From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia - View original article
Association of Southeast Asian Nations
"One Vision, One Identity, One Community"
|Anthem: The ASEAN Way|
|-||Secretary General||Lê Lương Minh|
|-||Current ASEAN Chair||Malaysia|
|-||Bangkok Declaration||8 August 1967|
|-||Charter||16 December 2008|
2,778,124.7 sq mi
|GDP (PPP)||2011 estimate|
|-||Total||US$ 3.574 trillion|
|-||Per capita||US$ 5,930|
|GDP (nominal)||2013 estimate|
|-||Total||US$ 2.403 trillion|
|-||Per capita||US$ 3,909|
|HDI (2013)|| 0.669b|
|Time zone||ASEAN (UTC+9 to +6:30)|
|a.||Address: Jalan Sisingamangaraja No.70A, South Jakarta.|
|b.||Calculated using UNDP data from member states.|
Association of Southeast Asian Nations
"One Vision, One Identity, One Community"
|Anthem: The ASEAN Way|
|-||Secretary General||Lê Lương Minh|
|-||Current ASEAN Chair||Malaysia|
|-||Bangkok Declaration||8 August 1967|
|-||Charter||16 December 2008|
2,778,124.7 sq mi
|GDP (PPP)||2011 estimate|
|-||Total||US$ 3.574 trillion|
|-||Per capita||US$ 5,930|
|GDP (nominal)||2013 estimate|
|-||Total||US$ 2.403 trillion|
|-||Per capita||US$ 3,909|
|HDI (2013)|| 0.669b|
|Time zone||ASEAN (UTC+9 to +6:30)|
|a.||Address: Jalan Sisingamangaraja No.70A, South Jakarta.|
|b.||Calculated using UNDP data from member states.|
The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN // AH-see-ahn, // AH-zee-ahn) is a political and economic organisation of ten countries located in Southeast Asia, which was formed on 8 August 1967 by Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore and Thailand. Since then, membership has expanded to include Brunei, Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar (Burma) and Vietnam. Its aims include accelerating economic growth, social progress, sociocultural evolution among its members, protection of regional peace and stability, and opportunities for member countries to discuss differences peacefully.
ASEAN covers a land area of 4.46 million km², which is 3% of the total land area of Earth, and has a population of approximately 600 million people, which is 8.8% of the world's population. The sea area of ASEAN is about three times larger than its land counterpart. In 2012, its combined nominal GDP had grown to more than US$2.3 trillion. If ASEAN were a single entity, it would rank as the seventh largest economy in the world, behind the US, China, Japan, Germany, France and the United Kingdom.
|Wikisource has original text related to this article:|
ASEAN was existing before by an organisation called the Association of Southeast Asia (ASA), a group consisting of the Philippines, Malaysia and Thailand that was formed in 1961. The bloc itself, however, was inaugurated on 8 August 1967, when foreign ministers of five countries – Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, and Thailand – met at the Thai Department of Foreign Affairs building in Bangkok and signed the ASEAN Declaration, more commonly known as the Bangkok Declaration. The five foreign ministers – Adam Malik of Indonesia, Narciso Ramos of the Philippines, Abdul Razak of Malaysia, S. Rajaratnam of Singapore, and Thanat Khoman of Thailand – are considered the organisation's Founding Fathers.
The motivations for the birth of ASEAN were so that its members’ governing elite could concentrate on nation building, the common fear of communism, reduced faith in or mistrust of external powers in the 1960s, and a desire for economic development.
Papua New Guinea was accorded Observer status in 1976 and Special Observer status in 1981. Papua New Guinea is a Melanesian state. ASEAN embarked on a programme of economic cooperation following the Bali Summit of 1976. This floundered in the mid-1980s and was only revived around 1991 due to a Thai proposal for a regional free trade area.
ASEAN achieved greater cohesion in the mid-1970s following the changed balance of power in Southeast Asia after the end of the Vietnam War. The region’s dynamic economic growth during the 1970s strengthened the organization, enabling ASEAN to adopt a unified response to Vietnam’s invasion of Cambodia in 1979. ASEAN’s first summit meeting, held in Bali, Indonesia, in 1976, resulted in an agreement on several industrial projects and the signing of a Treaty of Amity and Cooperation and a Declaration of Concord. The end of the Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union at the end of the 1980s allowed ASEAN countries to exercise greater political independence in the region, and in the 1990s ASEAN emerged as a leading voice on regional trade and security issues.
On 28 July 1995, Vietnam became the seventh member. Laos and Myanmar (Burma) joined two years later on 23 July 1997. Cambodia was to have joined together with Laos and Burma, but was deferred due to the country's internal political struggle. The country later joined on 30 April 1999, following the stabilisation of its government.
During the 1990s, the bloc experienced an increase in both membership and drive for further integration. In 1990, Malaysia proposed the creation of an East Asia Economic Caucus comprising the then members of ASEAN as well as the People's Republic of China, Japan, and South Korea, with the intention of counterbalancing the growing influence of the United States in the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) and in the Asian region as a whole. This proposal failed, however, because of heavy opposition from the United States and Japan. Despite this failure, member states continued to work for further integration and ASEAN Plus Three was created in 1997.
In 1992, the Common Effective Preferential Tariff (CEPT) scheme was signed as a schedule for phasing tariffs and as a goal to increase the region’s competitive advantage as a production base geared for the world market. This law would act as the framework for the ASEAN Free Trade Area. The AFTA is an agreement by the member nations of ASEAN concerning local manufacturing in all ASEAN countries. The AFTA agreement was signed on 28 January 1992 in Singapore.
After the East Asian Financial Crisis of 1997, a revival of the Malaysian proposal was established in Chiang Mai, known as the Chiang Mai Initiative, which calls for better integration between the economies of ASEAN as well as the ASEAN Plus Three countries (China, Japan, and South Korea).
Aside from improving each member state's economies, the bloc also focused on peace and stability in the region. On 15 December 1995, the Southeast Asian Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zone Treaty was signed with the intention of turning Southeast Asia into a Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zone. The treaty took effect on 28 March 1997 after all but one of the member states have ratified it. It became fully effective on 21 June 2001, after the Philippines ratified it, effectively banning all nuclear weapons in the region.
Leaders of each country felt the need to further integrate the region. Beginning in 1997, the bloc began creating organisations within its framework with the intention of achieving this goal. ASEAN Plus Three was the first of these and was created to improve existing ties with the People's Republic of China, Japan, and South Korea. This was followed by the even larger East Asia Summit, which now includes these countries as well as India, Australia, New Zealand, United States and Russia. This new grouping acted as a prerequisite for the planned East Asia Community, which was supposedly patterned after the now-defunct European Community. The ASEAN Eminent Persons Group was created to study the possible successes and failures of this policy as well as the possibility of drafting an ASEAN Charter.
In 2006, ASEAN was given observer status at the United Nations General Assembly. As a response, the organisation awarded the status of "dialogue partner" to the United Nations.
Trade facilitation initiatives in ASEAN are spearheaded by the implementation of the ASEAN Trade in Goods Agreement (ATIGA) and Agreement on Customs. These agreements are supported by work done by several sectoral bodies plan and execute the trade facilitation measures, guided by the provisions and the requirements of ATIGA and the Agreement on Customs. The progress being made by these sectoral bodies forms the backbone for achieving the targets of the AEC Blueprint and establishing the ASEAN Economic Community by 2015.
The Coordinating Committee on the Implementation of the ATIGA (CCA) oversees the implementation of the ATIGA and supervises the implementation of the provisions of the agreement and its trade facilitation initiatives.
2007 was the 40th anniversary of ASEAN's beginning, and 30 years of diplomatic relations with the US. On 26 August 2007, ASEAN stated that it aims to complete all its free trade agreements with China, Japan, South Korea, India, Australia and New Zealand by 2013, in line with the start of the ASEAN Economic Community by 2015. In November 2007 the ASEAN members signed the ASEAN Charter, a constitution governing relations among the ASEAN members and establishing ASEAN itself as an international legal entity. During the same year, the Cebu Declaration on East Asian Energy Security was signed in Cebu on 15 January 2007, by ASEAN and the other members of the EAS (Australia, People's Republic of China, India, Japan, New Zealand, South Korea), which is in favour of energy security by finding energy alternatives to conventional fuels.
On 27 February 2009 a Free Trade Agreement with the ASEAN regional bloc of 10 countries and Australia and its close partner New Zealand was signed, it is believed that this FTA would boost combined GDP across the 12 countries by more than US$48 billion over the period 2000–2020. ASEAN members together with the group’s six major trading partners – Australia, China, India, Japan, New Zealand and South Korea – began the first round of negotiations on 26–28 February 2013 in Bali, Indonesia, on establishment of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership.
ASEAN has emphasized “three pillars” of regional cooperation: security, sociocultural integration, and economic integration. The regional group has decided to pursue economic integration by creating an ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) by 2015 to establish a common market. The average economic growth of ASEAN's member nations during 1989–2009 was between 3.8% and 7%. This economic growth was greater than the average growth of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC), which was 2.83 percent. ASEAN has in recent years become a hub for digital adoption. Asia Briefing that e-commerce in the region, specifically in Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia, and the Philippines have seen dramatic gains, with Singapore and Malaysia leading the pack, accounting for 50 percent of total online sales for ASEAN.
The ASEAN Free Trade Area (AFTA) which was signed on 28 January 1992 included a Common Effective Preferential Tariff (CEPT) to promote the free flow of goods between member states. When the AFTA agreement was originally signed, ASEAN had six members, namely, Brunei, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore and Thailand. Vietnam joined in 1995, Laos and Burma in 1997, and Cambodia in 1999. The latecomers have not fully met the AFTA's obligations, but they are officially considered part of the AFTA as they were required to sign the agreement upon entry into ASEAN, and were given longer time frames in which to meet AFTA's tariff reduction obligations.
The next step is ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) with main objectives are to create a:
Since 2007, the ASEAN countries gradually lower their import duties among them and targeted will be zero for most of the import duties at 2015.
By the end of 2015, ASEAN plans to establish a common market based upon the four freedoms. The single market will ensure the free flow of goods, services, investment and skilled labour and the freer flow of capital.
Until end of 2010, Intra-Asean trade were still low which mainly of them were mostly exporting to countries outside the region, except Laos and Myanmar were ASEAN-oriented in foreign trade with 80 percent and 50 percent respectively of their exports went to other ASEAN countries. In 2009, realised Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) was $37.9 billion and increase by two-fold in 2010 to $75.8 billion. 22 percent of FDI came from the European Union, followed by ASEAN countries themselves by 16 percent and then followed by Japan and US.
An ASEAN Framework Agreement on Trade in Services was adopted at the ASEAN Summit in Bangkok in December 1995. Under AFAS, ASEAN Member States enter into successive rounds of negotiations to liberalise trade in services with the aim of submitting increasingly higher levels of commitments. At present, ASEAN has concluded seven packages of commitments under AFAS.
ASEAN six majors refer to the six largest economies in the area with economies many times larger than the remaining four ASEAN countries.
|Country||GDP (nominal)||GDP (PPP)||GDP (Per Capita)|
The ASEAN Capital Markets Forum (ACMF) consists of:
When Vietnam, Laos, Myanmar, and Cambodia joined ASEAN in the late 1990s, concerns were raised about a certain developmental divide regarding a gap in average per capita GDP between older and the newer members. In response, the Initiative for ASEAN Integration (IAI) was formed by ASEAN as a regional integration policy with the principal goal of bridging this developmental divide, which, in addition to disparities in per capita GDP, is manifested by disparities in dimensions of human development such as life expectancy and literacy rates. Other than the IAI, other programmes for the development of the Mekong Basin - where all four newer ASEAN members are located - that tend to focus on infrastructure development have been effectively enacted. In general, ASEAN does not have the financial resources to extend substantial grants or loans to the new members. Therefore, it usually leaves the financing of these infrastructure projects to international financial institutions and to developed countries. Nevertheless, it has mobilised funding from these institutions and countries and from the ASEAN-6 (Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Brunei Darussalam, Singapore, and Thailand) themselves for areas where the development gap needs to be filled through the IAI programme. Other programmes intended for the development of the ASEAN-4 take advantage of the geographical proximity of the CLMV countries and tend to focus on infrastructure development in areas like transport, tourism, and power transmission.
Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership Initial in 2012 East Asia Summit and negotiations of Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) are predicted to be concluded in end of 2015. RCEP consists of all ten ASEAN countries plus 6 countries (China, Japan, South Korea, Australia, India, New Zealand) which have trade agreement with ASEAN countries. RCEP covers 45 percent of world population and about a third of world's total GDP. For example, New Zealand export about 60 percent of its goods to RCEP countries. RCEP is extension of ASEAN plus three and then ASEAN plus six.
The concept of an Asian Currency Unit (ACU) started in the middle of the nineties, prior to the Asian currency meltdown. It is a proposed basket of Asian currencies, similar to the European Currency Unit, which was the precursor of the Euro. The Asian Development Bank is responsible for exploring the feasibility and construction of the basket.
Since the ACU is being considered to be a precursor to a common currency in the future, it has a dynamic outlook of the region. The overall goal of a common currency is to contribute to the financial stability of a regional economy, including price stability. It means lower cost of cross-border business through the elimination of currency risk for the members of the monetary union. Greater flows of intra-regional trade would put pressure on prices, resulting in cheaper goods and services. Individuals benefit not only from the lowering of prices, they also make savings by not having to change money when traveling within the union, by being able to compare prices more readily, and by the reduced cost of transferring money across borders. However, there are conditions for a common currency: the intensity of intra-regional trade and the convergence of macroeconomic conditions. Substantial intra-ASEAN trade and economic integration is an incentive for a monetary union. Intra-ASEAN trade is growing, partly as a result of the ASEAN Free Trade Area (AFTA) and the ASEAN Economic Community.
However some obstacles remain. ASEAN currently trades more with other countries (80%) than among its member countries (20%). Therefore, ASEAN economies are more concerned about currency stability against major international currencies, like the US dollar. On macroeconomic conditions, ASEAN member countries have different levels of economic development, capacity and priorities that translate into different levels of interest and readiness. Monetary integration however implies less control over national monetary and fiscal policy to stimulate the economy. Therefore, greater convergence in macroeconomic conditions is being enacted to improve conditions and confidence in a common currency. On the other hand, there are also constraints on the adoption of one currency, such as, diversity in the level of economic development across countries, weaknesses in the financial sectors of many countries, inadequacy of regional-level resource pooling mechanisms and institutions required for forming and managing a currency union, and lack of political preconditions for monetary cooperation and a common currency.
ASEAN has concluded free trade agreements with China (expecting bilateral trade of $500 billion by 2015), Korea, Japan, Australia, New Zealand, and India. ASEAN-India bilateral trade crossed the $70 billion target in 2012 (target was to reach the level only by 2015). The agreement with People's Republic of China created the ASEAN–China Free Trade Area (ACFTA), which went into full effect on 1 January 2010. In addition, ASEAN is currently negotiating a free trade agreement with the European Union. Republic of China (Taiwan) has also expressed interest in an agreement with ASEAN but needs to overcome diplomatic objections from China.
Due to Asian financial crisis of 1997 to 1998 and long and difficult negotiations with International Monetary Fund, ASEAN+3 agreed to set up a mainly bilateral currency swap scheme known as the 2000 Chiang Mai Initiative (CMI) to anticipate another financial crisis or currency turmoil in the future. In 2006 they agreed to make CMI with multilateralisation and called as CMIM. On 3 May 2009, they agreed to make a currency pool consist of contribution $38.4 billion each by China and Japan, $19.2 billion by South Korea and totally $24 billion by all of ASEAN members, so the total currency pool was $120 billion. A key component has also newly been added, with the establishment of a surveillance unit.
The ASEAN+3 Macroeconomic and Research Office (AMRO) started its operation in Singapore in May 2011. It performs a key regional surveillance function as part of the $120 billion of Chiang Mai Initiative Multilateralisation (CMIM) currency swap facility that was established by Finance Minister and Central Bank Governors of ASEAN countries plus China, Japan and South Korea in December 2009.
According to some analysts, the amount of $120 billion is relatively small (cover only about 20 percent of needs), so coordination or help from International Monetary Fund is still needed. On 3 May 2012 ASEAN+3 finance ministers agreed to double emergency reserve fund to $240 billion.
The ASEAN Single Aviation Market (ASEAN-SAM), is the region's major aviation policy geared towards the development of a unified and single aviation market in Southeast Asia by 2015. The aviation policy was proposed by the ASEAN Air Transport Working Group, supported by the ASEAN Senior Transport Officials Meeting, and endorsed by the ASEAN Transport Ministers. The ASEAN-SAM is expected to fully liberalise air travel between member states in the ASEAN region, allowing ASEAN countries and airlines operating in the region to directly benefit from the growth in air travel around the world, and also freeing up tourism, trade, investment and services flows between member states. Since 1 December 2008, restrictions on the third and fourth freedoms of the air between capital cities of member states for air passengers services have been removed, while from 1 January 2009, full liberalisation of air freight services in the region took effect. On 1 January 2011, full liberalisation on fifth freedom traffic rights between all capital cities took effect.
The ASEAN Single Aviation Market policy will supersede existing unilateral, bilateral and multilateral air services agreements among member states which are inconsistent with its provisions.
With the institutionalisation of visa-free travel between ASEAN member states, intra-ASEAN travel has boomed, a sign that endeavors to form an ASEAN Community shall bear fruit in years to come. In 2010, 47 percent or 34 million out of 73 million tourists in ASEAN member-states were from other ASEAN countries.
In an article by Danessa O. Rivera for GMA News, the Tourism Congress of the Philippines (TCP) is holding a series of workshops and creating awareness among its stakeholders for upcoming Asean integration in 2015. The TCP is a national organization of tourism enterprises created by virtue of the Tourism Act of 2009. In an email statement by the TCP President Rosanna Tuason-Fores explained the consultative meetings are to increase awareness level of the implications of the economic integration to tourism enterprises and to identify the market access opportunities for the business in the Philippines and other ASEAN economies.
Through consultative meetings, Tuason-Fores said the Departments of Tourism and of Trade and Industry will be able to get inputs for the roadmap of Philippine Tourism in 2015 and Beyond (with support from USAID Advancing Philippine Competitiveness).
Europe and China are the main sources of tourists in the last 4 years.
At the turn of the 21st century, issues shifted to include a regional approach to the environment. The organisation started to discuss environmental agreements. These included the signing of the ASEAN Agreement on Transboundary Haze Pollution in 2002 as an attempt to control haze pollution in Southeast Asia. Unfortunately, this was unsuccessful due to the outbreaks of the 2005 Malaysian haze and the 2006 Southeast Asian haze. Other environmental treaties introduced by the organisation include the Cebu Declaration on East Asian Energy Security, the ASEAN Wildlife Enforcement Network in 2005, and the Asia-Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate, both of which are responses to the potential effects of climate change. Climate change is of current interest.
Through the Bali Concord II in 2003, ASEAN has subscribed to the notion of democratic peace, which means all member countries believe democratic processes will promote regional peace and stability. Also, the non-democratic members all agreed that it was something all member states should aspire to.
Since the post-independence phases of Southeast Asian states, efforts were made to implement regional foreign policies, but with a unifying focus to refrain from interference in domestic affairs of member states.
There was a move to unify the region under what was called the ‘ASEAN Way’ based on the ideals of non-interference, informality, minimal institutionalisation, consultation and consensus, non-use of force and non-confrontation. ASEAN members (especially Singapore) approved of the term ‘ASEAN Way’ to describe a regional method of multilateralism.
The ‘ASEAN way’ is said to contribute durability and longevity within the organisation, by promoting regional identity and enhancing a spirit of mutual confidence and cooperation. ASEAN agreements are negotiated in a close, interpersonal process. The process of consultations and consensus is designed to engender a democratic approach to decision making. These leaders are wary of any effort to legitimise efforts to undermine their nation or contain regional co-operation.
ASEAN has formulated a planned integration among its ten member nations and has challenged its citizens to embrace a regional identity. The call for ASEAN identity delivers a challenge to construct dynamic institutions and foster sufficient amounts of social capital. The underlying assumption is that the creation of a regional identity is of special interest to ASEAN and the intent of the 2020 Vision policy document was to reassert the belief in a regional framework designed as an action plan related to human development and civic empowerment. Accordingly, these assumptions will be the basis for recommendations and strategies in developing a participatory regional identity.
Critical reception The ASEAN way can be seen as divergent from the contextual contemporary political reality at the formative stages of the association. A critical distinction is made by Amitav Acharya, that the ‘ASEAN Way’ indicates “a process of ‘regional interactions and cooperation based on discreteness, informality, consensus building and non-confrontational bargaining styles’ that contrasts with ‘the adversarial posturing, majority vote and other legalistic decision-making procedures in Western multilateral organisations’".
The organisation holds meetings, known as the ASEAN Summit, where heads of government of each member meet to discuss and resolve regional issues, as well as to conduct other meetings with other countries outside of the bloc with the intention of promoting external relations.
The ASEAN Leaders' Formal Summit was first held in Bali, Indonesia in 1976. Its third meeting was held in Manila in 1987 and during this meeting, it was decided that the leaders would meet every five years. Consequently, the fourth meeting was held in Singapore in 1992 where the leaders again agreed to meet more frequently, deciding to hold the summit every three years. In 2001, it was decided to meet annually to address urgent issues affecting the region. Member nations were assigned to be the summit host in alphabetical order except in the case of Burma which dropped its 2006 hosting rights in 2004 due to pressure from the United States and the European Union.
By December 2008, the ASEAN Charter came into force and with it, the ASEAN Summit will be held twice in a year.
The formal summit meets for three days. The usual itinerary is as follows:
|ASEAN Formal Summits|
|1st||23–24 February 1976||Indonesia||Bali||Soeharto|
|2nd||4–5 August 1977||Malaysia||Kuala Lumpur||Hussein Onn|
|3rd||14–15 December 1987||Philippines||Manila||Corazon Aquino|
|4th||27‒29 January 1992||Singapore||Singapore||Goh Chok Tong|
|5th||14‒15 December 1995||Thailand||Bangkok||Banharn Silpa-archa|
|6th||15‒16 December 1998||Vietnam||Hanoi||Phan Văn Khải|
|7th||5‒6 November 2001||Brunei||Bandar Seri Begawan||Hassanal Bolkiah|
|8th||4‒5 November 2002||Cambodia||Phnom Penh||Hun Sen|
|9th||7‒8 October 2003||Indonesia||Bali||Megawati Soekarnoputri|
|10th||29‒30 November 2004||Laos||Vientiane||Bounnhang Vorachith|
|11th||12‒14 December 2005||Malaysia||Kuala Lumpur||Abdullah Ahmad Badawi|
|12th||11‒14 January 20071||Philippines2||Cebu||Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo|
|13th||18‒22 November 2007||Singapore||Singapore||Lee Hsien Loong|
|14th3||27 February – 1 March 2009|
10–11 April 2009
|Thailand||Cha Am, Hua Hin|
|15th||23 October 2009||Thailand||Cha Am, Hua Hin|
|16th3||8–9 April 2010||Vietnam||Hanoi||Nguyễn Tấn Dũng|
|17th||28–31 October 2010||Vietnam||Hanoi|
|18th4||7–8 May 2011||Indonesia||Jakarta||Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono|
|19th4||14–19 November 2011||Indonesia||Bali|
|20th||3–4 April 2012||Cambodia||Phnom Penh||Hun Sen|
|21st||17–20 November 2012||Cambodia||Phnom Penh|
|22nd||24–25 April 2013||Brunei||Bandar Seri Begawan||Hassanal Bolkiah|
|23rd||9–10 October 2013||Brunei||Bandar Seri Begawan|
|24th||10–11 May 2014||Myanmar||Nay Pyi Taw||Thein Sein|
|25th||10–12 November 2014||Myanmar||Nay Pyi Taw|
|1 Postponed from 10‒14 December 2006 due to Typhoon Utor.|
|2 hosted the summit because Burma backed out due to enormous pressure from US and EU|
|3 This summit consisted of two parts.|
The first part was moved from 12‒17 December 2008 due to the 2008 Thai political crisis.
The second part was aborted on 11 April due to protesters entering the summit venue.
|4 Indonesia hosted twice in a row by swapping years with Brunei, as it will play host to APEC (and the possibility of hosting the G20 summit which ultimately fell to Russia) in 2013.|
During the fifth Summit in Bangkok, the leaders decided to meet "informally" between each formal summit:
|ASEAN Informal Summits|
|1st||30 November 1996||Indonesia||Jakarta||Soeharto|
|2nd||14‒16 December 1997||Malaysia||Kuala Lumpur||Mahathir Mohamad|
|3rd||27‒28 November 1999||Philippines||Manila||Joseph Estrada|
|4th||22‒25 November 2000||Singapore||Singapore||Goh Chok Tong|
The East Asia Summit (EAS) is a pan-Asian forum held annually by the leaders of 18 countries in the East Asian region, with ASEAN in a leadership position. Membership was initially all 10 members of ASEAN plus China, Japan, South Korea, India, Australia, and New Zealand, but expanded to include the United States and Russia at the Sixth EAS in 2011.
The first summit was held in Kuala Lumpur on 14 December 2005 and subsequent meetings have been held after the annual ASEAN Leaders’ Meeting. The summit has discussed issues including trade, energy and security and the summit has a role in regional community building.
|East Asia Summits|
|First EAS||Malaysia||Kuala Lumpur||14 December 2005||Russia attended as a guest.|
|Second EAS||Philippines||Cebu City||15 January 2007||Rescheduled from 13 December 2006.|
|Third EAS||Singapore||Singapore||21 November 2007||Singapore Declaration on Climate Change, Energy and the Environment|
Agreed to establish Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia
|Fourth EAS||Thailand||Cha-am and Hua Hin||25 October 2009||The date and location of the venue was rescheduled several times, and then a Summit scheduled for 12 April 2009 at Pattaya, Thailand was cancelled when protesters stormed the venue. The Summit has been rescheduled for October 2009 and transferred again from Phuket to Cha-am and Hua Hin.|
|Fifth EAS||Vietnam||Hanoi||30 October 2010||Officially invited the US and Russia to participate in future EAS as full-fledged members|
|Sixth EAS||Indonesia||Bali||19 November 2011||The United States and Russia to join the Summit.|
|Seventh EAS||Cambodia||Phnom Penh||20 November 2012|
|Eighth EAS||Brunei||Bandar Seri Begawan||10 October 2013|
|Ninth EAS||Burma (Myanmar)||Naypyidaw||13 November 2014|
A commemorative summit is a summit hosted by a non-ASEAN country to mark a milestone anniversary of the establishment of relations between ASEAN and the host country. The host country invites the heads of government of ASEAN member countries to discuss future cooperation and partnership.
|ASEAN–Japan Commemorative Summit||Japan||Tokyo||11, 12 December 2003||To celebrate the 30th anniversary of the establishment of relations between ASEAN and Japan. The summit was also notable as the first ASEAN summit held between ASEAN and a non-ASEAN country outside the region.|
|ASEAN–China Commemorative Summit||China||Nanning||30, 31 October 2006||To celebrate the 15th anniversary of the establishment of relations between ASEAN and China|
|ASEAN–Republic of Korea Commemorative Summit||Republic of Korea||Jeju-do||1, 2 June 2009||To celebrate the 20th anniversary of the establishment of relations between ASEAN and Republic of Korea|
|ASEAN–India Commemorative Summit||India||New Delhi||20, 21 December 2012||To celebrate the 20th anniversary of the establishment of relations between ASEAN and India.|
The ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF) is a formal, official, multilateral dialogue in Asia Pacific region. As of July 2007, it consists of 27 participants. ARF objectives are to foster dialogue and consultation, and promote confidence-building and preventive diplomacy in the region. The ARF met for the first time in 1994. The current participants in the ARF are as follows: all the ASEAN members, Australia, Bangladesh, Canada, the People's Republic of China, the European Union, India, Japan, North Korea, South Korea, Mongolia, New Zealand, Pakistan, Papua New Guinea, Russia, East Timor, United States and Sri Lanka. The Republic of China (also known as Taiwan) has been excluded since the establishment of the ARF, and issues regarding the Taiwan Strait are neither discussed at the ARF meetings nor stated in the ARF Chairman's Statements.
Aside from the ones above, other regular meetings are also held. These include the annual ASEAN Ministerial Meeting as well as other smaller committees. Meetings mostly focus on specific topics, such as defence or the environment, and are attended by Ministers, instead of heads of government.
On 15 December 2008, the members of ASEAN met in the Indonesian capital of Jakarta to launch a charter, signed in November 2007, with the aim of moving closer to "an EU-style community". The charter turns ASEAN into a legal entity and aims to create a single free-trade area for the region encompassing 500 million people. President of Indonesia Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono stated that "This is a momentous development when ASEAN is consolidating, integrating and transforming itself into a community. It is achieved while ASEAN seeks a more vigorous role in Asian and global affairs at a time when the international system is experiencing a seismic shift", he added, referring to climate change and economic upheaval, and concluded "Southeast Asia is no longer the bitterly divided, war-torn region it was in the 1960s and 1970s". The fundamental principles include:
a) respect for the independence, sovereignty, equality, territorial integrity and national identity of all ASEAN Member States;
b) shared commitment and collective responsibility in enhancing regional peace, security and prosperity;
c) renunciation of aggression and of the threat or use of force or other actions in any manner inconsistent with international law;
d) reliance on peaceful settlement of disputes;
e) non-interference in the internal affairs of ASEAN Member States;
f) respect for the right of every Member State to lead its national existence free from external interference, subversion and coercion;
g) enhanced consultations on matters seriously affecting the common interest of ASEAN;
h) adherence to the rule of law, good governance, the principles of democracy and constitutional government;
j) upholding the United Nations Charter and international law, including international humanitarian law, subscribed to by ASEAN Member States;
k) abstention from participation in any policy or activity, including the use of its territory, pursued by an ASEAN Member State or non-ASEAN State or any non-State actor, which threatens the sovereignty, territorial integrity or political and economic stability of ASEAN Member States;
l) respect for the different cultures, languages and religions of the peoples of ASEAN, while emphasising their common values in the spirit of unity in diversity;
m) the centrality of ASEAN in external political, economic, social and cultural relations while remaining actively engaged, outward-looking, inclusive and non-discriminatory; and
n) adherence to multilateral trade rules and ASEAN's rules-based regimes for effective implementation of economic commitments and progressive reduction towards elimination of all barriers to regional economic integration, in a market-driven economy.
However, the ongoing global financial crisis was stated as being a threat to the goals envisioned by the charter, and also set forth the idea of a proposed human rights body to be discussed at a future summit in February 2009. This proposition caused controversy, as the body would not have the power to impose sanctions or punish countries who violate citizens' rights and would therefore be limited in effectiveness. The body was established later in 2009 as the ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights (AICHR). In November 2012, the Commission adopted the ASEAN Human Rights Declaration.
The organisation hosts cultural activities in an attempt to further integrate the region. These include sports and educational activities as well as writing awards. Examples of these include the ASEAN University Network, the ASEAN Centre for Biodiversity, the ASEAN Outstanding Scientist and Technologist Award, and the Singapore-sponsored ASEAN Scholarship.
ASAIHL or the Association of Southeast Asian Institutions of Higher Learning is a non-governmental organisation founded in 1956 that strives to strengthen higher learning institutions, espescially in teaching, research, and public service, with the intention of cultivating a sense of regional identity and interdependence.
ASEAN Heritage Parks is a list of nature parks launched 1984 and relaunched in 2004. It aims to protect the region's natural treasures. There are now 35 such protected areas, including the Tubbataha Reef Marine Park and the Kinabalu National Park.
ASEAN Heritage Sites
|ASEAN Heritage Sites|
|Alaungdaw Kathapa National Park||Burma||Ao Phang-nga Marine National Park||Thailand|
|Apo Natural Park||Philippines||Imperial City, Huế||Vietnam|
|Bukit Barisan Selatan National Park||Indonesia||Gunung Leuser National Park||Indonesia|
|Gunung Mulu National Park||Malaysia||Ha Long Bay||Vietnam|
|Hoi An Ancient Town||Vietnam||Mounts Iglit-Baco National Park||Philippines|
|Indawgyi Lake Wildlife Sanctuary||Burma||Inlé Lake Wildlife Sanctuary||Burma|
|Kaeng Krachan National Park||Thailand||Kerinci Seblat National Park||Indonesia|
|Khakaborazi National Park||Burma||Khao Yai National Park||Thailand|
|Kinabalu National Park||Malaysia||Komodo National Park||Indonesia|
|Imperial Citadel of Thang Long||Vietnam||Lampi Kyun Wildlife Reserve||Burma|
|Lorentz National Park||Indonesia||Meinmhala Kyun Wildlife Sanctuary||Burma|
|Mu Ko Surin-Mu Ko Similan Marine National Park||Thailand||Nam Ha Protected Area||Laos|
|Phong Nha-Ke Bang National Park||Vietnam||Preah Monivong (Bokor) National Park||Cambodia|
|Puerto Princesa Subterranean River National Park||Philippines||Sungei Buloh Wetland Reserve||Singapore|
|Taman Negara National Park||Malaysia||Tarutao Marine National Park||Thailand|
|Tasek Merimbun Wildlife Sanctuary||Brunei||Thung Yai-Huay Kha Khaeng National Park||Thailand|
|Ujung Kulon National Park||Indonesia|
|Virachey National Park||Cambodia||Keraton Yogyakarta||Indonesia|
|Mỹ Sơn||Vietnam||Citadel of Ho Dynasty||Vietnam|
|Mount Malindang||Philippines||Vigan City||Philippines|
|Taal Volcano||Philippines||Mayon Volcano||Philippines|
The Southeast Asian Games, commonly known as the SEA Games, is a biennial multi-sport event involving participants from the current 11 countries of Southeast Asia. The games is under regulation of the Southeast Asian Games Federation with supervision by the International Olympic Committee (IOC) and the Olympic Council of Asia.
The ASEAN Para Games is a biennial multi-sport event held after every Southeast Asian Games for athletes with physical disabilities. The games are participated by the 11 countries located in Southeast Asia. The Games, patterned after the Paralympic Games, are played by physically challenged athletes with mobility disabilities, visual disabilities,
The FESPIC Games, also known as the Far East and South Pacific Games for the persons with disability, was the biggest multi-sports games in Asia and South Pacific region. The FESPIC Games were held nine times and bowed out, a success in December 2006 in the 9th FESPIC Games in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. The Games re-emerged as the 2010 Asian Para Games in Guangzhou, China. The 2010 Asian Para Games debuted shortly after the conclusion of the 16th Asian Games, using the same facilities and venue made disability-accessible. The inaugural Asian Para Games, the parallel event for athletes with physical disabilities, is a multi-sport event held every four years after every Asian Games.
The ASEAN Football Championship is a biennial Football competition organised by the ASEAN Football Federation, accredited by FIFA and contested by the national teams of Southeast Asia nations. It was inaugurated in 1996 as Tiger Cup, but after Asia Pacific Breweries terminated the sponsorship deal, "Tiger" was renamed "ASEAN".
May 2011: ASEAN will go ahead with its bid for the FIFA 2030 World Cup. It was a follow up to the agreement reached in January before.
The ASEAN Media Cooperation (AMC) set digital television standards, policies and create in preparation for broadcasters to transition from analogue to digital broadcasting, better promote media collaboration and information exchange to enhance voice, understanding, and perspective between ASEAN people on the international stage.
The ASEAN member countries aim media sector towards digitalisation and further regional media coaction. AMC establishes partnerships between ASEAN news media, and cooperate on information sharing, photo swapping, technical cooperation, exchange programmes, and facilitating joint news coverage and exchange of news footage.
The concept was stressed during the 11th AMRI Conference adopting the theme: ”Media Connecting Peoples and Bridging Cultures Towards One ASEAN Nation”. ASEAN Ministers believed that the new and traditional media are important mediums to connect ASEAN people and bridging the cultural gap.
Accessing information towards the goal of creating a One ASEAN nation requires participation among the nation members and its citizens. During the 18th ASEAN Summit in May 2011, the Chair stated the important role of a participatory approach among people and stakeholders of ASEAN towards a “people-oriented , people centred and rule-based ASEAN”.
Several key initiatives that were initiated under the AMC:
ASEAN Member States promote cooperation in information to help build an ASEAN identity. One of the main bodies in ASEAN cooperation in information is the ASEAN Committee on Culture and Information (COCI). Established in 1978, its mission is to promote effective cooperation in the fields of information, as well as culture, through its various projects and activities. The COCI comprises representatives from national institutions like the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Ministries of Culture and Information, national radio and television networks, museums, archives and libraries, among others. Together, they meet once a year to formulate and agree on projects to fulfil their mission.
The 10th ASEAN MRI
The 10th Conference of the ASEAN Ministers Responsible for Information (AMRI) was held in Vientiane, Lao PDR, on 2–7 November 2009, attended by ministers responsible for Information and senior officials from all ASEAN Member States, as well as representatives from the ASEAN Secretariat.
11th ASEAN AMRI
During the 11th ASEAN Ministers Responsible for Information meeting held in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, ASEAN leaders recognised the emergence of new and social media as an important tool for communications and interaction in ASEAN today. The Ministers agreed that efforts should be made to leverage on social media to promote ASEAN awareness towards achieving an ASEAN community by 2015. Initially, ASEAN will consolidate the ASEAN Culture and Information Portal and the ASEAN Media Portal to incorporate new media elements.
12th ASEAN AMRI 
Twelfth Conference of the ASEAN Ministers Responsible for Information and Third Conference of ASEAN Plus Three Ministers Responsible for Information (Venue: Nay Pyi Taw, Myanmar, 12 June 2014)
Citizen Involvement in One ASEAN Community In building the Asean Community by 2015, the Asean Ministers Responsible for Information (Amri) Technical Working Group call for citizen involvement in “connectivity master plan.” Presidential Communications Operations Office (PCOO) Secretary Sonny Coloma said the interaction must not only come from government officials at the political levels but also from the citizens themselves. He stressed the importance of the participation of students, saying the way to build Asean consciousness and awareness is through the youth. Asean saw the need for breaching digital divide, increasing internet penetration and harmonizing technology to enhance ties. In Malaysia, Balakrishnan Kandasamy said this has been actively executed in his country, where usage of social networking sites like Facebook and Twitter has been increasing. Communication plan focused on the three key pillars of the Asean Community, namely political-security community, economic community and socio-cultural community.
|It has been suggested that this section be split into a new article titled ASEAN Educational and Human Development Goals. (Discuss) Proposed since December 2014.|
A "collective entity to enhance regional cooperation in education", the ASEAN Education Ministers have determined four priorities for education: (1) Promoting ASEAN awareness among ASEAN citizens, particularly the youth; (2) Strengthening ASEAN identity through education; (3) Building ASEAN human resources in the field of education; and (4) Strengthening the ASEAN University Network. Nations such as Malaysia, Singapore, Indonesia, Thailand, and the Philippines have experienced rapid development in education over the past 20 years. ASEAN initiatives plan to interconnect the countries' unique human and physical infrastructure to provide youth education, to sustain economic growth for the entire region. Various programmes and projects have been and are currently in the process of being developed to fulfil these directives and to reach these future goals.
At the 11th ASEAN Summit in December 2005, ASEAN Leaders set new directions for regional education collaboration when they welcomed the decision of the ASEAN Education Ministers to convene meetings on a regular basis. The ASEAN Education Ministers Meeting, which meets annually, oversees ASEAN cooperation efforts on education at the ministerial level. With regard to implementation, programmes and activities are carried out by the ASEAN Senior Officials on Education (SOM-ED). SOM-ED also manages cooperation on higher education through the ASEAN University Network (AUN).
The ASEAN University Network was established to (1) promote cooperation among ASEAN scholars, academics, and scientists in the region; (2) develop academic and professional human resources in the region; (3) promote information dissemination among the ASEAN academic community; and (4) enhance the awareness of a regional identity and the sense of "ASEAN-ness" among members.
For example, Batangas State University in the Philippines, is encouraging its faculty members, who are engineers by profession, to apply as an "ASEAN engineer" through the ASEAN Engineering Register (AER). The AER has spearheaded the mobility of engineers within ASEAN since 1998. As a result, seven (7) Mechanical Engineers and two (2) Industrial Engineers of the university were conferred as ASEAN Engineers. The new president of Batangas State University was the first Engineer in the province of Batangas to be conferred as an ASEAN Engineer. This initiative is in line with the ASEAN Secretarial Program for the liberalization of professional services which aims for globalization under the World Trade Organization (WTO) initiative.
Education indicators are outlined separated in three levels: primary, secondary, and tertiary. Primary education is generally defined as the level of education where children are provided with basic reading, writing, and mathematical skills together with elementary understanding of such subjects as history, geography, natural science, social science, art, and music. Secondary education continues to build up on the knowledge provided by primary education and aims at laying the foundations for lifelong learning and human development with more advanced material and learning mechanisms. Tertiary education, whether or not leading to an advanced research qualification, requires the successful completion of secondary education for admission and entails education within a college or university.
Participation in formal education is usually measured by the metric Gross Enrollment Ratio (GER) and Net Enrollment Ratio (NER). The NER demonstrates the extent of participation in a given age-specific level of education. The purpose of the GER is to show the total enrollment in a level of education regardless of age. The GER is expressed as a percentage of the official school-age population corresponding to the same level of education.
Brunei Darussalam had almost reached 100% net enrollment by 2001, while Indonesia has slowly moved downward from close to that enrollment percentage thereafter. The Philippines has been inching closer and closer to this target in recent years. The data indicate two groups of countries - one which has consistently attained a net enrollment ratio of more than 90% (Brunei Darussalam, Indonesia, the Philippines, and Singapore) and the other group with around 80% (Cambodia, Lao PDR and Myanmar). Vietnam started in the lower group and has since moved to the upper group in the last few decades. Thailand has not provided data for both sexes, but the separate net enrollment ratio for girls and boys indicates that the overall ratio would be between 86% and 87%, and as such would be closer to the higher group. The primary net enrollment ratios of boys were almost always higher than those of girls for all reporting countries except Malaysia. For Singapore and Indonesia since 1998, however, the net enrollment ratios for girls and boys were not significantly different. A marked widening of gender gap was noticeable in the Philippines in 1997 but in 1999 the net enrolment ratios for girls exceeded that for boys.
It is also useful to look at retainment and efficiency rates in education throughout ASEAN. The effectiveness of efforts to extend literacy depends on the ability of the education system to ensure full participation of school-age children and their successful progression to reach at least grade 5, which is the stage when they are believed to have firmly acquired literacy and numeracy. The usual indicator to measure the level of this efficiency achievement is the proportion of pupils starting grade 1 reaching grade 5 of primary education.
Most reporting countries in ASEAN have steadily improved retention rates of pupils through 5th grade. At the top are Malaysia, Singapore, and Thailand, which have shown consistent survival rates of close to 100%, indicating a very high retention of children in school through at least 5th grade. Among the rest of the countries with rates ranging from 57% to 89% towards the end of the past century, Myanmar has maintained the largest improvements over the years.
By 2001, Brunei, Myanmar, Singapore, Malaysia, and the Philippines had achieved improvements in net enrollment ratios for secondary education of 11%-19% over those of 1990 or 1991. Vietnam experienced the fastest growth rate in net enrollment between the years 1993 and 1998. Singapore, the country with the highest overall achievement, has maintained consistently high net enrollment rates of above 90% since 1994. With regard to gender differences, the difference in the ratios of females to males ranges from 0.2%-6% (for the six countries for which these ratios are available: Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam). The overall pattern is that girls seem to exhibit appreciably higher net enrollment ratios for secondary education, except in the case of Singapore where the ratios for girls and boys converged in the second half of the reporting period.
While the High Performing Asian Economies and the 6 oldest ASEAN members have invested heavily in public education, and unlike many other developing nations, have concentrated on primary and secondary schooling, tertiary education has been left largely to the private sector. Tertiary education in Southeast Asia is in general relatively weak. In most cases universities are focused on teaching and service to government rather than academic research. Additionally, universities in Southeast Asia, both in terms of academic salaries and research infrastructure (libraries, laboratories) tend to be financially handicapped and poorly supported. Moreover, regional academic journals cater to their local audiences and respond less to international standards which makes universal or regional benchmarking difficult.
Governments have a vested interest in investing in education and other aspects of human capital infrastructure, especially rapidly developing nations such as those within ASEAN. In the short run, investment spending directly supports aggregate demand and growth. In the longer term, investments in physical infrastructure, productivity enhancements, and provision of education and health services determine the potential for growth.
To measure the investments in education by governments, current expenditure on primary education as a percent of GDP and expenditure per pupil as a percent of GDP are taken into account. These two indicators are based on public current expenditure at all government levels on all public primary schools and subsidies to private educational institutions, teachers and pupils. In some instances regarding figures used in these calculations, data on current public expenditure on education may refer only to the Ministry of Education, excluding other ministries that spend a part of their budget on educational activities.
Primary education expenditure in ASEAN countries is usually lower than 3% of GDP, with the exception of Indonesia, which invests 5%. Two countries that show noticeable rising trends are the Philippines and Laos. Malaysia has experienced a gradual downward trend throughout the 1990s but stabilised around the year 2000. Indonesia experienced a sharp decline in primary education expenditure as a percent of GDP between 1995 and 1999 from almost 10% to 5%. Singapore has maintained a stable 0.6% up until 2000 and increased slightly to 0.7% in 2001.
While public current expenditure on primary education as percentage of GDP can never be close to 100%, it is theoretically possible to have the public current expenditure per pupil as percentage of GDP per capita to reach or exceed 100%. Except for Singapore, this indicator fluctuates, but seems to have stabilised at around 10% for two countries of ASEAN at the end of the 1990s decade. Since 1996, the indicator has steadily risen in the Philippines reaching almost 14% by 1998. Upward or downward trend of this indicator can have many causes including sharp changes in enrollment rates.
The ASEAN Scholarship is a scholarship programme offered by Singapore to the 9 other member states for secondary school, junior college, and university education. It covers accommodation, food, medical benefits & accident insurance, school fees, and examination fees. Scholarship recipients who then perform well in the GCE Advanced Level Examination may apply for ASEAN Undergraduate Scholarships, which are tailored specifically for undergraduate institutions in Singapore and in other ASEAN member countries. Singapore has effectively used this programme to attract many of the best students from the ASEAN region over the past several years, and scholars for the most part tend to remain in Singapore to pursue undergraduate studies through the ASEAN Undergraduate Scholarship programme.
Statistically, educational attainment (as measured by average years of schooling) strongly correlates with subsequent income levels and development capabilities. An improvement in educational attainment will have a positive effect on a country's income and human development (humanity) growth.
It is therefore evident that "universal access to, and completion of, primary or basic education is a self-evident goal upon which the foundations for building the human capacity rests. Increased participation, regardless of sex, in secondary and tertiary levels of education is a necessary step to be able to move forward in the process of achieving equity, capacity building, access to information, and strengthening science."
Literacy indicators provide a measure of the number of literate persons within the population who are capable of using written words in daily and to continue to learn. The literacy rate essentially reflects the cumulative accomplishment of education in spreading literacy. The literacy rate is usually linked to school enrolment ratios and school retainment rates (through at least grade 5) of primary education, both of which contribute to the literate population.
The data of literacy rates in reporting countries of 15 to 24 years old reflect outcomes of the basic education process and is therefore considered an accepted measure of the effectiveness of that country's education system's investment in children. Among the eight ASEAN countries reporting six have made significant progress towards 100% literacy by 2000. This progress is comprable with member countries of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), an impressive accomplishment. Overall, there is not much disparity between male and female literacy with the exceptions of Cambodia and Lao PDR, where the literacy rate for females is about 10% lower than that of males in 1999. The results of overall improvement in literacy rates, though, indicate positive effectiveness of the primary education systems of these countries throughout the 1990s.
|Country||Year (most recent)||Adult (15+) Literacy Rate Total||Adult Men||Adult Women||Youth (15-24) Literacy Rate Total||Youth Men||Youth Women|
Looking at adult (defined as the entire population 15 and older) literacy rates, we can see that most reporting countries have made significant progress in this demographic as well. All but two reporting countries reached adult literacy rates of around 90% or better. Looking at the differences in literacy rates by sex, we can see a visible gender gap. This gap is most apparent in Cambodia and Laos, with percentage differences between adult men and adult women literacy rates of 14% and 19%, respectively. Only in the Philippines is the literacy rate among women higher than among men.
For nearly two decades, the ASEAN was composed of only five countries—Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, and Thailand—being its founders in 1967. Other southeast Asian countries joined in different times: Brunei (1984), Vietnam (1995), Laos and Myanmar (1997), and Cambodia (1999).
The ASEAN Community, aimed to be fully established by 2015 through the process of integration, is a product of various and successive declarations and agreements between the ASEAN member-states. One landmark agreement was the ASEAN Vision 2020 signed on 1997 in Kuala Lumpur. It delineated the visions of the member-states for the region to be achieved two decades on. Included here were provisions on peace and stability, being nuclear-free, closer economic integration, human development, sustainable development, cultural heritage, being drug-free, environment, among others. The Vision also aimed to "see an outward-looking ASEAN playing a pivotal role in the international fora, and advancing ASEAN's common interests", exhibiting the hope for a common regional identity.
The Initiative for ASEAN Integration (IAI) was launched in 2000 to help the newer members (Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, Vietnam) to be integrated economically, narrowing the development gap between them and the original members.
In a speech by former Singaporean Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong titled "Deepening Regional Integration and Co-operation", he mentioned reinvigorating the ASEAN economies from the slump of the 1997 Asian Financial Crisis. He proposed for deeper economic integration within the region and enhancement of linkages with other economies outside the region; the need for response to the growth of the East Asian economies, especially "riding on" the rising Chinese economy; and stronger regional anti-terrorism measures. "[T]he general way forward for ASEAN is clearly faster and deeper integration, internally, and with the rest of East Asia, rather than slower and less," he said, further musing should ASEAN evolve like the European Union or remain a "free association of independent states that voluntarily synchronise their policies."
The Bali Concord II of 2003 was an affirmation and reiteration of the principles of original Bali Concord of 1976. This stipulated the formation of an ASEAN Community with the establishment of three pillars, namely ASEAN Security Community (now ASEAN Political-Security Community or APSC), ASEAN Economic Community (AEC), and ASEAN Socio-Cultural Community (ASCC), all of which are "closely intertwined and mutually reinforcing for the purpose of ensuring durable peace, stability and shared prosperity in the region."
At the 12th ASEAN Summit in Cebu, Philippines on January 2007, the member-states agreed to accelerate by five years the fulfillment of the ASEAN Community as planned in Vision 2020 and Bali Concord II, making the integration possible by 2015.
Former ASEAN Secretary General Rodolfo Severino Jr. explained in a paper about the acceleration: "Problems that require regional cooperation are increasing in number and severity. The acceleration of ASEAN community building, therefore, seems justified and urgently so." Yet he further opined that "ASEAN has a long way to go in achieving the goals that its leaders have set. It is still a long way from becoming a real community.... ASEAN has seldom espoused common positions on great international or regional issues. It has not exerted effective intellectual leadership in the regional security forums that it has organized."
On 20 November 2007, the ASEAN Charter was signed in Singapore, 40 years after the founding of ASEAN. Also concurrently signed was the AEC Blueprint. The blueprints for APSC and ASCC were adopted on 1 March 2009 in Thailand. These blueprints outline the road maps for the establishment of the three pillars by 2015 as part of the larger ASEAN Community entity.
The ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) is now often referred to as the "AEC 2015" since its acceleration from the original target date of 2020 to 2015. As one of the three pillars of the ASEAN, it aims to "implement economic integration initiatives" in order to create a single market across ASEAN nations. Thus, on 20 November 2007, during the 13th ASEAN Summit in Singapore, its blueprint, which serves as a coherent master plan guiding the establishment of the ASEAN Economic Community 2015 was adopted.
The declaration of ASEAN Economic Community Blueprint <http://www.asean.org/archive/5187-10.pdf>:
WE, the Heads of State/Government of Brunei Darussalam, the Kingdom of Cambodia, the Republic of Indonesia, the Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Malaysia, the Union of Myanmar, the Republic of the Philippines, the Republic of Singapore, the Kingdom of Thailand and the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam, Member Countries of ASEAN, on the occasion of the 40th Anniversary of ASEAN and the 13th ASEAN Summit in Singapore;
1. ADOPT the AEC Blueprint which each ASEAN Member Country shall abide by and implement the AEC by 2015. The AEC Blueprint will transform ASEAN into a single market and production base, a highly competitive economic region, a region of equitable economic development, and a region fully integrated into the global economy. The AEC Blueprint including its strategic schedule is annexed to this Declaration.
2. TASK concerned Ministers, assisted by the ASEAN Secretariat, to implement the AEC Blueprint and to report to us regularly, through the Council of the ASEAN Economic Community, on the progress of its implementation.
The ASEAN Economic Community is the goal of regional economic integration by 2015. Its characteristics include: (1) a single market and production base, (2) a highly competitive economic region, (3) a region of fair economic development, and (4) a region fully integrated into the global economy. The areas of cooperation include human resources development; recognition of professional qualifications; closer consultation on macroeconomic and financial policies; trade financing measures; enhanced infrastructure and communications connectivity; development of electronic transactions through e-ASEAN; integrating industries across the region to promote regional sourcing; and enhancing private sector involvement. Through the free movement of skilled labor, goods, services and investment, the ASEAN will rise globally as one market with each member gaining from each other's strength, thus will increase its total competitiveness and opportunities for development.
The ASEAN Economic Community or AEC is the embodiment of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations’ vision of “… a stable, prosperous and highly competitive ASEAN economic region in which there is a free flow of goods, services, investment and a freer flow of capital, equitable economic development and reduced poverty and socio-economic disparities.” AEC 2015 is a tagline or catchphrase that came about as a means to remind people that the target date for establishing the AEC is in 2015 – thus “AEC 2015.” 
The formulation of an AEC Blueprint (with clearly stated goals, timelines and implementing strategies) which the ASEAN Leaders ratified during the 13th ASEAN Summit in Singapore in November 2007, established the members’ commitment to a common goal as well as ensuring compliance with stated objectives and timelines. The AEC Blueprint lays out the overall vision as well as the goals, implementing plans and strategies (actions) as well as the strategic schedule (timeline) for achieving the establishment of the AEC by 2015.
The AEC is the realization of the end goal of economic integration as espoused in the Vision 2020 (brought forward to 2015), which is based on a convergence of interests of ASEAN Member States to deepen and broaden economic integration through existing and new initiatives with clear timelines. In establishing the AEC, ASEAN shall act in accordance to the principles of an open, outward-looking, inclusive, and market-driven economy consistent with multilateral rules as well as adherence to rules-based systems for effective compliance and implementation of economic commitments. The value of an AEC Blueprint is that it showed the world that ASEAN was serious about its plans and goals.
ASEAN will officially declare the establishment of an ASEAN Economic Community by end December 2015. For the ASEAN economies and citizens, it will be business as usual – mainly because the key agreements and regulations that will govern the business and economic relationships under the AEC are already in place and operational.
ASEAN Economic Community Blueprint, started since 1967.
The ASEAN Leaders were able to start transforming ASEAN into a stable, and progressive region with equitable economic development that alleviate poverty and socio-economic disparities (ASEAN Vision 2020)
ASEAN Economic Community has a noble goal for its neighboring members, however, can the economic trade regional integration scheme benefits its member countries in terms of economic growth with more export and poverty alleviation? The following are the challenges that a member country may encounter and may have negative impact on economy:
1. Will the ASEAN Free trade agreement caused the rampant smuggling activities in our country?
2. ASEAN member countries like Singapore and Indonesia may have multilateral with other non-ASEAN countries who have efficient production process. Indonesia's trade direction to non-ASEAN is 86.4 percent, while 13.5% were traded to ASEAN members.
3. Non-ASEAN members were able to take advantage of the AFTA privilege, however ASEAN has the parameter that measures the scope of liberalization.
ASEAN members established the ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) which is a part of ASEAN Vision 2020. Important achievement of the summit included the unprocessed agricultural products in the Common Effective Preferential Tariffs (CEPT) scheme.
Regional economic integration can enhance the possible incomes among ASEAN member countries, though ASEAN is concerned with the wide disparities of incomes and other human development among members. We hope for the possible assurance that ASEAN member countries would benefit from the progress of regional integration particularly our country.
ASEAN Free Trade AREA (FTA) is not generous to its members, it favors more countries under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), because of its greater scope than ASEAN FTA. This gap is a potential risk to the integration, the objective of AFT is defeated by GATT benefits. Therefore, other ASEAN members may deal with non-ASEAN countries who have efficient process and more productive us.
Reception and Criticisms
The ASEAN integration has raised concerns, particularly on its realization goals by 2015. Business and economy experts who attended the Lippo-UPH Dialogue in Naypidaw, Malaysia cited issues relating to aviation, agriculture, human resources development. The timing has also been a topic for discussion, as effects may not be realized based on set timelines due to several factors (such as cultural barriers and other regional differences), although some panelists, among them, Kishore Mahbubani, forewarned the very high expectations at the onset. He stated:
"please do not expect a big bang event in 2015 where everything is going to happen overnight when the ASEAN Economic Community comes into being. We've made progress in some areas and unfortunately regressed in some areas.
Some panelists enumerated other matters to be cogitated for the successful take off. Among them were massive consciousness from the 600 million people living in the concerned region, a heightened level of comprehension from the business sector, current visa arrangements, demand for specific skills, banking connections, and economic differences between member-nations and within their localities.
One late criticism is from former Philippine National Statistical Coordination Board (NSCB) Secretary General Romulo A. Virola, who said in 2012 that the Philippines does not appear to be ready to benefit from ASEAN integration due to its “wobbly” economic performance compared to other ASEAN member countries. According to Virola, the Philippines continues to lag behind in terms of employment rate, tourism, life expectancy, and cellular subscription.
Nestor Tan, who heads the Philippines’ largest bank - BDO Unibank Inc. said that while some businesses see the Asian Economic Blueprint (AEC) as an opportunity, the Integration would be more of a threat to local firms. "I think the Philippine industries are not ready yet," he said. President Nestor Tan said that protecting the country's agricultural and financial services sectors, as well as the labor sector, would be necessary for the implementation of AEC by 2015.
Standard & Poor's, an American Financial Services Company, also believed that banks in the Philippines are not yet prepared for the tougher competition that would result from the integration of Southeast Asian economies. In one of its latest publications, S&P said banks in the country, although profitable and stable, have a much smaller business scale compared with their counterparts in the region.
In 2014, The U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s ASEAN Business Outlook Survey 2015  highlighted the widespread concern that the much-anticipated ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) would not be launched by the end-2015 deadline.
In January 2014, Former ASEAN Secretary-General, Rodolfo C. Severino, wrote: “While ASEAN should not be condemned for its members’ failure to make good on their commitments, any failure to deliver will likely lead to a loss of credibility and could mean that member countries fall further behind in the global competition for export markets and foreign direct investment (FDI).”
This is not the first time that AEC faces a probable delay: In 2012, the commencement of the AEC was postponed to December 31, 2015 from the original plan of January 1, 2015. Despite ASEAN Secretary-General Surin Pitsuwan’s firm reassurance that “[t]here will be no more delays and that all ten ASEAN countries will participate,” even the most fervent proponents of AEC are beginning to worry about the increasingly diminishing chance of delivering AEC on time as 2015 closes in.
During the 14th ASEAN Summit held 26 February to 1 March 2009, the ASEAN Heads of States/Governments adopted the APSC Blueprint. This document is designed to create a robust political-security environment within the ASEAN, with programs and activities outlined to establish the APSC by 2015. It carries the principles and purposes of the ASEAN Charter and is based on the ASEAN Security Community Plan of Action, the Vientiane Action Programme, and other relevant decisions of various ASEAN Sectoral Bodies.
The APSC aims to create an ASEAN Community that portrays the following characteristics: a rules-based community of shared values and norms; a cohesive, peaceful, stable and resilient region with shared responsibility for comprehensive security, and a dynamic and outward-looking region in an increasingly integrated and interdependent world. To achieve this, the APSC Blueprint puts forward the following agenda, each with a list of action points detailed in the said document.
A. A Rules-based Community of Shared Values and Norms
A.1. Cooperation in Political Development
A.1.1. Promote understanding and appreciation of political systems, culture and history of ASEAN Member States A.1.2. Lay the groundwork for an institutional framework to facilitate free flow of information for mutual support and assistance among ASEAN Member States A.1.3. Establish programmes for mutual support and assistance among ASEAN Member States in the development of strategies for strengthening the rule of law and judiciary systems and legal infrastructure A.1.4. Promote good governance A.1.5. Promotion and protection of human rights A.1.6. Increase the participation of relevant entities associated with ASEAN in moving forward ASEAN political development initiatives A.1.7. Prevent and combat corruption A.1.8. Promote principles of democracy A.1.9. Promote peace and stability in the region
A.2. Shaping and Sharing of Norms
A.2.1. Adjust ASEAN institutional framework to comply with the ASEAN Charter A.2.2. Strengthening cooperation under the Treaty of Amity and Cooperation in Southeast Asia (TAC) A.2.3. Ensure full implementation of the Declaration on the Conduct of Parties (DOC) for peace and stability in the South China Sea A.2.4. Ensure the implementation of the South East Asian Nuclear Weapon-Free Zone (SEAN WFZ) Treaty and its Plan of Action A.2.5. Promote ASEAN maritime cooperation
B. A Cohesive, Peaceful and Resilient Region with Shared Responsibility for Comprehensive Security
B.1. Conflict Prevention/Confidence Building Measures
B.1.1. Strengthen confidence-building measures B.1.2. Promote greater transparency and understanding of defence policies and security perceptions B.1.3. Build up the necessary institutional framework to strengthen the ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF) process in support of the APSC B.1.4. Strengthen efforts in maintaining respect for territorial integrity, sovereignty and unity of ASEAN Member States as stipulated in the Declaration on Principles of International Law Concerning Friendly Relations and Cooperation among States in Accordance with the Charter of the United Nations B.1.5. Promote the development of norms that enhance ASEAN defence and security cooperation
B.2. Conflict Resolution and Pacific Settlement of Disputes
B.2.1. Build upon existing modes of pacific settlement of disputes and consider strengthening them with additional mechanisms as needed B.2.2. Strengthen research activities on peace, conflict management and conflict resolution B.2.3. Promote regional cooperation to maintain peace and stability
B.3. Post-Conflict Peace-building
B.3.1. Strengthen ASEAN humanitarian assistance B.3.2. Implement human resources development and capacity building programmes in post-conflict areas B.3.3. Increase cooperation in reconciliation and further strengthen peace-oriented values
B.4. Non-Traditional Security Issues
B.4.1. Strengthen cooperation in addressing non-traditional security issues, particularly in combating transnational crimes and other transboundary challenges B.4.2. Intensify counter-terrorism efforts by early ratification and full implementation of the ASEAN Convention on Counter-Terrorism
B.5. Strengthen ASEAN Cooperation on Disaster Management and Emergency Response
B.6. Effective and Timely Response to Urgent Issues or Crisis Situations Affecting ASEAN
C. A Dynamic and Outward-looking Region in an Increasingly Integrated and Interdependent World
C.1. Strengthening ASEAN Centrality in Regional Community Building
C.2. Promoting Enhanced Ties with External Parties
C.3. Strengthening Consultations and Cooperation on Multilateral Issues of Common Concern
It was also during the 14th ASEAN Summit that the Heads of States/Governments of ASEAN adopted the ASEAN Socio-Cultural Community (ASCC) Blueprint. The ASCC envisions an "ASEAN Community that is people-centered and socially responsible with a view to achieving enduring solidarity and unity among the nations and peoples of ASEAN by forging a common identity and building a caring and sharing society which is inclusive and harmonious where the well-being, livelihood, and welfare of the peoples are enhanced." Among its focus areas are human development, social welfare and protection, social justice and rights, ensuring environmental sustainability, building the ASEAN identity, and narrowing the development gap.
The ASCC Blueprint lists specific objectives and action points under each of the following agenda to concretize the ASCC vision.
A. Human Development
A.1. Advancing and prioritising education
A.2. Investing in human resource development
A.3. Promotion of decent work
A.4. Promoting information and communication technology
A.5. Facilitating access to applied science and technology
A.6. Strengthening entrepreneurship skills for women, youth, elderly and persons with disabilities
A.7. Building civil service capability
B. Social Welfare and Protection
B.1. Poverty alleviation
B.2. Social safety net and protection from the negative impacts of integration and globalization
B.3. Enhancing food security and safety
B.4. Access to healthcare and promotion of healthy lifestyles
B.5. Improving capability to control communicable diseases
B.6. Ensuring a drug-free ASEAN
B.7. Building disaster-resilient nations and safer communities
C. Social Justice and Rights
C.1. Promotion and protection of the rights and welfare of women, children, the elderly, and persons with disabilities
C.2. Protection and promotion of the rights of migrant workers
C.3. Promoting corporate social responsibility (CSR)
D. Ensuring Environmental Sustainability
D.1. Addressing global environmental issues
D.2. Managing and preventing transboundary environmental pollution
D.2.1. Transboundary haze pollution D.2.2. Transboundary movement of hazardous wastes
D.3. Promoting sustainable development through environmental education and public participation
D.4. Promoting environmentally sound technology (EST)
D.5. Promoting quality living standards in ASEAN cities/urban areas
D.6. Harmonizing environmental policies and databases
D.7. Promoting the sustainable use of coastal and marine environment
D.8. Promoting sustainable management of natural resources and biodiversity
D.9. Promoting the sustainability of freshwater resources
D.10. Responding to climate change and addressing its impacts
D.11. Promoting sustainable forest management
E. Building ASEAN Identity
E.1. Promotion of ASEAN awareness and a sense of community
E.2. Preservation and promotion of ASEAN cultural heritage
E.3. Promotion of cultural creativity and industry
E.4. Engagement with the community
F. Narrowing the Development Gap
The ASEAN Integration 2015 will see member-nations converge with one market economy, where trade is done with less restrictions (like no tariffs). The business playing field is flowing with goods (raw materials and products) and services (manpower). Nationalities are given a wide array of product choices which range from low end to high end. The integration encourages competition (showcasing the best) and complementarity (providing unique products).
Member-nations will place the right infrastructure to keep up with the fast changing ASEAN economic landscape. It also poses challenges, especially to member-nations like the Philippines whose economy is starting to boom. Journalist-businessman Wilson Lee Flores in his column titled Bull Market, Bull Sheet interviewed tycoons and identified different challenges that ASEAN businessmen face. They are the challenge of size or scale (family businesses can survive or flourish by becoming big or remaining small); the challenge of competitive spirit (market players should work harder); the challenge of speed (increase in transactions and productivity and developing new ideas); the challenge of efficiency (investment in technology and human resources); and the challenge of having a global mindset (thinking the international way).
Lessening the vulnerabilities of Phl “to foreign competition and exposure to market risks” is also the concern of Rafael Alunan III in his article “2015: Asean Integration, ready or not?.” The sectors which will be affected are the agribusiness and manufacturing industries. This is extra challenging to the agricultural industry which has to work double time in achieving its self-sufficiency status and surplus growth for export.
An article published by the Viet Nam News echoed some of the challenges and opportunities that Vietnam has to face in preparation for the AEC. The article said that the deputy head of the Import-Export Department under the Ministry of Industry and Trade, Tran Thanh Hai, was concerned about the local enterprises' lack of knowledge of the AEC. It was said that 80% of local enterprises surveyed acknowledged that they have little information about the interests and challenges available for them in the ASEAN market. The article also stated what the general secretary of Viet Nam Steel Association, Chu Duc Khai, said that most of the local enterprises lack information about doing business in the ASEAN market and that they did not have the chance to study the ASEAN market and have only exported small amount of steel to ASEAN countries. Another challenge for Vietnam, as the article cited, would be the need to compete with other countries in the ASEAN market to export raw products since the country had mainly exported raw products.
The Asian Development Bank also has its doubts on Cambodia's ability to meet the ASEAN Economic Community deadline for 2015. The leading economist of ADB, Jayant Menon, said that Cambodia needs to speed up its customs reform and to press ahead with automating processes in order to reduce trade costs and minimize the opportunities for corruption and be ready for the implementation of its National Single Window by 2015.
REINFORCING ASEAN RELATIONS
The conduct of the 2nd BIMP-EAGA and IMT-GT Trade Fair and Business Leaders Conference on October 22–26, 2014 in Davao City, Philippines, signified the renewed commitment of the four member countries namely, Brunei, Indonesia, Malaysia, and Philippines (BIMP) to further the cause of the East ASEAN Growth Area (EAGA) cooperation as a model for the 2015 ASEAN Integration.
In the Conference, Deputy Secretary General of ASEAN for the ASEAN Economic Community, His Excellency, Dr. Lim Hong Hin, said that the convergence of the BIMP-EAGA and Indonesia Malaysia Thailand –Growth Triangle (IMT-GT) will amplify the subregions’ full potential and maximize its initial gain towards greater engagement in the larger ASEAN community.
BIMP-EAGA was proposed in 1992 by then Philippine President Fidel V. Ramos as a major economic initiative in ASEAN. The idea of expanding the economic cooperation among the border areas of Brunei Darussalam, Indonesia, Malaysia and the Philippines was supported by the leaders of the three countries which eventually led to the creation of BIMP-EAGA launched on March 24, 1994 in Davao City, Mindanao, Philippines. The subregion covers a land-area of 1.54 million square kilometers and a population of 70 million.
The vision of the BIMP-EAGA initiative is to realize socially acceptable and sustainable economic development and the full participation of the sub region in the ASEAN development process.
Dr. Lim Hong Hin further explained that BIMP-EAGA and IMT will facilitate the implementation of regional initiatives and elevate new initiatives for regional wide implementation while the ASEAN will provide the regional context, goals, framework which could serve as guide for subregional initiatives.
The improved regional-subregional collaborations will spur trade, investment and SME development through enhanced backward linkages, production system and forward linkages. The convergence will also facilitate the completion of region wide infrastructure projects such as the Sumatra Port Development, Melaka-Pekan Baru Power Interconnection and Sumatra Toll Roads Project.
The subregions’ convergence will create synergy in transport facilitation by forging Greater Mekong Subregion (GMS) Cross Border Trade Arrangement and BIMP-EAGA Cross Border Arrangement. Promote clustering and branding through collaborative tourism promotion, tailored agro-based industries strategies and addressing environmental issues.
The greater coordination among the subregions, maximizing synergy with the full participation of the stakeholders will ensure equitable economic benefits of the ASEAN countries facing the challenge of globalization.
2020 ASEAN Banking Integration Framework (ABIF)
As the flow of goods, services, investment, capital and skilled labor between countries are liberalised with the ASEAN Economic Integration in 2015, the need arises for ASEAN banking institutions to accommodate and expand its services to a greater intra-ASEAN market.
While the ASEAN financial Integration isn’t going to take effect until 2020, experts from the financial services industry have already forecasted a shaky economic transition, especially for smaller players in the banking and financial services industry.
Two separate reports by credit-rating firm Standard & Poor entitled “Asean Financial Integration: The Long Road to Bank Consolidation” and “The Philippines’ Banking System: The Good, the Bad and the Ambivalent.” respectively, outlined the challenges ASEAN financial institutions are facing as they prepare for the 2020 banking integration.
The Philippines, with its overcrowded banking sector for example is among the ASEAN-member countries who are forecasted to feel the most pressure as the integration welcomes tighter competition with the entry of bigger, more established foreign banks.
To lessen the impact of this consolidation, countries with banking sectors considered smaller by global standards must expand regionally. S&P in a follow up report recently cited the Philippines for “shoring up its network bases and building up capital ahead of the banking integration – playing defense and strengthening their domestic networks.’ 
To track the progress of the AEC, the AEC Scorecard, a compliance tool developed based on the EU Internal Market Scorecard, was adopted by ASEAN. This regional economic scorecard is the only scorecard in effect  and is expected to serve as an unbiased assessment tool to measure the extent of integration among its members and the economic health of the region. It is expected to provide relevant information about regional priorities and in this way foster productive, inclusive and sustainable growth. Moreover, scores create incentives for improvement by highlighting what is working and what is not.
The AEC Scorecard is also a compliance tool that makes it possible to monitor the implementation of ASEAN agreements and the achievement of milestones indicated in the AEC Strategic Schedule. The Scorecard outlines specific actions that must be undertaken by ASEAN collectively and by its member states individually to establish an AEC by 2015.
To date, two official scorecards have been published, one in 2010 and the other in 2012. According to the AEC Scorecard 2012, the implementation rates of AEC’s four primary objectives: (a) single market and production base; (b) competitive economic region; (c) equitable economic development; and (d) integration into the global economy were 65.9 percent, 67.9 percent, 66.7 percent, and 85.7 percent, respectively, with 187 out of 277 measures being fully implemented by 2011.
The AEC Scorecard is purely quantitative. It only examines whether an ASEAN member state has performed the AEC task or not. The more “yes” answers, the higher the AEC Scorecard score.
While Brunei, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore and Thailand have eliminated 99.65 percent of their tariff lines, Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar and Vietnam have decreased tariffs on 98.86 percent of their lines to the 0-5 percent tariff range in 2010, and are projected to eliminate tariffs on these goods by 2015, with the ability to do so for a few import duty lines until 2018.
According to Lim Hng Kiang, Singapore's Minister for Trade and Industry, ASEAN was already the seventh largest economy in the world and the third largest in Asia in 2013, estimated at USD2.3 trillion. A recent study by Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited has projected that five of the top 15 manufacturing locations in the world will be in ASEAN by 2018. Furthermore, by 2050, ASEAN is also expected to be the fourth-largest economy in the world (after the European Union, United States and China). - 
The AEC also envisions free flow of overseas labour. However, certain receiving countries of foreign workers would require the latter to take licensing examinations on those territories to practice their professions. This is regardless of whether or not they have secured a professional license from their home countries.
Singapore is the major ASEAN destination for skilled migrants from other ASEAN countries, mostly from Malaysia and the Philippines. Total employment in Singapore doubled between 1992 and 2008 from 1.5 million to three million, and the number of foreign workers almost tripled, from less than 400,000 to almost 1.1 million. High-skilled foreign talents (customer service, nursing, engineering, IT, etc.) are earning at least US$2,000 a month and with a credential (usually a college degree) receive S Passes, Employment Passes, including an EP-1 for those earning more than $7,000 a month, EP-2 for those earning $3,500 to $7,000 a month, and EP-3 for those earning $2,500 to $3,500 a month.
However in the recent years, the Singapore government has been slowly cutting down the number of foreign workers to challenge companies in upgrading their hiring qualifications and offer more jobs for local residents. Nonetheless, the International Monetary Fund has warned that the Singapore policy of reducing the number of foreign talents could hurt the country's economic potential growth and lower its competitiveness.
The Roadmap for the Integration of ASEAN in Finance is the latest regional initiative, which aims to strengthen regional self -help and support mechanisms. The implementation of the Roadmap will contribute to the realization of the ASEAN Economic Community that was launched by the ASEAN Leaders in October 2003 in Bali. The AEC is the end-goal of economic integration as outlined in the ASEAN Vision 2020 and the Bali Concord II to establish a single market and production base, characterized by the free movement of goods, services, investment, and a freer flow of capital. The AEC will also facilitate the movement of businessmen, skilled labor, and talents within the region. As in the EU, adoption of an ASEAN common currency when the conditions are ripe could be the final stage of the ASEAN Economic Community. Under the Roadmap, approaches and milestones have been identified in areas deemed crucial to finance and monetary integration, namely (a) capital market development, (b) capital account liberalization, (c) financial services liberalization and (d) ASEAN currency cooperation. Capital market development entails promoting institutional capacity, including the legal and regulatory framework, as well as the facilitation of greater cross-border collaboration, linkages and harmonization between capital markets in the region. Orderly capital account liberalization will be promoted with adequate safeguards against volatility and systemic risks. To expedite the process of financial services liberalization, ASEAN has agreed on a positive list modality and adopted milestones to facilitate negotiations. Currency cooperation would involve exploration of possible currency arrangements, including an ASEAN currency payment system for trade in local goods in order to reduce the demand for US dollars and help promote stability of regional currencies, such as by settling intra-ASEAN trade using regional currencies.
While in the offing of an ASEAN common currency, the leaders of the members estates of ASEAN in November 1999 have agreed to create the establishment of currency swaps and repurchase agreements as a credit line against future financial shocks. In May 2000, the finance minister of the ASEAN agreed through the “Chiang Mai Initiative” to plan for closer monetary and financial cooperation. The "Chiang Mai Initiative" or CMI, named after the City of Chiang Mai in Thailand, has two components: an expanded ASEAN Swap Arrangement and a network of bilateral swap arrangements among ASEAN countries, China, Japan and the Republic of Korea. The ASEAN Swap Arrangement or ASA preceded the regional financial crisis. ASA was originally established by the ASEAN central bank and monetary authorities of the five founding members of ASEAN with a view to help countries meet temporary liquidity problems. An expanded ASA now includes all ten ASEAN countries with an expanded facility of US$1 billion. In recognition of the economic interdependence of East Asia, which has a combined foreign exchange reserves amounting to about US$1 trillion, a network of bilateral swap arrangements and repurchase agreements among ASEAN countries, China, Japan and the Republic of Korea has been agreed upon. The supplementary facility aims to provide temporary financing for members which may be in balance-of-payments difficulties. In 200, 16 bilateral swap arrangements (BSAs) have been successfully concluded with a combined amount of about US$35.5 billion. The original CMI was signed on December 9, 2009 which took effect on March 20, 2014, while the amended version, the multilateralization of CMI (CMIM), was on July 17, 2014. CMIM is a multilateral currency swap arrangement with the total size of US$240 billion, governed by a single contractual agreement, while the CMI is a network of bilateral swap arrangements among the “Plus Three” and ASEAN countries authorities. In addition, an independent regional surveillance unit called the ASEAN+3 Macroeconomic Research Office (AMRO) was established to monitor and analyze regional economies and support the CMIM decision-making process. The amendments will effectively allow access of the ASEAN+3 member countries and Hong Kong to an enhanced CMIM package, which includes, among others the doubling of the fund size from US$120 billion to US$240 billion, an increase in the level of access not linked to an International Monetary Fund program from 20 percent to 30 percent and the introduction of a crisis prevention facility. These amendments are expected to fortify CMIM as the region’s financial safety net in the event of any potential or actual liquidity difficulty. The ASEAN+3 Macroeconomic Research Office (AMRO) will serve as the independent regional surveillance unit of the CMIM. The establishment of AMRO will ensure timely monitoring and analysis of the ASEAN+3 economies, which will in turn aid in the early detection of risks, swift implementation of remedial actions, and effective decision-making of the CMIM. In particular, the AMRO will, during peace time, conduct annual consultations with individual member economies and on this basis, prepare quarterly consolidated reports on the macroeconomic assessment of the ASEAN+3 region and individual member countries. On the other hand, the AMRO will, during crisis time, prepare recommendations on any swap request based on its macroeconomic analysis of the swap requesting member and monitor the use and impact of funds once any swap request is approved. AMRO was officially incorporated as a company limited by guarantee in Singapore on 20 April 2011 and its office is located at the Monetary Authority of Singapore complex in Singapore. Governance of AMRO is being exercised by the Executive Committee (EC) and its operational direction by the Advisory Panel (AP). AMRO is currently headed by Dr. Yoichi Nemoto of Japan, who is serving his second 2-year term until 26 May 2016. Stability in the financial system is a precondition to maintain the momentum of ASEAN economic integration. In turn, the more ASEAN economies become integrated, the more feasible it is to adopt an ASEAN single currency, which is expected to reinforce even further stability and integration in Southeast Asia.
Narrowing the Development Gap (NDG) is ASEAN’s framework for addressing various forms of disparities among and within Member States where pockets of underdevelopment exist. Under NDG, ASEAN has continued coordinating closely with other subregional cooperation frameworks in the region (e.g., BIMP-EAGA, IMT-GT, GMS, Mekong programmes), viewing them as “equal partners in the development of regional production and distribution networks” in the AEC, and as a platform to “mainstream social development issues in developing and implementing projects,” in the context of the ASCC.
The six-year IAI Work Plans have been developed to assist the CLMV countries as well as ASEAN's other sub-regions to ensure that the economic wheels of their economies move at an accelerated pace. IAI Work Plan I was implemented from 2002 to 2008, prior to the development of the Roadmap for an ASEAN Community (2009-2015). IAI Work Plan II (2009-2015) supports the goals of the ASEAN Community and is composed of 182 prescribed actions, which includes studies, training programmes and policy implementation support conducted through projects supported by ASEAN-6 countries, and ASEAN’s Dialogue partners and external parties. The IAI Work Plan is patterned after and supports the key programme areas in the three ASEAN Community Blueprints: ASEAN Political-Security Community Blueprint, ASEAN Economic Community Blueprint and ASEAN Socio-Cultural Community Blueprint.
The IAI Task Force, composed of representatives of the Committee of Permanent Representatives and its working group from all ten ASEAN member states, is in charge of providing general advice and policy guidelines and directions in the design and implementation of the IAI Work Plan. All 10 ASEAN Member States are represented in the IAI Task Force, with the Task Force chaired by representatives of the four CLMV countries. Chairmanship is rotated annually in alphabetical order. The chair for 2014 is Cambodia.
ASEAN Secretariat - IAI and NDG Division
The ASEAN Secretariat, in particular through the IAI and NDG Division, supports the implementation and management of the IAI Work Plan and coordinates activities related to sub-regional frameworks. This includes servicing meetings, assisting in the formulation, implementation, monitoring and reporting of projects, resource mobilization and overall operational coordination among various IAI&NDG-related stakeholders. The Division works closely with the Dialogue Partners and international agencies to develop strategies and programmes to assist in promoting and implementing IAI and NDG activities in ASEAN.
The franchising industry in the Philippines eyed strong growth as it begins expanding to international markets.
There are currently 12 Association of Filipino Franchisers, Inc. (AFFI) members who are global franchisors with 76 overseas outlets.
“The upcoming ASEAN 2015 integration is expected to act as a further impetus for AFFI members to go overseas. The integration opens up the region’s capital and labor markets to competition. This is expected to lead an influx of foreign franchise brands into the country,” said AFFI.
AFFI President Victor Fernando announced that there will be a Franchisee Conference this year for the first time as part of the Filipino Franchise Show which will be held on October 3 to 5, 2014. The Franchisee Conference will be a venue to empower, recognize, and showcase the best practices of franchisees. Representatives from ASEAN countries are invited to the conference to share their franchisee experiences.
Fernando said that Filipino companies should try to be at par with their neighbors not just within the region but also globally. Ricardo Cuna, Chairman of the 2014 Filipino Franchise Show, said that the ASEAN integration is more of a challenge for Filipino entrepreneurs to compete worldwide.
The Filipino Franchise Show will be held at the World Trade Center with this year’s show bears the theme “ASEAN Integration through franchising.” The event will be composed of exhibits of franchises, product and services of support industries, regional products and services, retailers and distributors. The Filipino ASEAN Franchise Conference is also a part of the show along with the ASEAN Pavilion and other special events.
The ASEAN member nations recognize the importance of strengthening food security to maintain stability and prosperity in the region. Food security comprises both physical and economic access to food that meets people's dietary needs as well as their food preferences. The World Food Summit of 1996 defined food security as existing “when all people at all times have access to sufficient, safe, nutritious food to maintain a healthy and active life”. 
Part of the aim for ASEAN Integration is collectively achieve food security via trade in rice and maze. Trade facilitation measures and the harmonization/equivalency of food regulation and control standards will reduce the cost of trade in food products. While specialization and revealed comparative and competitive indices point to complementarities between trade patterns among the ASEAN member countries, intra-ASEAN trade in agriculture is quite small. However, integration could address this problem.
The MARKET project will provide flexible and demand-driven support to the ASEAN Secretariat, while bringing more private-sector and civil-society input into regional agriculture policy dialogue. By building an environment that reduces barriers to trade, ASEAN trade will increase, thereby decreasing the risk of another food price crisis.
As ASEAN moves towards an Integrated Community in 2015 and beyond, Food Security should be an integral part of the ASEAN community building agenda and deserves more attention. A paper on ASEAN Food Security: Towards a more Comprehensive Framework by Desker, Anthony and Teng - Rajaratnam School of International Studies in Singapore also recommends infusion of a new thinking on food security that is responsive to emerging global threats and challenges.
The supply chain industry should prepare for the shift towards a bigger services sector in the ASEAN economics.
A study by Logistics Institute-Asia Pacific; as shared by Vinod K. Aggarwal and Boa Park found that the greatest impediment that the SCM industry faced is in customs procedures and inspections, which include time consuming documentation requirements, and different classification of goods in different countries. Land transportation barriers continue to exist owing to regulations on the operation of trucks in cross-boarder and in-country transportation. In ASEAN, Singapore ranked very good in logistics friendliness followed by Brunei and Thailand which were ranked good; Philippines, Cambodia, Vietnam, Myanmar, Lao PDR, and Malaysia on the average rank while Indonesia were ranked weak. Many of the issues facing SCM stem from the lack of business representation and dialogue with government officials. Aside from facing the barriers to finance, logistics, technology development and human development in the region, it also lack opportunities to provide input into policy making or update information on policies that affect their enterprises.
The biggest challenge and opportunity for the SCM industry in gearing up for AEC 2015 is the industrial shift from manufacturing to services. With the services sector growing rapidly and accounting for an ever larger share of the GDP of countries in the region, services liberalization is crucial. In terms of SCM, it present challenges for the free movement of labour and demands for the new and adaptive processes for certification, customs, transportation, and other logistics – especially with respect to the issue of transparency – a core element of AEC 2015. If the SCM industry can provide logistics for professional services and basic services such as finance, health care, travel, and real estate, the interconnected and people-to-people community of AEC 2015 could provide more opportunities than challenges.
The manufacturing sector also has areas for improvement in transportation, storage, customs and payment services. Countries like Singapore and Indonesia, have one of the highest internet penetration rates in Asia, whereas, Cambodia and Myanmar have very low rates of internet penetration. The supply chain industry and the member governments could pool resources to enhance connectivity and the flow of goods and services in the region.
Southeast Asian economic integration on 2015 will create a competitive market of 600 million people with a combined GDP of $2.1 trillion, solid growth, low manufacturing costs and a rising middle class hungry for the consumer experience across 10 countries.
The Asean Economic Community (AEC) vision calls for improved logistics infrastructure, manufacturing incentives, fewer restrictions on movement of talent, more tariff reductions, and streamlined administrative procedures. There will be a free flow of goods, services and investment capital and improved access to skilled labour.
Southeast Asia has long been a prime manufacturing base. But the heart of its potential today lies in its emerging domestic market with increasingly affluent consumers, and as a source of highly educated, highly productive workers.
However, achieving the new vision for Asean will depend on developing world-class supply chain capabilities. Inconsistent quality and availability of transport infrastructure today impedes the flow of goods and adds significant cost to logistics operations. Cutting-edge supply chain expertise can address some of these challenges and spur growth.
A complex web of integrated production facilities has emerged in the region, most notably in the auto industry. Growth in intra-Asian trade has promoted vertical specialisation. More foreign investment coupled with increasing trade in intermediate goods is expected to further strengthen Asean's manufacturing base and expand growth.
However, it is still difficult for investors to decide where to establish and how to link the various supply chain components through limited financial and supply chain optimisation tools.
Filling the transport gaps: Over the past decade, the number of vehicles has doubled in countries such as Indonesia, Vietnam, Cambodia and Myanmar, but development of highways and related infrastructure has lagged. Road quality and capacity varies greatly. Singapore boasts fully paved roads, while in Cambodia and Laos fewer than 10% of the highways are paved. About 98% of the 38,400-kilometre Trans-Asian Highway has been built but critical links are still missing and the quality of some roads is questionable. Asean still has both left- and right-hand-drive vehicles, with limited transfer stations at borders to allow for modular transfer of trucks and their loads between different road systems.
The development of new rail links has been limited. Safe and properly constructed dual-track rail lines could greatly relieve overstretched road networks. However, efficient cargo movement is overshadowed by glamorous megaprojects such as high-speed passenger trains, even though low-cost airlines today move people more cheaply without the infrastructure burden.
Maritime transport is also crucial and 47 ports in nine countries form the backbone of the network. But aside from Singapore, Thailand and Malaysia, the remaining gateway ports vary greatly in terms of cargo-handling capabilities. In Vietnam, for example, seaway transport is very cost-efficient – but all port and loading facilities are overly congested.
Many Asean countries have made improvements in areas such as air cargo for perishable exports, and facilities generally are adequate for current traffic levels in capital cities. However, general and perishable freight-handling in some airports does not meet the required standards. If improved, it could offer huge opportunities for exporters in regional locations.
Supply chain weaknesses: Smart planning tools such as Transport Management Systems combined with global positioning tools can help to reduce freight transport operating costs. When combined with the latest inventory and warehouse management systems, these systems can control the movement and storage of materials across the entire supply chain.
However, the high initial cost of staff training often deters smaller logistics firms from investing in these technologies. Disparities between transport networks also are a drawback. In some countries, such as Indonesia and Vietnam, telecoms infrastructure in rural areas is weak, making cargo tracking difficult.
Another weak link in regional supply chains is a lack of trained and capable human capital. This problem is not unique to the region, but Southeast Asia is starting from a lower base in that it lacks the education and research centres seen in developed economies. Enterprises that are unable to design, build, and manage world-class supply chains are at a serious competitive disadvantage. Southeast Asian companies must develop supply chain solutions geared to the region’s special demands to compete effectively; copying Western best practices is not a viable option.
ASEAN cooperation in tourism was formalised in 1976, following formation of Sub-Committee on Tourism (SCOT) under ASEAN Committee on Trade and Tourism. The 1st ASEAN Tourism Forum was held on 18–26 October 1981, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. On 1986, established ASEAN Promotional Chapter for Tourism (APCT) in Hong Kong, West Germany, UK, Australia/New Zealand, Japan, and North America by I, M, P, S, T.
Tourism has been one of the key growth sectors in ASEAN and has proven resilient amid economic challenges globally. The wide array of tourist attractions across the region has drawn 81 million tourists to ASEAN in 2011, up by 30% compared to 62 million tourists in 2007. According to the World Travel and Tourism Council, tourism directly contributed to ASEAN’s GDP (4.4%) and employment (3.2%) in 2011. In addition, the sector accounted for an estimated 8% of total capital investment in the region.
On January 2012, the ASEAN Tourism Ministers calls for the development of a marketing strategy. This marketing strategy represents the consensus of the ASEAN National Tourism Organisations (NTOs) on important strategic marketing directions for the ASEAN region moving forwards to 2015 based on objectives agreed to by all of the NTOs.
The objectives of the ASEAN Tourism marketing strategy are:
1. To ensure an increased number of international visitors traveling to Southeast Asia and visiting more than one country. (It is recognised that the objective of each country is to increase visitation to its own nation. This strategy is designed to increase visitation to more than one ASEAN country thereby adding value to the efforts of the individual NTOs).
2. To determine how the ASEAN NTOs, using their resources, can contribute to the overall positioning of the region as a preferred destination. This will require the NTOs to effectively leverage their existing marketing and promotional activities towards the regional efforts.
3. To ensure that the power of tourism as a development tool is recognised and incorporated into a marketing approach that will be directed at meeting specific social, economic and cultural goals.
4. To guide budgetary decisions related to positioning the region and various dimensions of the travel experience.
5. While the intention of the marketing strategy is to attract visitors to the region it is also important that the NTOs work effectively together to promote travel within the region under the theme “ASEAN for ASEAN”. This objective recognizes that visitors within the region are a significant source of economic development and that people from ASEAN will play a significant role in meeting the overall strategy of the Master Plan on ASEAN Connectivity that encourages greater intra-ASEAN people mobility.
There are a number of emerging trends in visitor motivations and behavior that must be taken into account in developing a successful marketing strategy for Southeast Asia.
1. Experiential Travel 2. The Green Movement 3. Tourism as experience and memory 4. Demand for public programming 5. Creative Industries and Tourism 6. Redefining Backpacking 7. The Three New Ss (Sun and Sea and Sand) 8. Increasing importance of interest/Niche/Activity Based Tourism 9. The Growing trend in Cities as Attractions 10. Voluntourism
As of 2012, it is estimated to account for 4.6 percent of ASEAN GDP and 10.9 percent when taking into account all indirect contributions. It directly employs 9.3 million people, or 3.2 percent of total employment, and indirectly supports some 25 million jobs. This year, Malaysia attracted 25 million; Thailand, 22.3 million; Singapore, 14.4 million; Indonesia, 8 million; Vietnam, 6.8 million; Philippines, 4.7 million.
As of Travel and Tourism Competitiveness Index (TTCI) 2013 report, Singapore placed 1st, Malaysia placed 8th, Thailand placed 9th, Indonesia placed 12th, Brunei placed 13th, Vietnam placed 16th, Philippines placed 17th and Cambodia placed 20th in the top destination of travelers in the Asia Pacific region.
All ten ASEAN countries already collaborate actively to grow tourism in the region. As Singapore serves as a good access node in the regional tourism network, the Singapore Tourism Board hope to continue to strengthen cooperation among ASEAN members to harness the tourism potential of the region. Such collaboration is significant to the growth of the regional tourism industry. One example is the potential of the region’s cruise industry. Southeast Asia’s diverse culture, landscapes and cuisines, coupled with its year-round good climate and presence of many islands, adds to its ability to become a viable cruising destination that will draw passengers from the region and beyond. As the lead coordinator for the ASEAN Cruise Development initiative, Singapore Tourism Board will continue to work closely with the rest of ASEAN to develop the immense potential of the cruise industry in the region.
While Malaysia is playing pivotal role in promoting intra-ASEAN tourism. They have been promoting short haul travel, encouraging travelers to travel in a more affordable and easier way to our neighbours in ASEAN. In this respect, Malaysia has introduced the 3-2-1 Heritage Tour package — three UNESCO heritage sites (Melaka, Penang and Borobudur) in two countries (Malaysia and Indonesia) at one price.
For this purpose, the Ministers and tourism authorities of Myanmar, Cambodia, Indonesia and the Secretary of Tourism of the Philippines have expressed their intention to collaborate with relevant government agencies and other stakeholders to facilitate travel in the region by developing a common smart visa system, and have signed the “Statement of Intent on SMART Visa” at the 22nd World Economic Forum on East Asia. The meeting is taking place in Nay Pyi Taw from 5 to 7 June 2013.
While Vietnam, Laos, Thailand, Myanmar and Cambodia convened at a ministerial retreat in Ho Chi Minh City, where dialogues on easing travel barriers and issuing a single visa topped the agenda. ACMECS, which stands for Ayeyawadi – Chao Phraya – Mekong Economic Cooperation Strategy, is a political, economic, and cultural organization among the five countries. The Ayeyawadi, Chao Phraya, and Mekong are rivers that greatly affect the socio-economic development of the involved nations. The countries have taken a step closer to the plan, with Thailand and Cambodia running a pilot single visa policy, under which an international tourist obtaining a visa to enter Thailand is allowed to enter Cambodia, and vice versa.
Moreover, on September 18, 2014 in Bangkok, the Tourism Authority of Thailand (TAT) launched the ‘ASEAN to Thailand’ project with the key objective of enhancing the recognition of Thailand as an attractive and fun place to visit, and as a ‘Dream Destination’ in the heart of ASEAN. As part of the ‘ASEAN to Thailand’ project, TAT will be inviting members of the media from ASEAN countries to take part in a specially-organised familiarisation trip that will showcase the old towns in the central provinces of Ayutthaya, Ang Thong and Suphan Buri, some of which have played vital roles in the history of the ASEAN region.
The Philippine Department of Tourism (DOT) commenced a plan to fully comply with the demands of ASEAN Integration 2015 thru the implementation of the ASEAN Mutual Recognition Arrangement on Tourism Professionals (ASEAN MRA-TP). The agreement promotes opportunity for tourism professionals to work in various tourism-related fields across ASEAN regions. This is will be realized thru the continuous skills development of tourism professionals which the agreement has set forth.
Tourism Secretary Ramon Jimenez Jr. said the arrangement lays the foundation for the certification of skills and qualifications of working tourism professionals from different ASEAN countries. “Once fully integrated in 2015, ASEAN-certified tourism professionals who pass the common competency standards may find employment in various divisions of labor that are common across various sectors of tourism in member countries,” he said.
Another preparation taken by the Philippines for the ASEAN Integration 2015 is thru its new slogan billed as “Visit Philippines 2015” (VPY 2015). To gear up the country’s tourism potentials, VPY 2015 endeavors to lure and entice ASEAN regions, as well as neighboring continents, to visit the Philippines which boasts an astounding 7,107 islands.
Tourism Secretary Ramon Jimenez Jr. said they are now drafting the calendar of activities and expects to come up with the concrete program of activities before the middle of the year. “We are planning to have every quarter one major entertainment event that would attract not only domestic but also international tourists to visit the Philippines just to watch the event,” he said.
The preparation also coincides with the Philippines’ hosting of various meetings and conferences for eco-tourism activities which includes the ASEAN Tourism Forum (ATF) in 2016. Jimenez reported that in the recently concluded ATF held in Sarawak, Malaysia, ASEAN ministers pledged to step up measures to realize the planned regional economic integration by 2015. In that meeting, Jimenez said he reported on the progress made by the Philippine government on the common visa, citing the readiness of the Bureau of Immigration (BI) to honor the visas extended by all member countries to those traveling to the country. On the VPY 2015, he told the ATF membership that “In this connection, and to coincide with the holding of the APEC Ministerial Meetings and Leaders’ Summit in 2015, the Philippines has declared 2015 as Visit Philippines Year.”
As ASEAN moves towards the realisation of the ASEAN Community in 2015, its Foreign Ministers launched the ASEAN Communication Master Plan (ACPM) on 11 November 2014 at the capital city of Myanmar, Nay Pyi Taw.
This is the committee's response to the growing importance for ASEAN "to be able to speak to its internal and external stakeholders with clear messages, and with one voice, using traditional and non-traditional means of communication."
The ACPM provides a framework in communicating the character, structure and overall vision of ASEAN and the ASEAN Community to key audiences within the region and globally. The said plan seeks to demonstrate the relevance and benefits of the ASEAN through fact-based and compelling communications, recognizing that the ASEAN Community is unique and different from other country integration models.
In his opening remarks during the launch, current Secretary-General of ASEAN, H.E. Le Luong Minh stressed the need for the peoples of ASEAN "to understand what it means to be part of an integrated region where there are shared, equitable opportunities for personal, business and community growth." 
The ACMP articulates an overarching message for ASEAN as “ASEAN: A Community of Opportunities.” This messages focuses on instilling a sense of belonging and identity among its citizens, and highlights that regional integration brings new opportunities to the people of ASEAN and the broader global community.
To further articulate this message, the ACMP encourages the use of examples of real life, people-based benefits, which will help create lively storytelling and stress the tangible benefits felt by people and communities.
The ACMP recognizes the diversity of the peoples and communities of ASEAN; thus, emphasizing the need to reach varying levels of awareness, familiarity and understanding in the context of the forthcoming vision of one ASEAN Community in 2015. The identified audiences are as follows:
The ACMP’s timeline can be broadly mapped as covering the priority communications initiatives for 2014-2015 and 2016-2017 of the ASEAN Community.
With the realisation of the ASEAN Community, the ACMP recognises the need for more extensive, ongoing communication about its benefits within ASEAN, as well as to global audiences, as ASEAN communicates its place in the world economy.
extensive knowledge of ASEAN Community;
by each of the ASEAN Community Pillars and by ASEAN Connectivity, and encourages the development of annual communication plans to support these activities; and
According to its manual, the ACMP also envisions harnessing the growing sense of collective ASEAN mutual support and empowerment during times of natural disaster when member states have bonded to provide humanitarian assistance and disaster relief.
ICT will be a key enabler in the ASEAN's and economic integration. Be developing next generation ICT infrastructure and skilled human capital, promoting content and innovative industries, as well as establishing an enabling policy and regulatory environment, ICT will help ASEAN to transform into a single market. Such is envisioned towards achieving the e-ASEAN initiative. e-ASEAN is a collective effort of Southeast nations to encourage and facilitate the growth of e-commerce, promote the utilization of ICT in social services and government operations, and to narrow the digital divide within the region. In doing so, ASEAN will empower its communities and advance its status as an inclusive and vibrant ICT hub, making ASEAN and ideal region for economic activities.
The ASEAN ICT Awards (AICTA) is a project approved by the ASEAN Telecommunication Ministers. The project is in-line with one of the six Strategic Thrusts, Innovations as stated in the ASEAN ICT Masterplan (AIM) 2015 under the initiative 3.2 ‘Promote Innovation and collaborations amongst government, businesses, citizens and other institution’. AICTA wishes to recognize the best ICT achievement among entrepreneurs across the ASEAN region. AICTA aims to be the benchmark for success in terms of innovation and creativity, offering business opportunities and promote trade relations thus uplift the strength of ICT and community awareness in ASEAN both locally and international region. The 1st AICTA was introduced in 2012. Brunei Darussalam as the leading country successfully carried out the awards and introduced the first online judging, whereby nominees upload their video presentation via Youtube.com and set up a private account (inter-link) with the AICTA judges. The AICTA Judges will view the presentation and submit their scores to the AICTA Secretariat. The 2nd AICTA was successfully completed and was led by Brunei Darussalam in 2013. For the 2nd AICTA, the ASEAN TELSOM has introduced a new category in AICTA namely “Research and Development”. Using the same procedure from the first AICTA for the online judging and final judging. To determine the 1st, 2nd and 3rd place, shortlisted nominees (top three from each category) were told attend the final round judging. Nominees gave their very best presentation in front of the final round AICTA Judges, the TELSOM leaders. The competition concluded with the award ceremony which will be attended by ASEAN Member States (AMS) IT Ministers, from various government, agencies and industries. This gave the award its recognition as a prestigious meaningful event for ASEAN. Once again AICTA is back again in 2014 and from the last 13th TELMIN, Brunei Darussalam is to lead and continue the successful running of the AICTA.
The objectives of AICTA are:
This section outlines the product categories for the AICTA nomination. There are six (6) categories:
The ASEAN Political-Security Community has its genesis of over four decades of close co-operation and solidarity. The ASEAN Heads of States/Governments, at their Summit in Kuala Lumpur in December 1997 envisioned a concert of Southeast Asian nations, outward looking, living in peace, stability and prosperity, bonded together in partnership in dynamic development and in a community of caring societies.
To concretise the ASEAN Vision 2020, the ASEAN Heads of States/Governments adopted the Declaration of ASEAN Concord II (Bali Concord II) in 2003, which establishes an ASEAN Community by 2020. The ASEAN Community consists of three pillars, namely the ASEAN Political- Security Community (APSC), the ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) and the ASEAN Socio-Cultural Community (ASCC). During the 12th ASEAN Summit in the Philippines, the ASEAN leaders decided to accelerate the establishment of an ASEAN Community by 2015. By the next summit in Singapore, the ASEAN Charter was signed among leaders, signifying their commitment in intensifying community- building through enhanced regional cooperation and integration. In line with this, they tasked their Ministers and officials to draft the APSC Blueprint, which would be adopted at the 14th ASEAN Summit.
The ASEAN Defense Industry Collaboration (ADIC) was proposed at the 4th ASEAN Defense Ministers' Meeting on May 11, 2010 in Ha Noi, Vietnam. The emergence of this concept was triggered by the fact that majority of the ASEAN member states are regular importers of defense and security equipment. One of the purposes of this concept is to reduce defense importation in non-ASEAN countries by half ( i.e. from $25 billion down to $12.5 billion a year) and to further develop the defense industry in the region.
The concept was formally adopted during the 5th ASEAN Defense Ministers' Meeting (ADMM)on May 19, 2011 in Jakarta, Indonesia, in line with the ADMM agreement to enhance security cooperation in the following areas, namely; maritime security, humanitarian assistance and disaster relief, counter terrorism and military medicine. Its goal points toward actions that will enhance security and establish impact on peace and stability in each of the ASEAN member state.
Its main focus is to boost the capacity of the ASEAN in industrial and technological aspect consistent with the principles of flexibility, non-binding, and voluntary participation among ASEAN member states. The concept revolves around education and capability building program to develop the skills and capabilities of manpower, sharing in the production of capital for defense equipment, components, and spares and the provision of repair and maintenance services in order to address all the defense and security needs of each country. It also aims to develop the defense trade in the region by encouraging ASEAN member states to participate in the intra-ASEAN defense trade and support trade shows and exhibitions.
ADIC is a breakthrough in the development of defense industry in the ASEAN. It aims to establish a strong defense industry relying mainly on the local capabilities of each ASEAN member state, and limit annual procurement to Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) outside the region. Countries like USA, Germany, Russia, France, Italy, UK,China, South Korea, Israel, and the Netherlands are among the major suppliers in the ASEAN.
Military expenditures in the ASEAN reached $35.5 billion in 2013 (excluding Brunei and Myanmar), which surpassed the 2004 figure ($14.4 billion)by 147 percent and is expected to exceed $40 billion by 2016. Factors affecting the increase in military budget are economic growth, aging equipment and the plan to strengthen the establishment of defense industry in the region.
There are challenges to the defense collaboration effort in the ASEAN; the unequal level of capabilities among ASEAN member states in the field of defense industry, and the lack of established defense trade among them.
Prior to the adoption of the ADIC concept, the status of defense industry base in each of the ASEAN member state was at disparate level. Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia, and Thailand are among the top ASEAN member states with established defense industry base. But, even these four countries possess different levels of capacities, while the rest of the remaining member states like Philippines, Lao PDR, Timor Leste, Vietnam, Myanmar,and Cambodia have yet to develop and enhance their capabilities in this aspect.
Out of the ten ASEAN member states, Singapore and Indonesia are among the most competitive players in the area of defense industry.Though Indonesia is striving to establish its place in the industry, but, it just could not surpass Singapore in exporting more diverse defense products; from artillery to armored vehicles, ships and air crafts. In fact, it is the only ASEAN member state recognized as one of the top 100 global defense companies from 2010-2013.
In the area of defense trade, most of the ASEAN member states barely purchase defense products inside the ASEAN. Singapore for one, purchase defense products from Germany, France, and Israel but none from any of the ASEAN member states. Malaysia on the other hand, purchased only .49 percent from ASEAN, Indonesia with .1 percent,and Thailand with 8.02 percent.
ADIC is still in the developing stage. From its adoption on May 2011, only three workshops had been conducted. First, was on April 18, 2012 in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, second, was on March 31, 2013 in Langkawi, Malaysia, and third was on April 24–25, 2014 in Nay Pyi Taw, Myanmar where Terms of Reference(TOR)for the Consultative Group(CG)for ADIC was finalized along with the presentation of the proposed framework essential for the proper implementation of the said concept.
Non-ASEAN countries have criticised ASEAN for being too soft in its approach to promoting human rights and democracy in the junta-led Burma. Despite global outrage at the military crack-down on unarmed protesters in Yangon, ASEAN has refused to suspend Burma as a member and also rejects proposals for economic sanctions. This has caused concern as the European Union, a potential trade partner, has refused to conduct free trade negotiations at a regional level for these political reasons. International observers view it as a "talk shop", which implies that the organisation is "big on words but small on action". However, leaders such as the Philippines' Foreign Affairs Secretary, Alberto Romulo, said it "is a workshop not a talk shop". Others have also expressed similar sentiment.
Head of the International Institute of Strategic Studies – Asia, Tim Huxley cites the diverse political systems present in the grouping, including many young states, as a barrier to far-reaching cooperation outside the economic sphere. He also asserts that in the absence of an external threat to rally against with the end of the Cold War, ASEAN has begun to be less successful at restraining its members and resolving border disputes such as those between Burma and Thailand and that of Indonesia and Malaysia.
During the 12th ASEAN Summit in Cebu, several activist groups staged anti-globalisation protests. According to the activists, the agenda of economic integration would negatively affect industries in the Philippines and would cause thousands of Filipinos to lose their jobs.
The ASEAN Convention on Counter-Terrorism (ACCT) is a result of ASEAN’s counter-terrorism efforts as it serves as a framework for regional cooperation to counter, prevent and suppress terrorism and deepen counter-terrorism cooperation.
ACCT was signed by the ASEAN Leaders in 2007. Its sixth ASEAN Member State, Brunei Darussalam, submitted its instrument of ratification with the Secretary-General of ASEAN on April 28, 2011 and on the 27th of May 2011, the convention came into force. Malaysia became the tenth Member State of ACCT on January 11, 2013.
|last1=in Authors list (help)
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to Association of Southeast Asian Nations.|