From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia  View original article
Omar Khayyám عمر خیام  

Omar Khayyam bust in Nishapur, Iran  
Born  18 May^{[1]} 1048^{[2]} Nishapur, Khorasan 
Died  4 December^{[1]} 1131 (aged 82/83)^{[2]} Khorasan 
School  Persian mathematics, Persian poetry, Persian philosophy 
Main interests  sufism,Mathematics, Philosophy, Astronomy, Poetry 
Influences  
Influenced 
Omar Khayyám عمر خیام  

Omar Khayyam bust in Nishapur, Iran  
Born  18 May^{[1]} 1048^{[2]} Nishapur, Khorasan 
Died  4 December^{[1]} 1131 (aged 82/83)^{[2]} Khorasan 
School  Persian mathematics, Persian poetry, Persian philosophy 
Main interests  sufism,Mathematics, Philosophy, Astronomy, Poetry 
Influences  
Influenced 
Ghiyāth adDīn Abu'lFatḥ ʿUmar ibn Ibrāhīm alKhayyām Nīshāpūrī (/ˈoʊmɑr kaɪˈjɑːm, ˈjæm, ˈoʊmər/; Persian: غیاث الدین ابوالفتح عمر ابراهیم خیام نیشابورﻯ, pronounced [xæjˈjɒːm]; 18 May 1048 – 4 December 1131), commonly known as Omar Khayyám, was a sufi mystic,Persian polymath, philosopher, mathematician, astronomer and poet. He also wrote treatises on mechanics, geography, mineralogy, music, and Islamic theology.^{[3]}
Born in Nishapur in North Eastern Iran, at a young age he moved to Samarkand and obtained his education there. Afterwards he moved to Bukhara and became established as one of the major mathematicians and astronomers of the medieval period. He is the author of one of the most important treatises on algebra written before modern times, the Treatise on Demonstration of Problems of Algebra, which includes a geometric method for solving cubic equations by intersecting a hyperbola with a circle.^{[4]} He contributed to a calendar reform.
His significance as a philosopher and teacher, and his few remaining philosophical works, have not received the same attention as his scientific and poetic writings. AlZamakhshari referred to him as “the philosopher of the world”. Many sources have testified that he taught for decades the philosophy of Avicenna in Nishapur where Khayyám was born and buried and where his mausoleum today remains a masterpiece of Iranian architecture visited by many people every year.^{[5]}
Outside Iran and Persian speaking countries, Khayyám has had an impact on literature and societies through the translation of his works and popularization by other scholars. The greatest such impact was in Englishspeaking countries; the English scholar Thomas Hyde (1636–1703) was the first nonPersian to study him. The most influential of all was Edward FitzGerald (1809–83),^{[6]} who made Khayyám the most famous poet of the East in the West through his celebrated translation and adaptations of Khayyám's rather small number of quatrains (Persian: رباعیات rubāʿiyāt) in the Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam.
Omar Khayyám died in 1131 and is buried in the Khayyam Garden at the mausoleum of Imamzadeh Mahruq in Nishapur. In 1963, the mausoleum of Omar Khayyam was constructed on the site by Hooshang Seyhoun.
غیاث الدین Ghiyāth adDin  means "the Shoulder of the Faith" and implies the knowledge of the Quran.
ابوالفتح عمر بن ابراهیم Abu Fat'h 'Umar Ibrahim  Abu means father, Fat'h means conqueror, 'Umar means life, Ibrahim is the paternal name.
خیام Khayyām  means "tent maker" it is a byname derived from the father's craft.
نیشابورﻯ Nīshāpūrī  is the link to his hometown of Nishapur.
Ghiyāth adDin Abu'lFat'h 'Umar ibn Ibrāhīm alKhayyām Nīshāpūrī (Persian: غیاث الدین ابو الفتح عمر ابراهیم خیام نیشاپوری) was born in Nishapur, in Iran, then a Seljuq capital in Khorasan,^{[7]}^{[8]}^{[9]} which rivaled Cairo or Baghdad in cultural prominence in that era. He is thought to have been born into a family of tentmakers (khayyāmī "tentmaker"), which he would make into a play on words later in life:
Khayyám, who stitched the tents of science,
Has fallen in grief's furnace and been suddenly burned,
The shears of Fate have cut the tent ropes of his life,
And the broker of Hope has sold him for nothing!— Omar Khayyám^{[4]}
He spent part of his childhood in the town of Balkh (in presentday northern Afghanistan), studying under the wellknown scholar Sheikh Muhammad Mansuri. He later studied under Imam Mowaffaq Nishapuri, who was considered one of the greatest teachers of the Khorasan region. Throughout his life, Omar Khayyám was tireless in his efforts; by day he would teach algebra and geometry, in the evening he would attend the Seljuq court as an adviser of MalikShah I,^{[10]} and at night he would study astronomy and complete important aspects of the Jalali calendar.
Omar Khayyám's years in Isfahan were very productive ones, but after the death of the Seljuq Sultan MalikShah I (presumably by the Assassins sect), the Sultan's widow turned against him as an adviser, and as a result, he soon set out on his Hajj or pilgrimage to Mecca and Medina. He was then allowed to work as a court astrologer, and was permitted to return to Nishapur, where he was renowned for his works, and continued to teach mathematics, astronomy and even medicine.^{[1]}
Khayyám Sikander was famous during his times as a mathematician. He wrote the influential Treatise on Demonstration of Problems of Algebra (1070), which laid down the principles of algebra, part of the body of Persian Mathematics that was eventually transmitted to Europe. In particular, he derived general methods for solving cubic equations and even some higher orders.
In the Treatise, he wrote on the triangular array of binomial coefficients known as Pascal's triangle. In 1077, Khayyám wrote Sharh ma ashkala min musadarat kitab Uqlidis (Explanations of the Difficulties in the Postulates of Euclid) published in English as "On the Difficulties of Euclid's Definitions".^{[11]} An important part of the book is concerned with Euclid's famous parallel postulate, which attracted the interest of Thabit ibn Qurra. AlHaytham had previously attempted a demonstration of the postulate; Khayyám's attempt was a distinct advance, and his criticisms made their way to Europe, and may have contributed to the eventual development of nonEuclidean geometry.
Omar Khayyám created important works on geometry, specifically on the theory of proportions. His notable contemporary mathematicians included AlKhazini and Abu Hatim alMuzaffar ibn Ismail alIsfizari^{[12]}
Khayyám wrote a book entitled Explanations of the difficulties in the postulates in Euclid's Elements. The book consists of several sections on the parallel postulate (Book I), on the Euclidean definition of ratios and the Anthyphairetic ratio (modern continued fractions) (Book II), and on the multiplication of ratios (Book III).
The first section is a treatise containing some propositions and lemmas concerning the parallel postulate. It has reached the Western world from a reproduction in a manuscript written in 138788 AD by the Persian mathematician Tusi. Tusi mentions explicitly that he rewrites the treatise "in Khayyám's own words" and quotes Khayyám, saying that "they are worth adding to Euclid's Elements (first book) after Proposition 28."^{[13]} This proposition^{[14]} states a condition enough for having two lines in plane parallel to one another. After this proposition follows another, numbered 29, which is converse to the previous one.^{[15]} The proof of Euclid uses the socalled parallel postulate (numbered 5). Objection to the use of parallel postulate and alternative view of proposition 29 have been a major problem in foundation of what is now called nonEuclidean geometry.
The treatise of Khayyám can be considered as the first treatment of parallels axiom which is not based on petitio principii but on a more intuitive postulate. Khayyám refutes the previous attempts by other Greek and Persian mathematicians to prove the proposition. And he, as Aristotle, refuses the use of motion in geometry and therefore dismisses the different attempt by Ibn Haytham too.^{[16]} In a sense he made the first attempt at formulating a nonEuclidean postulate as an alternative to the parallel postulate,^{[17]}
This philosophical view of mathematics (see below) has had a significant impact on Khayyám's celebrated approach and method in geometric algebra and in particular in solving cubic equations. In that his solution is not a direct path to a numerical solution and in fact his solutions are not numbers but rather line segments. In this regard Khayyám's work can be considered the first systematic study and the first exact method of solving cubic equations.^{[19]}
In an untitled writing on cubic equations by Khayyám discovered in the 20th century,^{[18]} where the above quote appears, Khayyám works on problems of geometric algebra. First is the problem of "finding a point on a quadrant of a circle such that when a normal is dropped from the point to one of the bounding radii, the ratio of the normal's length to that of the radius equals the ratio of the segments determined by the foot of the normal." Again in solving this problem, he reduces it to another geometric problem: "find a right triangle having the property that the hypotenuse equals the sum of one leg (i.e. side) plus the altitude on the hypotenuse ".^{[20]} To solve this geometric problem, he specializes a parameter and reaches the cubic equation x^{3} + 200x = 20x^{2} + 2000.^{[18]} Indeed, he finds a positive root for this equation by intersecting a hyperbola with a circle.
This particular geometric solution of cubic equations has been further investigated and extended to degree four equations.^{[21]}
Regarding more general equations he states that the solution of cubic equations requires the use of conic sections and that it cannot be solved by ruler and compass methods.^{[18]} A proof of this impossibility was only plausible 750 years after Khayyám died. In this paper Khayyám mentions his will to prepare a paper giving full solution to cubic equations: "If the opportunity arises and I can succeed, I shall give all these fourteen forms with all their branches and cases, and how to distinguish whatever is possible or impossible so that a paper, containing elements which are greatly useful in this art, will be prepared."^{[18]}
This refers to the book Treatise on Demonstrations of Problems of Algebra (1070), which laid down the principles of algebra, part of the body of Persian Mathematics that was eventually transmitted to Europe.^{[19]} In particular, he derived general methods for solving cubic equations and even some higher orders.
From the Indians one has methods for obtaining square and cube roots, methods which are based on knowledge of individual cases, namely the knowledge of the squares of the nine digits 1^{2}, 2^{2}, 3^{2} (etc.) and their respective products, i.e. 2 × 3 etc. We have written a treatise on the proof of the validity of those methods and that they satisfy the conditions. In addition we have increased their types, namely in the form of the determination of the fourth, fifth, sixth roots up to any desired degree. No one preceded us in this and those proofs are purely arithmetic, founded on the arithmetic of The Elements.
This particular remark of Khayyám and certain propositions found in his Algebra book have made some historians of mathematics believe that Khayyám had indeed a binomial theorem up to any power. The case of power 2 is explicitly stated in Euclid's elements and the case of at most power 3 had been established by Indian mathematicians. Khayyám was the mathematician who noticed the importance of a general binomial theorem. The argument supporting the claim that Khayyám had a general binomial theorem is based on his ability to extract roots.^{[23]}
The Saccheri quadrilateral was first considered by Khayyám in the late 11th century in Book I of Explanations of the Difficulties in the Postulates of Euclid.^{[24]} Unlike many commentators on Euclid before and after him (including of course Saccheri), Khayyám was not trying to prove the parallel postulate as such but to derive it from an equivalent postulate he formulated from "the principles of the Philosopher" (Aristotle):
Khayyám then considered the three cases (right, obtuse, and acute) that the summit angles of a Saccheri quadrilateral can take and after proving a number of theorems about them, he (correctly) refuted the obtuse and acute cases based on his postulate and hence derived the classic postulate of Euclid.
It wasn't until 600 years later that Giordano Vitale made an advance on Khayyám in his book Euclide restituo (1680, 1686), when he used the quadrilateral to prove that if three points are equidistant on the base AB and the summit CD, then AB and CD are everywhere equidistant. Saccheri himself based the whole of his long, heroic, and ultimately flawed proof of the parallel postulate around the quadrilateral and its three cases, proving many theorems about its properties along the way.
Like most Persian mathematicians of the period, Khayyám was also an astronomer and achieved fame in that role. In 1073, the Seljuq Sultan Jalal alDin MalikShah Saljuqi (MalikShah I, 1072–92), invited Khayyám to build an observatory, along with various other distinguished scientists. According to some accounts, the version of the medieval Iranian calendar in which 2,820 solar years together contain 1,029,983 days (or 683 leap years, for an average year length of 365.24219858156 days) was based on the measurements of Khayyám and his colleagues.^{[30]} Another proposal is that Khayyám's calendar simply contained eight leap years every thirtythree years (for a year length of 365.2424 days).^{[31]} In either case, his calendar was more accurate to the mean tropical year than the Gregorian calendar of 500 years later. The modern Iranian calendar is based on his calculations.
It is sometimes claimed that Khayyam demonstrated that the earth rotates on its axis^{[32]} by presenting a model of the stars to his contemporary alGhazali in a planetarium.^{[33]}
The other source for the claim that Khayyam believed in heliocentrism is Edward Fitzgerald's popular but anachronistic rendering^{[34]} of Khayyam's poetry, in which the first lines are mistranslated with a heliocentric image of the Sun flinging "the Stone that puts the Stars to Flight".^{[35]}
Khayyám was a member of a panel that reformed the Iranian calendar. The panel was convened by Seljuk Sultan Malik Shah I, and completed its reforms in 1079, resulting in the Jalali calendar.^{[36]}^{[37]}
The Jalali calendar remained in force across Greater Iran from the 11th to the 20th centuries. It is the basis of the Iranian calendar which is followed today in Iran and Afghanistan. While the Jalali calendar is more accurate than the Gregorian, it is based on actual solar transit, similar to Hindu calendars, and requires an ephemeris for calculating dates. The lengths of the months can vary between 29 and 31 days depending on the moment when the sun crosses into a new zodiacal area (an attribute common to most Hindu calendars). This meant that seasonal errors were lower than in the Gregorian calendar.
The modernday Iranian calendar standardizes the month lengths based on a reform from 1925, thus minimizing the effect of solar transits. Seasonal errors are somewhat higher than in the Jalali version, but leap years are calculated as before.
He is believed to have written about a thousand fourline verses or rubaiyat. In the Englishspeaking world, he was introduced through the Rubáiyát of Omar Khayyám which are poetic, rather than literal, translations by Edward FitzGerald (1809–1883). Other English translations of parts of the rubáiyát (rubáiyát meaning "quatrains") exist, but FitzGerald's are the most well known.
Ironically, FitzGerald's translations reintroduced Khayyám to Iranians "who had long ignored the Neishapouri poet." A 1934 book by one of Iran's most prominent writers, Sadeq Hedayat, Songs of Khayyam, (Taranehhaye Khayyam) is said to have "shaped the way a generation of Iranians viewed" the poet.^{[38]}
Omar Khayyám's poems have been translated to many languages.^{[39]} Many translations were made directly from Persian, more literal than the translation by Edward Fitzgerald.^{[39]} The following samples are from FitzGerald's translation.
The Moving Finger writes; and, having writ,
Moves on: nor all thy Piety nor Wit,
Shall lure it back to cancel half a Line,
Nor all thy Tears wash out a Word of it.But helpless pieces in the game He plays,
Upon this chequerboard of Nights and Days,
He hither and thither moves, and checks… and slays,
Then one by one, back in the Closet lays.And, as the Cock crew, those who stood before
The Tavern shouted— “Open then the Door!
You know how little time we have to stay,
And once departed, may return no more.”A Book of Verses underneath the Bough,
A Jug of Wine, a Loaf of Bread—and Thou,
Beside me singing in the Wilderness,
And oh, Wilderness is Paradise enow.Myself when young did eagerly frequent
Doctor and Saint, and heard great Argument
About it and about: but evermore
Came out of the same Door as in I went.With them the Seed of Wisdom did I sow,
And with my own hand labour’d it to grow:
And this was all the Harvest that I reap’d—
“I came like Water, and like Wind I go.”Into this Universe, and why not knowing,
Nor whence, like Water willynilly flowing:
And out of it, as Wind along the Waste,
I know not whither, willynilly blowing.And that inverted Bowl we call The Sky,
Whereunder crawling coop’t we live and die,
Lift not thy hands to It for help—for It
Rolls impotently on as Thou or I.
The neutrality of this section is disputed. (April 2013) 
There have been widely divergent views on Khayyám. According to Seyyed Hossein Nasr, no other Iranian writer/scholar is viewed in such extremely differing ways. At one end of the spectrum, there are nightclubs named after Khayyám, and he is seen as an agnostic hedonist.^{[40]} On the other end of the spectrum, he is seen as a mystical Sufi poet influenced by platonic traditions.
Seyyed Hossein Nasr, after examining the philosophical works of Khayyám, maintains that it is really reductive to just look at the poems (which are sometimes doubtful) to establish his personal views about God or religion; in fact, he even wrote a treatise entitled "alKhutbat algharrå˘" (The Splendid Sermon) on the praise of God, where he holds orthodox views, agreeing with Avicenna on Divine Unity.^{[5]} In fact, this treatise is not an exception, and S.H. Nasr gives an example where he identified himself as a Sufi, after criticizing different methods of knowing God, preferring the intuition over the rational (opting for the socalled "kashf", or unveiling, method):^{[5]}
"... Fourth, the Sufis, who do not seek knowledge by ratiocination or discursive thinking, but by purgation of their inner being and the purifying of their dispositions. They cleanse the rational soul of the impurities of nature and bodily form, until it becomes pure substance. When it then comes face to face with the spiritual world, the forms of that world become truly reflected in it, without any doubt or ambiguity. This is the best of all ways, because it is known to the servant of God that there is no reflection better than the Divine Presence and in that state there are no obstacles or veils in between. Whatever man lacks is due to the impurity of his nature. If the veil be lifted and the screen and obstacle removed, the truth of things as they are will become manifest and known. And the Master of creatures [the Prophet Muhammad]—upon whom be peace—indicated this when he said: “Truly, during the days of your existence, inspirations come from God. Do you not want to follow them?” Tell unto reasoners that, for the lovers of God, intuition is guide, not discursive thought."
—Omar Khayyám^{[41]}
The same author goes on by giving other philosophical writings which are totally compatible with the religion of Islam, as the alRisālah filwujūd (الرسالة في الوجود, "Treatise on Being"), written in Arabic, which begin with Quranic verses and asserting that all things come from God, and there is an order in these things. In another work, Risālah jawāban lithalāth masāʾil (رسالة جوابان لثلاث مسائل, "Treatise of Two Responses to Three Questions"), he gives a response to question on, for instance, the becoming of the soul postmortem. S.H. Nasr even gives some poetry where he is perfectly in favor of Islamic orthodoxy, but expressing mystical views (God's goodness, the ephemeral state of this life, ...):^{[5]}
Considering possible misunderstandings about Khayyám in the West and elsewhere, Hossein Nasr concludes by saying that if a correct study of the authentic rubaiyat is done, but along with the philosophical works, or even the spiritual biography entitled Sayr wa sulak (Spiritual Wayfaring), we can no longer view the man as a simple hedonistic winelover, or even an early skeptic, but a profound mystical thinker and scientist whose works are more important than some verses.^{[5]} C.H.A. Bjerregaard earlier summarised the situation:
"The writings of Omar Khayyam are good specimens of Sufism but are not valued in the West as they ought to be, and the mass of englishspeaking people know him only through the poems of Edward Fitzgerald which is unfortunate. It is unfortunate because Fitzgerald is not faithful to his master and model, and at times he lays words upon the tongue of the Sufi which are blasphemous. Such outrageous language is that of the eightyfirst quatrain for instance. Fitzgerald is doubly guilty because he was more of a Sufi than he was willing to admit."^{[42]}
A French orientalist named Franz Toussaint was so dissatisfied with Fitzgerald's translation (and with some works just translating Fitzgerald from English to French) that he wrote his own directly from the Persian texts, trying to express the spirit of the verses rather than to versify.^{[43]} His translation was published from 1924 to 1979 uninterrupted by Editions d'Art Henri Piazza before that editor disappeared. That translation was itself translated in other languages on Internet sites.
Abdullah Dougan, a modern Naqshbandi Sufi, provides commentary^{[44]} on the role and contribution of Omar Khayyam to Sufi thought. Dougan says that while Omar is a minor Sufi teacher compared to the giants – Rumi, Attar and Sana’i – one aspect that makes Omar’s work so relevant and accessible is its very human scale as we can feel for him and understand his approach. The argument over the quality of Fitzgerald’s translation of the Rubaiyat has, according to Dougan, diverted attention from a fuller understanding of the deeply esoteric message contained in Omar’s actual material – "Every line of the Rubaiyat has more meaning than almost anything you could read in Sufi literature".
Khayyám himself rejected any association with the title falsafī "philosopher" in the sense of Aristotelianism and stressed he wishes "to know who I am". In the context of philosophers he was labeled by some of his contemporaries as "detached from divine blessings".^{[45]}
It is now established that Khayyám taught for decades the philosophy of Avicena, especially the Book of Healing, in his home town Nishapur, till his death.^{[5]} In an incident he had been requested to comment on a disagreement between Avicena and a philosopher called Abu'lBarakāt alBaghdādī who had criticized Avicena strongly. Khayyám is said to have answered "[he] does not even understand the sense of the words of Avicenna, how can he oppose what he does not know?"^{[45]}
Khayyám the philosopher could be understood from two rather distinct sources. One is through his Rubaiyat and the other through his own works in light of the intellectual and social conditions of his time.^{[46]} The latter could be informed by the evaluations of Khayyám's works by scholars and philosophers such as AbulFazl Bayhaqi, Nizami Aruzi, and alZamakhshari and Sufi poets and writers Attar of Nishapur and NajmalDin Razi.
As a mathematician, Khayyám has made fundamental contributions to the philosophy of mathematics especially in the context of Persian Mathematics and Persian philosophy with which most of the other Persian scientists and philosophers such as Avicenna, Abū Rayḥān alBīrūnī and Tusi are associated. There are at least three basic mathematical ideas of strong philosophical dimensions that can be associated with Khayyám.
Persian: "این قافلهٔ عُمر عجب میگذرد" — A line of poetry by the Iranian poet Omar Khayyam in Shikasta Nastaʿlīq.
A ruba'i of Omar Khayyam in Shikasta Nastaʿlīq.
Wikiquote has quotations related to: Omar Khayyám 
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Omar Khayyam. 
