From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia - View original article

The **gravity of Earth**, denoted * g*, refers to the acceleration that the Earth imparts to objects on or near its surface. In SI units this acceleration is measured in metres per second squared (in symbols, m/s

There is a direct relationship between gravitational acceleration and the downwards weight force experienced by objects on Earth, given by the equation *F* = *ma* (*force* = *mass* × *acceleration*). However, other factors such as the rotation of the Earth also contribute to the net acceleration.

The precise strength of Earth's gravity varies depending on location. The nominal "average" value at the Earth's surface, known as standard gravity is, by definition,^{[2]} 9.80665 m/s^{2} (about 32.1740 ft/s^{2}). This quantity is denoted variously as *g*_{n}, *g*_{e} (though this sometimes means the normal equatorial value on Earth, 9.78033 m/s^{2}), *g*_{0}, gee, or simply *g* (which is also used for the variable local value). The symbol *g* should not be confused with g, the abbreviation for gram (which is not italicized).^{[3]}^{[4]}

A perfect sphere of spherically uniform density (density varies solely with distance from centre) would produce a gravitational field of uniform magnitude at all points on its surface, always pointing directly towards the sphere's centre. However, the Earth deviates slightly from this ideal, and there are consequently slight deviations in both the magnitude and direction of gravity across its surface. Furthermore, the net force exerted on an object due to the Earth, called "effective gravity" or "apparent gravity", varies due to the presence of other factors, such as inertial response to the Earth's rotation. A scale or plumb bob measures only this effective gravity.

Parameters affecting the apparent or actual strength of Earth's gravity include latitude, altitude, and the local topography and geology.

Apparent gravity on the earth's surface varies by around 0.7%, from 9.7639 m/s^{2} on the Nevado Huascarán mountain in Peru to 9.8337 m/s^{2} at the surface of the Arctic Ocean.^{[5]} In large cities, it ranges from 9.766 in Kuala Lumpur, Mexico City, and Singapore to 9.825 in Oslo and Helsinki.

The surface of the Earth is rotating, so it is not an inertial frame of reference. At latitudes nearer the Equator, the outward centrifugal force produced by Earth's rotation is larger than at polar latitudes. This counteracts the Earth's gravity to a small degree – up to a maximum of 0.3% at the Equator – and reduces the apparent downward acceleration of falling objects.

The second major reason for the difference in gravity at different latitudes is that the Earth's equatorial bulge (itself also caused by inertia) causes objects at the Equator to be farther from the planet's centre than objects at the poles. Because the force due to gravitational attraction between two bodies (the Earth and the object being weighed) varies inversely with the square of the distance between them, an object at the Equator experiences a weaker gravitational pull than an object at the poles.

In combination, the equatorial bulge and the effects of the Earth's inertia mean that sea-level gravitational acceleration increases from about 9.780 m·s^{−2} at the Equator to about 9.832 m·s^{−2} at the poles, so an object will weigh about 0.5% more at the poles than at the Equator.^{[6]}^{[7]}

The same two factors influence the direction of the effective gravity. Anywhere on Earth away from the Equator or poles, effective gravity points not exactly toward the centre of the Earth, but rather perpendicular to the surface of the geoid, which, due to the flattened shape of the Earth, is somewhat toward the opposite pole. About half of the deflection is due to inertia, and half because the extra mass around the Equator causes a change in the direction of the true gravitational force relative to what it would be on a spherical Earth.

Gravity decreases with altitude as one rises above the earth's surface because greater altitude means greater distance from the Earth's center. All other things being equal, an increase in altitude from sea level to 9,000 metres (30,000 ft) causes a weight decrease of about 0.29%. (An additional factor affecting apparent weight is the decrease in air density at altitude, which lessens an object's buoyancy.^{[8]} This would increase a person's apparent weight at an altitude of 9,000 metres by about 0.08%)

It is a common misconception that astronauts in orbit are weightless because they have flown high enough to "escape" the Earth's gravity. In fact, at an altitude of 400 kilometres (250 mi), equivalent to a typical orbit of the Space Shuttle, gravity is still nearly 90% as strong as at the Earth's surface. Weightlessness actually occurs because orbiting objects are in free-fall.^{[9]}

The effect of ground elevation depends on the density of the ground (see Slab correction section). A person flying at 30 000 ft above sea level over mountains will feel more gravity than someone at the same elevation but over the sea. However, a person standing on the earth's surface feels less gravity when the elevation is higher.

The following formula approximates the Earth's gravity variation with altitude:

Where

*g*is the gravitational acceleration at height above sea level._{h}*r*is the Earth's mean radius._{e}*g*is the standard gravitational acceleration._{0}

This formula treats the Earth as a perfect sphere with a radially symmetric distribution of mass; a more accurate mathematical treatment is discussed below.

See also: Shell theorem

An approximate depth dependence of density in the Earth can be obtained by assuming that the mass is spherically symmetric (it depends only on depth, not on latitude or longitude). In such a body, the gravitational acceleration is towards the center. The gravity at a radius *r* depends only on the mass inside the sphere of radius *r*; all the contributions from outside cancel out. This is a consequence of the inverse-square law of gravitation. Another consequence is that the gravity is the same as if all the mass were concentrated at the center of the Earth. Thus, the gravitational acceleration at this radius is^{[10]}

where *G* is the gravitational constant and *M(r)* is the total mass enclosed within radius *r*. If the Earth had a constant density *ρ*, the mass would be *M(r)* = (4/3)π*ρr*^{3} and the dependence of gravity on depth would be

g at depth d is given by g'=g(1-d/R) where g is acceleration due to gravity on surface of the earth , d is depth and R is radius of Earth. If the density decreased linearly with increasing radius from a density *ρ*_{0} at the centre to *ρ*_{1} at the surface, then *ρ(r)* = ρ_{0} − (ρ_{0} − ρ_{1}) *r* / *r*_{e}, and the dependence would be

The actual depth dependence of density and gravity, inferred from seismic travel times (see Adams–Williamson equation), is shown in the graphs below.

See also: Physical geodesy

Local variations in topography (such as the presence of mountains) and geology (such as the density of rocks in the vicinity) cause fluctuations in the Earth's gravitational field, known as gravitational anomalies. Some of these anomalies can be very extensive, resulting in bulges in sea level, and throwing pendulum clocks out of synchronisation.

The study of these anomalies forms the basis of gravitational geophysics. The fluctuations are measured with highly sensitive gravimeters, the effect of topography and other known factors is subtracted, and from the resulting data conclusions are drawn. Such techniques are now used by prospectors to find oil and mineral deposits. Denser rocks (often containing mineral ores) cause higher than normal local gravitational fields on the Earth's surface. Less dense sedimentary rocks cause the opposite.

In air, objects experience a supporting buoyancy force which reduces the apparent strength of gravity (as measured by an object's weight). The magnitude of the effect depends on air density (and hence air pressure); see Apparent weight for details.

The gravitational effects of the Moon and the Sun (also the cause of the tides) have a very small effect on the apparent strength of Earth's gravity, depending on their relative positions; typical variations are 2 µm/s^{2} (0.2 mGal) over the course of a day.

The table below shows the gravitational acceleration in various cities around the world;^{[12]} amongst these listed cities, it is lowest in Mexico City or Kuala Lumpur (9.776 m/s^{2}) and highest in Anchorage, Alaska (9.826 m/s^{2}).

Location | Acceleration in m/s^{2} |
---|---|

Amsterdam | 9.817 |

Anchorage | 9.826 |

Athens | 9.800 |

Auckland | 9.799 |

Bangkok | 9.780 |

Birmingham | 9.817 |

Brussels | 9.815 |

Buenos Aires | 9.797 |

Calcutta | 9.785 |

Cape Town | 9.796 |

Chicago | 9.804 |

Copenhagen | 9.821 |

Denver | 9.798 |

Frankfurt | 9.814 |

Havana | 9.786 |

Helsinki | 9.825 |

Hong Kong | 9.785 |

Istanbul | 9.808 |

Jakarta | 9.777 |

Kuala Lumpur | 9.776 |

Kuwait | 9.792 |

Lisbon | 9.801 |

London | 9.816 |

Los Angeles | 9.796 |

Madrid | 9.800 |

Manchester | 9.818 |

Manila | 9.780 |

Melbourne | 9.800 |

Mexico City | 9.776 |

Montréal | 9.809 |

New York City | 9.802 |

Nicosia | 9.797 |

Oslo | 9.825 |

Ottawa | 9.806 |

Paris | 9.809 |

Perth | 9.794 |

Rio de Janeiro | 9.788 |

Rome | 9.803 |

Seattle | 9.811 |

Singapore | 9.776 |

Skopje | 9.804 |

Stockholm | 9.818 |

Sydney | 9.797 |

Taipei | 9.790 |

Tokyo | 9.798 |

Toronto | 9.807 |

Vancouver | 9.809 |

Washington, D.C. | 9.801 |

Wellington | 9.803 |

Zurich | 9.807 |

If the terrain is at sea level, we can estimate *g*:

where

- = acceleration in m·s
^{−2}at latitude :

This is the International Gravity Formula 1967, the 1967 Geodetic Reference System Formula, Helmert's equation or Clairaut's formula.^{[13]}

Helmert's equation may be written equivalently to the version above as either:

or

An alternate formula for *g* as a function of latitude is the WGS (World Geodetic System) 84 Ellipsoidal Gravity Formula:

The difference between the WGS-84 formula and Helmert's equation is less than 0.68·10^{−6} m·s^{−2}.

The first correction to be applied to the model is the free air correction (FAC) that accounts for heights above sea level. Near the surface of the Earth (sea level), gravity decreases with height such that linear extrapolation would give zero gravity at a height of one half the radius is 9.8 m·s^{−2} per 3,200 km.^{[14]}

Using the mass and radius of the Earth:

The FAC correction factor (Δ*g*) can be derived from the definition of the acceleration due to gravity in terms of G, the Gravitational Constant (see Estimating *g* from the law of universal gravitation, below):

where:

At a height *h* above the nominal surface of the earth *g _{h}* is given by:

So the FAC for a height *h* above the nominal earth radius can be expressed:

This expression can be readily used for programming or inclusion in a spreadsheet. Collecting terms, simplifying and neglecting small terms (*h*<<*r*_{Earth}), however yields the good approximation:

Using the numerical values above and for a height *h* in metres:

Grouping the latitude and FAC altitude factors the expression most commonly found in the literature is:

where = acceleration in m·s^{−2} at latitude and altitude *h* in metres. Alternatively (with the same units for *h*) the expression can be grouped as follows:

- Note: The section uses the galileo (symbol: "Gal"), which is a cgs unit for acceleration of 1 centimetre/second
^{2}.

- Note: The section uses the galileo (symbol: "Gal"), which is a cgs unit for acceleration of 1 centimetre/second

For flat terrain above sea level a second term is added for the gravity due to the extra mass; for this purpose the extra mass can be approximated by an infinite horizontal slab, and we get 2π*G* times the mass per unit area, i.e. 4.2×10^{−10} m^{3}·s^{−2}·kg^{−1} (0.042 μGal·kg^{−1}·m^{2})) (the Bouguer correction). For a mean rock density of 2.67 g·cm^{−3} this gives 1.1×10^{−6} s^{−2} (0.11 mGal·m^{−1}). Combined with the free-air correction this means a reduction of gravity at the surface of ca. 2 µm·s^{−2} (0.20 mGal) for every metre of elevation of the terrain. (The two effects would cancel at a surface rock density of 4/3 times the average density of the whole earth. The density of the whole earth is 5.515 g·cm^{−3}, so standing on a slab of something like iron whose density is over 7.35 g·cm^{−3} would increase one's weight.)

For the gravity below the surface we have to apply the free-air correction as well as a double Bouguer correction. With the infinite slab model this is because moving the point of observation below the slab changes the gravity due to it to its opposite. Alternatively, we can consider a spherically symmetrical Earth and subtract from the mass of the Earth that of the shell outside the point of observation, because that does not cause gravity inside. This gives the same result.

From the law of universal gravitation, the force on a body acted upon by Earth's gravity is given by

where *r* is the distance between the centre of the Earth and the body (see below), and here we take *m*_{1} to be the mass of the Earth and *m*_{2} to be the mass of the body.

Additionally, Newton's second law, *F* = *ma*, where *m* is mass and *a* is acceleration, here tells us that

Comparing the two formulas it is seen that:

So, to find the acceleration due to gravity at sea level, substitute the values of the gravitational constant, *G*, the Earth's mass (in kilograms), *m*_{1}, and the Earth's radius (in metres), *r*, to obtain the value of *g*:

Note that this formula only works because of the mathematical fact that the gravity of a uniform spherical body, as measured on or above its surface, is the same as if all its mass were concentrated at a point at its centre. This is what allows us to use the Earth's radius for *r*.

The value obtained agrees approximately with the measured value of *g*. The difference may be attributed to several factors, mentioned above under "Variations":

- The Earth is not homogeneous
- The Earth is not a perfect sphere, and an average value must be used for its radius
- This calculated value of
*g*only includes true gravity. It does not include the reduction of constraint force that we perceive as a reduction of gravity due to the rotation of Earth, and some of gravity being "used up" in providing the centripetal acceleration

There are significant uncertainties in the values of *r* and *m*_{1} as used in this calculation, and the value of *G* is also rather difficult to measure precisely.

If *G*, *g* and *r* are known then a reverse calculation will give an estimate of the mass of the Earth. This method was used by Henry Cavendish.

The table below shows comparative gravitational accelerations at the surface of the Sun, the Earth's moon, each of the planets in the Solar System and their major moons, Pluto, and Eris. The "surface" is taken to mean the cloud tops of the gas giants (Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune). For the Sun, the surface is taken to mean the photosphere. The values in the table have not been de-rated for the inertia effect of planet rotation (and cloud-top wind speeds for the gas giants) and therefore, generally speaking, are similar to the actual gravity that would be experienced near the poles. For reference the time it would take an object to fall 100 metres, the height of a skyscraper, is shown, along with the maximum speed reached. Air resistance is neglected.

Body | Multiple of Earth gravity | m/s^{2} | Time to fall 100 m and maximum speed reached | |
---|---|---|---|---|

Sun | 27.90 | 274.1 | 0.85 s | 843 km/h (524 mph) |

Mercury | 0.3770 | 3.703 | 7.4 s | 98 km/h (61 mph) |

Venus | 0.9032 | 8.872 | 4.8 s | 152 km/h (94 mph) |

Earth | 1 | 9.8067^{[15]} | 4.5 s | 159 km/h (99 mph) |

Moon | 0.1655 | 1.625 | 11.1 s | 65 km/h (40 mph) |

Mars | 0.3895 | 3.728 | 7.3 s | 98 km/h (61 mph) |

Jupiter | 2.640 | 25.93 | 2.8 s | 259 km/h (161 mph) |

Io | 0.182 | 1.789 | 10.6 s | 68 km/h (42 mph) |

Europa | 0.134 | 1.314 | 12.3 s | 58 km/h (36 mph) |

Ganymede | 0.145 | 1.426 | 11.8 s | 61 km/h (38 mph) |

Callisto | 0.126 | 1.24 | 12.7 s | 57 km/h (35 mph) |

Saturn | 1.139 | 11.19 | 4.2 s | 170 km/h (110 mph) |

Titan | 0.138 | 1.3455 | 12.2 s | 59 km/h (37 mph) |

Uranus | 0.917 | 9.01 | 4.7 s | 153 km/h (95 mph) |

Titania | 0.039 | 0.379 | 23.0 s | 31 km/h (19 mph) |

Oberon | 0.035 | 0.347 | 24.0 s | 30 km/h (19 mph) |

Neptune | 1.148 | 11.28 | 4.2 s | 171 km/h (106 mph) |

Triton | 0.079 | 0.779 | 16.0 s | 45 km/h (28 mph) |

Pluto | 0.0621 | 0.610 | 18.1 s | 40 km/h (25 mph) |

Eris | 0.0814 (approx.) | 0.8 (approx.) | 15.8 s | 46 km/h (29 mph) |

- Earth's magnetic field
- Gravitation
- Gravity anomaly, Bouguer anomaly
- Gravitation of the Moon
- Gravitational acceleration
- Gravity Field and Steady-State Ocean Circulation Explorer
- Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment
- Newton's law of universal gravitation

**^**NASA/JPL/University of Texas Center for Space Research. "PIA12146: GRACE Global Gravity Animation".*Photojournal*. NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory. Retrieved 30 December 2013.**^***The international system of units (SI)*(2008 ed.). United States Department of Commerce, NIST Special Publication 330. p. 51.**^**Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (2006). "Chapter 5".*The International System of Units (SI)*. 8th ed. Retrieved 2009-11-25. "Unit names are normally printed in roman (upright) type ... Symbols for quantities are generally single letters set in an italic font, although they may be qualified by further information in subscripts or superscripts or in brackets."**^**"SI Unit rules and style conventions". National Institute For Standards and Technology (USA). September 2004. Retrieved 2009-11-25. "Variables and quantity symbols are in italic type. Unit symbols are in roman type."**^**Hirt,Claessens et. al. (Aug 6, 2013). "New ultra-high resolution picture of Earth's gravity field".*Geophysical Research Letters DOI: 10.1002/grl.50838*.**^**Boynton, Richard (2001). "*Precise Measurement of Mass*".*Sawe Paper No. 3147*. Arlington, Texas: S.A.W.E., Inc. Retrieved 2007-01-21.**^**"Curious About Astronomy?", Cornell University, retrieved June 2007**^**"I feel 'lighter' when up a mountain but am I?", National Physical Laboratory FAQ**^**"The G's in the Machine", NASA, see "Editor's note #2"**^**Tipler, Paul A. (1999).*Physics for scientists and engineers.*(4th ed. ed.). New York: W.H. Freeman/Worth Publishers. pp. 336–337. ISBN 9781572594913.- ^
^{a}^{b}A. M. Dziewonski, D. L. Anderson (1981). "Preliminary reference Earth model".*Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors***25**(4): 297–356. Bibcode:1981PEPI...25..297D. doi:10.1016/0031-9201(81)90046-7. ISSN 0031-9201. PMC 411539. PMID 16592703. **^**Gravitational Fields Widget as of Oct 25th, 2012 – WolframAlpha**^**International Gravity formula**^**The rate is calculated by differentiating*g*(*r*) with respect to*r*and evaluating at*r*=*r*_{Earth}.**^**This value excludes the adjustment for centrifugal force due to Earth's rotation and is therefore greater than the 9.80665 m/s^{2}value of standard gravity.

- Altitude gravity calculator
- GRACE – Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment
- GGMplus high resolution data (2013)