Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia - View original article

Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984

Chapter1984 c 60
Dates
Commencementin force
Other legislation
Related legislationSerious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005, Police (Detention and Bail) Act 2011
Status: Current legislation
Text of statute as originally enacted
Official text of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 as in force today (including any amendments) within the United Kingdom, from the UK Statute Law Database
 
Jump to: navigation, search
Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984

Chapter1984 c 60
Dates
Commencementin force
Other legislation
Related legislationSerious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005, Police (Detention and Bail) Act 2011
Status: Current legislation
Text of statute as originally enacted
Official text of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 as in force today (including any amendments) within the United Kingdom, from the UK Statute Law Database

The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE) (1984 c. 60) is an Act of Parliament which instituted a legislative framework for the powers of police officers in England and Wales to combat crime, as well as providing codes of practice for the exercise of those powers.[1] Part VI [2] of PACE required the Home Secretary to issue Codes of Practice governing police powers. The aim of PACE has always been to establish a balance between the powers of the police in England and Wales and the rights of members of the public[citation needed]. Equivalent provision is made for Northern Ireland by the Police and Criminal Evidence (Northern Ireland) Order 1989 (SI 1989/1341). The equivalent in Scots Law is the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995. Although PACE is a fairly wide ranging piece of legislation, it mainly deals with police powers to search an individual or premises, including their powers to gain entry to those premises, the handling of exhibits seized from those searches, and the treatment of suspects once they are in custody, including being interviewed. Specific legislation as to more wide ranging conduct of a criminal investigation is contained within the Criminal Procedures and Investigation Act 1996.

Criminal liability may arise if the specific terms of the Act itself are not conformed to, whereas failure to conform to the codes of practice while searching, arresting, detaining or interviewing a suspect may lead to evidence obtained during the process becoming inadmissible in court.

PACE was significantly modified by the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005. This replaced nearly all existing powers of arrest, including the category of arrestable offences, with a new general power of arrest for all offences.[3]

PACE is applicable not only to police officers but to anyone with conduct of a criminal investigation including, but not limited to, Revenue and Customs [4] and to military investigations.[5] Any person with a duty of investigating criminal offences or charging offenders is also required to follow the provisions of the PACE codes of practice as far as practical and relevant.[6]

Despite its safeguards, PACE was extremely controversial on its introduction[citation needed], and reviews have also been controversial,[7] as the Act was thought to give considerable extra powers to the police.

Background[edit]

The 1981 Brixton riots, and the subsequent Scarman report were key factors in the passage of the Act.[citation needed]

PACE Codes of Practice[edit]

The Home Office and the Cabinet Office announced a joint review of PACE and its codes of practice in May 2002, and on 31 July 2004, new PACE Codes of Practice came into effect. Following a further review in 2010, PACE Codes A, B and D were re-issued to take effect on 7 March 2011.

On 1 January 2006 an additional code came into force:

On 24 July 2006 a further code came into force:

Case law[edit]

Since the passage of PACE, the courts have recognised the greater safeguards of civil liberties granted by the act.

In Osman v Southwark Crown Court (1999),[10] the search of Osman was held to be unlawful because the officers searching him did not give their names and station, contrary to PACE's requirements.[11]

In O'Loughlin v Chief Constable of Essex (1997), the courts held that the entry of a premises under section 17 PACE to arrest O'Loughlin's wife for criminal damage was unlawful because under PACE, anyone present on the premises must be given the reason for entry.[12][13]

However, not all cases have gone against the police; in R v Longman (1988), it was held that the police entry of a premises to execute a search warrant for drugs was lawful, although deception had been utilised to gain entry, and upon entering, the police had not identified themselves or shown the warrant.[14]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Police and Criminal Evidence Act (PACE) Codes of Practice
  2. ^ Part VI of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984
  3. ^ Spencer, J.R. (2007). "Arrest for Questioning". Cambridge Law Journal 66 (2): 282–284. doi:10.1017/S0008197307000505. 
  4. ^ Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, section 114
  5. ^ Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, section 113
  6. ^ Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, section 67(9). These include officers of the Serious Fraud Office (R v Director of the Serious Fraud Office, ex p. Saunders [1988] Crim LR 837), trading standards officers (Dudley MBC v Debenhams (1994) 159 JP 18), commercial investigators when interviewing an employee (Twaites and Brown (1990) 92 Cr App R 106), store detectives (Bayliss (1993) 98 Cr App R 235), Federation Against Copyright Theft investigators (Joy v Federation Against Copyright Theft [1993] Crim LR 588) and council officers[citation needed]. However such a duty is not owed by DTI inspectors appointed under sections 432 and 442 of the Companies Act 1985 (Seelig and Spens [1992] 1 WLR 148), nor by prison officers (Martin Taylor [2000] EWCA Crim 2922).
  7. ^ Press Gazette: PACE review is 'wake-up' call
  8. ^ Stop and Search under Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984
  9. ^ Home Office Circular 032 / 2008 - Stop And Account: Amendment To Pace Code A, Home Office, 19 December 2008.
  10. ^ Osman v Southwark Crown Court
  11. ^ Martin, Jacqueline (2005). The English Legal System (4th ed.), p. 129. London: Hodder Arnold. ISBN 0-340-89991-3.
  12. ^ O'Loughlin v Chief Constable of Essex [1997] EWCA Civ 2891
  13. ^ Martin, p133.
  14. ^ Martin, p. 132.

External links[edit]