From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia - View original article
|This article needs attention from an expert in Neurology. (January 2010)|
|This article includes a list of references, but its sources remain unclear because it has insufficient inline citations. (November 2012)|
The diagnosis of functional neurological deficit provides an umbrella term for a variety of symptoms of apparent neurological origin but which current models struggle to explain psychologically or organically. Presentation may be similar to a wide range of other neurological conditions from paralysis to weakness. Most neurologists use it as a code for conversion disorder in an effort not to offend the patient. Given the controversy over conversion disorder as a real diagnosis the term is most useful in an aetiological neutral sense.
Functional neurological deficit can present with any motor or sensory symptom in the body including:
Given the occurrence of these medically unexplained symptoms in patients with organic brain injury, spinal injury, to post-anaethaesia and post-viral illnesses, the modern term moves away from psychodynamic theory and provides a useful label for what is a complex and little understood disorder.
Abnormalities in orbitofrontal, cingulate or prefrontal cortex circuits in processing environmental stimuli from the CNS result in an interruption of “awareness” of contralateral basal ganglia and thalamic motor-circuits. Once the connection is disrupted motor circuits are no longer activated by cortex activity as they rely on reciprocal paths for continual function. In effect it is a hardware crash caused by an interruption of power (consciousness) with a corresponding decrease in blood flow to the basal ganglia and thalamus.
Macrocosmic damage (in the form of lesions for example) in the same subcortical pre-motor circuits may also result in unilateral motor neglect, where voluntary limb use may fail despite a lack of true paralysis and intact primary sensorimotor pathways.
As such hypothesized perpetuating aetiologies and even the precipitating stimuli are relatively unimportant, certainly psychodynamic theories of primary and secondary gain are of questionable relevance. Symptoms may indeed arise in any circumstance that the cortex is not structurally equipped to deal with; from post-anaesthetic weakness, neurological damage, viral infection, fatigue to trivial psycho-social events . These are not however the cause of symptoms but rather the abnormalities within the cortex predispose the brain towards a systemic reaction. (think about how windows randomly crashes) Hence a history of functional symptoms may me be found in individuals. In other species the prefrontal cortex is dedicated to voluntary movement but in man its development encompasses a variety of higher functions including memory and imagination.
As Functional Deficits arise almost certainly from the brain's idea of a limb (stone) then it is useful to hypothesize that dysfunction in the prefrontal cortex has caused the disconnection downstream (Vuilleimier) with the observation of prolonged physiotherapy being that patients "have forgotten how to move properly". Other prolonged observations showing "that patients have real changes of tone" is also thus explained by reciprocal motor neglect.
As the prefontal cortex is also associated with a variety of psychological deficits co-existing disturbances of consciousness and mood may also be present though co-morbidity is not a necessary precursor to functional motor symptoms.
Treatment options should be aimed towards the re-establishment of power (consciousness) to affected motor circuits through explanation of the condition, proprioception based physiotherapy and drug treatment. Finding and treating the root organic cause that has "sparked" the deafferentation within the CNS is also important i.e. vitamin b12 deficiency, lyme disease, antiphospholipid syndrome and various other non-structural diseases are all common causes.
The importance of the sub-cortex in movement and its relatively recent evolution could be hypothesised as the structural flaw in the “animal who knows and knows that he knows.” Chardin Studies of functional symptoms in other higher mammals thus offer the possibility of further insight into what is a distressing and often long-term, though completely reversible condition.