From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia - View original article

Classical mechanics |
---|

Core topics |

For a more accessible and less technical introduction to this topic, see Introduction to pendulum (mathematics).

The mathematics of pendulums are in general quite complicated. Simplifying assumptions can be made, which in the case of a simple pendulum allows the equations of motion to be solved analytically for small-angle oscillations.

A so-called "simple pendulum" is an idealization of a "real pendulum" but in an isolated system using the following assumptions:

- The rod or cord on which the bob swings is massless, inextensible and always remains taut;
- The bob is a point mass;
- Motion occurs only in two dimensions, i.e. the bob does not trace an ellipse but an arc.
- The motion does not lose energy to friction or air resistance.

The differential equation which represents the motion of a simple pendulum is

**(Eq. 1)**

where is acceleration due to gravity, is the length of the pendulum, and is the angular displacement.

Please take the time to consider Figure 1 on the right, showing the forces acting on a simple pendulum. Note that the path of the pendulum sweeps out an arc of a circle. The angle is measured in radians, and this is crucial for this formula. The blue arrow is the gravitational force acting on the bob, and the violet arrows are that same force resolved into components parallel and perpendicular to the bob's instantaneous motion. The direction of the bob's instantaneous velocity always points along the red axis, which is considered the tangential axis because its direction is always tangent to the circle. Consider Newton's second law, where where - is the acceleration due to gravity near the surface of the earth. The negative sign on the right hand side implies that and always point in opposite directions. This makes sense because when a pendulum swings further to the left, we would expect it to accelerate back toward the right.
This linear acceleration along the red axis can be related to the change in angle by the arc length formulas; is arc length: thus: |

Equation (1) can be obtained using two definitions for torque. First start by defining the torque on the pendulum bob using the force due to gravity. where is the length vector of the pendulum and is the force due to gravity. For now just consider the magnitude of the torque on the pendulum. where is the mass of the pendulum, is the acceleration due to gravity, is the length of the pendulum and is the angle between the length vector and the force due to gravity. Next rewrite the angular momentum. - .
Again just consider the magnitude of the angular momentum. - .
and its time derivative - ,
According to , we can get by comparing the magnitudes - ,
thus: which is the same result as obtained through force analysis. |

It can also be obtained via the conservation of mechanical energy principle: any object falling a vertical distance would acquire kinetic energy equal to that which it lost to the fall. In other words, gravitational potential energy is converted into kinetic energy. Change in potential energy is given by change in kinetic energy (body started from rest) is given by Since no energy is lost, those two must be equal Using the arc length formula above, this equation can be rewritten in favor of is the vertical distance the pendulum fell. Look at Figure 2, which presents the trigonometry of a simple pendulum. If the pendulum starts its swing from some initial angle , then , the vertical distance from the screw, is given by similarly, for , we have then is the difference of the two in terms of gives **(Eq. 2)**
This equation is known as the which is the same result as obtained through force analysis. |

The differential equation given above is not easily solved, and there is no solution that can be written in terms of elementary functions. However adding a restriction to the size of the oscillation's amplitude gives a form whose solution can be easily obtained. If it is assumed that the angle is much less than 1 radian, or

- ,

then substituting for sin θ into **Eq. 1** using the small-angle approximation,

- ,

yields the equation for a harmonic oscillator,

The error due to the approximation is of order *θ*^{ 3} (from the Maclaurin series for sin *θ*).

Given the initial conditions *θ*(0) = *θ*_{0} and *dθ*/*dt*(0) = 0, the solution becomes,

The motion is simple harmonic motion where *θ*_{0} is the semi-amplitude of the oscillation (that is, the maximum angle between the rod of the pendulum and the vertical). The period of the motion, the time for a complete oscillation (outward and return) is

which is known as Christiaan Huygens's law for the period. Note that under the small-angle approximation, the period is independent of the amplitude *θ*_{0}; this is the property of isochronism that Galileo discovered.

- can be expressed as

If SI units are used (i.e. measure in metres and seconds), and assuming the measurement is taking place on the Earth's surface, then m/s^{2}, and (0.994 is the approximation to 3 decimal places).

Therefore a relatively reasonable approximation for the length and period are,

For amplitudes beyond the small angle approximation, one can compute the exact period by first inverting the equation for the angular velocity obtained from the energy method (**Eq. 2**),

and then integrating over one complete cycle,

or twice the half-cycle

or 4 times the quarter-cycle

which leads to

Note that this integral diverges as approaches the vertical

- ,

so that a pendulum with just the right energy to go vertical will never actually get there. (Conversely, a pendulum close to its maximum can take an arbitrarily long time to fall down.)

This integral can be re-written in terms of elliptic integrals as

where is the incomplete elliptic integral of the first kind defined by

Or more concisely by the substitution expressing in terms of ,

**(Eq. 3)**

where is the complete elliptic integral of the first kind defined by

For comparison of the approximation to the full solution, consider the period of a pendulum of length 1 m on Earth (*g* = 9.80665 m/s^{2}) at initial angle 10 degrees is . The linear approximation gives . The difference between the two values, less than 0.2%, is much less than that caused by the variation of g with geographical location.

From here there are many ways to proceed to calculate the elliptic integral:

Given **Eq. 3** and the Legendre polynomial solution for the elliptic integral:

where *n*!! denotes the double factorial, an exact solution to the period of a pendulum is:

Figure 4 shows the relative errors using the power series. *T*_{0} is the linear approximation, and *T*_{2} to *T*_{10} include respectively the terms up to the 2nd to the 10th powers.

Another formulation of the above solution can be found if the following Maclaurin series:

is used in the Legendre polynomial solution above. The resulting power series is:^{[1]}

Given **Eq. 3** and the Arithmetic-geometric mean solution of the elliptic integral:

where is the arithmetic-geometric mean of and .

This yields an alternative and faster-converging formula for the period:^{[2]}^{[3]}

The animations below depict several different modes of oscillation given different initial conditions. The small graph above the pendulums are their phase portraits.

A **compound pendulum** (or **physical pendulum**) is one where the rod is not massless, and may have extended size; that is, an arbitrarily shaped rigid body swinging by a pivot. In this case the pendulum's period depends on its moment of inertia *I* around the pivot point.

The equation of torque gives:

where:

- is the angular acceleration.
- is the torque

The torque is generated by gravity so:

where:

*L*is the distance from the pivot to the center of mass of the pendulum*θ*is the angle from the vertical

Hence, under the small-angle approximation ,

This is of the same form as the conventional simple pendulum and this gives a period of:

^{[4]}

And a frequency of:

The Jacobian elliptic function that expresses the position of a pendulum as a function of time is a doubly periodic function with a real period and an imaginary period. The real period is of course the time it takes the pendulum to go through one full cycle. Paul Appell pointed out a physical interpretation of the imaginary period:^{[5]} if *θ*_{0} is the maximum angle of one pendulum and 180° − *θ*_{0} is the maximum angle of another, then the real period of each is the magnitude of the imaginary period of the other. This interpretation, involving dual forces in opposite directions, might be further clarified and generalized to other classical problems in mechanics with dual solutions.^{[6]}

- Blackburn pendulum
- Conical pendulum
- Double pendulum
- Inverted pendulum
- Kapitza's pendulum
- Spring pendulum
- Mathieu function
- Pendulum equations (software)

**^**Nelson, Robert; M. G. Olsson (February 1986). "The pendulum — Rich physics from a simple system".*American Journal of Physics***54**(2): pp. 112–121. doi:10.1119/1.14703. Retrieved 2012-04-30.**^**Carvalhaes, Claudio G.; Suppes, Patrick (December 2008), "Approximations for the period of the simple pendulum based on the arithmetic-geometric mean",*Am. J. Phys.***76**(12͒): 1150–1154, doi:10.1119/1.2968864͔, ISSN 0002-9505, retrieved 2013-12-14**^**Adlaj, Semjon (September 2012), "An eloquent formula for the perimeter of an ellipse",*Notices of the AMS***76**(8): 1094・099, ISSN 1088-9477**^**Physical Pendulum**^**Paul Appell, "Sur une interprétation des valeurs imaginaires du temps en Mécanique",*Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Scéances de l'Académie des Sciences*, volume 87, number 1, July, 1878**^**Adlaj, S.*Mechanical interpretation of negative and imaginary tension of a tether in a linear parallel force field*, Selected papers of the International Scientific Conference on Mechanics "SIXTH POLYAKHOV READINGS", January 31 - February 3, 2012, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, pp. 13-18.

- Baker, Gregory L.; Blackburn, James A. (2005).
*The Pendulum: A Physics Case Study*. Oxford University Press. - Ochs, Karlheinz (2011). "A comprehensive analytical solution of the nonlinear pendulum".
*European Journal of Physics***32**(2): 479–490. doi:10.1088/0143-0807/32/2/019. - Sala, Kenneth L. (1989). "Transformations of the Jacobian Amplitude Function and its Calculation via the Arithmetic-Geometric Mean".
*SIAM J. Math. Anal.***20**(6): 1514–1528. doi:10.1137/0520100.