Bisphenol A

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia - View original article

Bisphenol A
Identifiers
CAS number80-05-7 YesY
PubChem6623
ChemSpider6371 YesY
UNIIMLT3645I99 YesY
EC number201-245-8
UN number2430
DrugBankDB06973
KEGGC13624 YesY
ChEBICHEBI:33216 YesY
ChEMBLCHEMBL418971 YesY
RTECS numberSL6300000
Jmol-3D imagesImage 1
Image 2
Properties
Molecular formulaC15H16O2
Molar mass228.29 g mol−1
AppearanceWhite solid
Density1.20 g/cm³
Melting point

158-159 °C, 431-432 K, 316-318 °F

Boiling point

220 °C, 493 K, 428 °F (4 mmHg)

Solubility in water120–300 ppm (21.5 °C)
Hazards
R-phrasesR36 R37 R38 R43
S-phrasesS24 S26 S37
NFPA 704
NFPA 704.svg
0
3
0
Flash point227 °C (441 °F)
Related compounds
Related compoundsphenols
Bisphenol S
 YesY (verify) (what is: YesY/N?)
Except where noted otherwise, data are given for materials in their standard state (at 25 °C, 100 kPa)
Infobox references
 
Jump to: navigation, search
Bisphenol A
Identifiers
CAS number80-05-7 YesY
PubChem6623
ChemSpider6371 YesY
UNIIMLT3645I99 YesY
EC number201-245-8
UN number2430
DrugBankDB06973
KEGGC13624 YesY
ChEBICHEBI:33216 YesY
ChEMBLCHEMBL418971 YesY
RTECS numberSL6300000
Jmol-3D imagesImage 1
Image 2
Properties
Molecular formulaC15H16O2
Molar mass228.29 g mol−1
AppearanceWhite solid
Density1.20 g/cm³
Melting point

158-159 °C, 431-432 K, 316-318 °F

Boiling point

220 °C, 493 K, 428 °F (4 mmHg)

Solubility in water120–300 ppm (21.5 °C)
Hazards
R-phrasesR36 R37 R38 R43
S-phrasesS24 S26 S37
NFPA 704
NFPA 704.svg
0
3
0
Flash point227 °C (441 °F)
Related compounds
Related compoundsphenols
Bisphenol S
 YesY (verify) (what is: YesY/N?)
Except where noted otherwise, data are given for materials in their standard state (at 25 °C, 100 kPa)
Infobox references

Bisphenol A (BPA) is an organic compound with the chemical formula (CH3)2C(C6H4OH)2. It is a colorless solid that is soluble in organic solvents, but poorly soluble in water. Having two phenol functional groups, it is used to make polycarbonate polymers and epoxy resins, along with other materials used to make plastics. Bisphenol A has a vapor pressure of 5*10-6 Pa.[1]

BPA exhibits hormone-like properties that raise concern about its suitability in consumer products and food containers. Since 2008, several governments have questioned its safety, which prompted some retailers to withdraw polycarbonate products. A 2010 report from the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warned of possible hazards to fetuses, infants, and young children.[2] In September 2010, Canada became the first country to declare BPA a toxic substance.[3][4] The European Union, Canada, and recently the United States have banned BPA use in baby bottles.[5]

Contents

Production

World production capacity of this compound was 1 million tons in the 80s,[6] and more than 2.2 million tons in 2009.[7] In 2003, U.S. consumption was 856,000 tons, 72% of which was used to make polycarbonate plastic and 21% going into epoxy resins.[8] In the U.S., less than 5% of the BPA produced is used in food contact applications,[9] but remains in the canned food industry and printing applications such as sales receipts.[10][11]

Bisphenol A was first synthesized by the Russian chemist A.P. Dianin in 1891.[12][13] This compound is synthesized by the condensation of acetone (hence the suffix A in the name)[14] with two equivalents of phenol. The reaction is catalyzed by a strong acid, such as hydrochloric acid (HCl) or a sulfonated polystyrene resin. Industrially, a large excess of phenol is used to ensure full condensation; the product mixture of the cumene process (acetone and phenol) may also be used as starting material:[6]

Synthesis of bisphenol A from phenol and acetone

A large number of ketones undergo analogous condensation reactions. Commercial production of BPA requires distillation – either extraction of BPA from many resinous byproducts under high vacuum, or solvent-based extraction using additional phenol followed by distillation.[6]

Use

Bisphenol A is used primarily to make plastics, and products using bisphenol A-based plastics have been in commercial use since 1957.[15] At least 3.6 million tonnes (8 billion pounds) of BPA are used by manufacturers yearly.[16] It is a key monomer in production of epoxy resins[17][18] and in the most common form of polycarbonate plastic.[6][19][20] Bisphenol A and phosgene react to give polycarbonate under biphasic conditions; the hydrochloric acid is scavenged with aqueous base:

Polycarbonatsynthese.svg

Diphenyl carbonate may be used in place of phosgene. Phenol is eliminated instead of hydrochloric acid. This transesterification process avoids the toxicity and handling of phosgene.[21]

Polycarbonate plastic, which is clear and nearly shatter-proof, is used to make a variety of common products including baby and water bottles, sports equipment, medical and dental devices, dental fillings and sealants, CDs and DVDs, household electronics, and eyeglass lenses.[6] BPA is also used in the synthesis of polysulfones and polyether ketones, as an antioxidant in some plasticizers, and as a polymerization inhibitor in PVC. Epoxy resins containing bisphenol A are used as coatings on the inside of almost all food and beverage cans;[22] however, due to BPA health concerns, in Japan epoxy coating was mostly replaced by PET film.[23]

Bisphenol A is also a precursor to the flame retardant tetrabromobisphenol A, and formerly was used as a fungicide.[24] Bisphenol A is a preferred color developer in carbonless copy paper and thermal paper,[25] with the most common public exposure coming from some[26] thermal point of sale receipt paper.[27][28] BPA-based products are also used in foundry castings and for lining water pipes.[9]

Identification in plastics

Some type 7 plastics may leak bisphenol A

There are seven classes of plastics used in packaging applications. Currently there are no BPA labeling requirements for plastics.

"In general, plastics that are marked with Resin Identification Codes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 are very unlikely to contain BPA. Some, but not all, plastics that are marked with the Resin Identification Code 7 may be made with BPA."[29]

Type 7 is the catch-all "other" class, and some type 7 plastics, such as polycarbonate (sometimes identified with the letters "PC" near the recycling symbol) and epoxy resins, are made from bisphenol A monomer.[6][30]

Type 3 (PVC) also may contain bisphenol A as an antioxidant in plasticizers.[6] This refers to "flexible PVC", but not for rigids such as pipe, windows, and siding.

History

Bisphenol A was discovered in 1891 by Russian chemist Aleksandr Dianin. In the early 1930s the British chemist Charles Edward Dodds recognized BPA as an artificial estrogen.[31] During that time BPA had two initial uses. The first use of BPA was to enhance the growth of cattle and poultry. The second use of BPA in the mid 1930s was as an estrogen replacement for women. BPA's ability to mimic the effects of natural estrogen derive from the similarity of phenol groups on both BPA and estradiol, which enable this synthetic molecule to trigger estrogenic pathways in the body. [32] BPA was only briefly used as an estrogen replacement and was replaced by diethylstilbestrol (DES).[31] Based on research by chemists at Bayer and General Electric, BPA has been used since the 1950s to harden polycarbonate plastics and make epoxy resin, and in the lining of food and beverage containers.[33][34] The first evidence of the estrogenicity of bisphenol A came from experiments on rats conducted in the 1930s,[35][36] but it was not until 1997 that adverse effects of low-dose exposure on laboratory animals were first proposed (hormesis).[22] Modern studies began finding possible connections to health issues caused by exposure to BPA during pregnancy and during development. See Government and industry response. Research is ongoing and the debate continues as to whether BPA should be banned or not, and to what extent, all over the world. In 2010 Canada's department of the environment declared BPA to be a "toxic substance".[37]

Health effects

Bisphenol A is an endocrine disruptor which can mimic estrogen and may lead to negative health effects. More specifically, Bisphenol A closely mimics the structure and function of the hormone estradiol with the ability to bind to and activate the same estrogen receptor as the natural hormone.[38] Gore AC. Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals: From Basic Research to Clinical Practice. Humana Press; 8 June 2007. (Contemporary Endocrinology). ISBN 978-1-58829-830-0.</ref>[39][40][41] Early developmental stages appear to be the period of greatest sensitivity to its effects,[42] and some studies have linked prenatal exposure to later physical and neurological difficulties. Regulatory bodies have determined safety levels for humans, but those safety levels are currently being questioned or are under review as a result of new scientific studies.[43][44] A 2011 study that investigated the number of chemicals pregnant women are exposed to in the U.S. found BPA in 96% of women.[45]

Overall, empirical evidence supporting the negative health effects of BPA varies significantly across studies. Opinions vary greatly about the health effects of BPA. Some studies conclude that BPA poses no health risks while others state that BPA causes a number of adverse health effects. In general, the European’s Scientific Committee on Food, the EUs European Chemicals Bureau, the European Food Safety Authority, and the US Food and Drug Administration have concluded that current levels of BPA present no risk to the general population. However, experts in the field of endocrine disruptors have stated that the entire population may suffer adverse health effects from current BPA levels.[46] In 2009, The Endocrine Society released a statement citing the adverse effects of endocrine-disrupting chemicals, and the controversy surrounding BPA.[47] In 2012 the FDA did ban the use of BPA in baby bottles, however the Environmental Working Group called the ban "purely cosmetic". In a statement they said,“If the agency truly wants to prevent people from being exposed to this toxic chemical associated with a variety of serious and chronic conditions it should ban its use in cans of infant formula, food and beverages." The Natural Resources Defense Council called the move inadequate saying, the FDA needs to ban BPA from all food packaging.[48] In a statement a FDA spokesman said the agency's action was not based on safety concerns and that "the agency continues to support the safety of BPA for use in products that hold food."[49]

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also holds the position that BPA is not a health concern. In 2011, Andrew Wadge, the chief scientist of the United Kingdom's Food Standards Agency, commented on an EPA study on dietary exposure of adult humans to BPA,[50] saying, "This corroborates other independent studies and adds to the evidence that BPA is rapidly absorbed, detoxified, and eliminated from humans – therefore is not a health concern."[51] In the study 20 subjects were tested for BPA every hour for twenty-four hours while consuming three meals consisting of canned food.[50] This study has been criticized, however, as lacking data and having flawed assumptions.[52]

Expert panel conclusions

In 2006, the US Government sponsored an assessment of the scientific literature on BPA. 38 opponents of bisphenol A gathered in Chapel Hill, North Carolina to review several hundred studies on BPA, many conducted by members of the group. At the end of the meeting, the group issued the Chapel Hill Consensus Statement, which stated "BPA at concentrations found in the human body is associated with organizational changes in the prostate, breast, testis, mammary glands, body size, brain structure and chemistry, and behavior of laboratory animals."[53]

The Chapel Hill Consensus Statement claimed that average levels in people are above those that cause harm to many animals in laboratory experiments. They noted that while BPA is not persistent in the environment or in humans, biomonitoring surveys indicate that exposure is continuous, however, which is problematic because acute animal exposure studies are used to estimate daily human exposure to BPA, and no studies that had examined BPA pharmacokinetics in animal models had followed continuous low-level exposures. They added that measurement of BPA levels in serum and other body fluids suggests the possibilities that BPA intake is much higher than accounted for, and/or that BPA can bioaccumulate in some conditions (such as pregnancy).[54] A 2011 study, the first to examine BPA in a continuous low-level exposure throughout the day, did find an increased absorption and accumulation of BPA in the blood of mice.[55]

In 2007 studies indicating harm reported a variety of deleterious effects in rodent offspring exposed in the uterus: abnormal weight gain, insulin resistance, prostate cancer, and excessive mammary gland development.[56]

A panel convened by the U.S. National Institutes of Health in 2007 noted that many of the studies referenced by the Chapel Hill group had methodological problems. This panel could not rule out "some concern" about BPA's effects on fetal and infant brain development and behavior.[8] The concern over the effect of BPA on infants was also heightened by the fact that infants and children are estimated to have the highest daily intake of BPA.[57] A 2008 report by the U.S. National Toxicology Program (NTP) later agreed with the panel, expressing "some concern for effects on the brain, behavior, and prostate gland in fetuses, infants, and children at current human exposures to bisphenol A," and "minimal concern for effects on the mammary gland and an earlier age for puberty for females in fetuses, infants, and children at current human exposures to bisphenol A." The NTP had "negligible concern that exposure of pregnant women to bisphenol A will result in fetal or neonatal mortality, birth defects, or reduced birth weight and growth in their offspring."[58]

Obesity

A 2008 review has concluded that obesity may be increased as a function of BPA exposure, which "...merits concern among scientists and public health officials."[59] A 2009 review of available studies has concluded that "perinatal BPA exposure acts to exert persistent effects on body weight and adiposity".[60] Another 2009 review has concluded that "Eliminating exposures to (BPA) and improving nutrition during development offer the potential for reducing obesity and associated diseases".[61] Other reviews have come with similar conclusions.[62][63] A later study on rats has suggested that perinatal exposure to drinking water containing 1 mg/L of BPA increased adipogenesis in females at weaning.[64] Another study suggested that larger size-for-age was due to a faster growth rate rather than obesity.[65]

Neurological issues

A panel convened by the U.S. National Institutes of Health determined that there was "some concern" about BPA's effects on fetal and infant brain development and behavior.[8] A 2008 report by the U.S. National Toxicology Program (NTP) later agreed with the panel, expressing "some concern for effects on the brain".[58] In January 2010 the FDA expressed the same level of concern.

A 2007 review has concluded that BPA, like other xenoestrogens, should be considered as a player within the nervous system that can regulate or alter its functions through multiple pathways.[66] A 2007 review has concluded that low doses of BPA during development have persistent effects on brain structure, function and behavior in rats and mice.[67] A 2008 review concluded that low-dose BPA maternal exposure causes long-term consequences at the level of neurobehavioral development in mice.[68] A 2008 review has concluded that neonatal exposure to Bisphenol-A (BPA) can affect sexually dimorphic brain morphology and neuronal adult phenotypes in mice.[69] A 2008 review has concluded that BPA altered long-term potentiation in the hippocampus and even nanomolar dosage could induce significant effects on memory processes.[70] A 2009 review raised concerns about BPA effect on anteroventral periventricular nucleus.[71]

A 2008 study by the Yale School of Medicine demonstrated that adverse neurological effects occur in non-human primates regularly exposed to bisphenol A at levels equal to the United States Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) maximum safe dose of 50 µg/kg/day.[72][73] This research found a connection between BPA and interference with brain cell connections vital to memory, learning, and mood.

A 2010 study with rats prenatally exposed to 40 µg/kg bw BPA has concluded that corticosterone and its actions in the brain are sensitive to the programming effects of BPA.[74]

Disruption of the dopaminergic system

A 2005 review concluded that prenatal and neonatal exposure to BPA in mice can potentiate the central dopaminergic systems, resulting in the supersensitivity to the drugs-of-abuse-induced reward effects and hyperlocomotion.[75]

A 2008 review has concluded that BPA mimics estrogenic activity and affects various dopaminergic processes to enhance mesolimbic dopamine activity resulting in hyperactivity, attention deficits, and a heightened sensitivity to drugs of abuse.[76]

A 2009 study on rats has concluded that prenatal and neonatal exposure to low-dose BPA causes deficits in development at dorsolateral striatum via altering the function of dopaminergic receptors.[77] Another 2009 study has found associated changes in the dopaminergic system.[78]

Thyroid function

A 2007 review has concluded that bisphenol-A has been shown to bind to thyroid hormone receptor and perhaps have selective effects on its functions.[79]

A 2009 review about environmental chemicals and thyroid function raised concerns about BPA effects on triiodothyronine and concluded that "available evidence suggests that governing agencies need to regulate the use of thyroid-disrupting chemicals, particularly as such uses relate exposures of pregnant women, neonates and small children to the agents".[80]

A 2009 review summarized BPA adverse effects on thyroid hormone action.[81]

Cancer research

According to the WHO's INFOSAN, carcinogenicity studies conducted under the US National Toxicology Program, have shown increases in leukaemia and testicular interstitial cell tumours in male rats. However, according to the note "these studies have not been considered as convincing evidence of a potential cancer risk because of the doubtful statistical significance of the small differences in incidences from controls."[82]

A 2010 review at Tufts University Medical School concluded that Bisphenol A may increase cancer risk.[83]

Breast cancer

A 2008 review stated that "evidence from animal models is accumulating that perinatal exposure to (...) low doses of (..) BPA, alters breast development and increases breast cancer risk".[84] Another 2008 review concluded that "animal experiments and epidemiological data strengthen the hypothesis that fetal exposure to xenoestrogens may be an underlying cause of the increased incidence of breast cancer observed over the last 50 years".[85]

A 2009 in vitro study has concluded that BPA is able to induce neoplastic transformation in human breast epithelial cells.[86] Another 2009 study concluded that maternal oral exposure to low concentrations of BPA during lactation increases mammary carcinogenesis in a rodent model.[87]

A 2010 study with the mammary glands of the offspring of pregnant rats treated orally with 0, 25 or 250 µg BPA/kg body weight has found that key proteins involved in signaling pathways such as cellular proliferation were regulated at the protein level by BPA.[88]

A 2010 study has found that BPA may reduce sensitivity to chemotherapy treatment of specific tumors.[89]

Neuroblastoma

In vitro studies have suggested that BPA can promote the growth of neuroblastoma cells.[90][91] A 2010 in vitro study has concluded that BPA potently promotes invasion and metastasis of neuroblastoma cells through overexpression of MMP-2 and MMP-9 as well as downregulation of TIMP2.[92]

Prostate development and cancer

A 1997 study in mice has found that neonatal BPA exposure of 2 μg/kg increased adult prostate weight.[93] A 2005 study in mice has found that neonatal BPA exposure at 10 μg/kg disrupted the development of the fetal mouse prostate.[94] A 2006 study in rats has shown that neonatal bisphenol A exposure at 10 μg/kg levels increases prostate gland susceptibility to adult-onset precancerous lesions and hormonal carcinogenesis.[95] A 2007 in vitro study has found that BPA within the range of concentrations currently measured in human serum is associated with permanent increases in prostate size.[96] A 2009 study has found that newborn rats exposed to a low-dose of BPA (10 µg/kg) showed increased prostate cancer susceptibility when adults.[97]

DNA methylation

At least one study has suggested that bisphenol A suppresses DNA methylation[98] which is linked to epigenetic changes.[99]

Reproductive system and sexual behavior research

A 2007 study using pregnant mice showed that BPA changes the expression of key developmental genes that form the uterus, which may impact female reproductive tract development and future fertility of female fetuses.[100]

A series of studies made in 2009 found:

A 2009 rodent study, funded by EPA and conducted by some of its scientists, concluded that, compared with ethinyl estradiol, low-dose exposures of bisphenol A (BPA) showed no effects on several reproductive functions and behavioral activities measured in female rats.[109] That study was criticized as flawed for using polycarbonate cages in the experiment (since polycarbonate contains BPA) and the claimed resistance of the rats to estradiol,[110] but that claim was contested by the authors and others.[111] Another 2009 rodent study found that BPA exposure during pregnancy has a lasting effect on one of the genes that are responsible for uterine development and subsequent fertility in both mice and humans (HOXA10). The authors concluded, "We don't know what a safe level of BPA is, so pregnant women should avoid BPA exposure."[112]

In a 2010 study, mice were given BPA at doses thought to be equivalent to levels currently being experienced by humans. The research showed that BPA exposure affects the earliest stages of egg production in the ovaries of the developing mouse fetuses, thus suggesting that the next generation may suffer genetic defects in such biological processes as mitosis and DNA replication. In addition, the research team noted that their study "revealed a striking down-regulation of mitotic/cell cycle genes, raising the possibility that BPA exposure immediately before meiotic entry might act to shorten the reproductive lifespan of the female" by reducing the total pool of fetal oocytes.[113] Another 2010 study with mice concluded that BPA exposure in utero leads to permanent DNA alterations in sensitivity to estrogen.[114] Also in 2010, a rodent study found that by exposing fetal mice to BPA during pregnancy and examining gene expression and DNA in the uteruses of female fetuses, BPA exposure permanently affected the uterus by decreasing regulation of gene expression. The changes caused the mice to over-respond to estrogen throughout adulthood, long after the BPA exposure, thus suggesting that early exposure to BPA genetically "programmed" the uterus to be hyper-responsive to estrogen. Extreme estrogen sensitivity can lead to fertility problems, advanced puberty, altered mammary development and reproductive function, as well as a variety of hormone-related cancers. One of the authors concluded that BPA may be similar to diethylstilbestrol that caused birth defects and cancers in young women whose mothers were given the drug during pregnancy.[114]

A 2011 study using the rhesus monkey – a species that is very similar to humans in regard to pregnancy and fetal development – found that prenatal exposure to BPA causes changes in female primates' uterus development.[115] A 2011 rodent study found that male rats exposed to BPA had lower sperm counts and testosterone levels than those of unexposed males.[116] A 2011 mice study found that male mice exposed to BPA became demasculinized and behaved more like females in their spatial navigational abilities. They were also less desirable to female mice.[117]

General research

At an Endocrine Society meeting in 2009, new research reported data from animals experimentally treated with BPA.[118] Studies presented at the group's annual meeting show BPA can affect the hearts of women, can permanently damage the DNA of mice, and appears to be entering the human body from a variety of unknown sources.[119]

A 2009 in vitro study on cytotrophoblast cells has found cytotoxic effects in exposure of BPA doses from 0.0002 to 0.2 µg/ml and concluded this finding "suggests that exposure of placental cells to low doses of BPA may cause detrimental effects, leading in vivo to adverse pregnancy outcomes such as preeclampsia, intrauterine growth restriction, prematurity and pregnancy loss".[120]

A 2009 study in rats concluded that BPA, at the reference safe limit for human exposure, was found to impact intestinal permeability and may represent a risk factor in female offspring for developing severe colonic inflammation in adulthood.[121]

A 2010 study on mice has concluded that perinatal exposure to 10 µg/ml of BPA in drinking water enhances allergic sensitization and bronchial inflammation and responsiveness in an animal model of asthma,[122] and a 2011 study found that higher BPA concentrations in the urine of the pregnant women at 16 weeks were associated with wheezing, a symptom of asthma, in their babies.[123]

Studies on humans

Lang study and heart disease

The first large study of health effects on humans associated with bisphenol A exposure was published in September 2008 by Iain Lang and colleagues in the Journal of the American Medical Association.[124][125] The cross-sectional study of almost 1,500 people assessed exposure to bisphenol A by looking at levels of the chemical in urine. The authors found that higher bisphenol A levels were significantly associated with heart disease, diabetes, and abnormally high levels of certain liver enzymes. An editorial in the same issue concludes:

"Based on this background information, the study by Lang et al,1 while preliminary with regard to these diseases in humans, should spur US regulatory agencies to follow the recent action taken by Canadian regulatory agencies, which have declared BPA a "toxic chemical" requiring aggressive action to limit human and environmental exposures.4 Alternatively, Congressional action could follow the precedent set with the recent passage of federal legislation designed to limit exposures to another family of compounds, phthalates, also used in plastic. Like BPA,5 phthalates are detectable in virtually everyone in the United States.6 This bill moves US policy closer to the European model, in which industry must provide data on the safety of a chemical before it can be used in products."[41][126]

A later similar study performed by the same group of scientists, published in January 2010, confirmed, despite of lower concentrations of BPA in the second study sample, an associated increased risk for heart disease but not for diabetes or liver enzymes. Patients with the highest levels of BPA in their urine carried a 33% increased risk of coronary heart disease.[127] In 2012, David Melzer and colleagues also published a correlation between BPA levels in urine and heart disease. BPA exposure was higher in those with severe coronary artery stenoses compared to those with no vessel disease.[128]

Brain tumors

A Chinese human study links BPA to noncancerous brain tumors. Those with higher urine BPA levels were about 1.6 times more likely to have meningioma compared to those with lower concentrations.[129]

Other studies

Studies have associated recurrent miscarriage with BPA serum concentrations,[130] oxidative stress and inflammation in postmenopausal women with urinary concentrations,[131] externalizing behaviors in two-year old children, especially among female children, with mother's urinary concentrations,[132] altered hormone levels in men[133][134] and declining male sexual function[135] with urinary concentrations. The Canadian Health Measures Survey, 2007 to 2009 published in 2010 found that teenagers carry 30 percent more BPA in their bodies than older adults. The reason for this is not known.[136] A 2010 study that analyzed BPA urinary concentrations has concluded that for people under 18 years of age BPA may negatively impact human immune function.[137] A study done in 2010 reported the daily excretion levels of BPA among European adults in a large-scale and high-quality population-based sample, and it was shown that higher BPA daily excretion was associated with an increase in serum total testosterone concentration in men.[138] A 2011 study found higher BPA levels in women with polycystic ovary syndrome compared to controls. Furthermore, researchers found a statistically significant positive association between male sex hormones and BPA in these women, suggesting a potential role of BPA in ovarian dysfunction.[139] A 2010 study found that people over age 18 with higher levels of BPA exposure had higher CMV antibody levels, which suggests their cell-mediated immune system may not be functioning properly.[140]

Sexual difficulties

A 2009 study on Chinese workers in BPA factories found that workers were four times more likely to report erectile dysfunction, reduced sexual desire and overall dissatisfaction with their sex life than workers with no heightened BPA exposure.[141] BPA workers were also seven times more likely to have ejaculation difficulties. They were also more likely to report reduced sexual function within one year of beginning employment at the factory, and the higher the exposure, the more likely they were to have sexual difficulties.[142]

Historical studies

The first evidence of the estrogenicity of bisphenol A came from experiments on rats conducted in the 1930s,[36][143] but it was not until 1997 that adverse effects of low-dose exposure on laboratory animals were first reported.[22]

Low-dose exposure in animals

Dose (µg/kg/day)Effects (measured in studies of mice or rats,
descriptions (in quotes) are from Environmental Working Group)[144][145]
Study Year
0.025"Permanent changes to genital tract"2005[146]
0.025"Changes in breast tissue that predispose cells to hormones and carcinogens"2005[147]
1long-term adverse reproductive and carcinogenic effects2009[101]
2"increased prostate weight 30%"1997[148]
2"lower bodyweight, increase of anogenital distance in both genders, signs of early puberty and longer estrus."2002[149]
2.4"Decline in testicular testosterone"2004[150]
2.5"Breast cells predisposed to cancer"2007[151]
10"Prostate cells more sensitive to hormones and cancer"2006[152]
10"Decreased maternal behaviors"2002[153]
30"Reversed the normal sex differences in brain structure and behavior"2003[154]
50Adverse neurological effects occur in non-human primates2008[72]
50Disrupts ovarian development2009[102]

The current U.S. human exposure limit set by the EPA is 50 µg/kg/day.[155]

Xenoestrogen

There is evidence that bisphenol A functions as a xenoestrogen by binding strongly to estrogen-related receptor γ (ERR-γ).[156] This orphan receptor (endogenous ligand unknown) behaves as a constitutive activator of transcription. BPA seems to bind strongly to ERR-γ (dissociation constant = 5.5 nM), but not to the estrogen receptor (ER).[156] BPA binding to ERR-γ preserves its basal constitutive activity.[156] It can also protect it from deactivation from the selective estrogen receptor modulator 4-hydroxytamoxifen.[156]

Different expression of ERR-γ in different parts of the body may account for variations in bisphenol A effects. For instance, ERR-γ has been found in high concentration in the placenta, explaining reports of high bisphenol accumulation in this tissue.[157]

Human exposure sources

The major human exposure route to BPA is diet, including ingestion of contaminated food and water.[158] There is limited evidence on inhalation exposure and the body of research on dermal absorption continues to grow. (see below)

The problem is, BPA is also a synthetic estrogen, and plastics with BPA can break down, especially when they're washed, heated or stressed, allowing the chemical to leach into food and water and then enter the human body. That happens to nearly all of us; the CDC has found BPA in the urine of 93% of surveyed Americans over the age of 6. If you don't have BPA in your body, you're not living in the modern world.

The Perils of Plastic, TIME Magazine[33]

Bisphenol A has been known to be leached from the plastic lining of canned foods[159] and polycarbonate plastics, especially those cleaned with harsh detergents or that contain acidic or high-temperature liquids. BPA is an ingredient in the internal coating of metal food and beverage cans used to protect the food from direct contact with the can. A recent Health Canada study found that the majority of canned soft drinks it tested had low, but measurable levels of bisphenol A.[160] Furthermore, a study conducted by the University of Texas School of Public Health in 2010, found BPA in 63 of 105 samples of fresh and canned foods, foods sold in plastic packaging, and in cat and dog foods in cans and plastic packaging. This included fresh turkey, canned green beans, and canned infant formula.[161] While most human exposure is through diet, exposure can also occur through air and through skin absorption.[162]

A 2011 study published in Environmental Health Perspectives, "Food Packaging and Bisphenol A and Bis(2-Ethyhexyl) Phthalate Exposure: Findings from a Dietary Intervention," selected 20 participants based on their self-reported use of canned and packaged foods to study BPA. Participants ate their usual diets, followed by three days of consuming foods that were not canned or packaged. The study's findings include: 1) evidence of BPA in participants’ urine decreased by 50% to 70% during the period of eating fresh foods; and 2), participants’ reports of their food practices suggested that consumption of canned foods and beverages and restaurant meals were the most likely sources of exposure to BPA in their usual diets. The researchers note that, even beyond these 20 participants, BPA exposure is widespread, with detectable levels in urine samples in more than an estimated 90% of the U.S. population.[163]

Free BPA is found in high concentration in thermal paper and carbonless copy paper, which would be expected to be more available for exposure than BPA bound into resin or plastic.[28][164][165] Popular uses of thermal paper include receipts, event and cinema tickets, labels, and airline tickets. A Swiss study found that 11 of 13 thermal printing papers contained 8 – 17 g/kg Bisphenol A (BPA). Upon dry finger contact with a thermal paper receipt, roughly 1 μg BPA (0.2 – 6 μg) was transferred to the forefinger and the middle finger. For wet or greasy fingers approximately 10 times more was transferred. Extraction of BPA from the fingers was possible up to 2 hours after exposure.[166] Further, it has been demonstrated that thermal receipts placed in contact with paper currency in a wallet for 24 hours cause a dramatic increase in the concentration of BPA in paper currency, making paper money a secondary source of exposure.[167] Also, other paper products, such as toilet paper, newspapers and napkins, become contaminated with BPA during the recycling process.[168] Free BPA can readily be transferred to skin, and residues on hands can be ingested.[9] Bodily intake through dermal absorption (99% of which comes from handling receipts) has been shown for the general population to be 0.219 ng/kg bw/day (occupationally exposed persons absorb higher amounts at 16.3 ng/kg bw/day)[168] whereas aggregate intake (food/beverage/environment) for adults is estimated at 0.36–0.43 μg/kg bw/day (estimated intake for occupationally exposed adults is 0.043–100 μg/kg bw/day).[169]

Studies conducted by the CDC found bisphenol A in the urine of 95% of adults sampled in 1988–1994[170] and in 93% of children and adults tested in 2003–04.[171] While the EPA considers exposures up to 50 µg/kg/day to be safe, the most sensitive animal studies show effects at much lower doses.[144][155]

In 2009, a study found that drinking from polycarbonate bottles increased urinary bisphenol A levels by two thirds, from 1.2 μg/g creatinine to 2 μg/g creatinine.[172] Consumer groups recommend that people wishing to lower their exposure to bisphenol A avoid canned food and polycarbonate plastic containers (which shares resin identification code 7 with many other plastics) unless the packaging indicates the plastic is bisphenol A-free.[173] To avoid the possibility of BPA leaching into food or drink, the National Toxicology Panel recommends avoiding microwaving food in plastic containers, putting plastics in the dishwasher, or using harsh detergents.[174]

In the U.S., consumption of soda, school lunches, and meals prepared outside the home was statistically significantly associated with higher urinary BPA.[175] This cannot be correlated with polycarbonate plastic, which is far too expensive to be used in packaging of such products, so it remains to be seen where this BPA is coming from.

BPA is also used to form epoxy resin coating of water pipes. In older buildings, such resin coatings are used to avoid replacement of deteriorating hot and cold water pipes.[176]

Fetal and early-childhood exposures

Children may be more susceptible to BPA exposure than adults. A recent study found higher urinary concentrations in young children than in adults under typical exposure scenarios.[177] In adults, BPA is eliminated from the body through a detoxification process in the liver. In infants and children, this pathway is not fully developed so they have a decreased ability to clear BPA from their systems. It is also estimated that from food consumption, infants and young children have higher BPA-exposure than adults.[178]

Studies have found that fetuses and young children exposed to BPA are at risk for secondary sexual developmental changes, brain and behavior changes and immune disorders.[31]

Infants fed with liquid formula are among the most exposed, and those fed formula from polycarbonate bottles can consume up to 13 micrograms of bisphenol A per kg of body weight per day (μg/kg/day; see table below).[179] In the US and Canada, BPA has been found in infant liquid formula in concentrations varying from 0.48 to 11 ng/g.[180][181] BPA has been rarely found in infant powder formula (only 1 of 14).[180] While breast milk is the optimal source of nutrition for infants, it is not always an option. The U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) states that "the benefit of a stable source of good nutrition from infant formula and food outweighs the potential risk of BPA exposure.".[182]

A 2010 study of people in Austria, Switzerland, and Germany has suggested polycarbonate (PC) baby bottles as the most prominent role of exposure for infants, and canned food for adults and teenagers.[183] In the United States, the growing concern over BPA exposure in infants in recent years has led the manufacturers of plastic baby bottles to stop using BPA in their bottles. However, babies may still be exposed if they are fed with old or hand-me-down bottles bought before the companies stopped using BPA.

One often overlooked source of exposure occurs when a pregnant woman is exposed, thereby exposing the fetus. Animal studies have shown that BPA can be found in both the placenta and the amniotic fluid of pregnant mice.[184] A small US study in 2009, funded by the EWG, detected an average of 2.8 ng/mL BPA in the blood of 9 out of the 10 umbilical cords tested.[185] A study of 244 mothers indicated that exposure to BPA before birth could affect the behavior of girls' at age 3. Girls whose mother's urine contained high levels of BPA during pregnancy scored worse on tests of anxiety and hyperactivity. Although these girls still scored within a normal range, for every 10-fold increase in the BPA of the mother, the girls scored at least six points lower on the tests. Boys did not seem to be affected by their mother's BPA levels during pregnancy.[186] After the baby is born, maternal exposure can continue to affect the infant through transfer of BPA to the infant via breast milk.[187][188] Because of these exposures that can occur both during and after pregnancy, mothers wishing to limit their child’s exposure to BPA should attempt to limit their own exposures during that time period.

While the majority of exposures have been shown to come through the diet, accidental ingestion can also be considered a source of exposure. One study conducted in Japan tested plastic baby books to look for possible leaching into saliva when babies chew on them.[189] While the results of this study have yet to be replicated, it gives reason to question whether exposure can also occur in infants through ingestion by chewing on certain books or toys.

PopulationEstimated daily bisphenol A intake, μg/kg/day.
Table adapted from the National Toxicology Program Expert Panel Report.
Infant (0–6 months)
formula-fed
1–24
Infant (0–6 months)
breast-fed
0.2–1
Infant (6–12 months)
1.65–13
Child (1.5–6 years)
0.043–14.7
Adult
0.008–1.5

Pharmacokinetics

There is no agreement between scientists of a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) BPA model for humans. The effects of BPA on an organism depend on how much free BPA is available and for how long cells are exposed to it. Glucuronidation in the liver, by conjugation with glucuronic acid to form the metabolite BPA-glucuronide (BPAG),[9] reduces the amount of free BPA, however BPAG can be deconjugated by beta-glucuronidase, an enzyme present in high concentration in placenta and other tissues.[190][191] Free BPA can also be inactivated by sulfation, a process that can also be reverted by arylsulfatase C.[190]

A 2009 research study found that some drugs, like naproxen, salicylic acid, carbamazepine and mefenamic acid can, in vitro, significantly inhibit BPA glucuronidation.[192] A 2010 study on rats embryos has found that genistein may enhance developmental toxicity of BPA,[193] and another 2010 vitro study has shown that placenta P-glycoprotein may efflux BPA from placenta.[194]

A 2010 review of 80+ biomonitoring studies concluded that the general population is internally exposed to significant amounts of unconjugated BPA (in the ng/ml blood range).[195] Using GC/MS on 20 samples, BPA was detected in 100% of urine samples with a median of 1.25 ng/ml, and 10% of blood samples (LOD 0.5 ng/ml).[196] In a 2011 study, researchers found that after a 5-day consumption of 1 serving of canned vegetarian soup, subjects exhibited a 1200% increase in urinary BPA concentrations compared to controls, suggesting that such a diet induces a peak of BPA elevation of unknown duration and of unknown biological safety.[197]

The best test methods for studying BPA effects are currently under discussion with scientists sharing different opinions.[198]

Environmental risk

In 2010 the EPA reported that over one million pounds of BPA are released into the environment annually.[31] BPA can enter the environment either directly or through degradation of products, such as ocean-borne plastic trash.[199] Leaching of BPA from plastic and metal waste in landfills is one potential source of environmental contamination. A 2009 meta-analysis of BPA in the surface water system reported that BPA is found in surface water and sediment in the United States and Europe.[200]

In general, studies have shown that BPA can affect growth, reproduction and development in aquatic organisms. Among freshwater organisms, fish appear to be the most sensitive species. Evidence of endocrine-related effects in fish, aquatic invertebrates, amphibians and reptiles has been reported at environmentally relevant exposure levels lower than those required for acute toxicity. There is a widespread variation in reported values for endocrine-related effects, but many fall in the range of 1μg/L to 1 mg/L.[9]

As an environmental contaminant, BPA interferes with nitrogen fixation at the roots of leguminous plants associated with the bacterial symbiont Sinorhizobium meliloti. Despite a half-life in the soil of only 1–10 days, its ubiquity makes it an important pollutant.[201] According to Environment Canada, "initial assessment shows that at low levels, bisphenol A can harm fish and organisms over time. Studies also indicate that it can currently be found in municipal wastewater."[202] However, a study conducted in the United States in 2005 found that 91-98% of BPA may be removed from water during treatment at municipal water treatment plants.[203]

A 2009 review of the biological impacts of plasticizers on wildlife published by the Royal Society with a focus on annelids (both aquatic and terrestrial), molluscs, crustaceans, insects, fish and amphibians concluded that BPA has been shown to affect reproduction in all studied animal groups, to impair development in crustaceans and amphibians and to induce genetic aberrations.[204]

A large 2010 study of two rivers in Canada found that areas contaminated with hormone-like chemicals including bisphenol A showed females made up 85 per cent of the population of a certain fish, while females made up only 55 per cent in uncontaminated areas.[205]

Government and industry response

World Health Organization

In November 2009, the WHO announced it would organize an expert consultation in 2010 to assess low dose BPA exposure health effects, focusing on the nervous and behavioral system and exposure to young children.[82]

The WHO expert panel recommended no new regulations limiting or banning the use of Bisphenol-A, stating that "initiation of public health measures would be premature."[206]

Australia and New Zealand

The Australia and New Zealand Food Safety Authority (Food Standards Australia New Zealand) does not see any health risk with bisphenol A baby bottles if the manufacturer's instructions are followed. Levels of exposure are very low and do not pose a significant health risk. It added that "the move by overseas manufacturers to stop using BPA in baby bottles is a voluntary action and not the result of a specific action by regulators."[207] It suggests the use of glass baby bottles if parents have any concerns.[208]

The Australian Government has introduced a voluntary phase out of BPA use in polycarbonate baby bottles.[209]

Canada

In April 2008, Health Canada concluded that, while adverse health effects were not expected, the margin of safety was too small for formula-fed infants[210] and proposed classifying the chemical as "'toxic' to human health and the environment."[211]

After the release of that assessment, Canadian Health Minister Tony Clement announced Canada's intent to ban the import, sale, and advertisement of polycarbonate baby bottles containing bisphenol A due to safety concerns, and investigate ways to reduce BPA contamination of baby formula packaged in metal cans. While the agency concluded that human exposures were less than levels believed unsafe, the margin of safety was not high enough for formula-fed infants.[42][212] Around the same time, Wal-Mart announced that it was immediately ceasing sales in all its Canadian stores of food containers, water and baby bottles, sippy cups, and pacifiers containing bisphenol A, and that it would phase out baby bottles made with it in U.S. stores by early 2009.[213] Nalgene also announced it will stop using the chemical in its products,[214] and Toys-R-Us said it too will cease selling baby bottles made from it.[215] Subsequent news reports showed many retailers removing polycarbonate drinking products from their shelves.[216]

The federal government proposed declaring Bisphenol A a hazardous substance in October 2008 and has since placed it on its list of toxic substances. Health officials wrote in Canada Gazette that "It is concluded that bisphenol A be considered as a substance that may be entering the environment in a quantity or concentration or under conditions that constitute or may constitute a danger in Canada to human life or health."[217] The federal ministries of health and the environment announced they would seek to restrict imports, sales and advertising of polycarbonate baby bottles containing BPA.[218]

In its statement released on 18 October 2008, Health Canada noted that "bisphenol A exposure to newborns and infants is below levels that cause effects" and that the "general public need not be concerned".[219]

Environment Canada listed bisphenol A as a "toxic substance" in September 2010.[37]

Europe

European Union

The updated 2008 European Union Risk Assessment Report on bisphenol A, published in June 2008, by the European Commission and European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), concluded that bisphenol A-based products, such as polycarbonate plastic and epoxy resins, are safe for consumers and the environment when used as intended.[220] By October 2008, after the Lang Study was published, the EFSA issued a statement concluding that the study provided no grounds to revise the current Tolerable Daily Intake (TDI) level for BPA of 0.05 mg/kg bodyweight.[221]

A 2009 scientific study criticized the European risk assessment processes of endocrine disruptors, including BPA.[222]

On 22 December 2009, the EU Environment ministers released a statement expressing concerns over recent studies showing adverse effects of exposure to endocrine disruptors.[223]

In September 2010, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) published its latest scientific opinion, based on a "comprehensive evaluation of recent toxicity data [...] concluded that no new study could be identified, which would call for a revision of the current TDI".[224] The Panel noted that some studies conducted on developing animals have suggested BPA-related effects of possible toxicological relevance, in particular biochemical changes in brain, immune-modulatory effects and enhanced susceptibility to breast tumours but considered that those studies had several shortcomings so the relevance of these findings for human health could not be assessed.[224]

On 25 November 2010, the European Union executive commission said it will ban the manufacturing by 1 March 2011 and ban the marketing and market placement of polycarbonate baby bottles containing the organic compound bisphenol A (BPA) by 1 June 2011, according to John Dalli, commissioner in charge of health and consumer policy. This is backed by a majority of EU governments.[225][226] The ban was called an over-reaction by Richard Sharpe, of the Medical Research Council's Human Reproductive Sciences Unit, who said to be unaware of any convincing evidence justifying the measure and criticized it as being done on political, rather than scientific grounds.[227]

Denmark

In May 2009, the Danish parliament passed a resolution to ban the use of BPA in baby bottles, which has not been enacted by April 2010. In March 2010, a temporary ban was declared by the Health Minister.[228]

Belgium

On March 2010, senator Philippe Mahoux proposed legislation to ban BPA in food contact plastics.[229]

France

On 5 February 2010, the French Food Safety Agency (AFSSA) questioned the previous assessments of the health risks of BPA, especially in regard to behavioral effects observed in rat pups following exposure in utero and during the first months of life.[230][231] In April 2010, the AFFSA suggested the adoption of better labels for food products containing BPA.[232]

On 24 March 2010, French Senate unanimously approved a proposition of law to ban BPA from baby bottles.[233] The National Assembly (Lower House) approved the text on 23 June 2010, which has been applicable law since 2 July 2010.[234] On 12 October 2011, the French National Assembly voted a law forbidding the use of Bisphenol A in products aimed at less than 3-year-old children for 2013, and 2014 for all food containers.[235]

On 9 October 2012, the French Senate adopted unanimously the law proposition to suspend manufacture, import, export and marketing of all food containers which include bisphenol A for 2015. The ban of bisphenol A in 2013 for food products designed for children less than 3-ears-old was maintained.[236]

Germany

On 19 September 2008, the German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung, BfR) stated that there was no reason to change the current risk assessment for bisphenol A on the basis of the Lang Study.[237]

In October 2009, the German environmental organization Bund für Umwelt und Naturschutz Deutschland requested a ban on BPA for children's products, especially pacifiers,[238] and products that make contact with food.[239] In response, some manufacturers voluntarily removed the problematic pacifiers from the market.[240]

Netherlands

On 6 November 2008, the Dutch Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority (VWA) stated in a newsletter that baby bottles made from polycarbonate plastic do not release measurable concentrations of bisphenol A and therefore are safe to use.[241]

Switzerland

In February 2009, the Swiss Federal Office for Public Health, based on reports of other health agencies, stated that the intake of bisphenol A from food represents no risk to the consumer, including newborns and infants. However, in the same statement, it advised for proper use of polycarbonate baby bottles and listed alternatives.[242]

Sweden

By May 2010, the Swedish Chemicals Agency asked for a BPA ban in baby bottles, but the Swedish Food Safety Authority prefers to await the expected European Food Safety Authority's updated review. The Minister of Environment said to wait for the EFSA review but not for too long.[243][244] From March 2011 it is prohibited to manufacture babybottles containing bisphenol A and from July 2011 they can not be bought in stores. On 12 April 2012, the Swedish government announced that Sweden will ban the endocrine disruptor Bisphenol A (BPA) in cans containing food for children under the age of three.[245]

United Kingdom

In December 2009, responding to a letter from a group of seven scientists that urged the UK Government to "adopt a standpoint consistent with the approach taken by other Governments who have ended the use of BPA in food contact products marketed at children",[246] the UK Food Standards Agency reaffirmed, in January 2009, its view that "exposure of UK consumers to BPA from all sources, including food contact materials, was well below levels considered harmful".[247]

Turkey

As of 10 June 2011, Turkey banned the use of BPA in baby bottles and other PC items produced for babies.[248]

Japan

Between 1998 and 2003, the canning industry voluntarily replaced its BPA-containing epoxy resin can liners with BPA-free polyethylene terephthalate (PET) in many of its products. For other products, it switched to a different epoxy lining that yielded much less migration of BPA into food than the previously used resin. In addition, polycarbonate tableware for school lunches was replaced by BPA-free plastics. As a result of these changes, Japanese risk assessors have found that virtually no BPA is detectable in canned foods or drinks, and blood levels of BPA in the Japanese people have declined dramatically (50% in one study).[249]

United States

Currently 11 states have banned BPA from baby bottles and children's sippy cups. In October 2011, California became the latest to enact such legislation, when it passed the Toxin-Free Infants and Toddlers Act. The American Medical Association also recently announced its support of tighter restrictions on products containing BPA.

Organizations like the American Chemistry Council (ACC) have been lobbying to make BPA federally recognized as a safe product. The ACC is composed of companies that represent 85% of chemical manufacturing capacity in the United States.[250] The ACC position states that BPA is safe for use in products. "Government and scientific bodies around the globe have extensively evaluated the weight of scientific evidence on bisphenol A (BPA) and have declared that BPA is safe as used, including in materials that come into contact with food, such as reusable foodstorage containers and linings in metal cans."[251]

Due to consumer pressure, by 2011 BPA was no longer being used in sippy cups and baby bottles. In October 2011, the ACC said that it had petitioned the FDA to make it clear to consumers that BPA is no longer present in those products. Steven Hentges of ACC's Polycarbonate/BPA Global Group said, "What we are trying to do is cut through the confusion and provide some clarity about sippy cups and baby bottles. We want that to be very clear, these products are not on the market. There is no need for parents or consumers to worry about them. They aren't there and they won't be in the future."[252] In July 2012, the FDA moved to ban BPA in baby bottles and sippy cups to satisfy a request by the ACC, stating that the measure was intended to "boost consumer confidence" and not due to safety concerns. (See 2012 below)

2008

In April the Federal BPA-Free Kids Act of 2008 (SB 2928) was introduced to the U.S. Senate. The bill sought to ban BPA in any product designed for use by children 7 years or younger. SB2928 would also require the Center for Disease Control to conduct a study about the health effects of BPA exposure. The bill was referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation and so far, no action has been taken.[31]

In September, the National Toxicology Program finalized its report on bisphenol A, finding "some concern", midpoint of a five-level scale, that infants were at risk from exposure to the chemical.[58]

At that time, the FDA reassured consumers that current limits were safe, but convened an outside panel of experts to review the issue. The Lang study was also released that month, and David Melzer, a co-author of the study, presented the results of the study before the FDA panel.[253]

The editorial accompanying the Lang study's publication in JAMA criticized the FDA's assessment of bisphenol A: "A fundamental problem is that the current ADI [acceptable daily intake] for BPA is based on experiments conducted in the early 1980s using outdated methods (only very high doses were tested) and insensitive assays. More recent findings from independent scientists were rejected by the FDA, apparently because those investigators did not follow the outdated testing guidelines for environmental chemicals, whereas studies using the outdated, insensitive assays (predominantly involving studies funded by the chemical industry) are given more weight in arriving at the conclusion that BPA is not harmful at current exposure levels."[41]


2009

Sunoco, a producer of gasoline and chemicals, is now refusing to sell the chemical to companies for use in food and water containers for children younger than 3, saying it can't be certain of the compound's safety. Sunoco plans to require its customers to guarantee that the chemical will not be used in children's food products.[254]

The six largest US companies that produce baby bottles decided to stop using bisphenol A in their products.[255] Suffolk County, New York banned baby beverage containers made with bisphenol A.[256]

On 13 March, leaders from the House and Senate proposed legislation to ban bisphenol A.[257]

In the same month, Rochelle Tyl, author of two studies used by FDA to assert BPA safety in August 2008, said those studies didn't claim that BPA is safe because they weren't designed to cover all aspects of the chemical's effects.[258]

In May the first US jurisdictions to pass regulations limiting or banning BPA were Minnesota and Chicago. Minnesota's regulation takes effect in 2010, "manufacturers of ... children's products containing BPA may not sell them in the state after 1 Jan. 2010. The ban extends to all retailers in the state a year later." The products impacted are known as sippy cups and baby bottles.[259] The City of Chicago adopted a similar ban shortly thereafter. Coverage of Chicago's ban in the news showed a relentless opposition by the industry. A Chicago Tribune article noted an up-hill battle while passing legislation, "[industry officials] used FDA’s position on the issue when they tried to block the city’s measure."[260]

In May 2009, the Washington Post accused the manufacturers of food and beverage containers and some of their biggest customers of trying to devise a public relations and lobbying strategy to block government BPA bans. Lyndsey Layton, from the Washington Post, criticized the FDA noting that, "Despite more than 100 published studies by government scientists and university laboratories that have raised health concerns about the chemical, the Food and Drug Administration has deemed it safe largely because of two studies, both funded by a chemical industry trade group".[261]

In June 2009, the FDA announced the decision to reconsider the BPA safety levels.[262]

Grassroots political action led Connecticut to become the first US state to ban bisphenol A from infant formula and baby food containers, as well from any reusable food or beverage container.[263] A diverse coalition of over 50 Connecticut non-profits teamed up to support the measure, including health professionals, labor unions, faith communities, environmental organizations, public health, reproductive rights, and health affected groups.[264]

In July the California Environmental Protection Agency's Developmental and Reproductive Toxicant Identification Committee unanimously voted against placing Bisphenol A on the state's list of chemicals that are believed to cause reproductive harm. The panel, although concerned over the growing scientific research showing BPA's reproductive harm in animals, found that there was insufficient data of the effects in humans.[265] Critics point out that the same panel failed to add second-hand smoke to the list until 2006, and only one chemical was added to the list in the last three years.[266]

On 3 August, Massachusetts' Department of Public Health advised mothers to take certain actions to prevent possible health impact in children. Mothers with children up to two years old were advised to limit exposure by avoiding products that might contain BPA, such as plastic drinking bottles and other plastic materials with recycling codes of 7 or 3.[267]

The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, as part of an ongoing investigative series into BPA and its effects, revealed plans by the Society of the Plastics Industry to execute a major public relations blitz to promote BPA, including plans to attack and discredit those who report or comment negatively on the monomer and its effects.[268][269]

On 29 September, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency announced that it is evaluating BPA, and another five chemicals, for action plan development.[270]

On 28 October, the NIH announced $30,000,000 in stimulus grants to study the health effects of BPA. This money is expected to result in many peer-reviewed publications.[271]

In November the Consumer Reports magazine published an analysis of BPA content in some canned foods and beverages, where in specific cases the content of a single can of food could exceed the current FDA Cumulative Exposure Daily Intake.[10][272]

2010

On 15 January, the FDA expressed "some concern", the middle level in the scale of concerns, about the potential effects of BPA on the brain, behavior, and prostate gland in fetuses, infants, and young children, and announced it was taking reasonable steps to reduce human exposure to BPA in the food supply. However, the FDA is not recommending that families change the use of infant formula or foods, as it sees the benefit of a stable source of good nutrition as outweighing the potential risk from BPA exposure.[2]

On the same date, the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services released information to help parents to reduce children's BPA exposure.[273]

In February, according to The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, which supports a BPA ban, after lobbyists for the chemical industry met with administration officials, the EPA delayed BPA regulation and did not include the chemical in an action plan released 30 December 2009.[274][275]

Many US states are considering some sort of BPA ban.[276]

On 29 March, the EPA declared BPA a "chemical of concern".[277][278]

The 2008–2009 Annual Report of the President’s Cancer Panel declared: "because of the long latency period of many cancers, the available evidence argues for a precautionary approach to these diverse chemicals, which include (...) bisphenol A".[279]

Meanwhile, as of April 2011, General Mills has announced that it has found a BPA-free alternative can liner that apparently works even with tomatoes, a highly acidic product that has long baffled the industry in terms of finding a suitable substitute. General Mills says that with the next tomato harvest, it will begin using the BPA-free alternative in tomato products sold by its organic foods subsidiary Muir Glen.[280] Thus far, there has been no word on whether General Mills will use BPA-free alternatives on any of its other canned products.

2011

In 2011, 26 states proposed legislation that would ban certain uses of BPA. Many bills died in committee however, some are moving forward.[281] In August 2010, the Maine Board of Environmental Protection voted unanimously to ban the sale of baby bottles and other reusable food and beverage containers made with bisphenol A as of January 2012.[282] In February 2011, the newly elected governor of Maine, Paul LePage, gained national attention when he spoke on a local TV news show saying he hoped to repeal the ban because, "There hasn't been any science that identifies that there is a problem" and added: "The only thing that I've heard is if you take a plastic bottle and put it in the microwave and you heat it up, it gives off a chemical similar to estrogen. So the worst case is some women may have little beards."[283][284] In April, the Maine legislature passed a bill to ban the use of BPA in baby bottles, sippy cups, and other reusable food and beverage containers, effective 1 January 2012. Governor LePage refused to sign the bill.[285]

A study by researchers at the Harvard School of Public Health indicates that BPA used in the lining of food cans is absorbed by the food and then ingested by consumers. The experiment involved 75 participants, half of whom ate a lunch of canned vegetable soup for five days, followed by five days of fresh soup; the other half did the same experiment in reverse order. "The analysis revealed that when participants ate the canned soup they experienced more than a 1,000 percent increase in their urinary concentrations of BPA, compared to when they dined on fresh soup."[286]

In October 2011 California banned BPA from baby bottles and toddlers' drinking cups. The ban will take effect 1 July 2013.[287]

In a July report the American Medical Association (AMA) declared that they believe that feeding products for babies and infants that contain BPA should be banned. In the report AMA said they would also like to see better federal oversight of BPA and the clear labeling of products containing it. It stressed the importance of the Food and Drug Administration to "actively incorporate current science into the regulation of food and beverage BPA-containing products."[288]

2012

In the spring of 2012, Colorado representative Daniel Kagan attempted to pass Colorado House Bill 12-1174, which would have prohibited the use of BPA in children’s products in the state of Colorado. The measure failed but may be re-introduced in January 2013.[289]

The FDA recently concluded an assessment of scientific research on the effects of BPA. In the March 2012 Consumer Update, the FDA concluded that "the scientific evidence at this time does not suggest that the very low levels of human exposure to BPA through the diet are unsafe."[290] However, the FDA recognizes potential uncertainties in the overall interpretation of these studies including route of exposure used in the studies and the relevance of animal models to human health. The FDA is continuing to pursue additional research to resolve these uncertainties.

On 17 July, the FDA banned BPA from baby bottles and sippy cups. Since manufacturers have already stopped using the chemical in baby bottles and sippy cups, the decision was not over concerns about the safety of BPA but a response to a request by the American Chemistry Council, the chemical industry’s main trade association, who believe that a ban would boost consumer confidence.[291] The Environmental Working Group called the ban "purely cosmetic". In a statement they said,“If the agency truly wants to prevent people from being exposed to this toxic chemical associated with a variety of serious and chronic conditions it should ban its use in cans of infant formula, food and beverages." The Natural Resources Defense Council called the move inadequate saying, the FDA needs to ban BPA from all food packaging.[48] In a statement a FDA spokesman said the agency's action was not based on safety concerns and that "the agency continues to support the safety of BPA for use in products that hold food."[49]

See also

References

  1. ^ speclab.com - Chemical Fact Sheet - Cas #80057 CASRN 80-05-7, 1 April 2012
  2. ^ a b U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Update on Bisphenol A for Use in Food Contact Applications: January 2010; 15 January 2010 [cited 15 January 2010].
  3. ^ [1]. Canada Gazette Part II. 13 October 2010;144(21):1806–18.
  4. ^ Martin Mittelstaedt. Canada first to declare bisphenol A toxic. Globe and Mail (Canada). 13 October 2010.
  5. ^ Hamilton J (12 July 2012). "FDA Bans Chemical BPA From Sippy Cups And Baby Bottles". The Salt: NPR Food Blog. National Public Radio. http://www.npr.org/blogs/thesalt/2012/07/17/156916616/fda-bans-chemical-bpa-in-sippy-cups-and-baby-bottles.
  6. ^ a b c d e f g Fiege H, Voges H-W, Hamamoto T, Umemura S, = Iwata T, Miki H, Fujita Y, Buysch H-J, = Garbe D, Paulus W. Phenol Derivatives. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH; 2002. (Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry). doi:10.1002/14356007.a19_313.
  7. ^ Experts demand European action on plastics chemical. 22 June 2010. Reuters.
  8. ^ a b c National Toxicology Program, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. CERHR Expert Panel Report for Bisphenol A [PDF].. 26 November 2007 [archived 18 February 2008; cited 18 April 2008].
  9. ^ a b c d e U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Bisphenol A Action Plan; 29 March 2010 [cited 12 April 2010].
  10. ^ a b Concern over canned foods. Consumer Reports. December 2009 [cited 2 February 2012].
  11. ^ Soaring BPA Levels Found in People Who Eat Canned Foods. 23 November 2011. Fox News.
  12. ^ Dianin. Zhurnal russkogo fiziko-khimicheskogo obshchestva. 1891;23: 492–.
  13. ^ Zincke T. Ueber die Einwirkung von Brom und von Chlor auf Phenole: Substitutionsprodukte, Pseudobromide und Pseudochloride. Justus Liebigs Annalen der Chemie. 1905;343:75–99. doi:10.1002/jlac.19053430106.
  14. ^ Synthesis and Characterization of Oligomers. CRC Press; 1991. ISBN 0-8493-4954-0. p. 103.
  15. ^ Bisphenol A Global Industry Group. Bisphenol A Information Sheet; October 2002 [cited 7 December 2010].
  16. ^ Studies Report More Harmful Effects From BPA. U.S. News & World Report. 10 June 2009 [cited 28 October 2010].
  17. ^ Replogle J. California Progress Report. Lawmakers to press for BPA regulation; 17 July 2009 [cited 31 January 2012].
  18. ^ Ridding life of bisphenol A a challenge. Toronto Star. 16 April 2008 [cited 2 August 2009].
  19. ^ Kirk-Othmer encyclopedia of chemical technology. 5 ed. Vol. 5. ISBN 0-471-52695-9. p. 8.
  20. ^ Alliance Polymers, Inc. Polycarbonate (PC) Polymer Resin [cited 2 August 2009].
  21. ^ Wittcoff, Harold; Reuben, B. G.; Plotkin, Jeffrey S. (2004). Industrial Organic Chemicals. Wiley-IEEE. pp. 278. ISBN 978-0-471-44385-8. http://books.google.com/?id=4KHzc-nYPNsC&pg=PA278&dq=%22Diphenyl+carbonate%22. Retrieved 1 February 2012.
  22. ^ a b c Erickson BE. Bisphenol A under scrutiny. Chemical and Engineering News. 2 June 2008;86(22):36–39.
  23. ^ Consumers fear the packaging – a BPA alternative is needed now; 22 September 2008 [cited 5 January 2010].
  24. ^ Pesticideinfo.org. Bisphenol A [cited 23 October 2011].
  25. ^ US 6562755, "Thermal paper with security features" 
  26. ^ Raloff, Janet. Science News. More evidence that BPA laces store receipts; 27 July 2001 [cited 3 August 2010]. "Bill Van Den Brandt of Appleton Papers says that the receipts paper made by his company (which bills itself as the nation's leading producer of carbonless and thermal papers) is BPA-free."
  27. ^ Raloff, Janet. Science News. Concerned about BPA: Check your receipts; 7 October 2009 [cited 3 August 2010].
  28. ^ a b Fukazawa h, H. K.; Hoshino, K.; Shiozawa, T.; Matsushita, H.; Terao, Y. (2001). "Identification and quantification of chlorinated bisphenol a in wastewater from wastepaper recycling plants". Chemosphere 44 (5): 973–979. doi:10.1016/S0045-6535(00)00507-5. PMID 11513431.edit
  29. ^ Hhs.gov. Bisphenol A (BPA) Information for Parents; 15 January 2010 [cited 23 October 2011].
  30. ^ Biello D. Plastic (not) fantastic: Food containers leach a potentially harmful chemical. Scientific American. 19 February 2008 [cited 9 April 2008];2.
  31. ^ a b c d e Erler C, Novak J (October 2010). "Bisphenol a exposure: human risk and health policy". J Pediatr Nurs 25 (5): 400–7. doi:10.1016/j.pedn.2009.05.006. PMID 20816563.
  32. ^ Kwon, Jung-Hwan; Lynn E. Katz, Howard M. Liljestrand (2007). "Modeling binding equilibrium in a competitive estrogen receptor binding assay". CHEMOSPHERE 69: 1025-1031.
  33. ^ a b Walsh B. The Perils of Plastic – Environmental Toxins – TIME. TIME. 1 April 2010 [cited 2 July 2010].
  34. ^ Erler C, Novak J (October 2010). "Bisphenol a exposure: human risk and health policy". J Pediatr Nurs 25 (5): 400–7. doi:10.1016/j.pedn.2009.05.006. PMID 20816563.
  35. ^ Dodds EC, Lawson W. Synthetic Œstrogenic Agents without the Phenanthrene Nucleus. Nature. 1936;137(3476):996. doi:10.1038/137996a0. Bibcode:1936Natur.137..996D.
  36. ^ a b E. C. Dodds and W. Lawson, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, Biological Sciences, 125, No. 839 (27-IV-1938), pp. 222–232.
  37. ^ a b Order Adding a Toxic Substance to Schedule 1 to the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999; 23 September 2010 [cited 2 February 2012].
  38. ^ Rubin, Beverly S (2011). "Bisphenol A: An endocrine disruptor with widespread exposure and multiple effects". J.Steroid Biochem.Mol.Bio 127: 27-34.
  39. ^ O’Connor JC, Chapin RE. Critical evaluation of observed adverse effects of endocrine active substances on reproduction and development, the immune system, and the nervous system. Pure Appl. Chem. 2003 [cited 28 February 2007];75(11–12):2099–2123. doi:10.1351/pac200375112099.
  40. ^ Okada H, Tokunaga T, Liu X, Takayanagi S, Matsushima A, Shimohigashi Y. Direct evidence revealing structural elements essential for the high binding ability of bisphenol A to human estrogen-related receptor-gamma. Environ. Health Perspect.. 2008;116(1):32–8. doi:10.1289/ehp.10587. PMID 18197296.
  41. ^ a b c vom Saal FS, Myers JP. Bisphenol A and Risk of Metabolic Disorders. JAMA. 2008;300(11):1353–5. doi:10.1001/jama.300.11.1353. PMID 18799451.
  42. ^ a b Draft Screening Assessment for The Challenge Phenol, 4,4' -(1-methylethylidene)bis- (Bisphenol A)Chemical Abstracts Service Registry Number 80-05-7. Health Canada, 2008.
  43. ^ Ginsberg G, Rice DC. Does Rapid Metabolism Ensure Negligible Risk from Bisphenol A?. EPH. 2009;117(11):1639–1643. doi:10.1289/ehp.0901010. PMID 20049111. PMC 2801165.
  44. ^ Beronius a, R. N. C. (2009). "Risk to all or none?-A comparative analysis of controversies in the health risk assessment of Bisphenol A". Reproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.) 29 (2): 132–146. doi:10.1016/j.reprotox.2009.11.007. PMID 19931376. edit
  45. ^ ScienceDaily. 99% of pregnant women in US test positive for multiple chemicals including banned ones, study suggests; 14 January 2011 [cited 1 February 2012].
  46. ^ [Breonius, A. Rudén, C. Håkansson, H, & Hanberg, A. (2010) "Risk to all or none? A comparative analysis of controversies in the health risk assessment of Bisphenol A" Reproductive Toxicology 29. 132-146
  47. ^ Endocrine Society. Endocrine Society Position Statement Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals; 11 June 2009 [cited 6 April 2012].
  48. ^ a b http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2012/07/17-4
  49. ^ a b http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/17/fda-bans-bpa-baby-bottles_n_1679795.html
  50. ^ a b Teeguarden JG, Calafat AM, Ye X, Doerge DR, Churchwell MI, Gunawan R, Graham MK.. Twenty-four hour human urine and serum profiles of bisphenol a during high-dietary exposure. Toxicological Sciences - an official journal of the Society for Toxicology. 2011;125:318–20.
  51. ^ FSA. Small pond, same big issues; 27 July 2011 [cited 3 August 2011].
  52. ^ Vom Saal FS, Prins GS, Welshons WV. (2012). "Report of very low real-world exposure to bisphenol A is unwarranted based on a lack of data and flawed assumptions. Toxicol Sci. 2012 Jan;125(1):318-20". Toxicological Sciences - an official journal of the Society for Toxicology 125 (1): 321–5. doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfr273. PMID 22020768.
  53. ^ Vogel, S. (2009). "The Politics of Plastics: The Making and Unmaking of Bisphenol A ‘Safety’". American Journal of Public Health 99 (S3): 559-566.
  54. ^ vom Saal FS. Chapel Hill bisphenol A expert panel consensus statement: integration of mechanisms, effects in animals and potential to impact human health at current levels of exposure. Reprod. Toxicol.. 2007;24(2):131–8. doi:10.1016/j.reprotox.2007.07.005. PMID 17768031.
  55. ^ Sciencedaily.com. Bisphenol A (BPA) accumulates more rapidly within the body than previously thought; 6 June 2011 [cited 1 February 2012].
  56. ^ Pubs.acs.org. Chemical & Engineering News: Government & Policy – Bisphenol A On Trial [cited 23 October 2011].
  57. ^ Diana Zuckerman, PhD, Paul Brown, BS, and Laura Walls, BA. National Research Center for Women & Families. Are Bisphenol A (BPA) Plastic Products Safe for Infants and Children?; November 2009 [cited 2 February 2012].
  58. ^ a b c John Bucher, PhD, Mike Shelby, PhD. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. Since you asked – Bisphenol A (BPA): Questions and Answers about Bisphenol A [cited 2 February 2012].
  59. ^ Elobeid Ma, A. D. (October 2008). "Putative environmental-endocrine disruptors and obesity: a review". Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes 15 (5): 403–408. doi:10.1097/MED.0b013e32830ce95c. PMC 2566897. PMID 18769210. //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2566897/.edit
  60. ^ Rubin Bs, S. A. (May 2009). "Bisphenol A: Perinatal exposure and body weight". Molecular and cellular endocrinology 304 (1–2): 55–62. doi:10.1016/j.mce.2009.02.023. PMC 2817931. PMID 19433248. //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2817931/. edit
  61. ^ Heindel Jj, V. S. F.; Vom Saal, F. S. (May 2009). "Role of nutrition and environmental endocrine disrupting chemicals during the perinatal period on the aetiology of obesity". Molecular and cellular endocrinology 304 (1–2): 90–96. doi:10.1016/j.mce.2009.02.025. PMID 19433253.edit
  62. ^ Newbold, P. B. E.; Padilla-Banks, E.; Jefferson, W. N. (May 2009). "Environmental estrogens and obesity". Molecular and cellular endocrinology 304 (1–2): 84–89. doi:10.1016/j.mce.2009.02.024. PMC 2682588. PMID 19433252. //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2682588/. edit
  63. ^ Grün f, B. B. (May 2009). "Endocrine disrupters as obesogens". Molecular and cellular endocrinology 304 (1–2): 19–29. doi:10.1016/j.mce.2009.02.018. PMC 2713042. PMID 19433244. //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2713042/. edit
  64. ^ Somm e, S. V.; Schwitzgebel, V. R.; Toulotte, A.; Cederroth, C.; Combescure, C.; Nef, S.; Aubert, M.; Hüppi, P. (October 2009). "Perinatal exposure to bisphenol a alters early adipogenesis in the rat". Environ. Health Perspect. 117 (10): 1549–1555. doi:10.1289/ehp.11342. PMC 2790509. PMID 20019905. //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2790509/.edit
  65. ^ Ryan Kk, H. A.; Haller, A. M.; Sorrell, J. E.; Woods, S. C.; Jandacek, R. J.; Seeley, R. J. (June 2010). "Perinatal exposure to bisphenol-a and the development of metabolic syndrome in CD-1 mice". Endocrinology 151 (6): 2603–2612. doi:10.1210/en.2009-1218. PMC 2875828. PMID 20351315. //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2875828/. edit
  66. ^ Panzica Gc, V. P. C.; Viglietti-Panzica, C.; Mura, E.; Quinn, M. J.; Lavoie, E.; Palanza, P.; Ottinger, M. A. (2007). "Effects of xenoestrogens on the differentiation of behaviorally-relevant neural circuits". Frontiers in neuroendocrinology 28 (4): 179–200. doi:10.1016/j.yfrne.2007.07.001. PMID 17868795. edit
  67. ^ Richter Ca, B. L.; Birnbaum, L. S.; Farabollini, F.; Newbold, R. R.; Rubin, B. S.; Talsness, C. E.; Vandenbergh, J. G.; Walser-Kuntz, D. R. et al. (2007). "In vivo effects of bisphenol a in laboratory rodent studies". Reproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.) 24 (2): 199–224. doi:10.1016/j.reprotox.2007.06.004. PMC 2151845. PMID 17683900. //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2151845/.edit
  68. ^ Palanza p, G. L.; Gioiosa, L.; Vom Saal, F. S.; Parmigiani, S. (October 2008). "Effects of developmental exposure to bisphenol A on brain and behavior in mice". Environ. Res. 108 (2): 150–157. Bibcode 2008ER....108..150P. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2008.07.023. PMID 18949834. edit
  69. ^ Patisaul Hb, P. E. (2008). "Influence of endocrine active compounds on the developing rodent brain". Brain Research Reviews 57 (2): 352–362. doi:10.1016/j.brainresrev.2007.06.008. PMID 17822772. edit
  70. ^ Ogiue-Ikeda m, T. N.; Tanabe, N.; Mukai, H.; Hojo, Y.; Murakami, G.; Tsurugizawa, T.; Takata, N.; Kimoto, T. et al. (2008). "Rapid modulation of synaptic plasticity by estrogens as well as endocrine disrupters in hippocampal neurons". Brain Research Reviews 57 (2): 363–375. doi:10.1016/j.brainresrev.2007.06.010. PMID 17822775. edit
  71. ^ Gore AC (June 2008). "Developmental programming and endocrine disruptor effects on reproductive neuroendocrine systems". Front Neuroendocrinol 29 (3): 358–74. doi:10.1016/j.yfrne.2008.02.002. PMC 2702520. PMID 18394690. //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2702520/.
  72. ^ a b Leranth C, Hajszan T, Szigeti-Buck K, Bober J, Maclusky NJ. Bisphenol A prevents the synaptogenic response to estradiol in hippocampus and prefrontal cortex of ovariectomized nonhuman primates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.. 2008;105(37):14187–91. doi:10.1073/pnas.0806139105. PMID 18768812. Bibcode:2008PNAS..10514187L.
  73. ^ Chemical in Plastic Is Connected to Health Problems in Monkeys. Washington Post. 4 September 2008 [cited 6 September 2008]:A02.
  74. ^ Poimenova a, M. E.; Markaki, E.; Rahiotis, C.; Kitraki, E. (2010). "Corticosterone - regulated actions in the rat brain are affected by perinatal exposure to low dose of bisphenol A". Neuroscience 167 (3): 741–749. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.02.051. PMID 20219646. edit
  75. ^ Suzuki t, M. K.; Mizuo, K.; Miyagawa, K.; Narita, M. (June 2005). "[Exposure to bisphenol-A affects the rewarding system in mice]" (in Japanese). Nihon Shinkei Seishin Yakurigaku Zasshi 25 (3): 125–128. PMID 16045194. edit
  76. ^ Jones Dc, M. G.; Miller, G. W. (2008). "The effects of environmental neurotoxicants on the dopaminergic system: A possible role in drug addiction". Biochemical pharmacology 76 (5): 569–581. doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2008.05.010. PMID 18555207. edit
  77. ^ Zhou r, Z. Z.; Zhang, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Chen, L.; Sokabe, M.; Chen, L. (2009). "Deficits in development of synaptic plasticity in rat dorsal striatum following prenatal and neonatal exposure to low-dose bisphenol A". Neuroscience 159 (1): 161–171. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.12.028. PMID 19162132. edit
  78. ^ Tanida t, W. K.; Warita, K.; Ishihara, K.; Fukui, S.; Mitsuhashi, T.; Sugawara, T.; Tabuchi, Y.; Nanmori, T. et al. (2009). "Fetal and neonatal exposure to three typical environmental chemicals with different mechanisms of action: mixed exposure to phenol, phthalate, and dioxin cancels the effects of sole exposure on mouse midbrain dopaminergic nuclei". Toxicology letters 189 (1): 40–47. doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2009.04.005. PMID 19481886. edit
  79. ^ Zoeller R (2007). "Environmental chemicals impacting the thyroid: targets and consequences". Thyroid : official journal of the American Thyroid Association 17 (9): 811–817. doi:10.1089/thy.2007.0107. PMID 17956155. edit
  80. ^ Boas m, M. K.; Main, K. M.; Feldt-Rasmussen, U. (Oct 2009). "Environmental chemicals and thyroid function: an update". Current opinion in endocrinology, diabetes, and obesity 16 (5): 385–391. doi:10.1097/MED.0b013e3283305af7. PMID 19625957. edit
  81. ^ Kashiwagi k, F. N.; Furuno, N.; Kitamura, S.; Ohta, S.; Sugihara, K.; Utsumi, K.; Hanada, H.; Taniguchi, K. et al. (2009). "Disruption of Thyroid Hormone Function by Environmental Pollutants". Journal of Health Science 55 (2): 147–142. doi:10.1248/jhs.55.147. http://jhs.pharm.or.jp/data/55(2)/55_147.pdf.edit
  82. ^ a b BISPHENOL A (BPA) – Current state of knowledge and future actions by WHO and FAO; 27 November 2009 [cited 2 December 2009].
  83. ^ Soto Am, S. C.; Sonnenschein, C. (2010). "Environmental causes of cancer: endocrine disruptors as carcinogens". Nature Reviews Endocrinology 6 (7): 363–370. doi:10.1038/nrendo.2010.87. PMID 20498677. Lay summary.edit
  84. ^ Brisken C (2008). "Endocrine Disruptors and Breast Cancer". CHIMIA International Journal for Chemistry 62 (5): 406–409. doi:10.2533/chimia.2008.406.edit
  85. ^ Soto Am, V. L.; Vandenberg, L. N.; Maffini, M. V.; Sonnenschein, C. (2008). "Does breast cancer start in the womb?". Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology 102 (2): 125–133. doi:10.1111/j.1742-7843.2007.00165.x. PMC 2817934. PMID 18226065. //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2817934/. edit
  86. ^ Fernandez Sv, R. J. (January 2010). "Estrogen and xenoestrogens in breast cancer". Toxicol Pathol 38 (1): 110–122. doi:10.1177/0192623309354108. PMC 2907875. PMID 19933552. //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2907875/. edit
  87. ^ Jenkins s, R. N.; Russo, J.; Carpenter, M.; Eltoum, I.; Raghuraman, N.; Jenkins, S. (2009). "Oral Exposure to Bisphenol A Increases Dimethylbenzanthracene-Induced Mammary Cancer in Rats" (Free full text). Environmental Health Perspectives 117 (6): 910–915. doi:10.1289/ehp.11751. PMC 2702405. PMID 19590682. http://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/members/2009/11751/11751.html.edit
  88. ^ Betancourt Am, M. J.; Mobley, J. A.; Russo, J.; Lamartiniere, C. A. (2010). "Proteomic Analysis in Mammary Glands of Rat Offspring Exposed In Utero to Bisphenol A". Journal of proteomics 73 (6): 1241–1253. doi:10.1016/j.jprot.2010.02.020. PMID 20219716. edit
  89. ^ Lapensee Ew, L. E. C. (2010). "Bisphenol a and estradiol are equipotent in antagonizing cisplatin-induced cytotoxicity in breast cancer cells". Cancer Letters 290 (2): 167–173. doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2009.09.005. PMC 2853868. PMID 19796866. //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2853868/. Lay summary. edit
  90. ^ Zhu h, X. X.; Xiao, X.; Zheng, J.; Zheng, S.; Dong, K.; Yu, Y. (2009). "Growth-promoting effect of bisphenol a on neuroblastoma in vitro and in vivo☆". Journal of Pediatric Surgery 44 (4): 672–680. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2008.10.067. PMID 19361625. edit
  91. ^ Zheng j, X. X.; Xiao, X.; Liu, J.; Zheng, S.; Yin, Q.; Yu, Y. (2007). "Growth-promoting effect of environmental endocrine disruptors on human neuroblastoma SK-N-SH cells☆". Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology 24 (2): 189–193. doi:10.1016/j.etap.2007.05.003. PMID 21783809.edit
  92. ^ Zhu h, Z. J.; Zheng, J.; Xiao, X.; Zheng, S.; Dong, K.; Liu, J.; Wang, Y. (2010). "Environmental endocrine disruptors promote invasion and metastasis of SK-N-SH human neuroblastoma cells". Oncology reports 23 (1): 129–139. PMID 19956873. edit
  93. ^ Nagel Sc, V. S. F.; Vom Saal, F. S.; Thayer, K. A.; Dhar, M. G.; Boechler, M.; Welshons, W. V. (1997). "Relative binding affinity-serum modified access (RBA-SMA) assay predicts the relative in vivo bioactivity of the xenoestrogens bisphenol A and octylphenol". Environmental health perspectives (Brogan & Partners) 105 (1): 70–76. doi:10.2307/3433065. JSTOR 3433065. PMC 1469837. PMID 9074884. //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1469837/. edit
  94. ^ Timms Bg, H. K.; Howdeshell, K. L.; Barton, L.; Bradley, S.; Richter, C. A.; Vom Saal, F. S. (2005). "Estrogenic chemicals in plastic and oral contraceptives disrupt development of the fetal mouse prostate and urethra". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102 (19): 7014–7019. Bibcode 2005PNAS..102.7014T. doi:10.1073/pnas.0502544102. PMC 1088066. PMID 15867144. //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1088066/.edit
  95. ^ Ho Sm, T. W. (2006). "Developmental exposure to estradiol and bisphenol a increases susceptibility to prostate carcinogenesis and epigenetically regulates phosphodiesterase type 4 variant 4". Cancer Research 66 (11): 5624–5632. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-0516. PMC 2276876. PMID 16740699. //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2276876/. edit
  96. ^ Richter Ca, T. J.; Taylor, J. A.; Ruhlen, R. L.; Welshons, W. V.; Vom Saal, F. S. (2007). "Estradiol and Bisphenol a stimulate androgen receptor and estrogen receptor gene expression in fetal mouse prostate mesenchyme cells". Environmental health perspectives 115 (6): 902–908. doi:10.1289/ehp.9804. PMC 1892114. PMID 17589598. //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1892114/. edit
  97. ^ Prins Gs, T. W.; Tang, W. Y.; Belmonte, J.; Ho, S. M. (2008). "Developmental exposure to bisphenol a increases prostate cancer susceptibility in adult rats: epigenetic mode of action is implicated". Fertility and Sterility 89 (2 Suppl): e41–e41. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.12.023. PMC 2531072. PMID 18308059. //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2531072/.edit
  98. ^ Genomics, Proteomics and Metabolomics in Nutraceuticals and Functional Foods. Wiley; 2010. ISBN 0-8138-1402-2. p. 319.
  99. ^ Dolinoy Dc, H. D.; Huang, D.; Jirtle, R. L. (2007). "Maternal nutrient supplementation counteracts bisphenol A-induced DNA hypomethylation in early development". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104 (32): 13056–13061. Bibcode 2007PNAS..10413056D. doi:10.1073/pnas.0703739104. PMC 1941790. PMID 17670942. //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1941790/.edit
  100. ^ Smith CC, Taylor HS (January 2007). "Xenoestrogen exposure imprints expression of genes (Hoxa10) required for normal uterine development". FASEB J. 21 (1): 239–46. doi:10.1096/fj.06-6635com. PMID 17093138. Lay summary – Science Daily.
  101. ^ a b Newbold Rr, J. W. (Jun 2009). "Prenatal exposure to bisphenol a at environmentally relevant doses adversely affects the murine female reproductive tract later in life". Environmental health perspectives 117 (6): 879–885. doi:10.1289/ehp.0800045. PMC 2702400. PMID 19590677. //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2702400/. edit
  102. ^ a b Adewale Hb, J. W.; Jefferson, W. N.; Newbold, R. R.; Patisaul, H. B. (Jun 2009). "Neonatal Bisphenol-A Exposure Alters Rat Reproductive Development and Ovarian Morphology Without Impairing Activation of Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone Neurons". Biology of Reproduction 81 (4): 690–699. doi:10.1095/biolreprod.109.078261. PMC 2754884. PMID 19535786. //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2754884/. edit
  103. ^ Bosquiazzo Vl, V. J. (January 2010). "Effects of neonatal exposure to bisphenol A on steroid regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor expression and endothelial cell proliferation in the adult rat uterus". Biol. Reprod. 82 (1): 86–95. doi:10.1095/biolreprod.109.078543. PMID 19696011. edit
  104. ^ Monje l, V. J.; Varayoud, J.; Muñoz-De-Toro, M.; Luque, E. H.; Ramos, J. G. (Jul 2009). "Neonatal exposure to bisphenol a alters estrogen-dependent mechanisms governing sexual behavior in the adult female rat". Reproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.) 28 (4): 435–442. doi:10.1016/j.reprotox.2009.06.012. ISSN 0890-6238. PMID 19577632.edit
  105. ^ Nakagami a, N. T.; Negishi, T.; Kawasaki, K.; Imai, N.; Nishida, Y.; Ihara, T.; Kuroda, Y.; Yoshikawa, Y. et al. (Sep 2009). "Alterations in male infant behaviors towards its mother by prenatal exposure to bisphenol a in cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis) during early suckling period". Psychoneuroendocrinology 34 (8): 1189–1197. doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2009.03.005. PMID 19345509.edit
  106. ^ Huang, L. L.; Leung, L. K. (Sep 2009). "Bisphenol a downregulates CYP19 transcription in JEG-3 cells". Toxicology letters 189 (3): 248–252. doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2009.06.853. PMID 19539015.edit
  107. ^ Li Mw, M. D. (2009). "Disruption of the blood-testis barrier integrity by bisphenol a in vitro: is this a suitable model for studying blood-testis barrier dynamics?". The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology 41 (11): 2302–2314. doi:10.1016/j.biocel.2009.05.016. PMID 19497385. edit
  108. ^ Li d, Z. Z.; Zhou, Z.; Qing, D.; He, Y.; Wu, T.; Miao, M.; Wang, J.; Weng, X. et al. (2009). "Occupational exposure to bisphenol-A (BPA) and the risk of Self-Reported Male Sexual Dysfunction". Human Reproduction 25 (2): 519–527. doi:10.1093/humrep/dep381. PMID 19906654.edit
  109. ^ Ryan Bc, H. A. (2010). "In utero and lactational exposure to bisphenol A, in contrast to ethinyl estradiol, does not alter sexually dimorphic behavior, puberty, fertility, and anatomy of female LE rats". Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology 114 (1): 133–148. doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfp266. PMID 19864446.edit
  110. ^ Vom Saal Fs, A. B. (2010). "Flawed Experimental Design Reveals the Need for Guidelines Requiring Appropriate Positive Controls in Endocrine Disruption Research". Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology 115 (2): 612–613; author 613 614–613. doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfq048. PMID 20164146.edit
  111. ^ Gray LE, Ryan B, Hotchkiss AK, Crofton KM. Rebuttal of "Flawed Experimental Design Reveals the Need for Guidelines Requiring Appropriate Positive Controls in Endocrine Disruption Research" by (Vom Saal 2010). Toxicol. Sci.. 2010;115(2):614. doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfq073. PMID 20207694.
  112. ^ ScienceDaily. Bisphenol A Exposure In Pregnant Mice Permanently Changes DNA Of Offspring; 10 June 2009 [cited 23 October 2011].
  113. ^ Lawson C, Gieske M, Murdoch B, Ye P, Li Y, Hassold T, Hunt PA. Gene expression in the fetal mouse ovary is altered by exposure to low doses of bisphenol A. Biol. Reprod.. 2011;84(1):79–86. doi:10.1095/biolreprod.110.084814. PMID 20739668. Lay summary: ScienceDaily.
  114. ^ a b Bromer JG, Zhou Y, Taylor MB, Doherty L, Taylor HS. Bisphenol-A exposure in utero leads to epigenetic alterations in the developmental programming of uterine estrogen response. FASEB J.. 2010;24(7):2273–80. doi:10.1096/fj.09-140533. PMID 20181937. Lay summary: ScienceDaily.
  115. ^ ScienceDaily. Fetal exposure to BPA changes development of uterus in primates, study suggests; 7 June 2011 [cited 1 February 2012].
  116. ^ ScienceDaily. BPA lowers male fertility, mouse study finds; 6 June 2011 [cited 1 February 2012].
  117. ^ Jašarević E, Sieli PT, Twellman EE, Welsh TH, Schachtman TR, Roberts RM, Geary DC, Rosenfeld CS. Disruption of adult expression of sexually selected traits by developmental exposure to bisphenol A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.. 2011;108(28):11715–20. doi:10.1073/pnas.1107958108. PMID 21709224. Lay summary: ScienceDaily.
  118. ^ sciencenews.org. More Troubling News About BPA / Science News [cited 11 June 2009].
  119. ^ Maggie Fox. Reuters. Hormone experts worried about plastics, chemicals [cited 10 June 2009].
  120. ^ Benachour n, A. A. (2009). "Toxic effects of low doses of Bisphenol-A on human placental cells". Toxicology and applied pharmacology 241 (3): 322–328. doi:10.1016/j.taap.2009.09.005. PMID 19769995. Lay summary.edit
  121. ^ Braniste v, J. A.; Jouault, A.; Gaultier, E.; Polizzi, A.; Buisson-Brenac, C.; Leveque, M.; Martin, P. G.; Theodorou, V. et al. (2009). "Impact of oral bisphenol a at reference doses on intestinal barrier function and sex differences after perinatal exposure in rats" (PDF). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107 (1): 448–453. Bibcode 2010PNAS..107..448B. doi:10.1073/pnas.0907697107. PMC 2806743. PMID 20018722. http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2009/12/10/0907697107.full.pdf. edit
  122. ^ Midoro-Horiuti t, T. R.; Tiwari, R.; Watson, C. S.; Goldblum, R. M. (2010). "Maternal bisphenol a exposure promotes the development of experimental asthma in mouse pups". Environmental health perspectives 118 (2): 273–277. doi:10.1289/ehp.0901259. PMC 2831929. PMID 20123615. //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2831929/. edit
  123. ^ ScienceDaily. Chemical in plastic, BPA, exposure may be associated with wheezing in children; 1 May 2011 [cited 1 February 2012].
  124. ^ Lang IA, Galloway TS, Scarlett A, Henley WE, Depledge M, Wallace RB, Melzer D. Association of Urinary Bisphenol A Concentration With Medical Disorders and Laboratory Abnormalities in Adults. JAMA. 2008;300(11):1303–10. doi:10.1001/jama.300.11.1303. PMID 18799442.
  125. ^ Alison Motluk. NewScientist. Plastic bottle chemical linked to heart disease; September 2008 [cited 2 February 2012].
  126. ^ Vom Saal Fs, M. J.; Myers, J. P. (2008). "Bisphenol a and Risk of Metabolic Disorders". JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association 300 (11): 1353–1355. doi:10.1001/jama.300.11.1353. PMID 18799451.edit
  127. ^ Melzer d, R. N. (2010). Zhang, Baohong. ed. "Association of Urinary Bisphenol A Concentration with Heart Disease: Evidence from NHANES 2003/06" (pdf). PLoS ONE 5 (1): e8673. Bibcode 2010PLoSO...5.8673M. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0008673. PMC 2800195. PMID 20084273. http://www.plosone.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0008673&representation=PDF. Lay summary.edit
  128. ^ Melzer D, Gates P, Osborn NJ, et al.. Urinary bisphenol a concentration and angiography-defined coronary artery stenosis. PLoS ONE 2012. 2012;7.
  129. ^ Duan B, Hu X, Zhao H, Qin J, Luo J (April 2012). "The relationship between urinary bisphenol A levels and meningioma in Chinese adults". Int J Clin Oncol. doi:10.1007/s10147-012-0408-6. PMID 22527848.
  130. ^ Sugiura-Ogasawara m, O. Y.; Ozaki, Y.; Sonta, S.; Makino, T.; Suzumori, K. (August 2005). "Exposure to bisphenol A is associated with recurrent miscarriage". Hum. Reprod. 20 (8): 2325–2329. doi:10.1093/humrep/deh888. PMID 15947000.edit
  131. ^ Yang Yj, H. Y.; Hong, Y. C.; Oh, S. Y.; Park, M. S.; Kim, H.; Leem, J. H.; Ha, E. H. (Aug 2009). "Bisphenol a exposure is associated with oxidative stress and inflammation in postmenopausal women". Environmental research 109 (6): 797–801. Bibcode 2009ER....109..797Y. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2009.04.014. ISSN 0013-9351. PMID 19464675.edit
  132. ^ Braun Jm, Y. K. (2009). "Prenatal Bisphenol a Exposure and Early Childhood Behavior". Environmental Health Perspectives 117 (12): 1945–1952. doi:10.1289/ehp.0900979. PMC 2799471. PMID 20049216. //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2799471/.edit
  133. ^ Meeker Jd, C. A.; Calafat, A. M.; Hauser, R. (2009). "Urinary Bisphenol a Concentrations in Relation to Serum Thyroid and Reproductive Hormone Levels in Men from an Infertility Clinic". Environmental Science & Technology 44 (4): 1458–1463. doi:10.1021/es9028292. PMC 2823133. PMID 20030380. //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2823133/.edit
  134. ^ Mendiola j, J. R. N.; Jørgensen, N.; Andersson, A. M.; Calafat, A. M.; Ye, X.; Redmon, J. B.; Drobnis, E. Z.; Wang, C. et al. (2010). "Are Environmental Levels of Bisphenol A Associated with Reproductive Function in Fertile Men?". Environmental Health Perspectives 118 (9): 1286–1291. doi:10.1289/ehp.1002037. PMC 2944091. PMID 20494855. //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2944091/. edit
  135. ^ Li DK, Zhou Z, Miao M, He Y, Qing D, Wu T, Wang J, Weng X, Ferber J, Herrinton LJ, Zhu Q, Gao E, Yuan W. Relationship between urine bisphenol-A level and declining male sexual function. J. Androl.. 2010;31(5):500–6. doi:10.2164/jandrol.110.010413. PMID 20467048.
  136. ^ Bisphenol A concentrations in the Canadian population, 2007 to 2009. Statistics Canada. 16 August 2010 [cited 19 November 2010]:82–625–XWE.
  137. ^ Clayton Em, T. M.; Todd, M.; Dowd, J. B.; Aiello, A. E. (2010). "The Impact of Bisphenol A and Triclosan on Immune Parameters in the U.S. Population, NHANES 2003–2006". Environ Health Perspectives 119 (3): 390–396. doi:10.1289/ehp.1002883. PMC 3060004. PMID 21062687. //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3060004/. edit
  138. ^ Daily Bisphenol A Excretion and Associations with Sex Hormone Concentrations: Results from the InCHIANTI Adult Population Study [cited 3 February 2012].
  139. ^ ScienceDaily. Bisphenol A may have role in ovarian dysfunction; 13 January 2011 [cited 1 February 2012].
  140. ^ ScienceDaily. Antibacterial Soaps: Being Too Clean Can Make People Sick, Study Suggests; 29 November 2010 [cited 1 February 2012].
  141. ^ D. Li, Z. Zhou, D. Qing, Y. He, T. Wu, M. Miao, J. Wang, X. Weng, J.R. Ferber, L.J. Herrinton, Q. Zhu, E. Gao, H. Checkoway, and W. Yuan. Occupational exposure to bisphenol-A (BPA) and the risk of Self-Reported Male Sexual Dysfunction. Human Reproduction. 2009;25(2):519–27. doi:10.1093/humrep/dep381. PMID 19906654.
  142. ^ Ajc.com. BPA Tied to Impotence in Men; 11 November 2009 [cited 23 October 2011].
  143. ^ Dodds E. C., Lawson Wilfrid. Synthetic Œstrogenic Agents without the Phenanthrene Nucleus. Nature. 1936;137(3476):996. doi:10.1038/137996a0. Bibcode:1936Natur.137..996D.
  144. ^ a b 'Inherently toxic' chemical faces its future. Globe and Mail (Toronto). 7 April 2007 [cited 7 April 2007].
  145. ^ This table is adapted from: EWG, 2007. "Many studies confirm BPA's low-dose toxicity across a diverse range of toxic effects," Environmental Working Group Report: A Survey of Bisphenol A in U.S. Canned Foods. Retrieved 4 November 2007 at http://www.ewg.org/node/20941. All studies included in this table where judged by the CEHRH panel to be at least of moderate usefulness for assessing the risk of BPA to human reproduction.
  146. ^ Markey CM, Wadia PR, Rubin BS, Sonnenschein C, Soto AM. Long-term effects of fetal exposure to low doses of the xenoestrogen bisphenol-A in the female mouse genital tract. Biology of Reproduction. 2005 [cited 1 February 2012];72(6):1344–51. doi:10.1095/biolreprod.104.036301. PMID 15689538.
  147. ^ Muñoz-de-Toro M. Perinatal exposure to bisphenol-A alters peripubertal mammary gland development in mice. Endocrinology. 2005;146(9):4138–47. doi:10.1210/en.2005-0340. PMID 15919749. PMC 2834307.
  148. ^ Nagel SC, vom Saal FS, Thayer KA, Dhar MG, Boechler M, Welshons WV. Relative binding affinity-serum modified access (RBA-SMA) assay predicts the relative in vivo bioactivity of the xenoestrogens bisphenol A and octylphenol. Environ. Health Perspect.. 1997;105(1):70–6. doi:10.2307/3433065. PMID 9074884.
  149. ^ Honma S, Suzuki A, Buchanan DL, Katsu Y, Watanabe H, Iguchi T. Low dose effect of in utero exposure to bisphenol A and diethylstilbestrol on female mouse reproduction. Reproductive Toxicology. 2002;16(2):117–22. doi:10.1016/S0890-6238(02)00006-0. PMID 11955942.
  150. ^ Akingbemi BT, Sottas CM, Koulova AI, Klinefelter GR, Hardy MP. Inhibition of testicular steroidogenesis by the xenoestrogen bisphenol A is associated with reduced pituitary luteinizing hormone secretion and decreased steroidogenic enzyme gene expression in rat Leydig cells. Endocrinology. 2004;145(2):592–603. doi:10.1210/en.2003-1174. PMID 14605012.
  151. ^ Murray TJ, Maffini MV, Ucci AA, Sonnenschein C, Soto AM. Induction of mammary gland ductal hyperplasias and carcinoma in situ following fetal bisphenol A exposure. Reproductive Toxicology. 2007;23(3):383–90. doi:10.1016/j.reprotox.2006.10.002. PMID 17123778. PMC 1987322.
  152. ^ Ho SM, Tang WY, Belmonte de Frausto J, Prins GS. Developmental exposure to estradiol and bisphenol A increases susceptibility to prostate carcinogenesis and epigenetically regulates phosphodiesterase type 4 variant 4. Cancer Res.. 2006;66(11):5624–32. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-0516. PMID 16740699. PMC 2276876.
  153. ^ Palanza PL, Howdeshell KL, Parmigiani S, vom Saal FS. Exposure to a low dose of bisphenol A during fetal life or in adulthood alters maternal behavior in mice. Environmental Health Perspectives. 2002;110 Suppl 3:415–22. PMID 12060838. PMC 1241192.
  154. ^ Kubo K, Arai O, Omura M, Watanabe R, Ogata R, Aou S. Low dose effects of bisphenol A on sexual differentiation of the brain and behavior in rats. Neurosci. Res.. 2003;45(3):345–56. doi:10.1016/S0168-0102(02)00251-1. PMID 12631470.
  155. ^ a b Integrated Risk Information System: Bisphenol A. (CASRN 80-05-7): Oral RfD Assessment: Bisphenol A; 1988 [cited 2 February 2012].
  156. ^ a b c d Matsushima A, Kakuta Y, Teramoto T, Koshiba T, Liu X, Okada H, Tokunaga T, Kawabata S, Kimura M, Shimohigashi Y. Structural evidence for endocrine disruptor bisphenol A binding to human nuclear receptor ERR gamma. J. Biochem.. 2007;142(4):517–24. doi:10.1093/jb/mvm158. PMID 17761695.
  157. ^ Takeda Y, Liu X, Sumiyoshi M, Matsushima A, Shimohigashi M, Shimohigashi Y. Placenta expressing the greatest quantity of bisphenol A receptor ERR{gamma} among the human reproductive tissues: Predominant expression of type-1 ERRgamma isoform. J. Biochem.. 2009;146(1):113–22. doi:10.1093/jb/mvp049. PMID 19304792.
  158. ^ Cichna-Markl, M. Methods (2012).
  159. ^ A Survey of Bisphenol A in U.S. Canned Foods; 5 March 2007 [cited 2 February 2012].
  160. ^ Survey of Bisphenol A in Canned Drink Products [cited 13 March 2009].
  161. ^ Schecter a, M. N. (2010). "Bisphenol A (BPA) in U.S. Food". Environmental Science & Technology 44 (24): 9425–9430. doi:10.1021/es102785d. PMID 21038926. edit
  162. ^ Lang IA Galloway TS, Scarlett A, Henley WE, Depledge M, Wallace, Robert B, Melzer, D. Association of Urinary Bisphenol A Concentration With Medical Disorders and Laboratory Abnormalities in Adults. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2008;300(11):1303–10. doi:10.1001/jama.300.11.1303. PMID 18799442.
  163. ^ Journalist's Resource.org. Food Packaging and Bisphenol A and Bis(2-Ethyhexyl) Phthalate Exposure: Findings from a Dietary Intervention.
  164. ^ Society for Science and the Public. Concerned About BPA: Check Your Receipts; 7 October 2009 [cited 7 October 2009].
  165. ^ Gehring M, Tennhardt L, Vogel D, Weltin D, Bilitewski B. Bisphenol A Contamination of Wastepaper, Cellulose and Recycled Paper Products. Transactions on Ecology and the Environment. 2004;78:294–300. Lay summary.
  166. ^ Biedermann S, Tschudin P, Grob K. Transfer of bisphenol A from thermal printer paper to the skin. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2010;398(1):571–6. doi:10.1007/s00216-010-3936-9. PMID 20623271.
  167. ^ Liao C, Kannan K. High levels of bisphenol A in paper currencies from several countries, and implications for dermal exposure. Environ. Sci. Technol.. 2011;45(16):6761–8. doi:10.1021/es200977t. PMID 21744851.
  168. ^ a b Liao C, Kannan K. Widespread occurrence of bisphenol A in paper and paper products: implications for human exposure. Environ. Sci. Technol.. 2011;45(21):9372–9. doi:10.1021/es202507f. PMID 21939283.
  169. ^ US Department of Health and Human Services. NTP-CERHR EXPERT PANEL REPORT on the REPRODUCTIVE and DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICITY of BISPHENOL A; 26 November 2007 [cited 2 March 2011].
  170. ^ Calafat AM, Kuklenyik Z, Reidy JA, Caudill SP, Ekong J, Needham LL. Urinary concentrations of bisphenol A and 4-nonylphenol in a human reference population. Environ. Health Perspect.. 2005;113(4):391–5. doi:10.1289/ehp.7534. PMID 15811827. PMC 1278476.
  171. ^ Calafat AM, Ye X, Wong LY, Reidy JA, Needham LL. Exposure of the U.S. population to bisphenol A and 4-tertiary-octylphenol: 2003–2004. Environ. Health Perspect.. 2008;116(1):39–44. doi:10.1289/ehp.10753. PMID 18197297.
  172. ^ Carwile JL, Luu HT, Bassett LS, Driscoll DA, Yuan C, Chang JY, Ye X, Calafat AM, Michels KB. Use of Polycarbonate Bottles and Urinary Bisphenol A Concentrations. Environ. Health Perspect.. 2009;117(9):1368–72. doi:10.1289/ehp.0900604. PMID 19750099. PMC 2737011.
  173. ^ Ashley Ahearn. War of the Sciences; 19 September 2008 [cited 2 February 2012].
  174. ^ Npr.org. FDA Weighs Safety Of Bisphenol A [cited 23 October 2011].
  175. ^ Lakind, J. S.; Naiman, D. Q. (2010). "Daily intake of bisphenol a and potential sources of exposure: 2005–2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey". Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology 21 (3): 272–279. doi:10.1038/jes.2010.9. PMC 3079892. PMID 20237498. //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3079892/.edit
  176. ^ Pipeline relining [cited 18 October 2010].
  177. ^ Edginton An, R. L.; Ritter, L. (2008). "Predicting Plasma Concentrations of Bisphenol a in Children Younger Than 2 Years of Age after Typical Feeding Schedules, using a Physiologically Based Toxicokinetic Model". Environmental Health Perspectives 117 (4): 645–652. doi:10.1289/ehp.0800073. PMC 2679611. PMID 19440506. //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2679611/. edit
  178. ^ Beronius A, Rudén C, Håkansson H, Hanberg A. Risk to all or none? A comparative analysis of controversies in the health risk assessment of Bisphenol A. Reprod. Toxicol.. 2010;29(2):132–46. doi:10.1016/j.reprotox.2009.11.007. PMID 19931376.
  179. ^ European Food Safety Authority Opinion [Abstract] [cited 28 February 2007].
  180. ^ a b Ackerman LK, Noonan GO, Heiserman WM, Roach JA, Limm W, Begley TH (2010). "Determination of Bisphenol a in U.S. Infant Formulas: Updated Methods and Concentrations". Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 58 (4): 2307–2313. doi:10.1021/jf903959u. PMID 20102208. edit
  181. ^ Cao Xl, D. G.; Dufresne, G.; Belisle, S.; Clement, G.; Falicki, M.; Beraldin, F.; Rulibikiye, A. (2008). "Levels of bisphenol a in canned liquid infant formula products in Canada and dietary intake estimates". Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 56 (17): 7919–7924. doi:10.1021/jf8008712. PMID 18702469. edit
  182. ^ U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Bisphenol A (BPA) Information for Parents [cited 25 March 2011].
  183. ^ Von Goetz n, W. M.; Wormuth, M.; Scheringer, M.; Hungerbühler, K. (2010). "Bisphenol A: How the Most Relevant Exposure Sources Contribute to Total Consumer Exposure". Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis 30 (3): 473–487. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01345.x. PMID 20136739.edit
  184. ^ Zalko d, S. A.; Soto, A. M.; Dolo, L.; Dorio, C. L.; Rathahao, E.; Debrauwer, L.; Faure, R.; Cravedi, J. P. (2003). "Biotransformations of bisphenol a in a mammalian model: Answers and new questions raised by low-dose metabolic fate studies in pregnant CD1 mice". Environmental health perspectives 111 (3): 309–319. doi:10.1289/ehp.5603. PMC 1241388. PMID 12611660. //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1241388/. edit
  185. ^ Environmental Working Group. Cord Blood Contaminants in Minority Newborns; 2009 [cited 2 December 2009].
  186. ^ Austin American Statesman. Study links BPA with girls' behavior problems; 2011 [cited 24 October 2011].
  187. ^ Sun y, I. M.; Irie, M.; Kishikawa, N.; Wada, M.; Kuroda, N.; Nakashima, K. (2004). "Determination of bisphenol a in human breast milk by HPLC with column-switching andfluorescence detection". Biomedical Chromatography 18 (8): 501–507. doi:10.1002/bmc.345. PMID 15386523. edit
  188. ^ Ye x, K. Z.; Kuklenyik, Z.; Needham, L. L.; Calafat, A. M. (2006). "Measuring environmental phenols and chlorinated organic chemicals in breast milk using automated on-line column-switching–high performance liquid chromatography–isotope dilution tandem mass spectrometry". Journal of Chromatography B 831 (1–2): 110–115. doi:10.1016/j.jchromb.2005.11.050. PMID 16377264. edit
  189. ^ Sajiki j, Y. R. (2010). "Study of experiment on leaching of bisphenol a from infant books to artificial saliva". Nippon eiseigaku zasshi. Japanese journal of hygiene 65 (3): 467–470. doi:10.1265/jjh.65.467. PMID 20508389. edit
  190. ^ a b Does Rapid Metabolism Ensure Negligible Risk from Bisphenol A?. Environmental Health Perspectives. November 2009 [cited 16 November 2009];117(11):1639–1643. doi:10.1289/ehp.0901010. PMID 20049111. PMC 2801165.
  191. ^ Nishikawa m, I. H.; Iwano, H.; Yanagisawa, R.; Koike, N.; Inoue, H.; Yokota, H. (2010). "Placental Transfer of Conjugated Bisphenol a and Subsequent Reactivation in the Rat Fetus". Environmental health perspectives 118 (9): 1196–1203. doi:10.1289/ehp.0901575. PMC 2944077. PMID 20382578. //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2944077/. edit
  192. ^ Verner Ma, M. T.; Magher, T.; Haddad, S. (2009). "High concentrations of commonly used drugs can inhibit the in vitro glucuronidation of bisphenol a and nonylphenol in rats". Xenobiotica 40 (2): 83–92. doi:10.3109/00498250903383334. PMID 19916736. edit
  193. ^ Xing l, X. Y.; Xu, Y.; Xiao, Y.; Shang, L.; Liu, R.; Wei, X.; Jiang, J.; Hao, W. (2010). "Embryotoxic and teratogenic effects of the combination of bisphenol a and genistein on in vitro cultured postimplantation rat embryos". Toxicological Sciences 115 (2): 577–588. doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfq081. PMID 20299547. edit
  194. ^ Mørck Tj, S. G. (August 2010). "Placental transport and in vitro effects of Bisphenol A". Reprod. Toxicol. 30 (1): 131–137. doi:10.1016/j.reprotox.2010.02.007. PMID 20214975. edit
  195. ^ Vandenberg Ln, C. I.; Chahoud, I.; Heindel, J. J.; Padmanabhan, V.; Paumgartten, F. J. R.; Schoenfelder, G. (August 2010). "Urinary, circulating, and tissue biomonitoring studies indicate widespread exposure to bisphenol A". Environ. Health Perspect. 118 (8): 1055–1070. doi:10.1289/ehp.0901716. PMC 2920080. PMID 20338858. //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2920080/.edit
  196. ^ Geens T, Neels H, Covaci A. Sensitive and selective method for the determination of bisphenol-A and triclosan in serum and urine as pentafluorobenzoate-derivatives using GC-ECNI/MS. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci.. 2009;877(31):4042–6. doi:10.1016/j.jchromb.2009.10.017. PMID 19884050.
  197. ^ Jenny L. Carwile, Xiaoyun Ye, Xiaoliu Zhou, Antonia M. Calafat, Karin B. Michels. Canned Soup Consumption and Urinary Bisphenol A: A Randomized Crossover Trial. JAMA. 2011;306(20):2218–2220. doi:10.1001/jama.2011.1721. PMID 22110104.
  198. ^ Toxicology: The big test for bisphenol A. Nature. 21 April [cited 21 April 2010];464(7292):1122–1124. doi:10.1038/4641122a. PMID 20414285.
  199. ^ Plastic Breaks Down in Ocean, After All – And Fast; 20 August 2009 [cited 1 February 2012].
  200. ^ Kle’cka, G., Staples, C., Clark, K., Anderhoeven, N., Thomas, D. and Hentges, S. Exposure Analysis of Bisphenol A in Surface Water Systems in North America and Europe. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 6145–6150.
  201. ^ Fox, J.E., J. Gulledge, E. Engelhaupt, M.E. Burrow & J.A. McLachlan. Pesticides reduce symbiotic efficiency of nitrogen-fixing rhizobia and host plants. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.. 2007;104(24):10282–7. doi:10.1073/pnas.0611710104. PMID 17548832. Bibcode:2007PNAS..10410282F.
  202. ^ Government of Canada. Bisphenol A Fact Sheet [http://www.chemicalsubstanceschimiques.gc.ca/fact-fait/bisphenol-a-eng.php archived 23 April 2011; cited 1 February 2012].
  203. ^ Drewes, J. E.; Hemming, J.; Ladenburger, S. J.; Schauer, J.; Sonzogni, W. An assessment of endocrine disrupting activity changes during wastewater treatment through the use of bioassays and chemical measurements. Water Environ. Res. 2005, 77, 12–23.
  204. ^ Oehlmann j, S. O. U. (July 2009). "A critical analysis of the biological impacts of plasticizers on wildlife". Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 364 (1526): 2047–2062. doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0242. PMC 2873012. PMID 19528055. //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2873012/.edit
  205. ^ ScienceDaily. Chemicals Are Likely Cause of Feminization of Fish Present in Two Rivers in Alberta, Canada, Researchers Find; 29 July 2010 [cited 1 February 2012].
  206. ^ Brown, Eryn. "Jury still out on BPA, World Health Organization says", The Los Angeles Times, 11 November 2010. Retrieved on 7 February 2011.
  207. ^ Food Standards Australia New Zealand. Bisphenol A (BPA) and food packaging; May 2009 [archived 9 January 2010; cited 1 February 2012].[dead link]
  208. ^ New Zealand Food Safety Authority. Babies’ bottles and bisphenol A; May 2008 [archived 26 July 2010; cited 1 February 2012].
  209. ^ Food Standards Australia New Zealand. Bisphenol A (BPA); April 2012.
  210. ^ Banning Bisphenol A In Baby Bottles: Canada moves toward restricting the chemical; Congress proposes similar legislation. 23 April 2008.
  211. ^ Bisphenol A [cited 2 February 2012].
  212. ^ The government will evaluate whether the ban will become law in October 2008. Government of Canada Takes Action on Another Chemical of Concern: Bisphenol A. [archived 2 July 2008; cited 2 February 2012].
  213. ^ Wal-Mart to pull baby bottles made with chemical BPA: Washington Post; 18 April 2008 [cited 2 February 2012].
  214. ^ Ian Austen. Bottle Maker to Stop Using Plastic Linked to Health Concerns; 18 April 2008 [cited 2 February 2012].
  215. ^ Toys 'R' Us to phase out bisphenol A baby bottles. 22 April 2008 [cited 22 April 2008]. CBC News.
  216. ^ Canoe.ca, Politics: Bisphenol A water-bottle removal expanding among Canadian retailers.[dead link]
  217. ^ Toxic status possible for bisphenol A in Canada. 17 October 2008 [cited 17 October 2008]. CBC News.
  218. ^ Canada moves to ban bisphenol A in baby bottles. 18 October 2008 [cited 20 October 2008]. CBC News.
  219. ^ Health Canada. Government of Canada Protects Families With Bisphenol A Regulations; 17 October 2008 [archived 26 February 2010; cited 1 February 2012].
  220. ^ Rapporteur: United Kingdom. (2008). JRC.it Updated European Risk Assessment Report: 4,4’-ISOPROPYLIDENEDIPHENOL (BISPHENOL-A) FINAL APPROVED VERSION AWAITING FOR PUBLICATION. EFSA, Press release.
  221. ^ Europa.eu[dead link]
  222. ^ Beronius a, R. N. C.; Rudén, C.; Hanberg, A.; Håkansson, H. (2009). "Health risk assessment procedures for endocrine disrupting compounds within different regulatory frameworks in the European Union". Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP 55 (2): 111–122. doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2009.05.019. PMID 19500631. edit
  223. ^ Brussels: Council of The European Union. Council conclusions on combination effects of chemicals; 22 December 2009 [cited 30 December 2009].
  224. ^ a b European Food Safety Authority. Scientific Opinion on Bisphenol A: evaluation of a study investigating its neurodevelopmental toxicity, review of recent scientific literature on its toxicity and advice on the Danish risk assessment of Bisphenol A; 23 September 2010 [cited 23 September 2010].
  225. ^ EU to ban Bisphenol A in baby bottles in 2011; 25 November 2010 [cited 2 February 2012].
  226. ^ Europe bans baby bottles with Bisphenol-A; 25 November 2010 [cited 2 February 2012].
  227. ^ EU bans bisphenol A chemical from babies' bottles. BBC News. 25 November 2010. BBC. "I do not know of any convincing evidence that bisphenol A exposure, in the amounts used in polycarbonate bottles, can cause any harm to babies as not only are the amounts so minuscule but they are rapidly broken down in the gut and liver."
  228. ^ DR. Danmark forbyder giftigt stof i sutteflasker; 26 March 2010 [cited 31 January 2012]. Danish.
  229. ^ Microsoft. Negen op tien zuigflessen zijn gevaarlijk; 3 May 2010 [cited 31 January 2012]. Dutch.
  230. ^ Bisphenol A: AFSSA recommends the development of new assessment methods; 5 February 2010 [cited 8 February 2010].
  231. ^ French Food Safety Agency. Opinion of the French Food Safety Agency on the critical analysis of the results of a study of the toxicity of bisphenol A on the development of the nervous system together with other recently-published data on its toxic effects; 29 January 2010 [cited 8 February 2010].
  232. ^ Afssa: informations sur le Bisphénol A. Le Figaro. 27 April 2010 [cited 7 May 2010]. french.
  233. ^ Les sénateurs votent la suspension de la commercialisation des biberons au Bisphenol A. Le Monde. 24 March 2010 [cited 24 March 2010]. French.
  234. ^ Legifrance.gouv.fr. Détail d'un texte [cited 23 October 2011]. (French).
  235. ^ L'Assemblée unanime interdit les contenants alimentaires avec du bisphénol A – Libération [cited 23 October 2011]. French.
  236. ^ Le Sénat a adopté une proposition de loi visant au retrait des conditionnements alimentaires en bisphénol A - Sénat [cited 31 October 2012]. French.
  237. ^ Neue Studien zu Bisphenol A stellen die bisherige Risikobewertung nicht in Frage [pdf]; 19 September 2008 [cited 2 February 2012]. German.
  238. ^ Schnuller geben hormonell wirksames Bisphenol A ab. BUND fordert Verbot der Chemikalie für Babyartikel [cited 15 October 2009]. German.
  239. ^ Chemikalie in Schnullern entdeckt; 1 October 2009 [cited 2 October 2009]. German.
  240. ^ Bisphenol-A: Kehrtwende; 4 November 2009 [archived 19 July 2011; cited 1 February 2012]. German.
  241. ^ VWA.nl[dead link] (Dutch)
  242. ^ Bundesamt für Gesundheit. Bisphenol A [cited 1 February 2012].
  243. ^ Dagens Handel. Minister kör över Livsmedelsverket; 11 May 2010 [cited 1 February 2012]. Swedish.
  244. ^ BioNut researcher on ban of bisphenol A (BPA) 10 May 2010. accessdate 13 May 2010.
  245. ^ "Sweden acts on endocrine disruptor Bisphenol A". ChemSec. http://www.chemsec.org/news/news-2012/915-sweden-acts-on-endocrine-disruptor-bisphenol-a. Retrieved 16 April 2012.
  246. ^ Ban chemical linked to cancer in baby bottles: campaigners. 1 December 2009 [cited 16 February 2010].
  247. ^ Breast Cancer UK. US Acts on BPA and Baby Bottles while UK Food Standards Agency dismisses concerns; 18 January 2009 [cited 16 February 2010].
  248. ^ Resmigazete.gov.tr. Başbakanlık Mevzuatı Geliştirme ve Yayın Genel Müdürlüğü [cited 23 October 2011].
  249. ^ Bisphenol A: Toxic Plastics Chemical in Canned Food: Companies reduced BPA exposures in Japan [cited 3 February 2012].
  250. ^ Become an ACC Member Today!
  251. ^ About BPA: Weight of the Scientific Evidence Supports the Safety of BPA. http://plastics.americanchemistry.com/Product-Groups-and-Stats/PolycarbonateBPA-Global-Group/About-BPA-Weight-of-Scientific-Evidence-Supports-the-Safety-of-BPA.pdf Accessed online 28 March 2012.
  252. ^ http://www.eenews.net/public/eenewspm/2011/10/07/1
  253. ^ Study Links Chemical BPA to Health Problems. Washington Post. 16 September 2008 [cited 17 September 2008]:A03.
  254. ^ Matthew Perrone. Sunoco restricts sales of chemical used in bottles. 12 March 2009 [cited 3 February 2012]. The Seattle Times.
  255. ^ Lyndsey Layton. No BPA For Baby Bottles In U.S.; 6 March 2009 [cited 2 February 2012].
  256. ^ Karen Forman. County bans baby bottle plastic with BPA; 5 March 2009 [cited 2 February 2012].
  257. ^ Bills Would Ban BPA From Food and Drink Containers; 14 March 2009 [cited 2 February 2012].
  258. ^ Meg Kissinger and Susanne Rust. Scientists reject FDA assertion of BPA's safety; 11 April 2009 [archived 16 April 2009; cited 2 February 2012].
  259. ^ State bans chemical in baby bottles. Star Tribune. 8 May 2009 [cited 11 July 2009].
  260. ^ Chicago BPA ban: Chicago bans sale of baby bottles, sippy cups with dangerous chemical ... linked to diabetes, cancer and other illnesses. Chicago Tribune. 14 May 2009 [archived 24 March 2010; cited 1 February 2012].
  261. ^ Strategy Being Devised To Protect Use of BPA. The Washington Post. 31 May 2009 [cited 23 October 2011].
  262. ^ FDA to Revisit Decision on Safety of BPA. The Wall Street Journal. 3 June 2009 [cited 23 October 2011].
  263. ^ Connecticut first state to ban BPA. The Hour. 5 June 2009 [cited 9 September 2009]. The Hour Publishing Co..
  264. ^ http://www.saferstates.com/2009/06/conn-ban.html
  265. ^ Calif. regulators will not list Bisphenol A under Prop. 65, call for more study. [cited 19 July 2009].[dead link]
  266. ^ California won't warn public about bisphenol A. 17 July 2009 [cited 23 October 2011]. Latimesblogs.latimes.com.
  267. ^ Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Public Health Advisory Regarding Bisphenol A (BPA) [cited 4 August 2009].
  268. ^ Meg Kissinger and Susanne Rust. BPA industry fights back; 22 August 2009 [cited 2 February 2012].
  269. ^ Susanne Rust and Meg Kissinger. 'Watchdog' advocates for BPA; 22 August 2009 [cited 2 February 2012].
  270. ^ Existing Chemical Action Plans [cited 1 October 2009].
  271. ^ Sarewitz D. World view: A tale of two sciences. Nature. 2009;462(7273):566. doi:10.1038/462566a. PMID 19956236.
  272. ^ Significant bisphenol A levels found in canned food; 4 November 2009 [cited 4 November 2009].
  273. ^ U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. Bisphenol A (BPA) Information for Parents; 15 January 2010 [cited 15 January 2010].
  274. ^ Regulator waffles on bisphenol A. Journal Sentinel. 14 February 2010 [cited 17 February 2010].
  275. ^ EPA delays action on suspect chemical. 14 February 2010 [cited 17 February 2010]. United Press International.
  276. ^ Bans sought for chemical BPA in baby, toddler products. USA Today. 16 February 2010 [cited 17 February 2010].
  277. ^ US Environmental Protection Agency. EPA to Scrutinize Environmental Impact of Bisphenol A; 29 March 2010 [cited 12 April 2010].
  278. ^ US Environmental Protection Agency. Bisphenol A (BPA) Action Plan Summary [cited 12 April 2010].
  279. ^ National Cancer Institute. Annual Report for 2008–2009; April 2010 [archived 2 June 2010; cited 1 February 2012].
  280. ^ Greenbiz.com. General Mills to Pull BPA from Organic Tomato Cans, GreenerDesign, Accessed 08-09-2010; 19 April 2010 [cited 23 October 2011].
  281. ^ Shader, Maggie. "California Joins 10 Other States in Banning BPA From Infant Feeding Containers." Consumerreports.org Consumer News. 6 October 2011.
  282. ^ 1:18 am. New.bangordailynews.com. Maine board weighs BPA bottle ban – Maine Politics – Bangor Daily News; 18 June 2010 [cited 23 October 2011].
  283. ^ Kevin Miller. LePage dismisses BPA dangers; ‘worst case is some women may have little beards’; 22 February 2011 [cited 2 February 2012].
  284. ^ Maine Gov. Paul LePage On BPA: 'Worst Case Is Some Women May Have Little Beards'. Huffington Post. 23 February 2011.
  285. ^ Good Chemistry. BPA Phase-Out Becomes Maine Law; 25 April 2011 [cited 31 January 2012].
  286. ^ "BPA being absorbed from canned food" at theglobeandmail.com. Globe and Mail (Canada). 24 November 2011.
  287. ^ "Greenspace". Los Angeles Times. http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/greenspace/2011/10/bpa-ban-signed-by-california-governor-jerry-brown.html.
  288. ^ AMA supports tighter restrictions on products containing BPA American Medical Association
  289. ^ Katz, Danny. Director, Colorado Public Interest Research Group. Personal Interview. 13 March 2012.
  290. ^ FDA Continues to Study BPA: Consumer Updates. http://www.fda.gov/ForConsumers/ConsumerUpdates/ucm297954. Accessed 4 April 2012.
  291. ^ SABRINA TAVERNISE, F.D.A. Makes It Official: BPA Can’t Be Used in Baby Bottles and Cups NYTimes, July 17, 2012.

External links