Captive insurance

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia - View original article

 
Jump to: navigation, search

Captive insurance companies are insurance companies established with the specific objective of insuring risks emanating from their parent group or groups, but they sometimes also insure risks of the group's customers.This is an alternative form of risk management that is becoming a more practical and popular means through which companies can protect themselves financially while having more control over how they are insured.

Origin of term[edit]

The term "captive" was coined by the "father of captive insurance," Frederic M. Reiss, while he was bringing his concept into practice for his first client, the Youngstown Sheet & Tube Company, in Ohio in the 1950s.[1] The company had a series of mining operations, and its management referred to the mines whose output was put solely to the corporation's use as captive mines. When Reiss helped the company incorporate its own insurance subsidiaries, they were referred to as captive insurance companies because they wrote insurance exclusively for the captive mines. Reiss continued to use the term: the policyholder owns the insurance company i.e. the insurer is captive to the policyholder. If the captive insures its own parent and affiliates it is called a pure captive. If it insures just one type of industry (e.g. energy industries) it is called a homogeneous captive. A captive insurance company can also insure a group of diverse companies; this is called a heterogeneous captive. The captive insurance industry is believed to have started when ship owners met at Lloyd's coffee shop in London and agreed to share in the risks of their shipping fleet losses.[citation needed]

Domicile[edit]

Captives are licensed by many jurisdictions. The captive's primary jurisdiction is known as its domicile. Most captive insurers are based "offshore", in places such as Gibraltar, Mauritius, Belize, Bermuda, The Cayman Islands, Ireland, Guernsey, Luxembourg, Barbados, Malta, The Bahamas, Singapore, Anguilla, the British Virgin Islands, Qatar Financial Centre and Dubai International Financial Centre.

Bermuda is the world's leading offshore captive domicile. The onshore regulatory burden and the cost of operating either a U.S.-based or Lloyd's-based captive in the early 1960s drove Reiss to seek out a jurisdiction that would allow his captive concept to flourish. After much investigation, he chose Bermuda, due to its geographical location, clean reputation and status as a British Dependent Territory, which avoided the risks and uncertainties often experienced by international businesses operating in politically unstable and unaccountable jurisdictions. Bermuda's captives are predominantly owned by large U.S. corporations. The Cayman Islands is the second largest licensing jurisdiction in terms of the number of captives licensed. Vermont is second in terms of insurance company assets but third in terms of captives licensed. Healthcare corporations prefer Bermuda, due to the ease of claim payment provided by the regulatory environment. [2]

A recent trend has various States in the United States revising their regulations to be more attractive to captive insurance companies. For example, Oregon has removed premium taxes from captives, instead charging a $5000 annual fee.[3] In the United States, Vermont is home to more captive insurers than any other U.S. state, with nearly 900 licensed captive companies as of August 2009.[citation needed]. In recent years, Anguilla has been the fastest growing offshore domicile in numbers of captives, while Montana,[4] Delaware and Utah have been the fastest growing US domiciles.[5]

Business lines[edit]

Reiss introduced the captive to provide large corporations with insurance coverages they needed but could not obtain economically through the mainstream insurance market, thus reducing their costs. Captives can cover lines of business, such as workers' compensation, that have relatively predictable claim rates[citation needed]. They can access the reinsurance market to lay off risks that they do not wish to accept: this may include product liability, general and professional liability and directors' and officers' liability. Vehicle insurance, both property damage and third party liability of corporate fleets and vehicles, is also quite commonly covered.[6]

Regulation[edit]

Captives may be licenced to write some lines of business directly. In other cases, such as workers' compensation in the U.S., for example, the business must initially be written by another insurer, under its insurance licence, which then reinsures it (lays it off) to the captive. The original insurer retains a fee, usually somewhere between 5% and 15%, to provide this service. Premiums paid to captives are tax deductible, provided the terms of the policy (including the premium amount) are reasonable. A captive cannot arbitrarily set the premium amount simply to generate a deduction for the parent. In most situations, the captive carrier should be able to demonstrate its premium generating process (underwriting).

In the European Union, a new set of regulatory requirements (Solvency II) is planned with additional restrictions and responsibilities for captives and reinsurance companies. Some European captives ask for simplified regulation.[7]

Captive Manager[edit]

Reiss created the first captive management company, International Risk Management Limited (IRML), in Bermuda in 1962 to provide the administration of his client's captives (this is now part of the Aon Corporation). Most captive management is usually outsourced to a captive manager located in the jurisdiction that holds the primary license for the captive. The two largest captive insurance company managers in the world are units of Aon Corporation and Marsh & McLennan Companies which serve companies of all sizes.

In the U.S., most captive managers are small administrative services providers.[8] They don’t draft insurance policies, which is generally the function of a senior insurance or corporate lawyer; they don’t price policies, which is done by a property & casualty underwriter; and they don’t purport to be responsible for state or federal tax issues, which is what a tax lawyer does. Other captive management firms provide a full turnkey service to include all aspects of forming and managing a captive insurer on an ongoing basis, which would include professionals that that understand the insurance, tax, and legal aspects of a captive.[9] The middle market is the area of growth for captive managers because more than 90% of Fortune 500 companies already do captives, according to Capstone Associated Services Ltd.,[10] a comprehensive manager of small captive insurers with over 140 captives formed for the middle market in the last 15+years.

Captive insurance companies are creatures of the Internal Revenue Code. Over 75% of the world’s captives are associated with U.S. insureds because these insurance arrangements are encouraged under the Internal Revenue Code. Because captives are sophisticated tax structures (having been the subject of dozens of cases and rulings by the IRS, the Tax Court and various appellate courts over the past 70 years) captive owners often engage tax professionals in addition to captive managers that simply provide administrative services.[11][12]

Micro Captives[edit]

Over 90 percent of Fortune 1000 companies and many successful middle market businesses have captives. Over half of all property and casualty premiums that are written, are written through captives.[13]

The Section 831(b) or “small” P&C captive, also known as a "micro captive" is used by midsize companies looking for cost-effective ways to transfer risk.[14] Captive experts say an 831(b) introduces middle market companies to alternative risk transfer and its benefits, providing this class of insurance buyers a valuable cost-saving tool long utilized by Fortune 1000 companies. The Section 831(b) captive or “small” property and casualty captive is one of the most popular choices for middle market companies [15]

Main captive domiciles[edit]

DomicileCaptive NumberPercentage
Bermuda*
958
19.3%
Cayman Islands*
765
15.4%
Vermont*
567
11.4%
Guernsey*
368
7.4%
Luxembourg*
262
5.3%
Barbados*
256
5.2%
Delaware*
251
5.1%
Ireland*
224
4.5%
British Virgin Islands*
195
3.2%
Hawaii*
163
3.3%
South Carolina*
158
3.2%
Isle of Man
130
2.6%
Nevada*
115
2.3%
Arizona*
108
2.2%
Utah
100
2.0%
Turks & Caicos
71
1.4%
Singapore
57
1.1%
Sweden
41
0.8%
Switzerland
41
0.8%
District of Columbia
40
0.8%
Labuan#
32
0.6%
New York
27
0.5%
Netherlands
26
0.5%
Vanuatu
25
0.5%
Bahamas
23
0.5%
Total
5,003
100.0%

Not listed above by Business Insurance News is Montana with 150 captives as of December 2013 and Anguilla which has more than 300 captives as of December 2012. Delaware does not report.

*2008 Updated stats. Source: Business Insurance News Captives 2008
**2008 Updated stats. Source: http://www.captive.utah.gov/hotnews.html
#2007 Updated stats. Source: LOFSA 2007 Annual Report

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Held Captive; Catherine Duffy p38
  2. ^ Mitchell, D. (2013) Captive Carriers in Healthcare 101. American Society of Healthcare Risk Management. October, 2012.
  3. ^ Zolkos, Rodd (April 2, 2012). "Oregon becomes newest U.S. captive domicile". Business Insurance. Retrieved April 3, 2012. 
  4. ^ http://www.rmmagazine.com/2013/08/01/how-montana-has-become-a-captive-domicile-hotbed-in-recent-years/
  5. ^ Captive Insurance Times, October 1, 2012 “Domiciles that make sense”
  6. ^ A.M. Best Special Report (7/30/2007)
  7. ^ [1]
  8. ^ Captive Review, January 2013, "The 'Captive Manager' Falacy," p. 49-50
  9. ^ Insurance Journal, January 24, 2011, http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/southcentral/2011/01/24/181705.htm
  10. ^ http://www.forbes.com/sites/bmoharrisbank/2013/01/28/why-companies-are-opting-for-captive-insurance-arrangements/
  11. ^ New York Times, July 14, 2012, “An Insurer of One’s Own? It’s Possible, with Caveats,” http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/14/your-money/a-captive-insurance-company-offers-financial-benefits-if-not-abused-wealth-matters.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
  12. ^ Captive Review, January 2013, "The 'captive manager' fallacy," pp. 49-51
  13. ^ Insurance Journal, January 24, 2011, http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/southcentral/2011/01/24/181705.htm
  14. ^ 4. Property & Casualty 360, May 3, 2012, http://www.propertycasualty360.com/2012/05/03/831b-captives-small-option-is-increasingly-big-id
  15. ^ Forbes, January 28, 2013, http://www.forbes.com/sites/bmoharrisbank/2013/01/28/why-companies-are-opting-for-captive-insurance-arrangements/

Further reading[edit]