A smart city (also smarter city) uses digital technologies to enhance performance and wellbeing, to reduce costs and resource consumption, and to engage more effectively and actively with its citizens. Key 'smart' sectors include transport, energy, health care, water and waste. A smart city should be able to respond faster to city and global challenges than one with a simple 'transactional' relationship with its citizens.[n 1]
Interest in smart cities is motivated by major challenges, including climate change, economic restructuring, the move to online retail and entertainment, ageing populations, and pressures on public finances.[n 2] The terms 'intelligent city' and 'digital city' are also used.[n 3]
The European Union (EU) has devoted constant efforts to devising a strategy for achieving 'smart' urban growth for its metropolitan city-regions.[n 4]
Arup estimates that the global market for smart urban services will be $400 billion per annum by 2020.[n 5] Notably 'smart' cities include Chicago, Boston, Barcelona and Stockholm.[n 6]
Theories about smart cities are somewhat lacking as everything in the city might be informed by information technologies, but a useful review of this perspective was produced as part of the FuturICT initiative in 2012.
The term smart city is still quite a fuzzy concept and is used in ways that are not always consistent. Here are a number of definitions:
Smart Cities Council: "A smart city is one that has digital technology embedded across all city functions."
Frost & Sullivan: "We identified eight key aspects that define a Smart City: smart governance, smart energy, smart building, smart mobility, smart infrastructure, smart technology, smart healthcare and smart citizen."
IEEE Smart Cities: "A smart city brings together technology, government and society to enable the following characteristics: smart cities, a smart economy, smart mobility, a smart environment, smart people, smart living, smart governance."
Business Dictionary: "A developed urban area that creates sustainable economic development and high quality of life by excelling in multiple key areas; economy, mobility, environment, people, living, and government. Excelling in these key areas can be done so through strong human capital, social capital, and/or ICT infrastructure."
British Government: "The concept is not static, there is no absolute definition of a smart city, no end point, but rather a process, or series of steps, by which cities become more 'liveable' and resilient and, hence, able to respond quicker to new challenges."[n 7]
Caragliu and Nijkamp: "A city can be defined as ‘smart’ when investments in human and social capital and traditional (transport) and modern (ICT) communication infrastructure fuel sustainable economic development and a high quality of life, with a wise management of natural resources, through participatory action and engagement."
Giffinger et al.: "Regional competitiveness, transport and ICT economics, natural resources, human and social capital, quality of life, and participation of citizens in the governance of cities."
Uses physical infrastructure (roads, built environment and other physical assets) more efficiently supporting strong and healthy economic, social, cultural development.[n 8][n 9]
Is able to being able to learn, adapt and innovate and can responds more effectively and promptly to changing circumstances.
Engages effectively with local people in local governance and decision by use of open innovation processes and e-participation with emphasis placed on citizen participation and co-design.
Makes good use of the creative industries, supported by strong knowledge and social networks, voluntary organisations in a low-crime setting to achieve these aims.[n 8]
Intelligent cities (communities, clusters, regions) were defined as multi-layer territorial systems of innovation that bring together knowledge-intensive activities, institutions for cooperation in learning and innovation, and digital spaces for communication and interaction in order to maximize the problem-solving capability of the city. The distinctive characteristic of an intelligent city is the high performance in the field of innovation, because innovation and solving of new problems are main features of intelligence.[n 10][n 11]
the intelligence, inventiveness and creativity of the individuals who live and work in the city as ‘creative city’, gathering the values and desires of the ‘new creative class’ made by knowledge and talented people, scientists, artists, entrepreneurs, venture capitalists and other creative people, which have an enormous impact on determining how the workplace is organized, whether companies will prosper, whether cities thrive or wither.
the collective intelligence of a city’s population: ‘collective intelligence is the capacity of human communities to evolve toward higher order complexity and harmony based on the institutions of the city that enable cooperation in knowledge and innovation, through such innovation mechanisms as differentiation and integration, competition and collaboration.
artificial intelligence embedded into the physical environment and available to the city’s population: communication infrastructure, digital spaces, and online problem-solving tools for to the population.
Thus the concept of ‘intelligent city’ integrates all the three aforementioned dimensions of the physical, institutional and digital spaces of an agglomeration. Consequently, the term ‘intelligent city’ describes a territory with
developed knowledge-intensive activities or clusters of such activities;
embedded routines of social co-operation allowing knowledge and know-how to be acquired and adapted;
a developed communication infrastructure, digital spaces, and knowledge/innovation management tools; and
a proven ability to innovate, manage and resolve problems that appear for the first time, since the capacity to innovate and to manage uncertainty are the critical factors for measuring intelligence.
Online collaborative sensor data management platforms are on-line database services that allow sensor owners to register and connect their devices to feed data into an on-line database for storage and allow developers to connect to the database and build their own applications based on that data. Examples include Xively and Wikisensing.
The main arguments against the superficial use of this concept in the policy arena are:[n 8]
A bias in strategic interest may lead to ignoring alternative avenues of promising urban development.
The focus of the concept of smart city may lead to an underestimation of the possible negative effects of the development of the new technological and networked infrastructures needed for a city to be smart.
As a globalized business model is based on capital mobility, following a business-oriented model may result in a losing long term strategy: "The 'spatial fix' inevitably means that mobile capital can often 'write its own deals' to come to town, only to move on when it receives a better deal elsewhere. This is no less true for the smart city than it was for the industrial, [or] manufacturing city."[n 8]
^Paskaleva, K (25 January 2009). "Enabling the smart city:The progress of e-city governance in Europe". International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development1 (4): 405–422(18). doi:10.1504/ijird.2009.022730.
^"Definitions and overviews". Smart Cities Council. The smart city sector is still in the "I know it when I see it" phase, without a universally agreed definition. The Council defines a smart city as one that has digital technology embedded across all city functions
^Caragliu, A; Del Bo, C. & Nijkamp, P (2009). "Smart cities in Europe". Serie Research Memoranda 0048 (VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics).Cite uses deprecated parameters (help)
^Deakin, M; Allwinkle, S (2007). "Urban regeneration and sustainable communities: the role networks, innovation and creativity in building successful partnerships". Journal of Urban Technology14 (1): 77–91. doi:10.1080/10630730701260118.
^ abFlorida, R. L. (2002). The rise of the creative class: and how it's transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. New York: Basic Books.
^Greenfield, A. (2013). Against the Smart City. London: Verso. ASINB00FHQ5DBS.
^Graham, S.; Marvin, S. (1996). Telecommunications and the city: electronic spaces, urban place. London: Routledge. ISBN9780203430453.
The following notes are linked to the 'citations' shown below.
^Dept Business(2013) Page 7 "As consumers of private goods and services we have been empowered by the Web and, as citizens, we expect the same quality from our public services. In turn, public authorities are seeking to reduce costs and raise performance by adopting similar approaches in the delivery of public services. However, the concept of a Smart City goes way beyond the transactional relationships between citizen and service provider. It is essentially enabling and encouraging the citizen to become a more active and participative member of the community"
^Dept Business(2013) "But the concept is not static: there is no absolute definition of a smart city, no end point, but rather a process, or series of steps, by which cities become more “liveable” and resilient and, hence, able to respond quicker to new challenges."
Deakin, M (2010). Reddick, C, ed. "Review of City Portals: The Transformation of Service Provision under the Democratization of the Fourth Phase". Politics, Democracy and E-Government: Participation and Service Delivery (Hershey: IGI Publishing).
Torres, L; Pina, V. and Sonia, R. (2005). "E-government and the transformation of public administrations in EU countries: Beyond NPM or just a second wave of reforms?". Online Information Review29 (5): 531–553. doi:10.1108/14684520510628918.Cite uses deprecated parameters (help)
Odendal, Nancy (November 2003). "Information and communication technology and local governance: understanding the difference between cities in developed and emerging economies". Computers, Environment and Urban Systems27 (6): 585–607. doi:10.1016/s0198-9715(03)00016-4.