Mercury in fish

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia - View original article

Jump to: navigation, search

Fish and shellfish concentrate mercury in their bodies, often in the form of methylmercury, a highly toxic organic compound of mercury. Fish products have been shown to contain varying amounts of heavy metals, particularly mercury and fat-soluble pollutants from water pollution. Species of fish that are long-lived and high on the food chain, such as marlin, tuna, shark, swordfish, king mackerel, tilefish (Gulf of Mexico), northern pike, and lake trout contain higher concentrations of mercury than others.[1]

The presence of mercury in fish can be a health issue, particularly for women who are or may become pregnant, nursing mothers, and young children.


The consumption of fish is by far the most significant source of ingestion-related mercury exposure in humans and animals.[2] Mercury and methylmercury is present in only very small concentrations in seawater. However, it is absorbed, usually as methylmercury, by algae at the start of the food chain. This algae is then eaten by fish and other organisms higher in the food chain. Fish efficiently absorb methylmercury, but only very slowly excrete it.[3] Methylmercury is not soluble and therefore is not apt to be excreted. Instead, it accumulates, primarily in the viscera although also in the muscle tissue.[4] This results in the bioaccumulation of mercury, in a buildup in the adipose tissue of successive trophic levels: zooplankton, small nekton, larger fish etc. The older such fish become, the more mercury they may have absorbed. Anything which eats these fish within the food chain also consumes the higher level of mercury the fish have accumulated. This process explains why predatory fish such as swordfish and sharks or birds like osprey and eagles have higher concentrations of mercury in their tissue than could be accounted for by direct exposure alone. Recently a high concentration of mercury in seafood is related to the massive death of Arctic foxes.[5] Species on the food chain can amass body concentrations of mercury up to ten times higher than the species they consume. This process is called biomagnification. For example, herring contains mercury levels at about 0.01 ppm while shark contains mercury levels greater than 1 ppm.[6]

Levels of contamination[edit]

Mercury levels in commercial fish and shellfish
Std dev
Max age
Tilefish (Gulf of Mexico)1.450n/an/aMid-Atlantic tilefish has lower mercury levels
and is considered safe to eat in moderation.[1]
Mackerel (king)0.730n/an/a4.514
Tuna (bigeye)0.6890.3410.560Fresh/frozen4.511
Orange roughy0.5710.1830.5624.3149
Marlin *0.4850.2370.3904.5
Mackerel (Spanish)0.454n/an/aGulf of Mexico4.55
Grouper0.4480.2780.399All species4.2
Tuna0.3910.2660.340All species, fresh/frozen
Tuna (albacore)0.3580.1380.360Fresh/frozen4.39
Patagonian toothfish0.3540.2990.3034.050+[8]
Tuna (yellowfin)0.3540.2310.311Fresh/frozen4.39
Tuna (albacore)0.3500.1280.338Canned4.39
Croaker white0.2870.0690.280Pacific3.4
Weakfish0.2350.2160.157Sea trout3.817[9]
Mackerel (Spanish)0.182n/an/aSouth Atlantic4.5
Bass0.1520.2010.084Striped, black and sea bass3.9
Tilefish (Atlantic)0.1440.1220.0993.635
Tuna (skipjack)0.1440.1190.150Fresh/frozen3.812
Tuna0.1280.1350.078All species, canned, light
Perch (ocean) *0.1210.1250.102
Lobster (American)0.1070.0760.086
Sheephead (California)0.0930.0590.088
Lobster (spiny)0.0930.0970.062
Mackerel (chub)0.088n/an/aPacific3.1
Crab0.0650.0960.050Blue, king and snow crab
Flatfish *0.0560.0450.050Flounder, plaice and sole
Mackerel (Atlantic)0.050n/an/a
Croaker (Atlantic)0.0650.0500.061
Shad (American)0.0390.0450.045
Salmon *0.0220.0340.015Fresh/frozen
Tilapia *0.0130.0230.004
Clam *0.0090.0110.002
Salmon *0.0080.017n/dCanned
Shrimp *0.0010.0130.0096.5[10]
* indicates only methylmercury was analyzed (all other results are for total mercury)
n/a – data not available
n/d – below detection level (0.01ppm)

U.S. government scientists tested fish in 291 streams around the country for mercury contamination. They found mercury in every fish tested, according to the study by the U.S. Department of the Interior. They found mercury even in fish of isolated rural waterways. Twenty five percent of the fish tested had mercury levels above the safety levels determined by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for people who eat the fish regularly.[11]


Much (an estimated 40%) of the mercury that eventually finds its way into fish originates with coal-burning power plants and chlorine production plants.[12] The largest source of mercury contamination in the United States is coal-fueled power plant emissions.[11] Chlorine chemical plants use mercury to extract chlorine from salt, which in many parts of the world is discharged as mercury compounds in waste water, though this process has been replaced for the most part by the more economically viable membrane cell process, which does not use mercury. Coal contains mercury as a natural contaminant. When it is fired for electricity generation, the mercury is released as smoke into the atmosphere. Most of this mercury pollution can be eliminated if pollution-control devices are installed.[12]

Current advice[edit]

The complexities associated with mercury transport and environmental fate are described by USEPA in their 1997 Mercury Study Report to Congress.[13] Because methylmercury and high levels of elemental mercury can be particularly toxic to a fetus or young children, organizations such as the U.S. EPA and FDA recommend that women who are pregnant or plan to become pregnant within the next one or two years, as well as young children, avoid eating more than 6 ounces (170g, one average meal) of fish per week.[14]

In the United States, the FDA has an action level for methylmercury in commercial marine and freshwater fish that is 1.0 parts per million (ppm). In Canada, the limit for the total of mercury content is 0.5 ppm. The Got Mercury? website includes a calculator for determining mercury levels in fish.[15]

Species with characteristically low levels of mercury include shrimp, tilapia, salmon, pollock, and catfish (FDA March 2004). The FDA characterizes shrimp, catfish, pollock, salmon, sardines, and canned light tuna as low-mercury seafood, although recent tests have indicated that up to 6 percent of canned light tuna may contain high levels.[16] A study published in 2008 found that mercury distribution in tuna meat is inversely related to the lipid content, suggesting that the lipid concentration within edible tuna tissues has a diluting effect on mercury content.[17] These findings suggest that choosing to consume a type of tuna that has a higher natural fat content may help reduce the amount of mercury intake, compared to consuming tuna with a low fat content. Also, many of the fish chosen for sushi contain high levels of mercury.[18]

According to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the risk from mercury by eating fish and shellfish is not a health concern for most people.[19] However, certain seafood might contain levels of mercury that may cause harm to an unborn baby (and especially its brain development and nervous system). In a young child, high levels of mercury can interfere with the development of the nervous system. The FDA provides three recommendations for young children, pregnant women, and women of child-bearing age:

  1. Do not eat shark, swordfish, king mackerel, or tilefish (Gulf of Mexico) because they might contain high levels of mercury.
  2. Eat up to 12 ounces (2 average meals) a week of a variety of fish and shellfish that are lower in mercury. Five of the most commonly eaten fish and shellfish that are low in mercury are: shrimp, canned light tuna, salmon, pollock, and catfish. Another commonly eaten fish, albacore or big eye ("white") tuna depending on its origin might have more mercury than canned light tuna. So, when choosing your two meals of fish and shellfish, it is recommended that you should not eat more than up to 6 ounces (one average meal) of albacore tuna per week.
  3. Check local advisories about the safety of fish caught by family and friends in your local lakes, rivers, and coastal areas. If no advice is available, eat up to 6 ounces (one average meal) per week of fish you catch from local waters, but consume no other fish during that week.

Research suggests that selenium content in fish is protective against the toxic effects of methylmercury content.[20] Fish with higher ratios of selenium to methylmercury (Se:Hg) are better to eat since the selenium binds to the methylmercury allowing it to pass through the body un-absorbed.

In 2012 the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) reported on chemical contaminants they found in the food of over 20 European countries. They established that fish meat and fish products were primarily responsible for methylmercury in the diet of all age classes. Particularly implicated were swordfish, tuna, cod, pike, whiting and hake. The EFSA recommend a tolerable weekly intake for methylmercury of 1.3 μg/kg body weight.[21][22]


In the 1950s, inhabitants of the seaside town of Minamata, on Kyushu island in Japan, noticed strange behavior in animals. Cats would exhibit nervous tremors, and dance and scream. Within a few years this was observed in other animals; birds would drop out of the sky. Symptoms were also observed in fish, an important component of the diet, especially for the poor. When human symptoms started to be noticed around 1956 an investigation began. Fishing was officially banned in 1957. It was found that the Chisso Corporation, a petrochemical company and maker of plastics such as vinyl chloride, had been discharging heavy metal waste into the sea for decades. They used mercury compounds as catalysts in their syntheses. It is believed that about 5,000 people were killed and perhaps 50,000 have been to some extent poisoned by mercury. Mercury poisoning in Minamata, Japan, is now known as Minamata disease.

See also[edit]


  1. ^ a b c d e Mercury Levels in Commercial Fish and Shellfish (1990-2010). United States Food and Drug Administration. Retrieved July 1, 2011.
  2. ^ United States Environmental Protection Agency (December 1997). Mercury Study Report to Congress (PDF) 3. Washington, D.C.: United States Environmental Protection Agency. 
  3. ^ Croteau, M., S. N. Luoma, and A. R Stewart. 2005. Trophic transfer of metals along freshwater food webs: Evidence of cadmium biomagnification in nature. Limnol. Oceanogr. 50 (5): 1511-1519.
  4. ^ Cocoros, G.; Cahn, P. H.; Siler, W. (1973). "Mercury concentrations in fish, plankton and water from three Western Atlantic estuaries". Journal of Fish Biology 5 (6): 641–647. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.1973.tb04500.x.  edit
  5. ^
  6. ^ EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 1997. Mercury Study Report to Congress. Vol. IV: An Assessment of Exposure to Mercury in the United States . EPA-452/R-97-006. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards and Office of Research and Development.
  7. ^ a b Trophic levels and maximum ages are, unless otherwise indicated, taken from the relevant species pages on Rainer Froese and Daniel Pauly (Eds) (2012) FishBase January 2012 version. Where a group has more than one species, the average of the principal commercial species is used
  8. ^ Collins MA, Brickle P, Brown J and Belchier M (2010) "The Patagonian toothfish: biology, ecology and fishery" In: M Lesser (Ed.) Advances in Marine Biology, Volume 58, pp. 229–289, Academic Press. ISBN 978-0-12-381015-1.
  9. ^ Lowerre-Barbieri SK, Chittenden ME and Barbieri LR (1995) "Age and growth of weakfish, Cynoscion regalis, in the Chesapeake Bay region with a discussion of historical changes in maximum size" Fishery Bulletin, 93 (4): 643–656.
  10. ^ "A bouillabaisse of fascinating facts about fish". NOAA: National Marine Fisheries Service. Retrieved October 22, 2009. 
  11. ^ a b New York Times, 2009 Aug. 19, "Mercury Found in Every Fish Tested, Scientists Say,"
  12. ^ a b Mercury contamination in fish: Know where it's coming from Natural Resources Defense Council. Retrieved 23 January 2010
  13. ^ EPA (1997). "Mercury Study Report to Congress". Retrieved January 23, 2008. 
  14. ^ FDA/EPA (2004). "What You Need to Know About Mercury in Fish and Shellfish". Retrieved October 25, 2006. 
  15. ^ "Got Mercury? Online Calculator Helps Seafood Consumers Gauge Mercury Intake". Common Dreams. March 9, 2004. Retrieved 2008-03-30. 
  16. ^ "FDA tests show risk in tuna". Chicago Tribune. January 27, 2006. Retrieved 2007-05-01. 
  17. ^ Balshaw, S.; J.W. Edwards, K.E. Ross, and B.J. Daughtry (December 2008). "Mercury distribution in the muscular tissue of farmed southern bluefin tuna (Thunnus maccoyii) is inversely related to the lipid content of tissues". Food Chemistry 111 (3): 616–621. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.04.041. Retrieved March 30, 2010. 
  18. ^ "NRDC: Mercury Contamination in Fish - Guide to Mercury in Sushi". 
  19. ^ What You Need to Know About Mercury in Fish and Shellfish
  20. ^
  21. ^ Scientific Opinion on the risk for public health related to the presence of mercury and methylmercury in food EFSA Journal 2012;10(12):2985 [241 pp.]. Retrieved 04/24/2013
  22. ^ EFSA Updates Opinion on Mercury and Methylmercury SGS SafeGuards Bulletin, Retrieved 04/24/2013


External links[edit]