From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia - View original article

In probability theory and statistics, **skewness** is a measure of the asymmetry of the probability distribution of a real-valued random variable. The skewness value can be positive or negative, or even undefined. Qualitatively, a negative skew indicates that the *tail* on the left side of the probability density function is *longer* than the right side and the bulk of the values (possibly including the median) lie to the right of the mean. A positive skew indicates that the *tail* on the right side is *longer* than the left side and the bulk of the values lie to the left of the mean. A zero value indicates that the values are relatively evenly distributed on both sides of the mean, typically (but not necessarily) implying a symmetric distribution.

## Contents |

Consider the distribution on the figure. The bars on the right side of the distribution taper differently than the bars on the left side. These tapering sides are called *tails*, and they provide a visual means for determining which of the two kinds of skewness a distribution has:

*negative skew*: The left tail is longer; the mass of the distribution is concentrated on the right of the figure. It has relatively few low values. The distribution is said to be*left-skewed*,*left-tailed*, or*skewed to the left*.^{[1]}Example (observations): 1,1001,1002,1003.*positive skew*: The right tail is longer; the mass of the distribution is concentrated on the left of the figure. It has relatively few high values. The distribution is said to be*right-skewed*,*right-tailed*, or*skewed to the right*.^{[1]}Example (observations): 1,2,3,1000.

If the distribution is symmetric then the mean is equal to the median and the distribution will have close to zero skewness.^{[2]} (If, in addition, the distribution is unimodal, then the mean = median = mode.) This is the case of a coin toss or the series 1,2,3,4,... Note, however, that the converse is not true in general, i.e. zero skewness does not imply that the mean is equal to the median.

"Many textbooks," a 2005 article points out, "teach a rule of thumb stating that the mean is right of the median under right skew, and left of the median under left skew. [But] this rule fails with surprising frequency. It can fail in multimodal distributions, or in distributions where one tail is long but the other is heavy. Most commonly, though, the rule fails in discrete distributions where the areas to the left and right of the median are not equal. Such distributions not only contradict the textbook relationship between mean, median, and skew, they also contradict the textbook interpretation of the median."^{[3]}

The skewness of a random variable *X* is the third standardized moment, denoted *γ*_{1} and defined as

where *μ*_{3} is the third moment about the mean *μ*, *σ* is the standard deviation, and *E* is the expectation operator. The last equality expresses skewness in terms of the ratio of the third cumulant *κ*_{3} and the 1.5th power of the second cumulant *κ*_{2}. This is analogous to the definition of kurtosis as the fourth cumulant normalized by the square of the second cumulant.

The skewness is also sometimes denoted Skew[*X*].

The formula expressing skewness in terms of the non-central moment E[*X*^{3}] can be expressed by expanding the previous formula,

For a sample of *n* values the *sample skewness* is

where is the sample mean, *m*_{3} is the sample third central moment, and *m*_{2} is the sample variance.

Given samples from a population, the equation for the sample skewness above is a biased estimator of the population skewness. (Note that for a discrete distribution the sample skewness may be undefined (0/0), so its expected value will be undefined.) The usual estimator of population skewness is^{[citation needed]}

where is the unique symmetric unbiased estimator of the third cumulant and is the symmetric unbiased estimator of the second cumulant. Unfortunately is, nevertheless, generally biased (although it obviously has the correct expected value of zero for a symmetric distribution). Its expected value can even have the opposite sign from the true skewness. For instance a mixed distribution consisting of very thin Gaussians centred at −99, 0.5, and 2 with weights 0.01, 0.66, and 0.33 has a skewness of about −9.77, but in a sample of 3, has an expected value of about 0.32, since usually all three samples are in the positive-valued part of the distribution, which is skewed the other way.

The variance of the skewness of a sample of size *n* from a normal distribution is^{[4]}^{[5]}

An approximate alternative is 6/*n* but this is inaccurate for small samples.

Skewness can be infinite, as when

or undefined, as when

In this latter example, the third cumulant is undefined. One can also have distributions such as

where both the second and third cumulants are infinite, so the skewness is again undefined.

If *Y* is the sum of *n* independent and identically distributed random variables, all with the distribution of *X*, then the third cumulant of *Y* is *n* times that of *X* and the second cumulant of *Y* is *n* times that of *X*, so . This shows that the skewness of the sum is smaller, as it approaches a Gaussian distribution in accordance with the central limit theorem.

Skewness has benefits in many areas. Many models assume normal distribution; i.e., data are symmetric about the mean. The normal distribution has a skewness of zero. But in reality, data points may not be perfectly symmetric. So, an understanding of the skewness of the dataset indicates whether deviations from the mean are going to be positive or negative.

D'Agostino's K-squared test is a goodness-of-fit normality test based on sample skewness and sample kurtosis.

Karl Pearson suggested simpler calculations as a measure of skewness:^{[6]} the Pearson mode or first skewness coefficient,^{[7]} defined by

- (mean − mode) / standard deviation,

as well as Pearson's median or second skewness coefficient,^{[8]} defined by

- 3 (mean − median) / standard deviation.

The latter is a simple multiple of the nonparametric skew.

Starting from a standard cumulant expansion around a Normal distribution, one can actually show that skewness = 6 (mean − median) / standard deviation ( 1 + kurtosis / 8) + O(skewness^{2}).^{[citation needed]} One should keep in mind that above given equalities often don't hold even approximately and these empirical formulas are abandoned nowadays. There is no guarantee that these will be the same sign as each other or as the ordinary definition of skewness.

The adjusted Fisher-Pearson standardized moment coefficient is the version found in Excel and several statistical packages including Minitab, SAS and SPSS.^{[9]} The formula for this statistic is

where *n* is the sample size and *s* is the sample standard deviation.

A skewness function

can be defined,^{[10]}^{[11]} where *F* is the cumulative distribution function. This leads to a corresponding overall measure of skewness^{[10]} defined as the supremum of this over the range 1/2 ≤ *u* < 1. Another measure can be obtained by integrating the numerator and denominator of this expression.^{[12]} The function *γ*(*u*) satifies -1 ≤ *γ*(*u*) ≤ 1 and is well defined without requiring the existence of any moments of the distribution.^{[12]}

Galton's measure of skewness^{[13]} is γ(*u*) evaluated at *u* = 3 / 4. Other names for this same quantity are the Bowley Skewness,^{[14]} the Yule-Kendall index^{[15]} and the quartile skewness.

Kelley's measure of skewness uses u = 0.1.^{[citation needed]}

Use of L-moments in place of moments provides a measure of skewness known as the L-skewness.^{[16]}

An alternative skewness coefficient may be derived from the sample mean and the individual observations:^{[17]}

*a*= ( number of observations below the mean - number of observations above the mean ) / total number of observations

The distribution of the skewness coefficient *a* in large sample sizes (≥45) approaches that of a normal distribution. If the variates have a normal or a uniform distribution the distribution of *a* is the same. The behavior of *a* when the variates have other distributions is currently unknown. Although this measure of skewness is very intuitive, an analytic approach to its distribution has proven difficult.

A value of skewness equal to zero does not imply that the probability distribution is symmetric. Thus there is a need for another measure of asymmetry which has this property: such a measure was introduced in 2000.^{[18]} It is called **distance skewness** and denoted by dSkew. If X is a random variable which takes values in the d-dimensional Euclidean space, X has finite expectation, X' is an independent identically distributed copy of X and denotes the norm in the Euclidean space then a simple *measure of asymmetry* is

- dSkew (X) := 1 - E||X-X'|| / E||X + X'|| if X is not 0 with probability one,

and dSkew (X):= 0 for X = 0 (with probability 1). Distance skewness is always between 0 and 1, equals 0 if and only if X is diagonally symmetric (X and -X has the same probability distribution) and equals 1 if and only if X is a nonzero constant with probability one.^{[19]} Thus there is a simple consistent statistical test of diagonal symmetry based on the **sample distance skewness**:

- dSkew
_{n}(X):= 1- ∑_{i,j}||x_{i}– x_{j}|| / ∑_{i,j}||x_{i}+ x_{j}||.

Groeneveld & Meeden have suggested, as an alternative measure of skewness,^{[12]}

where *μ* is the mean, *ν* is the median, || is the absolute value and *E*() is the expectation operator.

Wikiversity has learning materials about Skewness |

Wikimedia Commons has media related to: Skewness (statistics) |

- ^
^{a}^{b}Susan Dean, Barbara Illowsky "Descriptive Statistics: Skewness and the Mean, Median, and Mode", Connexions website **^**"1.3.5.11. Measures of Skewness and Kurtosis". NIST. http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/eda/section3/eda35b.htm. Retrieved 18 March 2012.**^**von Hippel, Paul T. (2005). "Mean, Median, and Skew: Correcting a Textbook Rule".*Journal of Statistics Education***13**(2). http://www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v13n2/vonhippel.html.**^**Duncan Cramer (1997) Basic Statistics for Social Research. Routledge p 85**^**Kendall, M.G.; Stuart, A. (1969)*The Advanced Theory of Statistics, Volume 1: Distribution Theory, 3rd Edition*, Griffin. ISBN 0-85264-141-9 (Ex 12.9)**^**http://www.stat.upd.edu.ph/s114%20cnotes%20fcapistrano/Chapter%2010.pdf**^**Weisstein, Eric W., "Pearson Mode Skewness" from MathWorld.**^**Weisstein, Eric W., "Pearson's skewness coefficients" from MathWorld.**^**Doane DP, Seward LE (2011) J Stat Educ 19 (2)- ^
^{a}^{b}MacGillivray (1992) **^**Hinkley DV (1975) "On power transformations to symmetry",*Biometrika, 62, 101–111*- ^
^{a}^{b}^{c}Groeneveld, R.A.; Meeden, G. (1984). "Measuring Skewness and Kurtosis".*The Statistician***33**(4): 391–399. doi:10.2307/2987742. JSTOR 2987742. **^**Johnson*et al*(1994) p3, p40**^**Kenney JF and Keeping ES (1962)*Mathematics of Statistics, Pt. 1, 3rd ed.*, Van Nostrand, (page 102)**^**Wilks DS (1995)*Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences*, p27. Academic Press. ISBN 0-12-751965-3**^**Hosking, J.R.M. (1992). "Moments or L moments? An example comparing two measures of distributional shape".*The American Statistician***46**(3): 186–189. JSTOR 2685210.**^**"Statistické charakteristiky (míry)" (in Czech). Technical University of Liberec. p. 6. https://ilex.kin.tul.cz/~vladimira.valentova/multiedu/STI/Popisne_charakteristiky.pdf. Retrieved 11 September 2012.**^**Szekely, G.J. (2000). "Pre-limit and post-limit theorems for statistics", In:*Statistics for the 21st Century*(eds. C. R. Rao and G. J. Szekely), Dekker, New York, pp. 411-422.**^**Szekely, G.J. and Mori, T.F. (2001) "A characteristic measure of asymmetry and its application for testing diagonal symmetry",*Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods*30/8&9, 1633–1639.

- Johnson, NL, Kotz, S, Balakrishnan N (1994)
*Continuous Univariate Distributions, Vol 1, 2nd Edition*Wiley ISBN 0-471-58495-9 - MacGillivray, HL (1992). "Shape properties of the g- and h- and Johnson families".
*Comm. Statistics — Theory and Methods***21**: 1244–1250.

- Hazewinkel, Michiel, ed. (2001), "Asymmetry coefficient",
*Encyclopedia of Mathematics*, Springer, ISBN 978-1-55608-010-4, http://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=p/a013590 - An Asymmetry Coefficient for Multivariate Distributions by Michel Petitjean
- On More Robust Estimation of Skewness and Kurtosis Comparison of skew estimators by Kim and White.
- Closed-skew Distributions — Simulation, Inversion and Parameter Estimation