman and adventurer Tomas Cloma decided to "claim" a part of Spratly islands as his own, naming it the " Free Territory of Freedomland".[19]

Early cartography[edit]

An 1801 map of the East Indies which clearly showed the Spratlys' proper placement
The 1838 Unified Dai Nam Complete Map delineated the Paracel and Spratly islands as belonging to Vietnam.
Qing Dynasty in 1820, with provinces in yellow, tributary states in orange.
Geographic map of Spratlys. Click for more detailed image. For a satellite images of the islands, tagged by occupying country, see here.

The first possible human interaction with the Spratly Islands dates back between 600 BCE to 3 BCE. This is based on the theoretical migration patterns of the people of Nanyue (southern China and northern Vietnam) and Old Champa kingdom who may have migrated from Borneo, which may have led them through the Spratly Islands.[20]

Ancient Chinese maps record the "Thousand Li Stretch of Sands"; Qianli Changsha (千里長沙) and the "Ten-Thousand Li of Stone Pools"; Wanli Shitang (萬里石塘),[21] which China today claims refers to the Spratly Islands. The Wanli Shitang have been explored by the Chinese since the Yuan Dynasty and may have been considered by them to have been within their national boundaries.[22][23] They are also referenced in the 13th century,[24]followed by the Ming Dynasty.[25][citation needed] When the Ming Dynasty collapsed, the Qing Dynasty continued to include the territory in maps compiled in 1724,[26][citation needed] 1755,[27][citation needed]1767,[28][citation needed] 1810,[29][citation needed] and 1817.[30][citation needed]

A Vietnamese map from 1834 also includes the Spratly Islands clumped in with the Paracels (a common occurrence on maps of that time) labeled as Vạn Lý Trường Sa (萬里長沙),[31] that is, a combination of the two Chinese names mentioned above (Wanli Changsha "Ten-Thousand Li Stretch of Sands"). According to Hanoi, old Vietnamese maps record Bãi Cát Vàng (Golden Sandbanks, referring to both Paracels and the Spratly Islands) which lay near the Coast of the central Vietnam as early as 1838.[32] In Phủ Biên Tạp Lục (Frontier Chronicles) by the scholar Le Quy Don, Hoàng Sa, and Trường Sa were defined as belonging to the Quảng Ngãi District. He described it as where sea products and shipwrecked cargoes were available to be collected. Vietnamese text written in the 17th century referenced government-sponsored economic activities during the Le Dynasty, 200 years earlier. The Vietnamese government conducted several geographical surveys of the islands in the 18th century.[32]

Despite the fact that China and Vietnam both made a claim to these territories simultaneously, at the time, neither side was aware that its neighbor had already charted and made claims to the same stretch of islands.[32]

The islands were sporadically visited throughout the nineteenth and the early twentieth centuries by mariners from different European powers (including Richard Spratly, after whom the island group derives its most recognizable English name).[33] However, these nations showed little interest in the islands.

In the 19th century, Europeans found that Chinese fishermen from Hainan annually sojourned on the Spratly islands for part of the year, while in 1877 it was Britain who launched the first modern legal claims to the Spratlys and included it a a colony.[34][35]

British naval captain James George Meads in the 1870s laid claim to the islands, proclaiming a micronation called Republic of Morac-Songhrati-Meads. Descendants of Meads have continued to claim legitimacy over the islands, and continue to attempt to claim ownership of the island's resources.[36][37][38]

In 1883, German boats surveyed the Spratly and the Paracel Islands but eventually withdrew the survey, after receiving protests from Guangdong government representing Qing Dynasty. The 1887 Chinese-Vietnamese Boundary convention signed between France and China after the Sino-French War said that China was the owner of the Spratly and Paracel islands.[39] Many European maps before the 20th century do not even mention this region.[40]

Military conflict and diplomatic dialogues[edit]

Further information: Spratly Islands dispute
Territorial monument of the Republic of Vietnam (South Vietnam) on Southwest Cay, Spratly Islands, defining the cay as part of Vietnamese territory (tp Phước Tuy Province). Used since 22 August, 1956 until 1975, when replaced by another one from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam (successor state after the Fall of Saigon)

China sent naval forces on inspection tours in 1902 and 1907 and placed flags and markers on the islands. The Qing dynasty's succesor state, the Republic of China, claimed the Spratly and Paracel islands under the jurisdiction of Hainan.[43]

In 1904, a Chinese map entitled Map of all Chinese provinces from the Shanghai Publishing House showed that China stretched as far south as Hainan Island and that Paracel and Spratly Islands did not belong to China.

In 1933, France asserted its claims from 1887[44] to the Spratly and Paracel Islands on behalf of its then-colony Vietnam.[45] It occupied a number of the Spratly Islands, including Taiping Island, built weather stations on two of the islands, and administered them as part of French Indochina. This occupation was protested by the Republic of China (ROC) government because France admitted finding Chinese fishermen there when French warships visited nine of the islands.[46] In 1935, the ROC government also announced a sovereignty claim on the Spratly Islands. Japan occupied some of the islands in 1939 during World War II, and it used the islands as a submarine base for the occupation of Southeast Asia. Japan occupied the Paracels and the Spratleys from February 1939 to August 1945.[47] The Spratlys and the Paracels were conquered by Japan in 1939. Japan administered the Spratlys via Taiwan's jurisdiction and the Paracels via Hainan's jurisdiction.[48] During the Japanese occupation, these islands were called Shinnan Shoto (新南諸島), literally the New Southern Islands, and together with the Paracel Islands (西沙群岛), they were put under the governance of the Japanese colonial authority in Taiwan.

The Paracels and Spratlys were handed over to Republic of China control from Japan after the 1945 surrender of Japan,[49] since the Allied powers assigned the Republic of China to receive Japanese surrenders in that area.[50] After WW2 ended, the Republic of China was the "most active claimaint". The Republic of China then garrisoned Itu Aba (Taiping) island in 1946 and posted Chinese flags and markers on it along with Woody island in the Paracels, France tried, bur failed to make them leave Woody island.[51] The aim of the Republic of China was to block the French claims.[52][53] The Republic of China drew up the map showing the U shaped claim on the entire South China Sea, showing the Spratly and Paracels in Chinese territory, in 1947.[54]

In November 1946, the ROC sent naval ships to take control of the islands after the surrender of Japan.[47] It had chosen the largest and perhaps the only inhabitable island, Taiping Island, as its base, and it renamed the island under the name of the naval vessel as Taiping. Also following the defeat of Japan at the end of World War II, the ROC re-claimed the entirety of the Spratly Islands (including Taiping Island) after accepting the Japanese surrender of the islands based on the Cairo and Potsdam Declarations.[citation needed] Japan had renounced all claims to the islands in the 1951 San Francisco Peace Treaty together with the Paracels, Pratas and other islands captured from the Chinese, and upon these declarations, the government of the Republic of China reasserted its claim to the islands. The KMT force of the ROC government withdrew from most of the Spratly and Paracel Islands after they retreated to Taiwan from the opposing Communist Party of China due to their losses in the Chinese Civil War and the founding of the People's Republic of China (PRC) in 1949.[45] The ROC quietly withdrew troops from Taiping Island in 1950, but then reinstated them in 1956 in response to Tomas Cloma's sudden claim to the island as part of Freedomland.[55] As of 2013, Taiping Island is administered by the ROC.[56] After pulling out its garrison in 1950 when the Republic of China evacuated to Taiwan, when the Filipino Tomas Cloma uprooted an ROC flag on Itu Aba (Taiping) and laid claim to the Spratlys, the Republic of China (now Taiwan) again regarrisoned Itu Aba (Taiping) on 1956.[57] In 1946, the Americans reminded the Philippines at its independence that the Spratlys was not Philippine territory, both to notmanger Chiang Kai-shek in China and because the Spratlys were not part of the Philippines per the 1898 treaty Spain signed with America.[58] The Philippines then claim the Spratlys in 1971 under President Marcos, after Taiwanese troops attacked and shot at a Philippine fishing boat on Itu Aba.[59]

Taiwan's garrison from 1946-1950 and 1956-now on Itu Aba represent the first "effective occuption" of the Spratlys out of all the current countries claiming the islands.[60][61]

North Vietnam recognized China's claims on the Paracels and Spratlys during the Vietnam War as it was being supported by China. Only after winning the war and conquering South Vietnam did North Vietnam retract its recognition and admitted it recognized them as part of China in order to receive aid from China in fighting the Americans and now since the situation "changed", they would once again claim the islands.[62]

In 1988, the Vietnamese and Chinese navies engaged in a skirmish in the area of Johnson South Reef (also called Yongshu reef in China and Mabini reef in Philippines).[63]

It was unclear whether France continued its claim to the islands after WWII, since none of the islands, other than Taiping Island, was habitable. The South Vietnamese government took over the Trường Sa administration after the defeat of the French at the end of the First Indochina War. In 1958, the PRC issued a declaration defining its territorial waters, which encompassed the Spratly Islands. North Vietnam's prime minister, Pham Van Dong, sent a formal note to Zhou Enlai, stating that the Government of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam (DRV) respected the Chinese decision regarding the 12 nmi (22 km; 14 mi) limit of territorial waters.[citation needed] While accepting the 12-nmi principal with respect to territorial waters, the letter did not actually address the issue of defining actual territorial boundaries.

In an interview with BBC, Dr. Balazs Szalontai provided the following insight:

"The general context of the Chinese declaration was the United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea, held in 1956, and the resulting treaties signed in 1958, such as the Convention on the Territorial Sea and Contiguous Zone. Understandably, the PRC government, though not being a member of the U.N., also wanted to have a say in how these issues were dealt with. Hence the Chinese declaration of September 1958. In these years, North Vietnam could hardly afford to alienate Communist comrade China. The Soviet Union did not give any substantial support to Vietnamese reunification, and neither South Vietnamese leader Ngo Dinh Diem nor the United States government showed readiness to give consent to the holding of all-Vietnamese elections as stipulated by the Geneva Agreements. On the contrary, Diem did his best to suppress the Communist movement in the South. This is why Pham Van Dong felt it necessary to take sides with China, whose tough attitude toward the Asian policies of the US offered some hope. And yet he seems to have been cautious enough to make a statement that supported only the principle that China was entitled for 12-mile (19 km) territorial seas along its territory but evaded the issue of defining this territory. While the preceding Chinese statement was very specific, enumerating all the islands (including the Paracels and the Spratlys) for which the PRC laid claim, the DRV statement did not say a word about the concrete territories to which this rule was applicable. Still, it is true that in this bilateral territorial dispute between Chinese and Vietnamese interests, the DRV standpoint, more in a diplomatic than a legal sense, was incomparably closer to that of China than to that of South Vietnam".[64][unreliable source?]

In 1999, a Philippine navy ship (Number 57 - BRP Sierra Madre) was purposely run aground near Second Thomas Shoal to enable establishment of an outpost. As of 2014 it had not been removed, and Filipino troops have been stationed aboard since the grounding.[65][66]

Under President Lee Teng-hui, Taiwan stated that "legally, historically, geographically, or in reality", all of the South China Sea and Spratly islands were Taiwan's territory and under Taiwanese sovereignty, and denounced actions undertaken there by Malaysia and the Philippines, in a statement on July 13, 1999 released by the foreign ministry of Taiwan.[67] Taiwan and China's claims "mirrors" each other.[68] During international talks involving the Spratly islands, China and Taiwan have cooperated with each other since both have the same claims.[69] [70]

Taiwan and China are largely strategically aligned on the Spratly islands issue, since they both claim exactly the same area so Taiwan's control of Itu Aba (Taiping) island is viewed as an extension of China's claim.[71] Taiwan and China both claim the entire island chains while all the other claimaints only claim portions of them and China has proposed cooperation with Taiwan against all the other countries claiming the island such as Vietnam. Taiwanese lawmakers have demanded that Taiwan fortify Itu Aba (Taiping) island with weapons to defend against the Vietnamese, and both China and Taiwanese NGOs have pressured Taiwan to expand Taiwan's military capabilities on the island, which played a role in Taiwan expanding the island's runway in 2012.[72] China has urged Taiwan to cooperate and offered Taiwan a share in oil and gas resources while shutting out all the other rival claimaints. Taiwanese lawmakers have complained about repeated Vietnamese aggresion and trespassing on Taiwan's Itu Aba (Taiping), and Taiwan has started viewing Vietnam as an enemy over the Spratly Islands, not China.[73] Taiwan's state run oil company CPC Corp's board director Chiu Yi has called Vietnam as the "greatest threat" to Taiwan.[74] Taiwan's airstrip on Taiping has irritated Vietnam.[75] China view's Taiwan's expansion of its military and airstrip on Taiping as benefiting China's position against the other rival claimaints from southeast asian countries..[76] China's claims to the Spratlys benefit from legal weight because of Taiwan's presence on Itu Aba, while America on the other hand has regularly ignored Taiwan's claims in the South China Sea and does not include Taiwan in any talks on dispute resolution for the area.[77]

On May 23, 2011, the President of the Philippines, Benigno Aquino III, warned visiting Chinese Defence Minister Liang Guanglie of a possible arms race in the region if tensions worsened over disputes in the South China Sea. Aquino said he told Liang in their meeting that this could happen if there were more encounters in the disputed and potentially oil-rich Spratly Islands.[78]

In May 2011, Chinese patrol boats attacked two Vietnamese oil exploration ships near the Spratly Islands.[79] Also in May 2011, Chinese naval vessels opened fire on Vietnamese fishing vessels operating off East London Reef (Da Dong). The three Chinese military vessels were numbered 989, 27 and 28, and they showed up with a small group of Chinese fishing vessels. Another Vietnamese fishing vessel was fired on near Fiery Cross Reef (Chu Thap). The Chief Commander of Border Guards in Phu Yen Province, Vietnam reported that a total of four Vietnamese vessels were fired upon by Chinese naval vessels.[verification needed] These incidents involving Chinese forces sparked mass protests in Vietnam, especially in Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City,[80] and in various Vietnamese communities in the West (namely in the U.S. state of California and in Paris) over attacks on Vietnamese citizens and the intrusion into what Vietnam claimed was part of its territory.[81]

In June 2011, the Philippines began officially referring to the South China Sea as the "West Philippine Sea" and the Reed Bank as "Recto Bank".[82][83]

In July 2012, the National Assembly of Vietnam passed a law demarcating Vietnamese sea borders to include the Spratly and Paracel Islands.[84][85]

Taiwan performed live fire military exercises on Taiping island on September 2012, reports said that Vietnam was explicitly named by the Taiwanese military as the "imaginary enemy" in the drill.[86][87][88][89][90][91] Vietnam protested against the exercises as violation of its territory and "voiced anger", demanding that Taiwan stop the drill.[92][93][94][95] Taiwan rejected Vietnam's protests, and Taiwan's Department of East Asian and Pacific Affairs declared that "Taiping Island is part of the Republic of China's territory....We have noted Vietnam's dissatisfaction over the drill...No one has the right to protest over Taiwan's exercise of its sovereign rights there", while China voiced ifs approval and support of Taiwan's military drill on the island.[96][97] Taiwan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs also said, "Our sovereignty over the island is undisputable and all of our activities and deployments on the island are legal and will never cause regional tensions." in response to Vietnamese claims on the island.[98][99] Among the inspectors of the live fire drill were Taiwanese national legislators, adding to the tensions.[100][101][102][103]

In 2011, former Malysian PM Mahathir Mohamad said that China was not a threat to anyone and was not worried about aggresion from China, accusing the United States of provoking China and trying to turn China's neighbors against China.[104]mMahathir believes Malaysia could profit from China's economic growth through cooperation with China.[105]

Malaysia displayed no concern over China conducting a military exercise at James Shoal on March 2013.[106]

On August 2013, Malaysia suggested that it might work with China over their South China Sea claims and ignore the other claimaints, with Malaysian Defence Minister Hishamuddin Hussein saying that Malaysia had no problem with China patolling the South China Sea, and telling ASEAN, America, and Japan that "Just because you have enemies, doesn’t mean your enemies are my enemies."[107][108]

The editorial of the Taiwanese news website "Want China Times" accused America for being behind the May 2014 flareup in the South China Sea, saying that Vietnam rammed a Chinese vessel on May 2 over an oil rig drilling platform and the Philippines detained 11 Chinese fishmen occured because of Obama's visit to the region and that they were incited by America "behind the scenes". "Want China Times" claimed America ordered Vietnam on May 7 to complain about the drilling platform, and noted that a joint military exercise was happening at this time between the Philippines and America, and also noted that the American "New York Times" newspaper supported Vietnam.[109]


In 2005, a cellular phone base station was erected by the Philippines' Smart Communications on Pag-asa Island.[110]

On May 18, 2011, China Mobile announced that its mobile phone coverage has expanded to the Spratly Islands. The extended coverage would allow soldiers stationed on the islands, fishermen, and merchant vessels within the area to use mobile services, and can also provide assistance during storms and sea rescues. The service network deployment over the islands took nearly one year.[111]

In Popular Culture[edit]

The Spratly Islands featured in the 2013 first person shooter video game Battlefield 4 as a playable map on the Naval Strike expansion pack titled Nansha Strike. [112]


See also[edit]


  1. ^ 民政部关于国务院批准设立地级三沙市的公告-中华人民共和国民政部
  2. ^ User, S. (1990). Pasukan Gugusan Semarang Peninjau. [online] Retrieved from: http://www.navy.mil.my/pusmastldm/index.php/penubuhan-unit/markas-wilayah-laut-2/pasukan-gugusan-semarang-peninjau [Accessed: 4 June 2013]
  3. ^ Defencereviewasia.com (1990). Slow progress on capability growth | Asian Defence News Articles | Defence Review Asia. [online] Retrieved from: http://www.defencereviewasia.com/articles/140/Slow-progress-on-capability-growth [Accessed: 4 June 2013].
  4. ^ Navy.mil.my (n.d.). Untitled. [online] Retrieved from: http://www.navy.mil.my/index.php/component/k2/item/2479-warga-gugusan-semarang-peninjau-tldm-diraikan-di-pulau-layang-layang [Accessed: 4 June 2013].
  5. ^ Anda, Redempto (17 July 2012). "Government told of China buildup 2 months ago". Philippine Inquirer. Retrieved 29 October 2013. 
  6. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k "South China Sea Islands". Terrestrial Ecoregions. World Wildlife Fund. 
  7. ^ Ocampo, Ambeth (19 April 2012). "The Free Territory of Freedomland". Philippine Daily Inquirer. Retrieved 21 March 2014. 
  8. ^ a b c Owen, N. A. and C. H. Schofield, 2012, Disputed South China Sea hydrocarbons in perspective. Marine Policy. vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 809-822.
  9. ^ "Q&A: South China Sea dispute". Retrieved 30 October 2013. 
  10. ^ a b Blanche, J. B. and J. D. Blanche, 1997, An Overview of the Hydrocarbon Potential of the Spratly Islands Archipelago and its Implications for Regional Development. in A. J. Fraser, S. J. Matthews, and R. W. Murphy, eds., pp. 293-310, Petroleum Geology of South East Asia. Special Publication no. 126, The Geological Society, Bath, England 436 pp.
  11. ^ a b Hutchison, C. S., and V. R. Vijayan, 2010, What are the Spratly Islands? Journal of Asian Earth Science. vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 371–385.
  12. ^ a b Wei-Weil, D., and L, Jia-Biao, 2011, Seismic Stratigraphy, Tectonic Structure and Extension Factors Across the Dangerous Grounds: Evidence from Two Regional Multi-Channel Seismic Profiles. Chinese Journal of Geophysics. vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 921–941.
  13. ^ a b Zhen, S., Z. Zhong-Xian, L. Jia-Biao, Z. Di, and W. Zhang-Wen, 2013, Tectonic Analysis of the Breakup and Collision Unconformities in the Nansha Block. Chinese Journal of Geophysics. vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 1069-1083.
  14. ^ "A List of books on the history of Spratly islands". Retrieved 21 March 2014. 
  15. ^ Wortzel, Higham 1999, p. 180.
  16. ^ "Timeline". History of the Spratlys. www.spratlys.org. Retrieved 21 March 2014. 
  17. ^ Chemillier-Gendreau, Monique (2000). Sovereignty Over the Paracel and Spratly Islands. Kluwer Law International. ISBN 9041113819. 
  18. ^ China Sea pilot, Volume 1 (8th Edition). Taunton: UKHO - United Kingdom Hydrographic Office. 2010. 
  19. ^ "China and Philippines: The reasons why a battle for Zhongye (Pag-asa) Island seems unavoidable". China Daily Mail. 13 January 2014. Retrieved 21 March 2014. 
  20. ^ Thurgood, Graham (1999), From Ancient Cham to Modern Dialects: Two Thousand Years of Language Contact and Change, University of Hawaii Press, p. 16, ISBN 978-0-8248-2131-9 .
  21. ^ Image: General Map of Distances and Historic Capitals, Wikimedia Commons.
  22. ^ Jianming Shen (1998), "Territorial Aspects of the South China Sea Island Disputes", in Nordquist, Myron H.; Moore, John Norton, Security Flashpoints, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, pp. 165–166, ISBN 978-90-411-1056-5 , ISBN 90-411-1056-9 ISBN 978-90-411-1056-5.
  23. ^ Historical Evidence To Support China's Sovereignty over Nansha Islands
  24. ^ History of Yuan geographical records: Yuan Dynasty Territorial Map (元代疆域图叙)
  25. ^ Miscellaneous Records of the South Sea Defensive Command 《海南卫指挥佥事柴公墓志》
  26. ^ Qing dynasty provincial map from tianxia world map 《清直省分图》之《天下总舆图》
  27. ^ Qing dynasty circuit and province map from Tianxia world map 《皇清各直省分图》之《天下总舆图》
  28. ^ Great Qing of ten thousand years tianxia map 《大清万年一统天下全图》
  29. ^ Great Qing of ten thousand years general map of all territory 《大清万年一统地量全图》
  30. ^ Great Qing tianxia overview map 《大清一统天下全图》
  31. ^ Alleged Early Map of the Spratly Islands near the Vietnamese Coast
  32. ^ a b c King C. Chen, China's War with Vietnam (1979) Dispute over the Paracels and Spratlys, pp. 42–48.
  33. ^ MARITIME BRIEFING, Volume I, Number 6: A Geographical Description of the Spratly Island and an Account of Hydrographic Surveys Amongst Those Islands, 1995 by David Hancox and Victor Prescott. Pages 14–15
  34. ^ ed. Kivimäki 2002, p. 9.
  35. ^ Bateman, Emmers 2008, p. 43.
  36. ^ Shavit, David (1990). The United States in Asia: A Historical Dictionary. Greenwood Press. p. 285. ISBN 0-313-26788-X. 
  37. ^ Fowler, Michael; Bunck, Julie Marie (1995). Law, Power, and the Sovereign State. Pennsylvania State University Press. pp. 54–55. ISBN 0-271-01470-9. 
  38. ^ Whiting, Kenneth (February 2, 1992). "Asian Nations Squabble Over Obscure String of Islands". Los Angeles Times. p. A2. 
  39. ^ Wortzel, Higham 1999, p. 180.
  40. ^ Map of Asia 1892, University of Texas
  41. ^ Borneo Post: When All Else Fails (archived from the original on February 28, 2008) Additionally, pages 48 and 51 of "The Brunei-Malaysia Dispute over Territorial and Maritime Claims in International Law" by R. Haller-Trost, Clive Schofield, and Martin Pratt, published by the International Boundaries Research Unit, University of Durham, UK, points out that this is, in fact, a "territorial dispute" between Brunei and other claimants over the ownership of one above-water feature (Louisa Reef)
  42. ^ Romero, Alexis (8 May 2013). "China fishing boats cordon off Spratlys". The Philippine Star. Retrieved 29 October 2013. 
  43. ^ Severino 2011, p. 76.
  44. ^ Paracel Islands, worldstatesmen.org
  45. ^ a b Spratly Islands[broken citation], Microsoft Encarta Online Encyclopedia 2008. All Rights Reserved.
  46. ^ Todd C. Kelly, Vietnamese Claims to the Truong Sa Archipelago, Explorations in Southeast Asian Studies, Vol.3, Fall 1999.
  47. ^ a b King 1979, p. 43
  48. ^ ed. Kivimäki 2002, p. 10.]
  49. ^ ed. Morley, Nishihara 1997, p. 124.
  50. ^ Severino 2011, p. 74.
  51. ^ ed. Kivimäki 2002, p. 11.
  52. ^ Severino 2011, p. 74.
  53. ^ The Editors of Encyclopædia Britannica.
  54. ^ Severino 2011, p. 76.
  55. ^ Kivimäki, Timo (2002), War Or Peace in the South China Sea?, Nordic Institute of Asian Studies (NIAS), ISBN 87-91114-01-2
  56. ^ "Taiwan’s Power Grab in the South China Sea". 
  57. ^ ed. Morley, Nishihara 1997, p. 125-126.
  58. ^ ed. Kivimäki 2002, p. 11.
  59. ^ Pak 2000, p. 92.
  60. ^ Pak 2000, p. 92.
  61. ^ Lin Feb 22, 2008. p. 1.
  62. ^ ed. Morley, Nishihara 1997, pp. 126-127.
  63. ^ Malig, Jojo (17 July 2012). "Chinese ships eye 'bumper harvest' in Spratly". ABS CBN News. Retrieved 29 October 2013. 
  64. ^ Regarding the 1958 Letter by Pham Van Dong Translation by Thinh Do of the BBC Vietnamese 2018—09-23
  65. ^ Keck, Zachary (13 March 2014). "Second Thomas Shoal Tensions Intensify". The Diplomat. Retrieved 17 March 2014. 
  66. ^ "A game of shark and minnow". The New York Times. Retrieved 17 March 2014. 
  67. ^ STRATFOR's 1999.
  68. ^ Sisci 2010.
  69. ^ Pak 2000, p. 91.
  70. ^ Sisci 2010.
  71. ^ Wortzel, Higham 1999, p. 180.
  72. ^ Kastner Aug 10, 2012.
  73. ^ Kastner Jun 13, 2012.
  74. ^ Kastner Aug 10, 2012.
  75. ^ Lee Jul 29, 2010, p. 2.
  76. ^ Lin Feb 22, 2008. p. 1.
  77. ^ Womack Feb 14, '13.
  78. ^ Philippines warns of arms race in South China Sea | Inquirer Global Nation
  79. ^ Chinese patrol boats confront Vietnamese oil exploration ship in South China Sea
  80. ^ [1].]BBC News Asia-Pacific. 2011.
  81. ^ [2].]BBC News Tiếng Việt. 2011.
  82. ^ "‘It’s West Philippine Sea’". Inquirer.net. June 11, 2011. Retrieved June 28, 2012. 
  83. ^ "Name game: PH now calls Spratly isle ‘Recto Bank’". Inquirer.net. June 14, 2011. Retrieved June 28, 2012. 
  84. ^ [3]
  85. ^ China Criticizes Vietnam in Dispute Over Islands – Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
  86. ^ Published: 9:06:51 September 5,2012.
  87. ^ "Taiwan holds live-fire drill in Spratlys: official" 2013.
  88. ^ PTI 2013.
  89. ^ Staff Writers 2013.
  90. ^ PTI 2013.
  91. ^ Yeh 2013.
  92. ^ Bloomberg News 2012.
  93. ^ Thanh Nien News Thursday, August 23, 2012 16:00.
  94. ^ thanhniennews 2012.
  95. ^ Agence France-Presse 2013.
  96. ^ CNA and Staff Reporter 2012.
  97. ^ Philippine News 2012.
  98. ^ CNA 2012.
  99. ^ Staff writer, with CNA 2012, p. 3.
  100. ^ Carpenter 2013.
  101. ^ Carpenter 2013.
  102. ^ Carpenter 2013.
  103. ^ Carpenter 2013.
  104. ^ TSUKAMOTO 2011.
  105. ^ Mahathir: China no threat to Malaysia 2010.
  106. ^ Lockman 2013.
  107. ^ Amin 2013.
  108. ^ Malaysia splits with Asean on China Sea threat 2013.
  109. ^ Editorial 2014.
  110. ^ Kalayaan Palawan
  111. ^ Ian Mansfield, May 18, 2011, China Mobile Expands Coverage to the Spratly Islands, Cellular News
  112. ^ http://www.battlefield.com/battlefield-4/expansion-packs/naval-strike

Further reading[edit]

External links[edit]