Reward management

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia - View original article

 
Jump to: navigation, search

Reward management is concerned with the formulation and implementation of strategies and policies that aim to reward people fairly, equitably and consistently in accordance with their value to the organization.[1]

Reward management consists of analysing and controlling employee remuneration, compensation and all of the other benefits for the employees. Reward management aims to create and efficiently operate a reward structure for an organisation. Reward structure usually consists of pay policy and practices, salary and payroll administration, total reward, minimum wage, executive pay and team reward.[1]

History[edit]

Reward management is a popular management topic. Reward management was developed on the basis of psychologists' behavioral research. Psychologists started studying behavior in the early 1900s; one of the first psychologists to study behavior was Sigmund Freud and his work was called the Psychoanalytic Theory. Many other behavioral psychologists improved and added onto his work. With the improvements in the behavioral research and theories, psychologists started looking at how people reacted to rewards and what motivated them to do what they were doing, and as a result of this, psychologists started creating motivational theories, which is very closely affiliated with reward management.[2]

Mitchell (1982) agrees, defining motivation as “the degree to which an individual wants and choose to engage in certain specific behaviours”, to which Vroom (quoted in Mitchell, 1982) adds that performance = ability x motivation. To have an efficient Reward System then, is mandatory that employees know exactly what their task is, have the skills to do it, have the necessary motivation and work in an environment allowing the transformation of intended actions into an actual behaviour. From the company point of view instead, an effective performance appraisal has to be present, in order to let motivation be a major contributor to the rewarded performance.[3]

Objective[edit]

Reward management deals with processes, policies and strategies which are required to guarantee that the contribution of employees to the business is recognized by all means. Objective of reward management is to reward employees fairly, equitably and consistently in correlation to the value of these individuals to the organization. Reward system exists in order to motivate employees to work towards achieving strategic goals which are set by entities. Reward management is not only concerned with pay and employee benefits. It is equally concerned with non-financial rewards such as recognition, training, development and increased job responsibility.[4]

Kerr (1995) brings to attention how Reward Management is an easily understandable concept in theory, but how its practical application results often difficult. The author, in fact, points up how frequently the company creates a Reward System hoping to reward a specific behavior, but ending up rewarding another one. The example made is the one of a company giving an annual merit increase to all its employees, differentiating just between an “outstanding” (+5%), “above average” (+4%) and “negligent” (+3%) workers. Because the difference between the percentage increasing was so slight, what the company obtained from the employees was indifference to the extra percentage point for a superlative job or the loss of one point for an irresponsible behavior. In the following table other common management errors are summarized.[5]

Types of rewards[edit]

Rewards serve many purposes in organisations. They serve to build a better employment deal, hold on to good employees and to reduce turnover.[6]

The principal goal is to increase people's willingness to work in one’s company, to enhance their productivity.[7]

Most people assimilate "rewards", with salary raise or bonuses, but this is only one kind of reward, Extrinsic reward. Studies proves that salespeople prefer pay raises because they feel frustrated by their inability to obtain other rewards,[8] but this behavior can be modified by applying a complete reward strategy.

There are two kinds of rewards:

Intrinsic rewards makes the employee feel better in the organization, while Extrinsic rewards focus on the performance and activities of the employee in order to attain a certain outcome. The principal difficulty is to find a balance between employees' performance (extrinsic) and happiness (intrinsic).[10]

The reward also needs to be according to the employee’s personality. For instance, a sports fan will be really happy to get some tickets for the next big match. However a mother who passes all her time with her children, may not use them and therefore they will be wasted.

When rewarding one, the manager needs to choose if he wants to rewards an Individual, a Team or a whole Organization. One will choose the reward scope in harmony with the work that has been achieved.

Motivation theories[edit]

An interpretation of Maslow's hierarchy of needs, represented as a pyramid with the more basic needs at the bottom[11]

Motivational theories are split into two groups as process and content theories. Content theories endeavor to name and analyze the factors which motivate people to perform better and more efficiently while process theories concentrate on how different types of personal traits interfere and impact the human behavior.[12] Content theories are highly related with extrinsic rewards, things that are concrete like bonuses and will help improve employees' physiological circumstances whereas process theories are concerned with intrinsic rewards, such as recognition and respect, which will help boost employees confidence in the work place and improve job satisfaction.[13]

A famous content theory would be Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs,[14] and a famous process theory would be the equity theory.[15]

Theories of motivation provide a theoretical basis for reward management though some of the best known ones have emerged from the psychology discipline. Perhaps the first and best known of these comes from the work of Abraham Maslow.[16] Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs describes a pyramid comprising a series of layers from at the base the most fundamental physiological needs such as food, water, shelter and sex, rising to the apex where self-actualisation needs included morality and creativity. Maslow saw these levels of needs being fulfilled one at a time in sequence from bottom to top. Employment and the resources it brings are classed under ‘safety needs’ (level 2) while the workplace may also contribute to a sense of ‘belonging’ (level 3) and recognition at work can satisfy the need for ‘self-esteem’ (level 4).

Frederick Herzberg’s motivator-hygiene theory, first published in 1959, argues that an employee’s job satisfaction or dissatisfaction is influenced by two distinct sets of factors and also that satisfaction and dissatisfaction were not at opposite ends of the same continuum but instead needed to be measured separately. The two sets of factors are motivator factors and hygiene factors. According to Herzberg, real motivation comes from the work itself, from completing tasks, while the role of reward is to prevent dissatisfaction arising.[17]

Expectancy Theory is the theory which posits that we select our behaviour based on the desirability of expected outcomes of the action. It was most prominently used in a work context by Victor Vroom [18] who sought to establish the relationship between performance, motivation and ability and expressed it as a multiplicative one – where performance equals motivation x ability. There are a lot of attractions for this kind of approach, particularly for employers who can target their motivation effort and anticipate a definable mathematical return for them. As this is a cognitive process theory it relies on the way employees perceive rewards These three theories plus variants of them have been used in countless research studies and continue to inform the practice of reward management up to the present day.

Job evaluation[edit]

Job evaluation is closely related to reward management. It is important to understand and identify a job's order of importance. Job evaluation is the process which job's are systematically assessed to one another within an organization in order to define the worth and value of the job, to ensure the principle of equal pay for equal work. In the United Kingdom, it is now illegal to discriminate worker's pay levels and benefits, employment terms and conditions and promotion opportunities.[19] Job Evaluation is one method that can be adopted by companies in order to make sure that discrimination is eliminated and that the work performed is rewarded with fair pay scales. This system carries crucial importance for managers to decide which rewards should be handed out by what amount and to whom. Job evaluation provides the basis for grading, pay structure, grading jobs in the structure and managing job and pay relativities.[20]

It has been said that fairness and objectivity are the core principals using an assessment of the nature and size of the job each is employed to carry out.[21]

There also many different methods of job evaluation which can be used, but the three simplest methods are ranking, classification and factor comparison.[22] However, there are more complex variations of methods such as the point method which uses scales to measure job factors. This method does not not rank employees against one another but looks at the job as a whole. A disadvantage of these methods of job evaluation are that they are very static and it would be very difficult to perform a job evaluation quickly if it was needed.

An advisory company named ACAS stated that there were five main reasons why employers look at performing a job evaluation. These include: When deciding on a pay scale: Making sure that the current system is fair and equal for employees, Deciding on benefits such as bonuses,Comparing pay against other companies and reviewing all jobs after a major company pay change .[23] Employees need to feel that they are being paid a fair wage compared to the same job with the competition. If this is true it may help reduce staff turnover which is very beneficial for employers as it reduces the cost of hiring new staff.

Research regarding job evaluation has mainly been conducted using qualitative data collection methods such as interviews, large scale surveys and basic experimental methods. Therefore, there is a large gap for research on job evaluation collecting quantitative data for a more statistical analysis. A comparison between public and private sectors and the methods of job evaluation is another area that should be considered for further research.

However, is job evaluation enough? Steinburg (1999) [24] stated that very few organisations take into account that job evaluation should also look at emotional labour that may be used by employees.

Performance appraisal[edit]

Performance appraisal is the method in which an employee’s job performance is evaluated and reviewed.[25] This compares employee work behaviour with the organisations pre-set standards to provide feedback on job performance. Performance appraisals are a form of motivation through either positive or negative reinforcement, depending on outcome. Typically this information is gained through interview and questionnaire functions annually, executed among management of larger organisations primarily, as a method of motivation to gain full potential of staff.[26] The goal of which is to align and manage all organisational resources “to achieve highest possible performance” by improving your current staff through encouragement, setting targets and improving on past mistakes.[27] Edward Lawler of the University of Southern California unveiled research showing that 93% percent of companies use annual appraisal [28]

Performance appraisal was set up in the first place, as a justification for the pay of an employee. If his performance was seen as insufficient, his pay would be cut down. However if it was seen of a higher quality, he could receive a pay rise. Performance appraisals have been described as a “flawed system”, One must ask, can an entire year’s work be reviewed at one point in time? It has been argued that the time, money and energy needed is not comparable to its effectiveness.[29] There are various appraisal methods.

Some of these include « rank and yank » by which an organisation ranks its employees against each other and terminates the employment of the employee who finishes at bottom place. That corresponds to the yanking. Then there is the critical incident technique by which the organisation collects information and observes human behaviour that have a strong impact either positive or negative on an activity or procedure.

Each employee is different and can bring in something special to the organisation. Each employee has a specific job to fulfil. Performance appraisals are needed in order to understand how every employee can produce the best performance.

The effectiveness of an employee is the key factor for the employer, because the profit the company or organisation makes depends on the employees' productiveness.

The training and development needs should begin with an assessment of the company as it lies currently, how it operates and what each employee is best at. This assessment will enable the training to be based on certain factors which seem most important. Knowledge of the organisation's strategic plan and its needs for the future must help the training to bring the company up a step on the ladder.[32] In using a performance appraisal, an organisation can build an employee profile of poor performances which allows a reduced risk of legal implications for redundancies. Seeing additional benefit, as the company can decide who is worthy of promotion or bonus’.[29]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b Murlis, Michael Armstrong & Helen (2004). Reward management: a handbook of remuneration strategy and practice (5th ed. ed.). London [u.a.]: Kogan Page. ISBN 978-0749439842. 
  2. ^ Latham, Gary P. Work motivation: history, theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). London: SAGE. ISBN 9781412990936. 
  3. ^ Mitchell, T.R. 1982. Motivation: new directions for theory, research, and practice. The Academy of Management Review. [E-journal]. 7(1), 80-88. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/257251. Accessed: 1st March 2014.
  4. ^ Armstrong, Michael (2007). A handbook of employee reward management and practice (2nd ed. ed.). Philadelphia: Kogan Page. ISBN 978-0-7494-4962-9. 
  5. ^ Kerr, S. 1995. An academy classic. On the folly of rewarding A, while hoping for B. The Academy of Management Executive. [E-journal]. 9(1), 7-14. Available at: http://www.executivemanagementskills.com/pdf/folly.pdf. Accessed: 5th March 2014.
  6. ^ Watson, Stephen (December 2003). "Building a Better Employment Deal". Workspan 46 (12): 48–51. 
  7. ^ Gkorezis, Petridou, Panagiotis, Eugenia (2008). "Employees' Psychological Empowerment via Intrinsic and Extrinsic Rewards". Academy of Health Care Management Journal (The DreamCatchers Group, LLC) 4 (1): 17–38. 
  8. ^ Chonko, Tanner, Weeks, Lawrence B, John F, William A (Summer 1992). "The Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management". Pi Sigma Epsilon National Educational Foundation, Inc. 
  9. ^ "Business Dictionary Intrasic Rewards definition". WebFinance, Inc. Retrieved 31 October 2012. 
  10. ^ Reif, William E (Summer 1975). "Intrinsic versus Extrinsic rewards: resolving the controversy". Human Resource Management (Wiley Periodicals Inc.) 14 (2): 2–9. 
  11. ^ "Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs".
  12. ^ Brooks, Ian (2009). Organisational Behaviour (4th ed.). Essex England: Pearson Education Limited. pp. 81–89. ISBN 978-0-273-71536-8. 
  13. ^ Stredwick, John (2005). Introduction to Human Resource Management (1st ed.). Oxford, United Kingdom: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann. ISBN 978-0-7506-6534-6. 
  14. ^ Kelly, Phil and Cole, G. A. (2011). Management Theory and Practice (7th ed.). Hampshire, United Kingdom: Cengage Learning EMEA. ISBN 978-1-84480-506-8. 
  15. ^ Buchanan, D. A.; Huczynski A. A. (2010). Organizational Behaviour (7th ed.). Lombardy, Italy: Pearson Education LTD. ISBN 978-0-273-72822-1. 
  16. ^ Maslow, A.H. (1943) A Theory of Human Motivation Psychological Review, 50, 370-396
  17. ^ Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. (2010). The Motivation to Work (12th ed.).New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
  18. ^ For a clear explanation of Expectancy theory see Lunenburg, F.C. (2011) Expectancy Theory of Motivation: Motivating by Altering Expectations International Journal of Management, Business, and Administration Vol 15, (1)
  19. ^ . www.gov.uk/discrimination-your-rights/discrimination-at-work
  20. ^ Armstrong, M.; Stephens, T. (2005). A Handbook of Employee Reward Management and Practice. United Kingdom: Kogan Page Limited. p. 92. 
  21. ^ Torrington, D. Hall, L. Taylor, S. Human Resource Management, Sixth Edition Pearson Education Limited, England. Page 603, 613-629
  22. ^ Armstrong M.; Baron A. (1995). The job evaluation handbook. United Kingdom: The Cromwell Press. p. 46. 
  23. ^ http://www.acas.org.uk/index.aspx?articleid=682
  24. ^ Steinberg, R. J. (1999). Emotional labour in job evaluation: Redesigning compensation practices. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 561(1), 143-157.
  25. ^ Muchinsky, P. M. (2012). Psychology Applied to Work. Summerfield, NC: Hypergraphic Press
  26. ^ Daley, Dennis (1992) Performance Appraisal in the Public Sector: Techniques and Applications, ABC-CLIO
  27. ^ ] “Make Performance Appraisals Change Friendly” [online] Available at: http://www.forbes.com/sites/edwardlawler/2013/07/29/make-performance-appraisals-change-friendly/. Accessed 14th March 2014
  28. ^ “Is it time to give up on appraisals?” [online] Available at: http://www.hrmagazine.co.uk/hr/features/1075041/is-performance-appraisals#sthash.T787dpWp.dpuf Accessed: 14th March 2014
  29. ^ a b Broderick, Renae (1991) Pay for Performance: Evaluating Performance Appraisal and Merit Pay, National Academies Press
  30. ^ Latham, Gary (1993). Increasing productivity through performance appraisal. Addison-Wesley. ISBN 0201514001. 
  31. ^ Murphy, Kevin R. (1995). Understanding Performance Appraisal: Social, Organizational, and Goal-Based. Sage Publications. ISBN 0803954743. 
  32. ^ Mary Jo Ducharme, Parbudyal Singh, and Mark Podolsky (August 30, 2007). "Exploring the Links between Performance Appraisals and Pay Satisfaction". SAGE Publications. Retrieved 25 October 2012. 

External links[edit]