From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia  View original article
In computer programming, cons
(/ˈkɒnz/ or /ˈkɒns/) is a fundamental function in most dialects of the Lisp programming language. cons
constructs memory objects which hold two values or pointers to values. These objects are referred to as (cons) cells, conses, nonatomic sexpressions ("NATSes"), or (cons) pairs. In Lisp jargon, the expression "to cons x onto y" means to construct a new object with (cons x y)
. The resulting pair has a left half, referred to as the car
(the first element), and a right half (the second element), referred to as the cdr
.
It is loosely related to the objectoriented notion of a constructor, which creates a new object given arguments, and more closely related to the constructor function of an algebraic data type system.
The word "cons" and expressions like "to cons onto" are also part of a more general functional programming jargon. Sometimes operators that have a similar purpose, especially in the context of list processing, are pronounced "cons". (A good example is the :: operator in ML and Scala, or : in Haskell, which adds an element to the beginning of a list.)
Although cons cells can be used to hold ordered pairs of simplex data, they are more commonly used to construct more complex compound data structures, notably lists and binary trees.
For example, the Lisp expression (cons 1 2)
constructs a cell holding 1 in its left half (the socalled car
field) and 2 in its right half (the cdr
field). In Lisp notation, the value (cons 1 2)
looks like:
(1 . 2)
Note the dot between 1 and 2; this indicates that the Sexpression is a "dotted pair," rather than a "list."
In Lisp, lists are implemented on top of cons pairs. More specifically, any list structure in Lisp is either:
()
, which is a special object usually called nil
.car
is the first element of the list and whose cdr
is a list containing the rest of the elements.This forms the basis of a simple, singly linked list structure whose contents can be manipulated with cons
, car
, and cdr
. Note that nil
is the only list that is not also a cons pair. As an example, consider a list whose elements are 1, 2, and 3. Such a list can be created in three steps:
nil
, the empty listwhich is equivalent to the single expression:
(cons 1 (cons 2 (cons 3 nil)))
or its shorthand:
(list 1 2 3)
The resulting value is the list:
(1 . (2 . (3 . nil)))
i.e.
***nil    1 2 3
which is generally abbreviated as:
(1 2 3)
Thus, cons
can be used to add one element to the front of an existing linked list. For example, if x is the list we defined above, then (cons 5 x)
will produce the list:
(5 1 2 3)
Another useful list procedure is append
, which concatenates two existing lists (i.e. combines two lists into a single list).
Binary trees that only store data in their leaves are also easily constructed with cons
. For example, the code:
(cons (cons 1 2) (cons 3 4))
results in the tree:
((1 . 2) . (3 . 4))
i.e.
* / \ * * / \ / \ 1 2 3 4
Technically, the list (1 2 3) in the previous example is also a binary tree, one which happens to be particularly unbalanced. To see this, simply rearrange the diagram:
***nil    1 2 3
to the following equivalent:
* / \ 1 * / \ 2 * / \ 3 nil
Cons can refer to the general process of memory allocation, as opposed to using destructive operations of the kind that would be used in an imperative programming language. For example:
I sped up the code a bit by putting in side effects instead of having it cons like crazy.
Since Lisp has firstclass functions, all data structures, including cons cells, are not fundamentally necessary to the language, since all data structures can be implemented using functions. For example, in Scheme:
(define (cons x y) (lambda (m) (m x y))) (define (car z) (z (lambda (p q) p))) (define (cdr z) (z (lambda (p q) q)))
The above code reimplements the cons, car, and cdr operations, using a function as the "cons cell". This is the usual way of defining data structures in pure lambda calculus, an abstract, theoretical model of computation that is closely related to Scheme.
This implementation, while academically interesting, is impractical because it renders cons cells indistinguishable from any other Scheme procedure, as well as introducing unnecessary computational inefficiencies.
However, the same kind of encoding can be used for more complex algebraic data types with variants, where it may even turn out to be more efficient than other kinds of encoding.^{[1]} This encoding also has the advantage of being implementable in a statically typed language that doesn't have variants, such as Java, using interfaces instead of lambdas.
