Robert A. Dahl

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia - View original article

Robert A. Dahl
BornRobert Alan Dahl
December 17, 1915
Inwood, Iowa
DiedFebruary 5, 2014 (aged 98)
EducationYale University
OccupationPolitical Scientist, Professor
 
Jump to: navigation, search
Robert A. Dahl
BornRobert Alan Dahl
December 17, 1915
Inwood, Iowa
DiedFebruary 5, 2014 (aged 98)
EducationYale University
OccupationPolitical Scientist, Professor

Robert Alan Dahl (December 17, 1915 – February 5, 2014)[1] was the Sterling Professor emeritus of political science at Yale University, where he earned his Ph.D. in political science in 1940. He was past president of the American Political Science Association and an honorary member of Manuscript Society. He received an honorary Doctor of Laws (LL.D.) degree from Harvard University in 1998. Dahl was sometimes described as "the dean of American political scientists."[2]

Writings[edit]

In the late 1950s and early 1960s, he was involved in an academic disagreement with C. Wright Mills over the nature of politics in the United States. Mills held that America's governments are in the grasp of a unitary and demographically narrow power elite. Dahl responded that there are many different elites involved, who have to work both in contention and in compromise with one another. If this is not democracy in a populist sense, Dahl contended, it is at least polyarchy (or pluralism). In perhaps his best known work, Who Governs? (1961), he examines the power structures (both formal and informal) in the city of New Haven, Connecticut, as a case study, and finds that it supports this view.[citation needed]

From the late 1960s onwards, his conclusions were challenged by scholars such as G. William Domhoff and Charles E. Lindblom (a friend and colleague of Dahl).[citation needed]

In How Democratic Is the American Constitution? (2001) he argued that the constitution is much less democratic than it ought to be given that its authors were operating from a position of "profound ignorance" about the future. However, he adds that there is little or nothing that can be done about this "short of some constitutional breakdown, which I neither foresee nor, certainly, wish for."[citation needed]

Influence terms[edit]

One of Robert Dahl’s many contributions is his explication of the varieties of power, which he defines as “A” getting “B” to do what “A” wants. Dahl prefers the more neutral “influence terms,” (Michael G. Roskin) which he arrayed on a scale from best to worst:

  1. Rational Persuasion, the nicest form of influence, means telling the truth and explaining why someone should do something, like your doctor convincing you to stop smoking.
  2. Manipulative persuasion, a notch lower, means lying or misleading to get someone to do something.
  3. Inducement still lower, means offering rewards or punishments to get someone to do something, i.e. like bribery.
  4. Power threatens severe punishment, such as jail or loss of job.
  5. Coercion is power with no way out; you have to do it.
  6. Physical force – is backing up coercion with use or threat of bodily harm.

Thus, we can tell which governments are best; the ones that use influence at the higher end of the scale. The worst use the unpleasant forms of influence at the lower end.[citation needed]

Democracy and polyarchies[edit]

See also main article on polyarchy

In his book, Democracy and Its Critics (1989), Dahl clarifies his view about democracy. No modern country meets the ideal of democracy, which is as a theoretical utopia. To reach the ideal requires meeting five criteria:[3]

  1. Effective participation
    Citizens must have adequate and equal opportunities to form their preference and place questions on the public agenda and express reasons for one outcome over the other.
  2. Voting equality at the decisive stage
    Each citizen must be assured his or her judgments will be counted as equal in weights to the judgments of others.
  3. Enlightened understanding
    Citizens must enjoy ample and equal opportunities for discovering and affirming what choice would best serve their interests.
  4. Control of the agenda
    Demos or people must have the opportunity to decide what political matters actually are and what should be brought up for deliberation.
  5. Inclusiveness
    Equality must extend to all citizens within the state. Everyone has legitimate stake within the political process.

Instead, he calls politically advanced countries "polyarchies". Polyarchies have elected officials, free and fair elections, inclusive suffrage, rights to run for office, freedom of expression, alternative information and associational autonomy. Those institutions are a major advance in that they create multiple centers of political power.[4]

Prizes[edit]

Dahl was awarded the Johan Skytte Prize in Political Science in 1995.[citation needed]

Criticism[edit]

Bibliography[edit]

The most well-known of Dahl's works include:

Works on Dahl and his research[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Robert Dahl, Sterling Professor Emeritus in Political Science, passes away.
  2. ^ Campbell, John C. "Controlling Nuclear Weapons: Democracy Versus Guardianship". Retrieved February 7, 2014. 
  3. ^ R.A. Dahl, Democracy and Its Critics, Yale University Press, p.221
  4. ^ R.A. Dahl, Democracy and Its Critics, Yale University Press, p.222

Sources[edit]

External links[edit]