Polyandry

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia - View original article

 
Jump to: navigation, search
Draupadi with her five husbands.

Polyandry (Ancient Greek: polys—many, anēr—man) is a form of polygamy whereby a woman takes two or more husbands at the same time. Polyandry is contrasted with polygyny, involving one male and two or more females. Polyandry is also distinct from group marriage, involving plural participants of each sex.

According to the Ethnographic Atlas, of 1,231 societies noted, 186 were monogamous; 453 had occasional polygyny; 588 had more frequent polygyny; and 4 had polyandry.[1] Polyandry is less rare than this figure which listed only those examples found in the Himalayan Mountains. More recent studies have found 53 societies outside of the 28 found in the Himalayans which practice polyandry.[2]

Fraternal polyandry was traditionally practiced among Tibetans in Nepal, parts of China and part of northern India, in which two or more brothers are married to the same wife, with the wife having equal 'sexual access' to them. It is most common in egalitarian societies marked by high male mortality or male absenteeism. It is associated with partible paternity, the cultural belief that a child can have more than one father.[3]

Polyandry is believed to be more likely in societies with scarce environmental resources, as it is believed to limit human population growth and enhance child survival.[4] It is a rare form of marriage that exists not only among poor families, but also the elite.[5] For example, in the Himalayan Mountains polyandry is related to the scarcity of land; the marriage of all brothers in a family to the same wife allows family land to remain intact and undivided. If every brother married separately and had children, family land would be split into unsustainable small plots. In Europe, this was prevented through the social practice of impartible inheritance (the dis-inheriting of most siblings, many who went on to become celibate monks and priests).[6]

In zoology, polyandry is a mating system involving a female and two or more males. Most broadly, polyandry refers to sexual relations with multiple males, within or without marriage.

Types[edit]

Polygynandry[edit]

In the Indian Himalayas, polyandry may be combined with polygyny to produce a system termed "polygynandry". The system results in less land fragmentation, a diversification of domestic economic activities, and lower population growth.[7]

Fraternal polyandry[edit]

Fraternal polyandry (from the Latin frater—brother) is a form of polyandry in which a woman is married to two or more men who are one another's brothers. Fraternal polyandry is found in certain areas of Tibet and Nepal,[8] where polyandry is accepted as a social practice.[9] The Toda people of southern India practice fraternal polyandry, but monogamy has become prevalent recently.[10] In contemporary Hindu society, polyandrous marriages in the agrarian societies in Malwa region of Punjab are occurring to avoid division of farming land.[11]

Fraternal polyandry achieves a similar goal to what primogeniture did in 19th-century England. Primogeniture dictated that the eldest son inherited the family estate, while younger sons had to leave home and seek their own employment. Primogeniture maintained family estates intact over generations by permitting only one heir per generation. Fraternal polyandry also accomplishes this, but does so by keeping all the brothers together with just one wife so that there is only one set of heirs per generation.[12] This strategy appears less successful the larger the fraternal sibling group.[13]

Some forms of polyandry appear to be associated with a perceived need to retain aristocratic titles or agricultural lands within kin groups, and/or because of the frequent absence, for long periods, of a man from the household. In Tibet the practice was particularly popular among the priestly Sakya class.

An extreme gender imbalance has been suggested as a justification for polyandry. For example, the selective abortion of female fetuses in India has led to a significant margin in sex ratio and, it has been suggested, results in related men "sharing" a wife.[14]

Partible paternity[edit]

Anthropologist Stephen Beckerman points out that at least 20 tribal societies accept that a child could, and ideally should, have more than one father, referring to it as "partible paternity."[15] This often results in the shared nurture of a child by multiple fathers in a form of polyandric relation to the mother, although this is not always the case.[16] One of the most well known examples is that of Trobriand "virgin birth." The matrilineal Trobriand Islanders recognize the importance of sex to reproduction but do not believe the male makes a contribution to the constitution of the child, who therefore remains attached to their mother's lineage alone. The mother's non-resident husbands are not recognized as fathers, although the mother's co-resident brothers are, since they are part of the mother's lineage.

Known cases[edit]

Polyandry in Tibet was a common practice and continues to a lesser extent today. In Tibet, polyandry has been outlawed since the Chinese takeover of the area, so it is difficult to measure the incidence of polyandry in what may have been the world's most polyandrous society.[17] Polyandry in India still exists among minorities, and also in Bhutan, and the northern parts of Nepal. Polyandry has been practised in several parts of India, such as Rajasthan, Ladakh and Zanskar, in the Jaunsar-Bawar region in Uttarakhand, among the Toda of South India,[17] and the Nishi of Arunachal Pradesh.[citation needed]

It also occurs or has occurred in Nigeria, the Nymba,[17] and some pre-contact Polynesian societies,[18] though probably only among higher caste women.[19] It is also encountered in some regions of Yunnan and Sichuan regions of China, among the Mosuo people in China, and in some sub-Saharan African such as the Maasai people in Kenya and northern Tanzania[20] and American indigenous communities. The Guanches, the first known inhabitants of the Canary Islands, practiced polyandry until their disappearance.[21] The Zo'e tribe in the state of Pará on the Cuminapanema River, Brazil, also practice polyandry.[22] Polyandry was practiced in Celtic societies as women were allowed to own property and marry more than one husband.[citation needed]

Africa[edit]

Europe[edit]

Sepulcral inscription for Allia Potestas, Museo Epigrafico, Terme di Diocleziano, Rome

Asia[edit]

Pacific islands[edit]

North America[edit]

South America[edit]

Religious attitudes[edit]

Polyandry is prohibited by Judaism, Islam, and the vast majority of Hindu and Christian denominations; neither is it legally recognized in most countries, including those that permit polygyny. Most religions discourage or prohibit polyandry. Although polyandry is decried in Abrahamic religions, in some pagan religions, such as Celtic indigenous religion, it has been normal.

According to inscriptions describing the reforms of the Sumerian king Urukagina of Lagash (ca. 2300 BC), the former custom of polyandry in his country was abolished, on pain of the woman taking multiple husbands being stoned with rocks upon which her crime is written.[51]

Draupadi with her five husbands - the Pandavas. The central figure is Yudhishthira; the two to his left are Bhima and Arjuna . Nakula and Sahadeva, the twins, are to his right. Their wife, at far right, is Draupadi. Deogarh, Dasavatar temple.

Polyandrous relations are disapproved of in most expressions of Hinduism.[52] There is at least one reference to polyandry in the ancient Hindu epic Mahabharata. Draupadi marries the five Pandava brothers. This ancient text remains largely neutral to the concept of polyandry, accepting this as her way of life.[53] However, in the same epic, when questioned by Kunti to give an example of polyandry, Yudhisthira cites Gautam-clan Jatila (married to seven Saptarishis) and Hiranyaksha's sister Pracheti (married to ten brothers), thereby implying a more open attitude toward polyandry in Vedic society.[54]

Technically speaking Draupadi was married to five different men, though they all were born to the same mother, who had five different men to father her children. It is said in GOTHRA or lineage history that they were considered not as biological brothers coming from a same father because Yuddhishthira was fathered by Dharma, Arjuna by Indra, Bhima by Vayu, Nakula and SahaDeva by Ashvinikumars. They came from different fathers as Pandu could not have progeny due to impotence.

The Hebrew Bible contains no examples of women married to more than one man,[55][56] but its description of adultery clearly implies that polyandry is unacceptable[57][58] and the practice was never permitted in Jewish tradition.[59][60] In addition, the children from such relationships are considered illegitimate (i.e., a mamzer).[61]

Current-day mainstream Christianity strongly advocates monogamous marriage, and the New Testament explicitly forbids polyandry. (Romans 7:2-3).

Islam also prohibits polyandry.[62] Nikah Ijtimah is a pagan tradition of polyandry predating Islam which was forbidden to Muslims.[63]

In zoology[edit]

The queen bee is usually the only female bee within a hive reproducing with drones, which often come from various hives. She mothers most or all offspring within a given hive.

In the field of behavioural ecology polyandry is a type of breeding adaptation in which one female mates with many males. Another opposite[64] breeding system to this is polygyny in which one male mates with many females (e.g., lions, deer, some primates, and many systems where there is an alpha male).

Polyandry is positively correlated with testicle-to-body weight across taxa (see Sperm competition).[65] Human testicles are lighter than those of chimpanzees—including the highly promiscuous bonobo chimpanzees—but heavier than those of gorillas and orangutans.[66][67]

A common example of polyandrous mating can be found in the Field Cricket Gryllus bimaculatus of the invertebrate order Orthoptera (containing crickets, grasshoppers, and groundhoppers). Females in this species will mate with any male close to them, including siblings. Widely shown in frogs (Agile frogs, Rana dalmatina), polyandry was also documented in polecat (Mustela putorius) and other mustelids.

Many reptile species also demonstrate polyandry, especially among members of the tortoise family (Testudinidae). Through polyandry and long-term sperm storage, recent studies have found evidence for the ability of female tortoises to produce clutches of eggs that demonstrate multiple paternity.[68][69] Predictably, these hatchlings showed an increase in genetic variability compared to those sired by a single male.[69] Potential for multiple paternity within a clutch is primarily a result of sperm storage across reproductive cycles, since studies have confirmed the presence of multiple males’ sperm in the female tortoise reproductive tract simultaneously.[69] As a result of clutches with greater variation in paternal genes and increased sperm competition, females can maximize both the genetic quality and number of offspring.[70] Multiple paternities within a single clutch is therefore considered an effective strategy to increase the reproductive success and fitness of female tortoises.[68]

Some taxa with high social organization are eusocial, meaning that a single female (e.g., the queen bee) or caste produces offspring while the other organisms (e.g., worker bees) cooperate in caring for the young. Examples of mammalian eusociality include Damaraland mole rats and naked mole rats,[71][72] among whom polyandry is the norm and polygyny has never been observed.[73] Female mole rats compete for the status of Queen or “alpha female” (see Naked mole rat#Queen and gestation).

Commonly in canine[74] and feline[75] reproduction, plural ova are fertilized during the same instance of estrus by various males each, so that a single litter of puppies or kittens may have more than one father. This is called heteropaternal superfecundation; very rare in human reproduction, but is documented. In one study on humans, the frequency was 2.4% among dizygotic twins whose parents were involved in paternity suits.[76]

Many of the theories attempting to explain concealed ovulation in humans and other organisms rely on premises of polyandry.

According to Gordon G. Gallup, human penile shape is indicative of an evolutionary history of polyandry. Male humans evolved to have a wedge- or spoon-shaped glans and to perform repeated thrusting motions during copulation in order to draw foreign semen back away from the cervix and thus to compete with sperm of other males.[77]

Related to sexual conflict, Thierry Lodé[78] found possible evolutionary explanations for polyandry including mate competition and inbreeding avoidance.

Polyandry also occurs in some primates such as marmosets, mammal groups, the marsupial genus' Antechinus and bandicoots, whales,[80][81] around 1% of all bird species, such as jacanas and dunnocks, insects such as honeybees, and fish such as pipefish. Even female camels mate with multiple males.

In New World monkeys[edit]

Some New World monkeys, such as Goeldi's Marmoset, have been observed living in polyandrous groups. Although groups may contain more than one female, the dominant female suppresses ovulation in subordinates, causing her to be the only one capable of reproduction. A Goeldi's Marmoset female regularly births more than one offspring, and her eggs are separately fertilized by more than one male. Paternal investment is high among Goeldi's Marmosets, and males often carry infants on their backs even if they are not the father of the infant. It has been suggested that multiple male mates were related, and therefore cooperation in caring for each other's young is adaptive; however, researchers tagged and tracked Goeldi's Marmosets over time, and noticed that unrelated males migrated to new groups to cooperate with nonrelatives as well as with relatives to care for young. It has also been suggested that females select cooperative males, and that the multiple offspring of Goeldi's Marmosets require paternal care for survival.[citation needed]

Current research suggests that polyandry is the dominant social structure in the Callitrichidae subfamily of New World monkeys.

The callitrichidae family includes marmosets and tamarins, two groups of small New World monkeys found in South America. Wild groups usually consist of three to ten individuals, with one reproductively active female, one or more reproductive males, and several nonreproductive helpers that can be either male or female. Interestingly, cooperative polyandry is not the only mating system found in these primates. Polyandrous, monogamous, and polygynous groups can be found within the same population, and a group can even change mating systems, making it the most flexible mating system of any non-human primate.[82] Unlike most primates who typically give birth to single young, twins are the average litter size for tamarins and marmosets. The entire group participates in raising the offspring, sharing the responsibilities of infant carrying, feeding, and grooming. The presence of nonreproductive helpers appears to be the most important factor in determining which mating system is used, as ecological and environmental variability have not been found to have a significant impact. Goldizen (1987) proposed the hypothesis that monogamy in callitrichidae should develop only in groups with nonreproductive helpers to help raise the young, and in the absence of these helpers, both polyandrous males and females would have higher reproductive success than those in lone monogamous pairs. Indeed, in studies of Saguinus fuscicollis, common name saddle-back tamarin, no monogamous lone pairs have ever been seen to attempt a breeding cycle.[83]

Sociobiology[edit]

The term has gained some currency in sociobiology, where it refers, analogously, to a mating system in which one female forms more or less permanent bonds to more than one male. It can take two different forms. In one, typified by the Northern Jacana[84] and some other ground-living birds, the female takes on much the same role as the male in a polygynous species, holding a large territory within which several males build nests. Subsequently, the female lays eggs in all the nests, and plays little part in parental care. In the other form, typified by the Galápagos Hawk, a group of two or more males (which may or may not be related) and one female collectively care for a single nest. The latter situation more closely resembles typical human fraternal polyandry.[citation needed]

Although polecats are chiefly polygynous, females can show polyandry, and the sexual conflict aspect of the mating system can change with environmental conditions. Sexual conflict may result in sexually antagonistic co-evolution or “sexual conflict”, in which one sex evolves a “manipulative” character which is countered by a “resistance” trait in the other sex.

These two forms reflect different resource situations: polyandry with shared parental care is more likely in very difficult environments, where the efforts of more than two parents are needed to give a reasonable chance of rearing young successfully.

Honeybees are said to be polyandrous because a queen typically mates with multiple males, even though mating is the only interaction that they have (the males die off, while the queen uses stored sperm for eggs she fertilizes). Utetheisa ornatrix also demonstrate a polyandrous mating system, where females mate with multiple males. On average, females mate with four to five males over their lifespan of three to four weeks but can mate with and receive up to thirteen spermatophores. This allows for increased paternal investment through the content of the spermatophores given to females.[85]

Polyandry in primates, mammals and other animals is usually correlated with reduced or reverse sexual dimorphism—females larger than males. When males of a species are much larger than females, polygyny is usually practiced. As size difference decreases, or the females are larger than males, a species is more likely to practice monogamy or polyandry. The great apes (gorillas, orangutans, chimpanzees, and bonobos) are dimorphic, the greatest disparity occurring in gorillas. Chimpanzees and bonobos have promiscuous societies in which the female mates with multiple males and vice versa. Should only a few females come into estrous, the males of the group will mate with only a few females, creating a fluid form polyandry. However, in chimpanzees, should the alpha male be powerful enough, he will discourage the other males from soliciting a female in estrous and vice versa, effectively establishing a loosely maintained form of polygyny. Chimpanzees and bonobos exhibit slight sexual dimorphism, the latter being matriarchal despite the females' smaller size. Gorillas practice true polygyny with one much larger male travelling with several females and their children. He alone will mate with his female companions. Though orangutans are solitary, it has been found that several females will build their nests within an adult male's territory and will mate more often with this one male than with others, thus demonstrating a form of polygyny. Male and female gibbons (lesser apes) are similar in size and form monogamous pairs. Human males and females are less dimorphic in body size than the other great apes, and engage in polyandry, promiscuity, polygyny, and monogamy, the latter two being the most common.[86][87] Conversely, birds of prey - which show distinct reverse sexual dimorphism—tend to be monogamous for long periods or mate for life; some species like the Snail kite will choose new mates every year, polygyny is noted in many Harriers and polyandry has been observed in the Harris' Hawk (notable for being the only bird of prey to regularly live and hunt in family and social groups[88]) and the aforementioned Galapagos hawk.[89]

Paternal investment is often high in polyandrous species.

See also[edit]

Types of mating, marriage and lifestyler:

References[edit]

  1. ^ Ethnographic Atlas Codebook derived from George P. Murdock’s Ethnographic Atlas recording the marital composition of 1231 societies from 1960 to 1980
  2. ^ Starkweather, Katherine; Raymond Hames (2012). A Survey of Non-Classical Polyandry 23 (2): 149. 
  3. ^ Starkweather, Katherine; Raymond Hames (2012). A Survey of Non-Classical Polyandry 23 (2): 150. 
  4. ^ (Linda Stone, Kinship and Gender, 2006, Westview, 3rd ed, ch 6) The Center for Research on Tibet Papers on Tibetan Marriage and Polyandry. Accessed: October 1, 2006
  5. ^ Goldstein, Pahari and Tibetan Polyandry Revisited, Ethnology. 17(3): 325–327, 1978, from The Center for Research on Tibet. Accessed: October 1, 2007
  6. ^ Levine, Nancy (1998). The Dynamics of polyandry: kinship, domesticity, and population on the Tibetan border. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 
  7. ^ Levine, Nancy; Joan B. Silk (1997). ""Why Polyandry Fails: Sources of Instability in Polyandrous marriages"". Current Anthropology 38 (3): 376. 
  8. ^ Mustang
  9. ^ Levine, Nancy, The Dynamics of Polyandry: Kinship, domesticity and population on the Tibetan border, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988.[page needed]
  10. ^ Brothers share wife to secure family land
  11. ^ Draupadis bloom in rural Punjab Times of India, Jul 16, 2005.
  12. ^ Goldstein, Melvyn (1987). Natural History. Natural History Magazine. pp. 39–48. 
  13. ^ Levine, Nancy; Joan B. Silk (1997). ""Why Polyandry Fails: Sources of Instability in Polyandrous marriages"". Current Anthropology 38 (3): 375–98. 
  14. ^ Chris Arsenault (24 October 2011). "Millions of aborted girls imbalance India". Al Jazeera. Retrieved 29 October 2011. "While prospects for conflict are unclear, other problems including human trafficking, prostitution and polyandry—men (usually relatives) sharing a wife—are certain to get worse." 
  15. ^ Beckerman, S., Valentine, P., (eds) (2002) The Theory and Practice of Partible Paternity in South America, University Press of Florida
  16. ^ Starkweather, Katie, "A Preliminary Survey of Lesser-Known Polyandrous Societies" (2009).Nebraska Anthropologist.Paper 50. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebanthro/50
  17. ^ a b c Whittington, Dee (December 12, 1976). "Polyandry Practice Fascinates Prince". The Palm Beach Post. Retrieved October 14, 2010. 
  18. ^ Goldman I., 1970, Ancient Polynesian Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press'
  19. ^ Thomas, N. (1987). "Complementarity and History Misrecognizing Gender in the Pacific". Oceania 57 (4): 261–270. JSTOR 40332354. 
  20. ^ The Last of the Maasai. Mohamed Amin, Duncan Willetts, John Eames. 1987. Pp. 86-87. Camerapix Publishers International. ISBN 1-874041-32-6
  21. ^ "On Polyandry". Popular Science (Bonnier Corporation) 39 (52): 804. October 1891. 
  22. ^ Kathrine E. Starkweather (2010). Exploration into Human Polyandry: An Evolutionary Examination of the Non-Classical Cases (Master's thesis). University of Nebraska–Lincoln. Retrieved October 14, 2010. 
  23. ^ Warren R. Dawson (ed.): The Frazer Lectures, 1922-1932. Macmillan & Co, 1932. p. 33.
  24. ^ A. C. Hollis: The Masai. p. 312, fn. 2.
  25. ^ "Kenyan trio in 'wife-sharing' deal". BBC. 26 August 2013. 
  26. ^ Henry Theophilus Finck : Primitive Love and Love-Stories. 1899.
  27. ^ John Ferguson McLennon : Studies in Ancient History. Macmillan & Co., 1886. p. xxv
  28. ^ Henry Sumner Maine : Dissertations on Early Law and Custom. London: John Murray, 1883. Chapter IV, Note B.
  29. ^ Macrobius (translated by Percival V. Davies): The Saturnalia. New York: Columbia University Press, 1969, p. 53 (1:6:22)
  30. ^ Horsfall, N: CIL VI 37965 = CLE 1988 (Epitaph of Allia Potestas): A Commentary, ZPE 61: 1985
  31. ^ J. Bottero, E. Cassin & J. Vercoutter (eds.) (translated by R. F. Tannenbaum): The Near East: the Early Civilizations. New York, 1967. p. 82.
  32. ^ Strabōn : Geographia 16:4:25, C 783. Translated in Robertson Smith: Kinship and Marriage in Early Arabia, p. 158; quoted in Edward Westermarck: The History of Human Marriage. New York: Allerton Books Co., 1922. vol. 3, p. 154.
  33. ^ Strabōn: Geographia, lib. xi, Casaub 526. cited in John Ferguson McLennon: Studies in Ancient History. Macmillan & Co., 1866, p. 99
  34. ^ Hephthalites
  35. ^ René von Nebesky-Wojkowitz (translated by Michael Bullock) :one research done by one organization about Fraternal Polyandry in nepal and its detail data find here http://volunteercharitywork.org/polyandry_research.php Where the Gods are Mountains. New York: Reynal & Co. p. 152.
  36. ^ L. W. Shakespear : History of Upper Assam, Upper Burmah and North-eastern Frontier. London: Macmillan & Co., 1914. p. 92.
  37. ^ Chrame people in southwest Sichuan
  38. ^ Xinjiang
  39. ^ Russian Nihilism and Exile Life in Siberia. San Francisco: A. L. Bancroft & Co., 1883. p. 365.
  40. ^ Hussein, Asiff. "Traditional Sinhalese Marriage Laws and Customs". Retrieved 28 April 2012. 
  41. ^ Lavenda, Robert H.; Schultz, Emily A. "Additional Varieties Polyandry". Anthropology: What Does It Mean To Be Human?. Retrieved 28 April 2012. 
  42. ^ Levine, NE. "Conclusion". Asian and African Systems of Polyandry. Retrieved 28 April 2012. 
  43. ^ Dr. Jacobs: Untrodden Fields of Anthropology. New York: Falstaff Press, 1937. vol. 2, p. 219.
  44. ^ Roslyn Poignant: Oceanic Mythology. Paul Hamlyn, London, 1967, p. 69.
  45. ^ Ratzel, Friedrich. The History of Mankind. (London: MacMillan, 1896). URL: www.inquirewithin.biz/history/american_pacific/oceania/courtship-weddings.htm accessed 11 April 2010.
  46. ^ Katherine E. Starkweather & Raymond Hames. "A Survey of Non-Classical Polyandry". Human Nature An Interdisciplinary Biosocial Perspective ISSN 1045-6767 Volume 23 Number 2 Hum Nat (2012) 23:149-172 DOI 10.1007/s12110-012-9144-x 12 Jun 2012.
  47. ^ Starkweather, Katherine E. and Raymond Hames. "A Survey of Non-Classical Polyandry." 12 June 2012. Retrieved 28 Dec 2013.
  48. ^ Races of Man : an Outline of Anthropology. London: Walter Scott Press, 1901. p. 566.
  49. ^ C. Lévi-Strauss (translated by John Russell): Tristes Tropiques. New York: Criterion Books, 1961, p. 352.
  50. ^ "Multiple Fathers Prevalent in Amazonian Cultures, Study Finds" ScienceDaily (Nov. 11, 2010)
  51. ^ Engaging the powers: discernment and resistance in a world of domination p. 40 by Walter Wink, 1992 ISBN 0-8006-2646-X
  52. ^ V., Jayaram. "Extramarital relationships". Hindu Website.
  53. ^ Altekar, Anant Sadashiv (1959). The position of women in Hindu civilization, from prehistoric times to the present day. Motilal Banarsidass Publ. p. 112. ISBN 978-81-208-0324-4. Retrieved October 14, 2010. 
  54. ^ http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m01/m01199.htm
  55. ^ Coogan, Michael D., A Brief Introduction to the Old Testament: The Hebrew Bible in Its Context, Oxford University Press, 2008, p. 264, [1]
  56. ^ Bromiley, Geoffrey W., The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia, Volume 1, Wm. B. Eerdmans, 1980, p. 262, [2]
  57. ^ Fuchs, Esther, Sexual Politics in the Biblical Narrative: Reading the Hebrew Bible as a Woman, Continuum International, 2000, p. 122, [3]
  58. ^ Satlow, Michael L., Jewish Marriage in Antiquity, Princeton University Press, 2001, p. 189, [4]
  59. ^ Witte, John & Ellison, Eliza; Covenant Marriage In Comparative Perspective, Wm. B. Eerdmans, 2005, p. 56, [5]
  60. ^ Marriage, Sex And Family in Judaism, Rowman & Littlefield, 2005, p. 90, [6]
  61. ^ Murray, John (1991). Principles of Conduct: Aspects of Biblical Ethics. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing. pp. 250–256. ISBN 978-0-8028-1144-8. Retrieved October 14, 2010. 
  62. ^ For example, Quran Surah Nisa’ Chapter 4, verses 22-24, gives the list of women whom a man cannot marry.
  63. ^ Ahmed, Mufti M. Mukarram (2005). Encyclopaedia of Islam. Anmol Publications PVT. LTD. p. 383. ISBN 978-81-261-2339-1. Retrieved October 14, 2010. 
  64. ^ Evolutionary anthropology of the human family; In C. A. Salmon and T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Evolutionary Family Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
  65. ^ Karim Vahed1, Darren J. Parker, James D. J. Gilbert. "Larger testes are associated with a higher level of polyandry, but a smaller ejaculate volume, across bushcricket species (Tettigoniidae)". Biology Letters. November 10, 2010.
  66. ^ Harcourt, A.H., Harvey, P.H., Larson, S.G., & Short, R.V. 1981. Testis weight, body weight and breeding system in primates, Nature 293: 55-57
  67. ^ Shackelford, T. K.; Goetz, A. T. (2007). "Adaptation to Sperm Competition in Humans". Current Directions in Psychological Science 16: 47. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00473.x. 
  68. ^ a b Johnston, E., Rand, M., and Zweifel, S. 2006. Detection of multiple paternity and sperm storage in a captive colony of the central Asian tortoise, Testudo horsfieldii. Canadian Journal of Zoology 84:520-526.
  69. ^ a b c Davy C., Edwards T., Lathrop A., Bratton M., Hagan M., Henen B., Nagy K., Stone J., Hillard L., and Murphy R. 2011. Polyandry and multiple paternities in the threatened Agassiz’s desert tortoise, Gopherus agassizii. Conservation Genetics 12:1313-1322.
  70. ^ Moon J., McCoy E., Mushinsky H., and Karl S. 2006. Multiple paternity and breeding system in the gopher tortoise, Gopherus polyphemus. The Journal of Heredity 97:150–157.
  71. ^ Jarvis, Jennifer (May 1981). "Eusociality in a Mammal: Cooperative Breeding in Naked Mole-Rat Colonies". Science 212 (4494): 571–573. JSTOR 1686202. 
  72. ^ Burda, H. Honeycutt, R. L, Begall, S., Locker-Grutjen, O & Scharff A. (2000) Are naked and common mole-rats eusocial and if so, why? Behavioral ecology and sociobiology 47(5) 293-303 Abstract
  73. ^ Bray, TC; Bloomer, P; O'Riain, MJ; Bennett, NC (2012). "'How Attractive Is the Girl Next Door? An Assessment of Spatial Mate Acquisition and Paternity in the Solitary Cape Dune Mole-Rat, Bathyergus suillus". PLoS ONE 7 (6): e39866. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0039866. 
  74. ^ Coren, Stanley. "Why Are Some Litter Pups Uniform in Appearance While Others Are Mismatched?". Psychology Today. August 29, 2011.
  75. ^ "Prolific Cats: The Estrous Cycle". Veterinary Learning Systems. Retrieved 19 June 2009. 
  76. ^ Wenk RE, Houtz T, Brooks M, Chiafari FA. (1992). "How frequent is heteropaternal superfecundation?". Acta geneticae medicae et gemollologiae 41 (1): 43–7. PMID 1488855. 
  77. ^ Gordon, G. Gallup Jr.; Burch, Rebecca L.; Zappieri, Mary L.; Parvez, Rizwan A.; Stockwell, Malinda L.; Davis, Jennifer A. (2003). "The human penis as a semen displacement device" (PDF). Evolution and Human Behavior 24: 277–289. 
  78. ^ T Lodé La guerre des sexes chez les animaux, Paris: Eds O. Jacob, 2006, ISBN 2-7381-1901-8 (French)
  79. ^ Klemme, Ines; Ylönen, Hannu. "Polyandry enhances offspring survival in an infanticidal species". August 12, 2009. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0500 Biology Letters 23 February 2010 vol. 6 no. 1 24-26
  80. ^ "Blue Whale". Discovery Channel Blue Ocean.
  81. ^ "Milk". Modern Marvels. Season 14. 2008-01-07. The History Channel. http://www.history.com/minisites/modernmarvels.
  82. ^ Terborgh, John; Goldizen, Ann Wilson (1985). "On the mating system of the cooperatively breeding saddle-backed tamarin (Saguinus fuscicollis)". Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 16 (4): 293. doi:10.1007/BF00295541. 
  83. ^ Goldizen, Anne Wilson (1987). "Facultative polyandry and the role of infant-carrying in wild saddle-back tamarins (Saguinus fuscicollis)". Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 20 (2): 99. doi:10.1007/BF00572631. 
  84. ^ Jenni, Donald A.; Gerald Collier (1972). "Polyandry in the American Jaçana (Jacana spinosa)". The Auk 89 (4): 743–765. 
  85. ^ Bezzerides, Alexander, and Thomas Eisener. "Apportionment of Nuptial Alkaloidal Gifts by a Multiply-mated Female Moth (Utetheisa Ornatrix): Eggs Individually Receive Alkaloid from More than One Male Source." Chemoecology 12.4 (2002): 213-18. Print.
  86. ^ de Waal, Frans (1998). Chimpanzee Politics: Power and Sex among Apes. John Hopkins University Press, USA.
  87. ^ Goodall, Jane. (1993). The Chimpanzees of Gombe: Patterns of Behavior. Harvard University Press, USA.
  88. ^ Cook, William E. (1997). Avian Desert Predators. ISBN 3-540-59262-8. 
  89. ^ "Birds of prey - reproduction". webcitation.org: SeaWorld. Archived from the original on 11 April 2011. Retrieved 11 April 2011. 

Further reading[edit]