From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia - View original article
Obstetrics (from the Latin obstare, "to stand by") is the health science that deals with pregnancy, childbirth, and postpartum period  (including care of the newborn). The professional who practices obstetrics as a health science is the midwife. The professional who practices obstetrics as a medical speciality (Obstetrics and gynaecology) is the obstetrician-gynecologist.
|This article is in a list format that may be better presented using prose. (March 2009)|
Prenatal care is important in screening for various complications of pregnancy. This includes routine office visits with physical exams and routine lab tests:
First trimester screening varies by country. In the UK, women will typically be offered: Full Blood Count (FBC), Blood Group and Antibody screening (Group and Save), Syphilis, Hepatitis B, HIV, Rubella immunity and urine micro and sensitivity to test for asymptomatic bacturea. Additionally, women under 25 years of age will be offered chlamydia testing via a urine sample, and women considered high risk will be screened for Sickle Cell and Thalassemia. Women must consent to all tests before they are carried out. The woman's blood pressure, height and weight will also be measured, and her Body Mass Index (BMI) will be calculated. This is the only time her weight will be recorded routinely. Her family history, obstetric history, medical history and social history will also be discussed.
Women in the UK usually have their first ultrasound scan at around twelve weeks. This is a trans-abdominal ultrasound. This is the scan from which the pregnancy is dated and the woman's estimated due date (or EDD) is worked out. At this scan, some NHS Trusts offer women the opportunity to have screening for Down's Syndrome. If it is done at this point, both the nuchal fold is measured and a blood test taken from the mother. The result comes back as an odd's risk for the fetus having Down's Syndrome. This will be specified as somewhere between 1:2 (high risk) to 1:100,000 (low risk). High risk women (who have a risk of greater than about 1:150) will be offered further tests, which are diagnostic. These tests are invasive and carry a risk of miscarriage.
Genetic screening for downs syndrome (trisomy 21) and trisomy 18 the national standard in the United States is rapidly evolving away from the AFP-Quad screen for downs syndrome- done typically in the second trimester at 16–18 weeks. The newer integrated screen (formerly called F.A.S.T.E.R for First And Second Trimester Early Results) can be done at 10 plus weeks to 13 plus weeks with an ultrasound of the fetal neck (thick skin is bad) and two chemicals (analytes) Papp-a and bhcg (pregnancy hormone level itself). It gives an accurate risk profile very early. There is a second blood screen at 15 to 20 weeks which refines the risk more accurately. The cost is higher than an "AFP-quad" screen due to the ultrasound and second blood test but it is quoted to have a 93% pick up rate as opposed to 88% for the standard AFP/QS. This is an evolving standard of care in the United States.
In the UK, the second trimester is when women start to see their midwife. Other than the booking appointment at around ten weeks and her ultrasound scan at around twelve weeks, she will not have had much contact with health care professionals regarding her pregnancy. The actual schedule of appointments varies by NHS Trust, but the woman can expect to see her midwife around sixteen weeks. At this appointment, the results of the screening and tests carried out at her booking appointment will be discussed. The woman's blood pressure will be measured and a urinalysis carried out. The woman will be given the opportunity to ask any questions she may have. Some women may choose to ask to listen to the fetal heart at this appointment. This should not be routinely offered by the midwife as at 16 weeks gestation, the heartbeat can be difficult to detect and some NHS Trusts will not scan at this point if the midwife is unable to hear the fetal heart.
At around twenty weeks, the woman (in the UK) will have an anomaly scan. This trans-abdominal ultrasound scan checks on the anatomical development of the fetus. It is a detailed scan and checks all the major organs. As a consequence, if the fetus is not in a good position for the scan to be preformed, the woman may be sent off for a walk and then asked to return. At this scan, the position of the placenta is noted, to ensure it is not low. Cervical assessment is not routinely carried out in the UK.
Most doctors do a sugar load in a drink form of 50 grams of glucose in cola, lime or orange and draw blood an hour later (plus or minus 5 minutes) ; the standard modified criteria have been lowered to 135 since the late 1980s
During the third trimester, women in the UK will have further blood tests taken. Blood will be taken for Full Blood Count (FBC) and a Group and Save will be taken to confirm her blood group and as a further check for any antibodies. This may routinely be done twice in the third trimester. A Glucose Tolerance Test (GTT) will be done for women with risk factors for Gestational Diabetes. This includes women with a raised BMI, women of certain ethnic origins and women who have a first degree relative with diabetes. A vaginal swab for Group B Streptococcus (GBS) will only be taken for women who are known to have had a GBS-affected baby in the past or for women who have had a urine culture positive for GBS during this pregnancy.
Women will see this midwife more frequently as they progress through pregnancy. First time mums, or mums on the high risk care pathway, may see the midwife at around twenty four weeks, when the midwife will offer to listen to the fetal heart. From twenty eight weeks, the midwife will measure the symphysis fundal height (or SFH to measure the growth of the abdomen. This is currently the best method available to easily check the fetal growth, but it is not perfect. At appointments, the midwife will check the woman's blood pressure and do a urinalysis. The midwife will palpate the woman's abdomen to establish the lie, presentation and position of the fetus, and later, the engagement. The midwife will offer to listen to the fetal heart.
From the woman's due date, the midwife may offer to do a stretch and sweep. This involves a vaginal examination, where the midwife will assess the cervix and attempt to sweep the membranes. This releases a hormone called prostaglandin, which is believed to help the cervix prepare for labour.
On the first visit to her obstetrician or midwife, the pregnant woman is asked to carry out the antenatal record, which constitutes a medical history and physical examination. On subsequent visits, the gestational age (GA) is rechecked with each visit.
In the UK, the woman is given her notes at her booking appointment with the midwife. Following an assessment by the midwife, the woman's notes are put together and the woman is responsible for these notes. They are called her hand held records. The woman is advised to carry these with her at all times and to take them with her when she sees any healthcare professional. Following the anomaly scan, some NHS Trusts will print out a customized growth chart. This takes in to account the woman's size and the size of any previous babies when decided what her 'normal range' is for SFH growth.
Symphysis-fundal height (SFH; in cm) should equal gestational age after 20 weeks of gestation, and the fetal growth should be plotted on a curve during the antenatal visits. The fetus is palpated by the midwife or obstetrician using the Leopold maneuver to determine the position of the baby. Blood pressure should also be monitored, and may be up to 140/90 in normal pregnancies. However, a significant rise in blood pressure, even below the 140/90 threshold, may be a cause for concern High blood pressure indicates hypertension and possibly pre-eclampsia if other symptoms are present. These may include swelling (edema), headaches, visual disturbances, epigastric pain and proteinurea.
Fetal screening is also used to help assess the viability of the fetus, as well as congenital problems. Genetic counseling is often offered for families who may be at an increased risk to have a child with a genetic condition. Amniocentesis, which is usually performed between 15 and 20 weeks, to check for Down syndrome, other chromosome abnormalities or other conditions in the fetus, is sometimes offered to women who are at increased risk due to factors such as older age, previous affected pregnancies or family history. Amniocentesis, and other invasive investigations such as chorionic villus sampling, is not preformed in the UK as frequently as it is in other countries, and in the UK, advanced maternal age alone is not an indication for such an invasive procedure
Even earlier than amniocentesis is performed, the mother may undergo the triple test, nuchal screening, nasal bone, alpha-fetoprotein screening, Chorionic villus sampling, and also to check for disorders such as Down Syndrome. Amniocentesis is a prenatal genetic screening of the fetus, which involves inserting a needle through the mother's abdominal wall and uterine wall, to extract fetal DNA from the amniotic fluid. There is a risk of miscarriage and fetal injury with amniocentesis because it involves penetrating the uterus with the baby still in utero.
Imaging is another important way to monitor a pregnancy. The mother and fetus are also usually imaged in the first trimester of pregnancy. This is done to predict problems with the mother; confirm that a pregnancy is present inside the uterus; estimate the gestational age; determine the number of fetuses and placentae; evaluate for an ectopic pregnancy and first trimester bleeding; and assess for early signs of anomalies.
X-rays and computerized tomography (CT) are not used, especially in the first trimester, due to the ionizing radiation, which has teratogenic effects on the fetus. No effects of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on the fetus have been demonstrated, but this technique is too expensive for routine observation. Instead, obstetric ultrasonography is the imaging method of choice in the first trimester and throughout the pregnancy, because it emits no radiation, is portable, and allows for realtime imaging.
Ultrasound imaging may be done at any time throughout the pregnancy, but usually happens at the 12th week (dating scan) and the 20th week (detailed scan).
The safety of frequent ultrasound scanning has not be confirmed. Despite this, increasing numbers of women are choosing to have additional scans for no medical purpose, such as gender scans, 3D and 4D scans.
A normal gestation would reveal a gestational sac, yolk sac, and fetal pole. The gestational age can be assessed by evaluating the mean gestational sac diameter (MGD) before week 6, and the crown-rump length after week 6. Multiple gestation is evaluated by the number of placentae and amniotic sacs present.
Obstetric ultrasonography is routinely used for dating the gestational age of a pregnancy from the size of the fetus, the most accurate dating being in first trimester before the growth of the fetus has been significantly influenced by other factors. Ultrasound is also used for detecting congenital anomalies (or other fetal anomalies) and determining the biophysical profiles (BPP), which are generally easier to detect in the second trimester when the fetal structures are larger and more developed. Specialised ultrasound equipment can also evaluate the blood flow velocity in the umbilical cord, looking to detect a decrease/absence/reversal or diastolic blood flow in the umbilical artery.
Other tools used for assessment include:
|This section is in a list format that may be better presented using prose. (May 2010)|
The main emergencies include:
In addition to complications of pregnancy that can arise, a pregnant woman may have intercurrent diseases, that is, other diseases or conditions (not directly caused by the pregnancy) that may become worse or be a potential risk to the pregnancy.
Induction is a method of artificially or prematurely stimulating labour in a woman. Reasons to induce can include pre-eclampsia, placental malfunction, intrauterine growth retardation, and other various general medical conditions, such as renal disease. Induction may occur any time after 34 weeks of gestation if the risk to the fetus or mother is greater than the risk of delivering a premature fetus regardless of lung maturity.
Induction may be achieved via several methods:
In the UK, inducing labour may start with the midwife performing a stretch and sweep. This is a vaginal examination, where the midwife will assess the cervix and, if able to do so, will sweep the membranes, releasing prostaglandins which are believed to help the cervix prepare for labour, and therefore bring on labour. If this is unsuccessful, the woman may be offered induction. This usually involves a vaginal examination where the cervix is assessed and given a Bishop's Score, and the insertion of prostaglandin as a pessary. Once the cervix is favourable (and it may take more than one dose of prostaglandin) and there is space on the labour ward, the woman will be transferred to the labour ward for an Artificial Rupture of Membranes (ARM). Quite often, the woman will then be encouraged to mobilise in the hope that she labour naturally. This may be for a couple of hours. If nothing happens, the woman will then be commenced on an infusion of syntocinon. This is a synthetic form of the hormone oxytocin which women naturally release during labour. If any step is successful, the woman will continue to labour and not move on to the next procedure.
During labor itself, the obstetrician or midwife may be called on to do a number of tasks. These tasks can include:
In the UK, midwives care for women in labour and through the delivery. The midwife will constantly assess the woman and the fetus, and the progress of labour. As a minimum, in the first stage of labour, the midwife will listen to the fetal heart for one minute every fifteen minutes, measure the woman's pulse hourly and record her blood pressure and temperature four hourly. She will encourage the woman to empty her blood four hourly, and will measure and analyse each void. She will offer an abdominal palpation and vaginal examination four hourly. In the second stage of labour, the fetal heart will be ausculatated for one minute every five minutes, the pulse and blood pressure measured hourly, temperature four hourly, abdominal palpation and vaginal examination hourly and the woman will be encouraged to void frequently. Of course, these are all minimums. If the woman was on continuous fetal monitoring, the midwife would formally review this hourly. The midwife would refer to another health care practitioner if the labour deviated from the norm or if the woman requested an epidural. The midwife should discuss the woman's birth plan with her and explain the options regarding labour to the woman.
Postnatal care is care provided to the mother following parturition.
A woman in the Western world who is delivering in a hospital may leave the hospital as soon as she is medically stable and chooses to leave, which can be as early as a few hours postpartum, though the average for spontaneous vaginal delivery (SVD) is 1–2 days, and the average caesarean section postnatal stay is 3–4 days.
Certain things must be kept in mind as the physician proceeds with the post-natal care.
For women who have a hospital birth, the minimum hospital stay in the UK is 6 hours. If women choose to leave before this, they do so against medical advice. Women may choose when to be discharged from hospital. Full postnatal assessments will be conducted daily whilst an inpatient, or more frequently if needed. A postnatal assessment will include the woman's observations, general wellbeing, breasts (either a discussion and assistance with breastfeeding or a discussion about lactation suppression), abdominal palpation (if she has not had a caesarean section) to check for involution of the uterus, or a check of her caesarean wound (the dressing doesn't need to be removed for this), a check of her perineum, particualarly if she tore or had stitches, reviewing her lochia, ensuring she has passed urine and had her bowels open and checking for signs and symptoms of a DVT. The baby will also be checked for jaundice, signs of adequate feeding or any other concerns. The baby will have a nursery exam between six and seventy two hours of life to check for any conditions such as heart defects, hip problems or eye problems.
In the community, the community midwife will see the woman at least until day ten. This does not mean she will see the woman and the baby daily, but she cannot discharge them from her care until day ten at the earliest. Postnatal checks will be made on the woman and the baby, the neonatal screening test (NST, or heel prick test) will be taken around day five. The baby will be weighed and the midwife will plan her visits according to the health and needs of mum and baby. They will be discharged to the care of the health visitor.
At birth, the baby will be given an Apgar score at, at the least, one minute and five minutes of age. This is a score out of 10, which assesses the baby on five different areas, each worth between 0 and 2 points. These areas are: colour, respiratory effort, tone, heart rate and response to stimuli. The midwife will check the baby over for any obvious problems, and will weigh the baby and measure the head circumference. The midwife will ensure the cord has been clamped securely and the baby has the appropriate name tags on (if in hospital). In the UK, babies lengths are not routinely measured. These checks are done as close to mum as possible and baby will be returned to mum very quickly. Skin-to-skin will be encouraged as this regulates the baby's heart rate, breathing, oxygen saturations and temperature, and promotes bonding and breastfeeding.
The process in the past of birthing a child began with very little preparation; improvisation was the rule of thumb. Dilation was determined mostly by touch and described by obstetricians and midwives very differently. Midwives would refer to the dilation of the cervix by comparing it to body parts, such as the palm of the hand, a finger, or even a fist. Obstetricians, usually men who had experience with using coins would refer to the dilation by relation to the size of currency. The woman birthing the child would have topical remedies available to calm her nerves, ease pain and encourage her to deliver the baby hastily. The birthing mother was also able to decide her position of delivery as opposed to the standard laying down practice today. There were two main categories of positions, vertical and horizontal. These are expanded upon below.
Four positions are considered vertical and one horizontal:
An instinctive position, this ensured full use of gravity to the mother’s advantage, and if the child appears suddenly, ensures safety from falling from a height and being injured. This position was most common when a woman was unattended and essentially without help. If necessary, the mother could watch her perineum and disengage the head of the baby herself. Common practice in many cultures apparently thought it essential to lay the newborn upon the ground as a connection to the earth and this position allowed the child to arrive with immediate contact with the ground. Downsides of this position are it requires great stamina and the woman to be fully nude below the waist.
This position was common in the nineteenth century French provinces and by peasant women. The position called for knee protection and upper limb support, involving possibly a cushion and chair back or by being suspended between two chairs backs if alone. Downsides to this position were that it caused back aches and cramps; it was also regarded by doctors to be inferior due to the baby being received behind the mother. When a fetus underwent malpresentation (misalignment of the fetus with the head not exiting the womb first) or when the womb was extremely protruding or comparatively large to the woman, she may have kneeled on the ground with her hands placed on the ground in front of her. This ‘on all fours’ position was regarded to be too animalistic and indecent for doctors of the enlightenment period and was avoided.
A sitting position would be used in some cases for women who could not squat for extended periods of time. It was also reinvented with the creation and use of the birthing stool. Contrary to the name, this could be either a stool or a chair with a large hole in the seat to use gravity to align and birth the child while supporting the weight of the mother. With the stool variation and the side of the bed position, another person would be used to support the mother’s upper body.
Accidentally happening or deliberate, this position was rarely used due to the stamina required to do so as well as the tendency for mothers to teach their daughters how to birth otherwise. Daughters who hid their pregnancy could be caught standing and having their water break, instinctively these girls would brace themselves against a wall, table, chair and with the inability to move would deliver the baby there, allowing it to fall on the ground. This, of course, was extremely dangerous although in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, various textbooks show the persistence of the standing position with it persisting until the beginning of the twentieth century in some areas of France.
Compared to the other four vertical positions, this was certainly believed not instinctive and did not provide the labour with the necessary conditions to birth. Today we also know this position is inferior to the vertical positions as it increases the change of fetal distress as malpresentation. It also decreases the space available in the pelvis, as the sacrum is unable to move backwards as it does naturally during labour. This method of childbirth developed after the introduction of the birthing stool and with the change in concentration of births in homes to hospitals. This position was used for women who had some difficulty in bringing the fetus to birth. Women only resorted to lying down especially on the bed because it would mean that the bedclothes would be soiled in the process. It was also avoided because it showed determination and was significant in showing difference from animals that lay down to give birth. This is similar to the resistance to giving birth on all fours.
A sixth position was used in some instances of a poor household, in the countryside and during the winter. It was a combination of the sitting position and laying position usually by a combination of small mattress and a fallen chair used as a backrest. This method was also greatly avoided and only used at the request of the mother because it required for the person helping birth the child –usually an obstetrician and not a midwife at this point– had to be crouched on the ground working at nearly ground level.
The birthing stool –sometimes known as a birthing chair– was introduced in the seventeenth and the use of it was encouraged into the eighteenth century by the doctors and administrators who used it to control the child being birthed. The stool was usually very expensive and came in two types the more expensive and heavier variety was used by wealthy families as a family heirloom which was usually adorned with decoration or expensive materials. The second variety was used by village midwives as it was portable, lighter and thus able to be carried from home to home as became popular in the French territory of (mostly German speaking) Alasace-Lorraine. At the beginning of the 19th century the birthing stool’s use changed as it was restricted by its increased weight and then would become the modern delivery table. This contributed to the transition to the modern day hospital setting.
This was usually not the method of choice for many mothers as the stool was very revealing, cold and later became associated with the pain of childbirth. In order to decrease the draft on a woman’s genitals while sitting on the birthing stool, fabric was draped around the seat, this also gave privacy and respected the modesty of the mother.
Prior to the 18th century, caring for pregnant women in Europe was confined exclusively to women, and rigorously excluded men. The expectant mother would invite close female friends and family members to her home to keep her company. Skilled midwives managed all aspects of the labour and delivery. The presence of physicians and surgeons was very rare and only occurred once a serious complication had taken place and the midwife had exhausted all measures to manage the complication. Calling a surgeon was very much a last resort and having men deliver women in this era whatsoever was seen as offending female modesty. 
Obstetrics prior to the 18th and 19th centuries was not recognized on the same level of importance and professionalism as other medical fields, until about two hundred years ago it was not recognized as a medical practice. However, the subject matter and interest in the female reproductive system and sexual practice can be traced back to Ancient Greece and even to Ancient Egypt. Soranus of Ephesus sometimes is called the most important figure in ancient gynecology. Living in the late first century A.D. and early second century he studied anatomy and had opinions and techniques on abortion, contraception –most notably coitus interruptus– and birth complications. After the death of Soranus, techniques and works of gynecology declined but very little of his works were recorded and survived to the late 18th century when gynecology and obstetrics reemerged.
The 18th century marked the beginning of many advances in European midwifery. These advances in knowledge were mainly regarding the physiology of pregnancy and labour. By the end of the century the anatomy of the uterus and the physiological changes that take place during labour began to be understood by medical communities. The introduction of forceps in childbirth also took place during the 18th century. All of these medical advances in the knowledge of obstetrics would be the lever for the introduction of men into an arena that had only ever been managed and run by women, midwifery.
The addition of the male-midwife is historically a significant change to the profession of obstetrics. In the 18th century medical men began to train in area of childbirth and believed with their advanced knowledge in anatomy that childbirth could be improved. In France these male-midwives were referred to as "accoucheurs". This title was later on lent to male-midwives all over Europe. The founding of lying-hospitals also contributed to the medicalization and male-dominance of obstetrics. These lying-hospitals were establishments where women would come to have their babies delivered, which had prior been unheard of since the midwife normally came to home of the pregnant woman. This institution provided male-midwives or accoucheurs with an endless number of patients to practice their techniques on and also was a way for these men to demonstrate their knowledge.
Many midwives of the time bitterly opposed the involvement of men in childbirth. Some male practitioners also opposed the involvement of medical men like themselves in midwifery, and even went as far as to say that men-midwives only undertook midwifery solely for perverse erotic satisfaction. The accoucheurs argued that their involvement in midwifery was to improve the process of childbirth. These men also believed that obstetrics would forge ahead and continue to strengthen.
Even though it was expected in the 18th century that obstetrics would continue to grow, the opposite showed to be true. Obstetrics entered a stage of stagnation in the 19th century, until about the 1880s. The central explanation for the lack of advancement during this time was substantially due to the rejection of obstetrics by the medical community. The 19th century marked an era of medical reform in Europe and increased regulation over the medical profession. Major European institutions such as The College of Physicians and Surgeons considered delivering babies ungentlemanly work and refused to have anything to do with childbirth as a whole. Even when Medical Act 1858 was introduced, which stated that medical students could qualify as doctors, midwifery was entirely ignored. This made it nearly impossible to pursue an education in midwifery and also have the recognition of being a doctor or surgeon. Obstetrics was pushed to the side.
By the late 19th century the foundation of modern day obstetrics and midwifery began to be laid. The delivery of babies by doctors became popular and readily accepted but midwives also continued to play a role in childbirth. Midwifery also changed during this era due to increased regulation and the eventual need for midwives to become certified. Many European countries by the late 19th century were monitoring the training of midwives and issued certification based on competency. Midwives were no longer uneducated in the formal sense.
As midwifery began to develop so did the profession of obstetrics near the end of the century. Childbirth was no longer unjustifiably despised by the medical community as it once had been at the beginning of the century. But the specialty was still behind in its development stages in comparison to other medical specialities, and remained a generality in this era. Many male physicians would deliver children but very few would have referred to themselves as obstetricians. The end of the 19th century did mark a significant accomplishment in the profession with the advancements in asepsis and anesthesia which paved the way for the mainstream introduction and later success of the Caesarean Section.
Before the 1880s mortality rates in lying-hospitals would reach unacceptably high levels and became an area of public concern. Much of these maternal deaths were due to Puerperal fever, at the time commonly known as childbed fever. In the 1800s Dr. Ignaz Semmelweis noticed that women giving birth at home had a much lower incidence of childbed fever than those giving birth by physicians in lying-hospitals. His investigation discovered that washing hands with an antiseptic solution before a delivery reduced childbed fever fatalities by 90%. So it was concluded that it was physicians who had been spreading disease from one laboring mother to the next. Despite the publication of this information, doctors still would not wash. It was not until the 20th century when advancements in aseptic technique and the understanding of disease would play a significant role in the decrease of maternal mortality rates among many populations.
The development of obstetrics as a practice for accredited doctors happened at the turn of the 18th century and thus was very differently developed in Europe and in the Americas due to the independence of many countries in the Americas from European powers. “Unlike in Europe and the British Isles, where midwifery laws were national, in America, midwifery laws were local and varied widely”.
American surgeons are responsible for many of the advancements of Gynecology and Obstetrics –these two fields overlapped greatly as they both gained attention in the medical field– at the end of the nineteenth century through the development of such procedures as the ovariotomy. These procedures then were shared with European surgeons who replicated the surgeries. It should be noted that this was a period when antiseptic, aseptic or anesthetic measures were just being introduced to surgical and observational procedures and without these procedures surgeries were dangerous and often fatal. Following are two surgeons noted for their contributions to these fields include Ephraim McDowell and James Marion Sims.
Ephraim McDowell developed a surgical practice in 1795 and performed the first ovariotomy in 1809 on a 47-year-old widow who then lived on for thirty-one more years. He had attempted to share this with John Bell whom he had practiced under who had retired to Italy. Bell was said to have died without seeing the document but it was published by an associate in Extractions of Diseased Ovaria in 1825. By the mid-century the surgery was both successfully and unsuccessfully being performed. Pennsylvanian surgeons the Attlee brothers made this procedure very routine for a total of 465 surgeries–John Attlee performed 64 successfully of 78 while his brother William reported 387– between the years of 1843 and 1883. By the middle of the nineteenth century this procedure was successfully performed in Europe by English surgeons Sir Spencer Wills and Charles Clay as well as French surgeons Eugène Koeberlé, Augeste Nélation and Jules Peau.
John Marion Sims was the surgeon responsible for being the first treating a vesicovaginal fistula –a condition linked to many caused mainly by prolonged pressing of the fetus against the pelvis or other causes such as rape, hysterectomy, or other operations– and also having been doctor to many European royals and the 20th President of the United States James A. Garfield after he had been shot. Sims does have a controversial medical past. Under the beliefs at the time about pain and the prejudice towards African people, he had practiced his surgical skills and developed skills on slaves. Many of these women whom were operated on are regarded to be the mothers of modern gynecology, one of which is identified as Anarcha, the woman he had first treated for her fistula.
Women and men inhabited very different roles in natal care up to the 18th century. The role of a physician was exclusively held by men who went to university, an overly male institution, who would theorize anatomy and the process of reproduction based on theological teaching and philosophy. Many beliefs about the female body and menstruation were neither particularly accurate theory in the 17th and 18th centuries clearly resulting from the lack of literature about the practice. Many of the theories of what caused menstruation prevailed from Hippocratic philosophy. Midwives of this time were those assisted in the birth and care of both born and unborn children, and as the name suggests this position held mainly by women.
During the birth of a child, men were rarely present. Women from the neighborhood or family would join in on the process of birth and assist in many different ways. The one position where men would help with the birth of a child would be in the sitting position, usually when performed on the side of a bed to support the mother.
Men were introduced into the field of obstetrics in the nineteenth century and resulted in a change of the focus of this profession. Gynecology directly resulted as a new and separate field of study from obstetrics and focused on the curing of illness and indispositions of female sexual organs. This had some relevance to some conditions as menopause, uterine and cervical problems, and childbirth could leave the mother in need of extensive surgery to repair tissue. But, there was also a large blame of the uterus for completely unrelated conditions. This led to many social consequences of the nineteenth century.
Many social consequences affected women once the introduction of men into the field of obstetrics occurred. “Nineteenth-century medical literature portrayed women as weak, nervous, chronically ill and entirely prisoners of their sexual system". By the end of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th century about half of births were attended by midwives –woman oriented field – and the other half was by physicians –male oriented–.
By 1915, the population and popularity of physicians had increased and Dr. Joseph DeLee was actively suggesting means of birthing children to free women of the pain of labor –including forceps, ether, sedatives and episiotomies– and eliminating the position of the midwife from America. DeLee further argued that midwives were untrained and incompetent and childbirth required trained medical professionals.
This increase of the use of obstetricians instead of midwives coincides with an increase of infant mortality between 1915 and 1929. By 1935, the percentage of births that midwives attended had grown to only fifteen percent, in 1900 that number had been approximately half. The introduction of obstetricians in America is blamed for the increase in infant mortality by many as the decline of midwifery and growth of obstetrics both coincide with this time frame.
The salary of an obstetrician varies by country. In the United States, the salary ranges from $200,000 to $339,738.
|Country||Annual salary (US$)|
|United Arab Emirates||231,809|
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to Obstetrics.|
|This article needs additional citations for verification. (October 2008)|